All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve
@ 2020-03-05 14:02 Chris Wilson
  2020-03-05 15:51 ` Mika Kuoppala
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-03-05 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

We only need to serialise the multiple pinning during the eb_reserve
phase. Ideally this would be using the vm->mutex as an outer lock, or
using a composite global mutex (ww_mutex), but at the moment we are
using struct_mutex for the group.

Fixes: 003d8b9143a6 ("drm/i915/gem: Only call eb_lookup_vma once during execbuf ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 51 ++++++++-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  6 ---
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 7bb27f382af7..faa5b5c99a9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 	struct list_head last;
 	struct eb_vma *ev;
 	unsigned int i, pass;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Attempt to pin all of the buffers into the GTT.
@@ -626,8 +626,10 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 	 * room for the earlier objects *unless* we need to defragment.
 	 */
 
+	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex))
+		return -EINTR;
+
 	pass = 0;
-	err = 0;
 	do {
 		list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->unbound, bind_link) {
 			err = eb_reserve_vma(eb, ev, pin_flags);
@@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 				break;
 		}
 		if (!(err == -ENOSPC || err == -EAGAIN))
-			return err;
+			break;
 
 		/* Resort *all* the objects into priority order */
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
@@ -666,7 +668,9 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 		list_splice_tail(&last, &eb->unbound);
 
 		if (err == -EAGAIN) {
+			mutex_unlock(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
 			flush_workqueue(eb->i915->mm.userptr_wq);
+			mutex_lock(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -680,15 +684,20 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 			err = i915_gem_evict_vm(eb->context->vm);
 			mutex_unlock(&eb->context->vm->mutex);
 			if (err)
-				return err;
+				goto unlock;
 			break;
 
 		default:
-			return -ENOSPC;
+			err = -ENOSPC;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 
 		pin_flags = PIN_USER;
 	} while (1);
+
+unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static unsigned int eb_batch_index(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
@@ -1631,7 +1640,6 @@ static int eb_prefault_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 
 static noinline int eb_relocate_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
-	struct drm_device *dev = &eb->i915->drm;
 	bool have_copy = false;
 	struct eb_vma *ev;
 	int err = 0;
@@ -1642,8 +1650,6 @@ static noinline int eb_relocate_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
 	/*
 	 * We take 3 passes through the slowpatch.
 	 *
@@ -1666,21 +1672,8 @@ static noinline int eb_relocate_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 		cond_resched();
 		err = 0;
 	}
-	if (err) {
-		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* A frequent cause for EAGAIN are currently unavailable client pages */
-	flush_workqueue(eb->i915->mm.userptr_wq);
-
-	err = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
-	if (err) {
-		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	if (err)
 		goto out;
-	}
-
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!eb->batch);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->relocs, reloc_link) {
 		if (!have_copy) {
@@ -1738,9 +1731,11 @@ static int eb_relocate(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = eb_reserve(eb);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+	if (!list_empty(&eb->unbound)) {
+		err = eb_reserve(eb);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
 
 	/* The objects are in their final locations, apply the relocations. */
 	if (eb->args->flags & __EXEC_HAS_RELOC) {
@@ -2690,10 +2685,6 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
 	if (unlikely(err))
 		goto err_context;
 
-	err = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
-	if (err)
-		goto err_engine;
-
 	err = eb_relocate(&eb);
 	if (err) {
 		/*
@@ -2837,8 +2828,6 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
 		eb_release_vmas(&eb);
 	if (eb.trampoline)
 		i915_vma_unpin(eb.trampoline);
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-err_engine:
 	eb_unpin_engine(&eb);
 err_context:
 	i915_gem_context_put(eb.gem_context);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 123d0fadfafc..c081f4ec87df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1734,12 +1734,6 @@ int i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 
 void i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 
-static inline int __must_check
-i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
-	return mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
-}
-
 int i915_gem_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file_priv,
 			 struct drm_device *dev,
 			 struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args);
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve
  2020-03-05 14:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve Chris Wilson
@ 2020-03-05 15:51 ` Mika Kuoppala
  2020-03-06  1:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2) Patchwork
  2020-03-06  1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2020-03-05 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> We only need to serialise the multiple pinning during the eb_reserve
> phase. Ideally this would be using the vm->mutex as an outer lock, or
> using a composite global mutex (ww_mutex), but at the moment we are
> using struct_mutex for the group.
>
> Fixes: 003d8b9143a6 ("drm/i915/gem: Only call eb_lookup_vma once during execbuf ioctl")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 51 ++++++++-----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  6 ---
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 7bb27f382af7..faa5b5c99a9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  	struct list_head last;
>  	struct eb_vma *ev;
>  	unsigned int i, pass;
> -	int err;
> +	int err = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Attempt to pin all of the buffers into the GTT.
> @@ -626,8 +626,10 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  	 * room for the earlier objects *unless* we need to defragment.
>  	 */
>  
> +	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex))
> +		return -EINTR;
> +
>  	pass = 0;
> -	err = 0;
>  	do {
>  		list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->unbound, bind_link) {
>  			err = eb_reserve_vma(eb, ev, pin_flags);
> @@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  				break;
>  		}
>  		if (!(err == -ENOSPC || err == -EAGAIN))
> -			return err;
> +			break;
>  
>  		/* Resort *all* the objects into priority order */
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
> @@ -666,7 +668,9 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		list_splice_tail(&last, &eb->unbound);
>  
>  		if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
>  			flush_workqueue(eb->i915->mm.userptr_wq);
> +			mutex_lock(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex);

General curiousity of what mechanism prevents the possible jail of -EAGAIN
looping?

For the fix tho,
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -680,15 +684,20 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  			err = i915_gem_evict_vm(eb->context->vm);
>  			mutex_unlock(&eb->context->vm->mutex);
>  			if (err)
> -				return err;
> +				goto unlock;
>  			break;
>  
>  		default:
> -			return -ENOSPC;
> +			err = -ENOSPC;
> +			goto unlock;
>  		}
>  
>  		pin_flags = PIN_USER;
>  	} while (1);
> +
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&eb->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int eb_batch_index(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> @@ -1631,7 +1640,6 @@ static int eb_prefault_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  
>  static noinline int eb_relocate_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  {
> -	struct drm_device *dev = &eb->i915->drm;
>  	bool have_copy = false;
>  	struct eb_vma *ev;
>  	int err = 0;
> @@ -1642,8 +1650,6 @@ static noinline int eb_relocate_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * We take 3 passes through the slowpatch.
>  	 *
> @@ -1666,21 +1672,8 @@ static noinline int eb_relocate_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		cond_resched();
>  		err = 0;
>  	}
> -	if (err) {
> -		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* A frequent cause for EAGAIN are currently unavailable client pages */
> -	flush_workqueue(eb->i915->mm.userptr_wq);
> -
> -	err = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> -	if (err) {
> -		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +	if (err)
>  		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!eb->batch);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->relocs, reloc_link) {
>  		if (!have_copy) {
> @@ -1738,9 +1731,11 @@ static int eb_relocate(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = eb_reserve(eb);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +	if (!list_empty(&eb->unbound)) {
> +		err = eb_reserve(eb);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* The objects are in their final locations, apply the relocations. */
>  	if (eb->args->flags & __EXEC_HAS_RELOC) {
> @@ -2690,10 +2685,6 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	if (unlikely(err))
>  		goto err_context;
>  
> -	err = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto err_engine;
> -
>  	err = eb_relocate(&eb);
>  	if (err) {
>  		/*
> @@ -2837,8 +2828,6 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		eb_release_vmas(&eb);
>  	if (eb.trampoline)
>  		i915_vma_unpin(eb.trampoline);
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -err_engine:
>  	eb_unpin_engine(&eb);
>  err_context:
>  	i915_gem_context_put(eb.gem_context);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 123d0fadfafc..c081f4ec87df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1734,12 +1734,6 @@ int i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  
>  void i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  
> -static inline int __must_check
> -i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct drm_device *dev)
> -{
> -	return mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -}
> -
>  int i915_gem_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file_priv,
>  			 struct drm_device *dev,
>  			 struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2)
  2020-03-05 14:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve Chris Wilson
  2020-03-05 15:51 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2020-03-06  1:04 ` Patchwork
  2020-03-06  1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-03-06  1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74291/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h:285: warning: Function parameter or member 'get_freq' not described in 'intel_shared_dpll_funcs'

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2)
  2020-03-05 14:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve Chris Wilson
  2020-03-05 15:51 ` Mika Kuoppala
  2020-03-06  1:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2020-03-06  1:18 ` Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-03-06  1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74291/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8071 -> Patchwork_16842
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16842 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_16842, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16842:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic:
    - fi-icl-guc:         [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-icl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-icl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts:
    - fi-skl-guc:         [PASS][3] -> [TIMEOUT][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-skl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
    - fi-icl-dsi:         [PASS][5] -> [TIMEOUT][6] +9 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-icl-dsi/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-icl-dsi/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
    - fi-skl-6600u:       [PASS][7] -> [TIMEOUT][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-skl-6600u/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-6600u/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
    - fi-cfl-8700k:       [PASS][9] -> [TIMEOUT][10] +9 similar issues
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
    - fi-skl-lmem:        NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][11]
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-lmem/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
    - fi-skl-6700k2:      [PASS][12] -> [TIMEOUT][13]
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds:
    - fi-cml-s:           [PASS][14] -> [TIMEOUT][15] +8 similar issues
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-cml-s/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-cml-s/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
    - fi-cfl-guc:         [PASS][16] -> [TIMEOUT][17] +9 similar issues
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-cfl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-cfl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all:
    - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][18] -> [TIMEOUT][19] +10 similar issues
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
    - fi-apl-guc:         [PASS][20] -> [TIMEOUT][21] +8 similar issues
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
    - fi-kbl-x1275:       [PASS][22] -> [TIMEOUT][23] +9 similar issues
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
    - fi-icl-y:           [PASS][24] -> [TIMEOUT][25] +9 similar issues
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic:
    - fi-icl-u2:          [PASS][26] -> [TIMEOUT][27] +9 similar issues
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic.html
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0:
    - fi-cml-u2:          [PASS][28] -> [TIMEOUT][29] +8 similar issues
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
    - fi-kbl-r:           [PASS][30] -> [TIMEOUT][31] +9 similar issues
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-kbl-r/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-kbl-r/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
    - fi-kbl-guc:         [PASS][32] -> [TIMEOUT][33] +8 similar issues
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-kbl-guc/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-kbl-guc/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
    - fi-kbl-8809g:       [PASS][34] -> [TIMEOUT][35] +8 similar issues
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
    - fi-bdw-5557u:       NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][36] +8 similar issues
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html

  * igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-open:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [PASS][37] -> [TIMEOUT][38] +9 similar issues
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-open.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-open.html

  
#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts:
    - {fi-tgl-u}:         [PASS][39] -> [TIMEOUT][40]
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16842 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic:
    - fi-glk-dsi:         [PASS][41] -> [INCOMPLETE][42] ([i915#58] / [k.org#198133])
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds:
    - fi-skl-guc:         [PASS][43] -> [TIMEOUT][44] ([i915#1084]) +8 similar issues
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-skl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-guc/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html

  * igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all:
    - fi-skl-6600u:       [PASS][45] -> [TIMEOUT][46] ([i915#1084]) +9 similar issues
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-skl-6600u/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-6600u/igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [PASS][47] -> [FAIL][48] ([CI#94])
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html

  * igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink:
    - fi-skl-6700k2:      [PASS][49] -> [TIMEOUT][50] ([i915#1084]) +7 similar issues
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink.html
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink.html

  * igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [PASS][51] -> [DMESG-WARN][52] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) +1 similar issue
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files.html
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_getparams_basic@basic-subslice-total:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [DMESG-WARN][53] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) -> [PASS][54] +1 similar issue
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8071/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_getparams_basic@basic-subslice-total.html
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_getparams_basic@basic-subslice-total.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [CI#94]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/i915-infra/issues/94
  [fdo#112126]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112126
  [i915#1084]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1084
  [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
  [i915#58]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/58
  [k.org#198133]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198133


Participating hosts (48 -> 43)
------------------------------

  Additional (4): fi-skl-lmem fi-bdw-5557u fi-ivb-3770 fi-snb-2600 
  Missing    (9): fi-ilk-m540 fi-tgl-dsi fi-hsw-4200u fi-skl-6770hq fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_8071 -> Patchwork_16842

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_8071: c9eab2d6a1df271afd72c2ef771d4590b6baa108 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5495: 22df72de8affcec22d9f354bb6148d77f60cc580 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_16842: 6274a5c199895d36b2a43f0192abedbcba1137f6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

6274a5c19989 drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16842/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-06  1:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-05 14:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve Chris Wilson
2020-03-05 15:51 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-03-06  1:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/gem: Limit struct_mutex to eb_reserve (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-06  1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.