All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, paulburton@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	syq@debian.org, sernia.zhou@foxmail.com, zhenwenjin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust code to make it compatible with X1830.
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:23:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1575026622.3.2@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5DDF694B.1000902@zoho.com>

Hi Zhou,


>> Le mer., nov. 27, 2019 at 11:32, Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com> a 
>> \x7fécrit :
>>> 1.Adjust the PLL related code in "cgu.c" and "cgu.h" to make it
>>>   compatible with the X1830 Soc from Ingenic.
>>> 2.Adjust the code in "jz4740-cgu.c" to be compatible with the
>>>   new cgu code.
>>> 3.Adjust the code in "jz4725b-cgu.c" to be compatible with the
>>>   new cgu code.
>>> 4.Adjust the code in "jz4770-cgu.c" to be compatible with the
>>>   new cgu code.
>>> 5.Adjust the code in "jz4780-cgu.c" to be compatible with the
>>>   new cgu code.
>>> 6.Adjust the code in "x1000-cgu.c" to be compatible with the
>>>   new cgu code.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c         | 55 
>>> \x7f\x7f+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h         | 12 ++++++++-
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4725b-cgu.c |  3 ++-
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4740-cgu.c  |  3 ++-
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c  |  6 +++--
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4780-cgu.c  |  3 ++-
>>>  drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c   |  6 +++--
>>>  7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c
>>> index 6e96303..c3c69a8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c
>>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>>> unsigned \x7f\x7flong parent_rate)
>>>      pll_info = &clk_info->pll;
>>> 
>>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>> 
>> I really don't like this patch. There is no info on what reg[1] and 
>> \x7freg[0] are. First, don't use hardcoded numbers, use macros with 
>> \x7fmeaningful names. Second, why not just have two fields instead of 
>> one \x7f2-values array? That would remove a lot of the noise.
>> 
> 
> Because the X1830's PLL has been greatly changed, the bypass control 
> is
> placed in another register, so now two registers may needed to 
> control the
> PLL.

That kind of info belongs in the commit message.


> If two fields are used, all the PLL related code of jz47xx-cgu.c / 
> x1000-cgu.c
> will be more verbose. Using array methods such as:
> .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_CPPCR0 },
> in jz4770-cgu.c,
> 
> or :
> .reg = { CGU_REG_CPPCR, CGU_REG_APLL },
> in x1830-cgu.c,
> 
> can let us intuitively see that how many control registers the PLL 
> has.
> Maybe adding a corresponding comment to reg[0] and reg[1] is a better 
> way?

I don't see how having two fields would make the code more verbose. 
 From what I can see it would make this patch much smaller...

>> 
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> 
>>>      m = (ctl >> pll_info->m_shift) & GENMASK(pll_info->m_bits - 1, 
>>> 0);
>>> @@ -93,8 +93,17 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>>> \x7f\x7funsigned long parent_rate)
>>>      n += pll_info->n_offset;
>>>      od_enc = ctl >> pll_info->od_shift;
>>>      od_enc &= GENMASK(pll_info->od_bits - 1, 0);
>>> -    bypass = !pll_info->no_bypass_bit &&
>>> -         !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit));
>>> +
>>> +    if (pll_info->version >= CGU_X1830) {
>>> +        spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> +        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[0]);
>>> +        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>> 
>> Why the spinlock?
>> 
> 
> The original code used spinlock when reading the control register,
> so when reading this new control register, I think it should also
> be added with spinlock.

Well, the original code looks wrong to me. There's nothing to protect 
here.

Maybe @Paul Burton can shed some light?

>>> +
>>> +        bypass = !pll_info->no_bypass_bit &&
>>> +             !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit));
>>> +    } else
>> 
>> Please comply to the kernel coding style - use brackets after the 
>> else.
>> 
> 
> My fault, I will fix this in v2.
> 
>>> +        bypass = !pll_info->no_bypass_bit &&
>>> +             !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit));
>>> 
>>>      if (bypass)
>>>          return parent_rate;
>>> @@ -106,7 +115,10 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>>> \x7f\x7funsigned long parent_rate)
>>>      BUG_ON(od == pll_info->od_max);
>>>      od++;
>>> 
>>> -    return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od);
>>> +    if (pll_info->version >= CGU_X1830)
>>> +        return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m * 2, n * od);
>> 
>> Where does that *2 come from?
> 
> This is because the calculation method of the PLL frequency 
> multiplication
> of X1830 has changed, and a factor of 2 is added compared to the 
> original
> method (on page 381 of the X1830's PM manual).

Instead of adding a pll_info->version, add a pll_info->rate_multiplier, 
set it to 1 everywhere and 2 on the X1830.

Cheers,
-Paul

>> 
>>> +    else
>>> +        return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od);
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  static unsigned long
>>> @@ -139,7 +151,10 @@ ingenic_pll_calc(const struct 
>>> \x7f\x7fingenic_cgu_clk_info *clk_info,
>>>      if (pod)
>>>          *pod = od;
>>> 
>>> -    return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od);
>>> +    if (pll_info->version >= CGU_X1830)
>>> +        return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m * 2, n * od);
>>> +    else
>>> +        return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od);
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  static inline const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info *to_clk_info(
>>> @@ -183,7 +198,7 @@ ingenic_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>>> unsigned \x7f\x7flong req_rate,
>>>              clk_info->name, req_rate, rate);
>>> 
>>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>> 
>>>      ctl &= ~(GENMASK(pll_info->m_bits - 1, 0) << 
>>> pll_info->m_shift);
>>>      ctl |= (m - pll_info->m_offset) << pll_info->m_shift;
>>> @@ -194,7 +209,7 @@ ingenic_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
>>> unsigned \x7f\x7flong req_rate,
>>>      ctl &= ~(GENMASK(pll_info->od_bits - 1, 0) << 
>>> pll_info->od_shift);
>>>      ctl |= pll_info->od_encoding[od - 1] << pll_info->od_shift;
>>> 
>>> -    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> 
>>>      return 0;
>>> @@ -212,16 +227,28 @@ static int ingenic_pll_enable(struct clk_hw 
>>> *hw)
>>>      u32 ctl;
>>> 
>>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> 
>>> -    ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit);
>>> +    if (pll_info->version >= CGU_X1830) {
>>> +        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[0]);
>>> +
>>> +        ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit);
>>> +
>>> +        writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg[0]);
>>> +
>>> +        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>> +
>>> +        ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      ctl |= BIT(pll_info->enable_bit);
>>> 
>>> -    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>> 
>>>      /* wait for the PLL to stabilise */
>>>      for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
>>> -        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +        ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>>          if (ctl & BIT(pll_info->stable_bit))
>>>              break;
>>>          mdelay(1);
>>> @@ -245,11 +272,11 @@ static void ingenic_pll_disable(struct clk_hw 
>>> *hw)
>>>      u32 ctl;
>>> 
>>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>> 
>>>      ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->enable_bit);
>>> 
>>> -    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> @@ -263,7 +290,7 @@ static int ingenic_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw 
>>> *hw)
>>>      u32 ctl;
>>> 
>>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> -    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg);
>>> +    ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg[1]);
>>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
>>> 
>>>      return !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->enable_bit));
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h
>>> index 0dc8004..5f87be4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h
>>> @@ -42,8 +42,18 @@
>>>   * @stable_bit: the index of the stable bit in the PLL control 
>>> register
>>>   * @no_bypass_bit: if set, the PLL has no bypass functionality
>>>   */
>>> +enum ingenic_cgu_version {
>>> +    CGU_JZ4740,
>>> +    CGU_JZ4725B,
>>> +    CGU_JZ4770,
>>> +    CGU_JZ4780,
>>> +    CGU_X1000,
>>> +    CGU_X1830,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info {
>>> -    unsigned reg;
>>> +    enum ingenic_cgu_version version;
>>> +    unsigned reg[2];
>>>      const s8 *od_encoding;
>>>      u8 m_shift, m_bits, m_offset;
>>>      u8 n_shift, n_bits, n_offset;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4725b-cgu.c 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4725b-cgu.c
>>> index a3b4635..6da7b41 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4725b-cgu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4725b-cgu.c
>>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fjz4725b_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>          "pll", CGU_CLK_PLL,
>>>          .parents = { JZ4725B_CLK_EXT, -1, -1, -1 },
>>>          .pll = {
>>> -            .reg = CGU_REG_CPPCR,
>>> +            .version = CGU_JZ4725B,
>>> +            .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_CPPCR },
>>>              .m_shift = 23,
>>>              .m_bits = 9,
>>>              .m_offset = 2,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4740-cgu.c 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4740-cgu.c
>>> index 4f0e92c..3cf800d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4740-cgu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4740-cgu.c
>>> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fjz4740_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>          "pll", CGU_CLK_PLL,
>>>          .parents = { JZ4740_CLK_EXT, -1, -1, -1 },
>>>          .pll = {
>>> -            .reg = CGU_REG_CPPCR,
>>> +            .version = CGU_JZ4740,
>>> +            .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_CPPCR },
>>>              .m_shift = 23,
>>>              .m_bits = 9,
>>>              .m_offset = 2,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c
>>> index 956dd65..a62dfb1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c
>>> @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fjz4770_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>          "pll0", CGU_CLK_PLL,
>>>          .parents = { JZ4770_CLK_EXT },
>>>          .pll = {
>>> -            .reg = CGU_REG_CPPCR0,
>>> +            .version = CGU_JZ4770,
>>> +            .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_CPPCR0 },
>>>              .m_shift = 24,
>>>              .m_bits = 7,
>>>              .m_offset = 1,
>>> @@ -123,7 +124,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fjz4770_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>          "pll1", CGU_CLK_PLL,
>>>          .parents = { JZ4770_CLK_EXT },
>>>          .pll = {
>>> -            .reg = CGU_REG_CPPCR1,
>>> +            .version = CGU_JZ4770,
>>> +            .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_CPPCR1 },
>>>              .m_shift = 24,
>>>              .m_bits = 7,
>>>              .m_offset = 1,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4780-cgu.c 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4780-cgu.c
>>> index ea905ff..59356d1b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4780-cgu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4780-cgu.c
>>> @@ -220,7 +220,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fjz4780_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>      /* PLLs */
>>> 
>>>  #define DEF_PLL(name) { \
>>> -    .reg = CGU_REG_ ## name, \
>>> +    .version = CGU_JZ4780, \
>>> +    .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_ ## name }, \
>>>      .m_shift = 19, \
>>>      .m_bits = 13, \
>>>      .m_offset = 1, \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
>>> index b22d87b..7179b9f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
>>> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fx1000_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>          "apll", CGU_CLK_PLL,
>>>          .parents = { X1000_CLK_EXCLK, -1, -1, -1 },
>>>          .pll = {
>>> -            .reg = CGU_REG_APLL,
>>> +            .version = CGU_X1000,
>>> +            .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_APLL },
>>>              .m_shift = 24,
>>>              .m_bits = 7,
>>>              .m_offset = 1,
>>> @@ -78,7 +79,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info 
>>> \x7f\x7fx1000_cgu_clocks[] = {
>>>          "mpll", CGU_CLK_PLL,
>>>          .parents = { X1000_CLK_EXCLK, -1, -1, -1 },
>>>          .pll = {
>>> -            .reg = CGU_REG_MPLL,
>>> +            .version = CGU_X1000,
>>> +            .reg = { -1, CGU_REG_MPLL },
>>>              .m_shift = 24,
>>>              .m_bits = 7,
>>>              .m_offset = 1,
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27  3:32 clk: Ingenic: Add support for the X1830 and add USB clk for X1000 Zhou Yanjie
2019-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust code to make it compatible with X1830 Zhou Yanjie
2019-11-27 17:37   ` Paul Cercueil
2019-11-28  6:29     ` Zhou Yanjie
2019-11-29 11:23       ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2019-12-10 22:55         ` Paul Burton
2019-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add X1830 bindings Zhou Yanjie
2019-12-05 20:38   ` Rob Herring
2019-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] clk: Ingenic: Add CGU driver for X1830 Zhou Yanjie
2019-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add USB OTG clock for X1000 Zhou Yanjie
2019-11-27 17:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2019-11-28  5:44     ` Zhou Yanjie
2019-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] clk: Ingenic: " Zhou Yanjie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1575026622.3.2@crapouillou.net \
    --to=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sernia.zhou@foxmail.com \
    --cc=syq@debian.org \
    --cc=zhenwenjin@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhouyanjie@zoho.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.