FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 18d200460cd73636d4f20674085c39e32b4e0097 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:20:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep
 command

The busy timeout for the CMD5 to put the eMMC into sleep state, is specific
to the card. Potentially the timeout may exceed the host->max_busy_timeout.
If that becomes the case, mmc_sleep() converts from using an R1B response
to an R1 response, as to prevent the host from doing HW busy detection.

However, it has turned out that some hosts requires an R1B response no
matter what, so let's respect that via checking MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY. Note
that, if the R1B gets enforced, the host becomes fully responsible of
managing the needed busy timeout, in one way or the other.

Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200311092036.16084-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index f6912ded652d..de14b5845f52 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -1910,9 +1910,12 @@ static int mmc_sleep(struct mmc_host *host)
 	 * If the max_busy_timeout of the host is specified, validate it against
 	 * the sleep cmd timeout. A failure means we need to prevent the host
 	 * from doing hw busy detection, which is done by converting to a R1
-	 * response instead of a R1B.
+	 * response instead of a R1B. Note, some hosts requires R1B, which also
+	 * means they are on their own when it comes to deal with the busy
+	 * timeout.
 	 */
-	if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) {
+	if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) && host->max_busy_timeout &&
+	    (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) {
 		cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
 	} else {
 		cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;