All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Cc: ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, elliott@hpe.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
	krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com, linda.knippers@hpe.com,
	robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] ACPI / util: Fix acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 01:07:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1577689.MsoC4f0R7Z@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37cf7fc6c93496b84fa3984d94d689d8337a176b.1452121277.git.jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>

On Wednesday, January 06, 2016 04:03:38 PM Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and
> "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer."  Type Integers
> are 64 bit quantities.
> 
> The function evaluate_dsm specifies these types as simple "int"
> which are 32 bits.  Correct type passed to acpi_evaluate_dsm
> and its callers and derived callers to pass correct type.
> 
> acpi_check_dsm and acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed had similar issue
> and were corrected as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/utils.c    | 4 ++--
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index 475c907..049cba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock)
>   * some old BIOSes do expect a buffer or an integer etc.
>   */
>  union acpi_object *
> -acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, int func,
> +acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 func,
>  		  union acpi_object *argv4)
>  {
>  	acpi_status ret;
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_dsm);
>   * functions. Currently only support 64 functions at maximum, should be
>   * enough for now.
>   */
> -bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, u64 funcs)
> +bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 funcs)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	u64 mask = 0;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index ad0a5ff..8e6abcf 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
>  bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
>  bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);
>  
> -bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, u64 funcs);
> +bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 funcs);
>  union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid,
> -			int rev, int func, union acpi_object *argv4);
> +			u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4);
>  
>  static inline union acpi_object *
> -acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, int func,
> +acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 func,
>  			union acpi_object *argv4, acpi_object_type type)
>  {
>  	union acpi_object *obj;
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Cc: ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, elliott@hpe.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
	krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com, linda.knippers@hpe.com,
	robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] ACPI / util: Fix acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 01:07:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1577689.MsoC4f0R7Z@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37cf7fc6c93496b84fa3984d94d689d8337a176b.1452121277.git.jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>

On Wednesday, January 06, 2016 04:03:38 PM Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and
> "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer."  Type Integers
> are 64 bit quantities.
> 
> The function evaluate_dsm specifies these types as simple "int"
> which are 32 bits.  Correct type passed to acpi_evaluate_dsm
> and its callers and derived callers to pass correct type.
> 
> acpi_check_dsm and acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed had similar issue
> and were corrected as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/utils.c    | 4 ++--
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index 475c907..049cba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock)
>   * some old BIOSes do expect a buffer or an integer etc.
>   */
>  union acpi_object *
> -acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, int func,
> +acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 func,
>  		  union acpi_object *argv4)
>  {
>  	acpi_status ret;
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_dsm);
>   * functions. Currently only support 64 functions at maximum, should be
>   * enough for now.
>   */
> -bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, u64 funcs)
> +bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 funcs)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	u64 mask = 0;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index ad0a5ff..8e6abcf 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
>  bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
>  bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);
>  
> -bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, u64 funcs);
> +bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 funcs);
>  union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid,
> -			int rev, int func, union acpi_object *argv4);
> +			u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4);
>  
>  static inline union acpi_object *
> -acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, int func,
> +acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, u64 rev, u64 func,
>  			union acpi_object *argv4, acpi_object_type type)
>  {
>  	union acpi_object *obj;
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-08  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06 23:03 [PATCH v5 0/6] nvdimm: Add an IOCTL pass thru for DSM calls Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] ACPI / util: Fix acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03   ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-08  0:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-01-08  0:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] nvdimm: Clean-up access mode check Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03   ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] nvdimm: Add wrapper for IOCTL pass thru Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03   ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] nvdimm: Fix security issue with DSM IOCTL Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03   ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] nvdimm: Increase max envelope size for IOCTL Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03   ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:03   ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-06 23:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] nvdimm: Add an IOCTL pass thru for DSM calls Dan Williams
2016-01-06 23:58   ` Dan Williams
2016-01-11  0:03   ` Dan Williams
2016-01-11  0:03     ` Dan Williams
2016-01-12  1:32     ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-12  1:32       ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-01-12 18:55       ` Dan Williams
2016-01-12 18:55         ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1577689.MsoC4f0R7Z@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=elliott@hpe.com \
    --cc=jerry.hoemann@hpe.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linda.knippers@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.