* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-12-16 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Icenowy Zheng, Wolfram Sang, Wolfram Sang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2359 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
| ^
Caused by commit
6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
interacting with commit
2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
From Linus' tree.
I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
index 9917ce0d86a0..56f55c53abfd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
@@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int anx6345_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
/* Map slave addresses of ANX6345 */
for (i = 0; i < I2C_NUM_ADDRESSES; i++) {
if (anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1 != client->addr)
- anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
+ anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
else
anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = client;
- if (!anx6345->i2c_clients[i]) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i]);
DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve I2C bus %02x\n",
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i]);
goto err_unregister_i2c;
--
2.24.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-12-16 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Wolfram Sang, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2359 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
| ^
Caused by commit
6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
interacting with commit
2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
From Linus' tree.
I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
index 9917ce0d86a0..56f55c53abfd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
@@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int anx6345_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
/* Map slave addresses of ANX6345 */
for (i = 0; i < I2C_NUM_ADDRESSES; i++) {
if (anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1 != client->addr)
- anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
+ anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
else
anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = client;
- if (!anx6345->i2c_clients[i]) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i]);
DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve I2C bus %02x\n",
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i]);
goto err_unregister_i2c;
--
2.24.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-12-16 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Wolfram Sang, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2359 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
| ^
Caused by commit
6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
interacting with commit
2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
From Linus' tree.
I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
index 9917ce0d86a0..56f55c53abfd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
@@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int anx6345_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
/* Map slave addresses of ANX6345 */
for (i = 0; i < I2C_NUM_ADDRESSES; i++) {
if (anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1 != client->addr)
- anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
+ anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
else
anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = client;
- if (!anx6345->i2c_clients[i]) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i]);
DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve I2C bus %02x\n",
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i]);
goto err_unregister_i2c;
--
2.24.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
(?)
(?)
@ 2019-12-16 1:41 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-12-16 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70958/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
ccba0d4a341c linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
-:21: ERROR:GIT_COMMIT_ID: Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")'
#21:
6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
-:47: CHECK:PARENTHESIS_ALIGNMENT: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#47: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:739:
+ anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 16 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2019-12-16 2:02 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-12-16 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70958/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7569 -> Patchwork_15782
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15782 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads:
- fi-byt-j1900: [TIMEOUT][3] ([i915#816]) -> [PASS][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#722]) -> [PASS][6]
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
- fi-byt-n2820: [INCOMPLETE][7] ([i915#45]) -> [PASS][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
* igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms:
- fi-apl-guc: [DMESG-WARN][9] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms.html
[i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
[i915#45]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/45
[i915#553]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/553
[i915#722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/722
[i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725
[i915#816]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/816
Participating hosts (34 -> 24)
------------------------------
Missing (10): fi-icl-1065g7 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-bwr-2160 fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus fi-snb-2600
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7569 -> Patchwork_15782
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7569: 62c2abc0df8983aba79ba093413683c44e9c4748 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5349: 048f58513d8b8ec6bb307a939f0ac959bc0f0e10 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_15782: ccba0d4a341ccc5d1f1cc335d50723e251e787e1 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
ccba0d4a341c linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2019-12-16 3:43 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-12-16 3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70958/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7569_full -> Patchwork_15782_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15782_full:
### IGT changes ###
#### Suppressed ####
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* {igt@gen7_exec_parse@basic-allocation}:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw5/igt@gen7_exec_parse@basic-allocation.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw8/igt@gen7_exec_parse@basic-allocation.html
* {igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single}:
- shard-skl: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl3/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15782_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-none:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-none.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-none.html
* igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#607] / [i915#616])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render.html
* igt@gem_exec_async@concurrent-writes-bsd2:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#109276]) +2 similar issues
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_async@concurrent-writes-bsd2.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_async@concurrent-writes-bsd2.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#112146])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@smoketest-bsd2:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][13] -> [INCOMPLETE][14] ([i915#707])
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@smoketest-bsd2.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@smoketest-bsd2.html
* igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#644])
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
* igt@gem_tiled_blits@interruptible:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#818])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw6/igt@gem_tiled_blits@interruptible.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_tiled_blits@interruptible.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy:
- shard-snb: [PASS][19] -> [DMESG-WARN][20] ([fdo#111870]) +1 similar issue
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-snb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-snb4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap:
- shard-snb: [PASS][21] -> [DMESG-WARN][22] ([fdo#110789] / [fdo#111870])
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-snb1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-snb4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap.html
* igt@i915_hangman@error-state-capture-vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][23] -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#112080])
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_hangman@error-state-capture-vcs1.html
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_hangman@error-state-capture-vcs1.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_requests:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][25] -> [INCOMPLETE][26] ([fdo#112057])
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb5/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb4/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
* igt@i915_selftest@mock_sanitycheck:
- shard-skl: [PASS][27] -> [DMESG-WARN][28] ([i915#747])
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl4/igt@i915_selftest@mock_sanitycheck.html
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl2/igt@i915_selftest@mock_sanitycheck.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-256x256-sliding:
- shard-skl: [PASS][29] -> [FAIL][30] ([i915#54]) +2 similar issues
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x42-offscreen:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][31] -> [DMESG-WARN][32] ([IGT#6])
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x42-offscreen.html
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x42-offscreen.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend:
- shard-skl: [PASS][33] -> [INCOMPLETE][34] ([i915#221])
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-apl: [PASS][35] -> [DMESG-WARN][36] ([i915#180]) +4 similar issues
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-apl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-apl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][37] -> [DMESG-WARN][38] ([i915#180]) +6 similar issues
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html
- shard-tglb: [PASS][39] -> [INCOMPLETE][40] ([i915#456] / [i915#460] / [i915#474])
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][41] -> [FAIL][42] ([i915#49])
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-blt:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][43] -> [INCOMPLETE][44] ([i915#474] / [i915#667]) +1 similar issue
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-blt.html
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-blt.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-wc:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][45] -> [INCOMPLETE][46] ([i915#667])
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-wc.html
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-wc.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-min:
- shard-skl: [PASS][47] -> [FAIL][48] ([fdo#108145])
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-min.html
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-min.html
* igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-a-tiling-yf:
- shard-skl: [PASS][49] -> [DMESG-WARN][50] ([IGT#6])
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl1/igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-a-tiling-yf.html
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl5/igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-a-tiling-yf.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][51] -> [FAIL][52] ([i915#31])
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw5/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
- shard-kbl: [PASS][53] -> [FAIL][54] ([i915#31])
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
* igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][55] -> [INCOMPLETE][56] ([i915#456] / [i915#460])
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-reset:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][57] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][58]
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-reset.html
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-reset.html
* igt@gem_eio@reset-stress:
- shard-snb: [FAIL][59] ([i915#232]) -> [PASS][60]
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-snb2/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-snb5/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html
* igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][61] ([fdo#110854]) -> [PASS][62]
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
* igt@gem_exec_create@madvise:
- shard-tglb: [INCOMPLETE][63] ([i915#435]) -> [PASS][64]
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_create@madvise.html
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_create@madvise.html
* igt@gem_exec_params@invalid-bsd-ring:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][66] +1 similar issue
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_params@invalid-bsd-ring.html
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_params@invalid-bsd-ring.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][67] ([fdo#112146]) -> [PASS][68] +3 similar issues
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@smoketest-all:
- shard-tglb: [INCOMPLETE][69] ([i915#463]) -> [PASS][70]
[69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_exec_schedule@smoketest-all.html
[70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@smoketest-all.html
* igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3:
- shard-tglb: [INCOMPLETE][71] ([i915#456]) -> [PASS][72]
[71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html
[72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html
* igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-fd:
- shard-iclb: [INCOMPLETE][73] ([i915#140]) -> [PASS][74]
[73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-fd.html
[74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-fd.html
* igt@i915_selftest@mock_sanitycheck:
- shard-hsw: [DMESG-WARN][75] ([i915#747]) -> [PASS][76]
[75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw1/igt@i915_selftest@mock_sanitycheck.html
[76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw1/igt@i915_selftest@mock_sanitycheck.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][77] ([i915#54]) -> [PASS][78]
[77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
[78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-64x64-random:
- shard-hsw: [DMESG-WARN][79] ([IGT#6]) -> [PASS][80]
[79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-64x64-random.html
[80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-64x64-random.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend:
- shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][81] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][82] +1 similar issue
[81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
[82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend:
- shard-tglb: [INCOMPLETE][83] ([i915#460]) -> [PASS][84]
[83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html
[84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html
* igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-blt-ytiled:
- shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][85] ([i915#435] / [i915#667]) -> [PASS][86]
[85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl2/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-blt-ytiled.html
[86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl10/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-blt-ytiled.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-wc:
- shard-tglb: [INCOMPLETE][87] ([i915#435] / [i915#474] / [i915#667]) -> [PASS][88]
[87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-wc.html
[88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-wc.html
* igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes:
- shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][89] ([fdo#112347] / [fdo#112391] / [i915#648] / [i915#667]) -> [PASS][90]
[89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl1/igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
[90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl6/igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][91] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [PASS][92]
[91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-skl6/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html
[92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-skl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html
* igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-wait-busy-hang:
- shard-kbl: [INCOMPLETE][93] ([fdo#103665]) -> [PASS][94]
[93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-wait-busy-hang.html
[94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-wait-busy-hang.html
* igt@perf@disabled-read-error:
- shard-hsw: [INCOMPLETE][95] ([i915#61]) -> [PASS][96] +2 similar issues
[95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-hsw8/igt@perf@disabled-read-error.html
[96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-hsw1/igt@perf@disabled-read-error.html
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98-vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][97] ([fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][98] +2 similar issues
[97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-iclb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98-vcs1.html
[98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-iclb1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98-vcs1.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs2-nonpriv:
- shard-tglb: [SKIP][99] ([fdo#112080]) -> [SKIP][100] ([fdo#111912] / [fdo#112080])
[99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs2-nonpriv.html
[100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs2-nonpriv.html
* igt@gem_eio@kms:
- shard-snb: [DMESG-WARN][101] ([i915#444]) -> [INCOMPLETE][102] ([i915#82])
[101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7569/shard-snb4/igt@gem_eio@kms.html
[102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@kms.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[IGT#6]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/issues/6
[fdo#103665]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
[fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
[fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
[fdo#110789]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110789
[fdo#110854]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110854
[fdo#111870]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870
[fdo#111912]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111912
[fdo#112057]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112057
[fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080
[fdo#112146]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112146
[fdo#112347]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112347
[fdo#112391]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112391
[i915#140]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/140
[i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
[i915#221]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/221
[i915#232]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/232
[i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265
[i915#31]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/31
[i915#435]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/435
[i915#444]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/444
[i915#456]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/456
[i915#460]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/460
[i915#463]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/463
[i915#474]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/474
[i915#49]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/49
[i915#54]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/54
[i915#607]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/607
[i915#61]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/61
[i915#616]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/616
[i915#644]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/644
[i915#648]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/648
[i915#667]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/667
[i915#677]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/677
[i915#707]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/707
[i915#747]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/747
[i915#818]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/818
[i915#82]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/82
Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------
No changes in participating hosts
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7569 -> Patchwork_15782
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7569: 62c2abc0df8983aba79ba093413683c44e9c4748 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5349: 048f58513d8b8ec6bb307a939f0ac959bc0f0e10 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_15782: ccba0d4a341ccc5d1f1cc335d50723e251e787e1 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15782/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
(?)
@ 2019-12-17 13:19 ` Daniel Vetter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-12-17 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng, Wolfram Sang,
Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> | ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
>
> From Linus' tree.
>
> I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
pull.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> index 9917ce0d86a0..56f55c53abfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> @@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int anx6345_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> /* Map slave addresses of ANX6345 */
> for (i = 0; i < I2C_NUM_ADDRESSES; i++) {
> if (anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1 != client->addr)
> - anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> + anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
> anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
> else
> anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = client;
>
> - if (!anx6345->i2c_clients[i]) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> + if (IS_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i])) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i]);
> DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve I2C bus %02x\n",
> anx6345_i2c_addresses[i]);
> goto err_unregister_i2c;
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-17 13:19 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-12-17 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Wolfram Sang,
Linux Next Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> | ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
>
> From Linus' tree.
>
> I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
pull.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> index 9917ce0d86a0..56f55c53abfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> @@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int anx6345_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> /* Map slave addresses of ANX6345 */
> for (i = 0; i < I2C_NUM_ADDRESSES; i++) {
> if (anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1 != client->addr)
> - anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> + anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
> anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
> else
> anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = client;
>
> - if (!anx6345->i2c_clients[i]) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> + if (IS_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i])) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i]);
> DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve I2C bus %02x\n",
> anx6345_i2c_addresses[i]);
> goto err_unregister_i2c;
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-17 13:19 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-12-17 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Wolfram Sang,
Linux Next Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> | ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
>
> From Linus' tree.
>
> I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
pull.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> index 9917ce0d86a0..56f55c53abfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c
> @@ -735,13 +735,13 @@ static int anx6345_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> /* Map slave addresses of ANX6345 */
> for (i = 0; i < I2C_NUM_ADDRESSES; i++) {
> if (anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1 != client->addr)
> - anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> + anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
> anx6345_i2c_addresses[i] >> 1);
> else
> anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = client;
>
> - if (!anx6345->i2c_clients[i]) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> + if (IS_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i])) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(anx6345->i2c_clients[i]);
> DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve I2C bus %02x\n",
> anx6345_i2c_addresses[i]);
> goto err_unregister_i2c;
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
2019-12-17 13:19 ` Daniel Vetter
(?)
@ 2019-12-17 20:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-12-17 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng, Wolfram Sang,
Wolfram Sang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1740 bytes --]
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> >
> > From Linus' tree.
> >
> > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>
> Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> pull.
Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-17 20:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-12-17 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Wolfram Sang,
Linux Next Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1740 bytes --]
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> >
> > From Linus' tree.
> >
> > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>
> Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> pull.
Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-17 20:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-12-17 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Wolfram Sang,
Linux Next Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1740 bytes --]
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> >
> > From Linus' tree.
> >
> > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>
> Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> pull.
Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
2019-12-17 20:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
(?)
@ 2019-12-18 11:53 ` Daniel Vetter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-12-18 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Intel Graphics, DRI, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng, Wolfram Sang,
Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > > | ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> > >
> > > interacting with commit
> > >
> > > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> > >
> > > From Linus' tree.
> > >
> > > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> > >
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> >
> > Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> > pull.
>
> Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
> of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
I flip flop on this one, between retaining your contribution
explicitly and merging them in. Usually I squash them in, but this
felt substantial enough to retain explicitly. Worst case if someone is
unlucky they need to git bisect skip once. I guess next time I should
do a topic branch, apply it there on top of the pull, and then pull
that in so that it's both pretty history and no bisect hole.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-18 11:53 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-12-18 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Intel Graphics, Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI,
Wolfram Sang, Linux Next Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > > | ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> > >
> > > interacting with commit
> > >
> > > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> > >
> > > From Linus' tree.
> > >
> > > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> > >
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> >
> > Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> > pull.
>
> Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
> of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
I flip flop on this one, between retaining your contribution
explicitly and merging them in. Usually I squash them in, but this
felt substantial enough to retain explicitly. Worst case if someone is
unlucky they need to git bisect skip once. I guess next time I should
do a topic branch, apply it there on top of the pull, and then pull
that in so that it's both pretty history and no bisect hole.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2019-12-18 11:53 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-12-18 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Intel Graphics, Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI,
Wolfram Sang, Linux Next Mailing List, Icenowy Zheng
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > > | ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> > >
> > > interacting with commit
> > >
> > > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> > >
> > > From Linus' tree.
> > >
> > > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> > >
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> >
> > Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> > pull.
>
> Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
> of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
I flip flop on this one, between retaining your contribution
explicitly and merging them in. Usually I squash them in, but this
felt substantial enough to retain explicitly. Worst case if someone is
unlucky they need to git bisect skip once. I guess next time I should
do a topic branch, apply it there on top of the pull, and then pull
that in so that it's both pretty history and no bisect hole.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2020-04-20 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-29 10:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-04-20 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'controlfb_mmap':
drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgprot_cached_wthru'; did you mean 'pgprot_cached'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
756 | vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_cached_wthru(vma->vm_page_prot);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| pgprot_cached
drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'pgprot_t' {aka 'struct <anonymous>'} from type 'int'
Presumably exposed by commit
a07a63b0e24d ("video: fbdev: controlfb: add COMPILE_TEST support")
I just turned off COMPILE_TEST again for today. Please let me know when
this is fixed.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2020-06-17 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-17 2:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-06-17 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Emil Velikov,
Felix Kuehling, Alex Deucher
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1716 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_gem_object_put_unlocked'; did you mean 'drm_gem_object_put_locked'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1357 | drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(&mem->bo->tbo.base);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| drm_gem_object_put_locked
Caused by commit
ab15d56e27be ("drm: remove transient drm_gem_object_put_unlocked()")
interacting with commit
fd9a9f8801de ("drm/amdgpu: Use GEM obj reference for KFD BOs")
from Linus' tree.
I have applied the following merge fix up patch for today.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:55:32 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove stray drm_gem_object_put_unlocked
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index b91b5171270f..9015c7b76d60 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
}
/* Free the BO*/
- drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(&mem->bo->tbo.base);
+ drm_gem_object_put(&mem->bo->tbo.base);
mutex_destroy(&mem->lock);
kfree(mem);
--
2.26.2
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2020-11-02 1:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-02 2:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-11-02 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Christian König, Joerg Roedel, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1766 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26:
include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function 'swiotlb_max_mapping_size':
include/linux/swiotlb.h:99:9: error: 'SIZE_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
99 | return SIZE_MAX;
| ^~~~~~~~
include/linux/swiotlb.h:7:1: note: 'SIZE_MAX' is defined in header '<stdint.h>'; did you forget to '#include <stdint.h>'?
6 | #include <linux/init.h>
+++ |+#include <stdint.h>
7 | #include <linux/types.h>
include/linux/swiotlb.h:99:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
99 | return SIZE_MAX;
| ^~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
abe420bfae52 ("swiotlb: Introduce swiotlb_max_mapping_size()")
but only exposed by commit
4dbafbd30aef ("drm/nouveu: fix swiotlb include")
I applied the following fix for today:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 12:34:57 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: using SIZE_MAX needs limits.h included
Fixes: abe420bfae52 ("swiotlb: Introduce swiotlb_max_mapping_size()")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
index 513913ff7486..ed9de7855d3b 100644
--- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
#include <linux/dma-direction.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#ifndef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
+#include <linux/limits.h>
+#endif
struct device;
struct page;
--
2.28.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2021-10-15 9:26 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-15 12:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-10-15 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Jani Nikula, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3083 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for '__stack_depot_save'
111 | static depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/page_ext.h:7,
from include/linux/mm.h:25,
from include/linux/kallsyms.h:13,
from include/linux/bpf.h:20,
from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5,
from include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:22,
from include/linux/cgroup.h:28,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13,
from include/linux/swap.h:9,
from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
from include/linux/i2c.h:18,
from include/drm/drm_crtc.h:28,
from include/drm/drm_atomic.h:31,
from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:24:
include/linux/stackdepot.h:18:22: note: previous declaration of '__stack_depot_save' was here
18 | depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
cd06ab2fd48f ("drm/locking: add backtrace for locking contended locks without backoff")
This may only have been revealed because of another fix I have had to
apply today.
I have applied the following patch for today.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:17:52 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/locking: fix for name conflict
Fixes: cd06ab2fd48f ("drm/locking: add backtrace for locking contended locks without backoff")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c
index 4d32b61fa1fd..ee36dd20900d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(crtc_ww_class);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MODESET_LOCK)
-static noinline depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(void)
+static noinline depot_stack_handle_t __drm_stack_depot_save(void)
{
unsigned long entries[8];
unsigned int n;
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void __stack_depot_print(depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot)
kfree(buf);
}
#else /* CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MODESET_LOCK */
-static depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(void)
+static depot_stack_handle_t __drm_stack_depot_save(void)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static inline int modeset_lock(struct drm_modeset_lock *lock,
ret = 0;
} else if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
ctx->contended = lock;
- ctx->stack_depot = __stack_depot_save();
+ ctx->stack_depot = __drm_stack_depot_save();
}
return ret;
--
2.33.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2022-04-06 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-06 3:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-04-06 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Intel Graphics, DRI
Cc: Paul Cercueil, Linux Next Mailing List, Mark Brown,
Christophe Branchereau, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1912 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c:478:19: error: initialization of 'void (*)(struct spi_device *)' from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(struct spi_device *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
478 | .remove = nv3052c_remove,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c:478:19: note: (near initialization for 'nv3052c_driver.remove')
Caused by commit
49956b505c53 ("drm/panel: Add panel driver for NewVision NV3052C based LCDs")
interacting with commit
2cbfa2128662 ("spi: make remove callback a void function")
from Linus' tree (merged in v5.18-rc1).
I applied the following merge resolution patch for today.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:46:57 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "spi: make remove callback a void function"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c
index 127bcfdb59df..cf078f0d3cd3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c
@@ -416,15 +416,13 @@ static int nv3052c_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
return 0;
}
-static int nv3052c_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
+static void nv3052c_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct nv3052c *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
drm_panel_remove(&priv->panel);
drm_panel_disable(&priv->panel);
drm_panel_unprepare(&priv->panel);
-
- return 0;
}
static const struct drm_display_mode ltk035c5444t_modes[] = {
--
2.35.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
@ 2022-11-10 0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-10 21:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-11-10 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Dave Airlie
Cc: Ben Skeggs, Thomas Zimmermann, Intel Graphics, DRI,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1603 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c: In function 'nouveau_drm_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:797:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_fbdev_generic_setup' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
797 | drm_fbdev_generic_setup(drm_dev, 8);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
8ab59da26bc0 ("drm/fb-helper: Move generic fbdev emulation into separate source file")
interacting with commit
4a16dd9d18a0 ("drm/nouveau/kms: switch to drm fbdev helpers")
from the drm tree.
I have applied the following merge fix patch for today.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:05:52 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm-misc: fix up for "drm/fb-helper: Move generic fbdev
emulation into separate source file"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
index a19f18b251f3..80f154b6adab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
#include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
+#include <drm/drm_fbdev_generic.h>
#include <drm/drm_gem_ttm_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_ioctl.h>
#include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
--
2.35.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-10 21:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-16 1:23 linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 1:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 1:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-12-16 2:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-12-16 3:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-12-17 13:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-17 13:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-12-17 13:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-17 20:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-17 20:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-17 20:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-18 11:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-18 11:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-12-18 11:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-04-20 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-29 10:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-06-17 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-17 2:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-11-02 1:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-02 2:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-10-15 9:26 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-15 12:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-04-06 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-06 3:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-11-10 0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-10 21:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.