All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Eric Richter <erichte@linux.ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:13:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1585896170.ohti800w9v.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324193833.GH25468@kitsune.suse.cz>

Michal Suchánek's on March 25, 2020 5:38 am:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:48:20PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Michal Suchanek's on March 19, 2020 10:19 pm:
>> > There are two almost identical copies for 32bit and 64bit.
>> > 
>> > The function is used only in 32bit code which will be split out in next
>> > patch so consolidate to one function.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
>> > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>> > ---
>> > v6:  new patch
>> > v8:  move the consolidated function out of the ifdef block.
>> > v11: rebase on top of def0bfdbd603
>> > ---
>> >  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > index cbc251981209..c9a78c6e4361 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > @@ -161,18 +161,6 @@ static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
>> >  	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
>> > -{
>> > -	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
>> > -	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
>> > -		return -EFAULT;
>> > -
>> > -	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
>> > -		return 0;
>> > -
>> > -	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
>> > -}
>> > -
>> >  static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
>> >  {
>> >  	if (!sp || (sp & 7) || sp > (is_64 ? TASK_SIZE : 0x100000000UL) - 32)
>> > @@ -277,19 +265,9 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  #else  /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> > -/*
>> > - * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
>> > - * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
>> > - * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
>> > - * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
>> > - */
>> > -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
>> > +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
>> >  {
>> > -	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
>> > -	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
>> > -		return -EFAULT;
>> > -
>> > -	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
>> > +	return 0;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> > @@ -312,6 +290,28 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
>> >  
>> >  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> >  
>> > +/*
>> > + * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
>> > + * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
>> > + * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
>> > + * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
>> > + */
>> 
>> The comment is actually probably better to stay in the 32-bit
>> read_user_stack_slow implementation. Is that function defined
>> on 32-bit purely so that you can use IS_ENABLED()? In that case
> It documents the IS_ENABLED() and that's where it is. The 32bit
> definition is only a technical detail.

Sorry for the late reply, busy trying to fix bugs in the C rewrite
series. I don't think it is the right place, it should be in the
ppc32 implementation detail. ppc64 has an equivalent comment at the
top of its read_user_stack functions.

>> I would prefer to put a BUG() there which makes it self documenting.
> Which will cause checkpatch complaints about introducing new BUG() which
> is frowned on.

It's fine in this case, that warning is about not introducing
runtime bugs, but this wouldn't be.

But... I actually don't like adding read_user_stack_slow on 32-bit
and especially not just to make IS_ENABLED work.

IMO this would be better if you really want to consolidate it

---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
index cbc251981209..ca3a599b3f54 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
  * interrupt context, so if the access faults, we read the page tables
  * to find which page (if any) is mapped and access it directly.
  */
-static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
+static int read_user_stack_slow(const void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
 {
 	int ret = -EFAULT;
 	pgd_t *pgdir;
@@ -149,28 +149,21 @@ static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
+static int __read_user_stack(const void __user *ptr, void *ret, size_t size)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned long) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 7))
+	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - size ||
+	    ((unsigned long)ptr & (size - 1)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
+	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, size))
 		return 0;
 
-	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
+	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, size);
 }
 
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
-		return 0;
-
-	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
+	return __read_user_stack(ptr, ret, sizeof(*ret));
 }
 
 static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
@@ -283,13 +276,13 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
  * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
  * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
  */
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int __read_user_stack(const void __user *ptr, void *ret, size_t size)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
+	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - size ||
+	    ((unsigned long)ptr & (size - 1)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
+	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, size);
 }
 
 static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
@@ -312,6 +305,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
+static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+{
+	return __read_user_stack(ptr, ret, sizeof(*ret));
+}
+
 /*
  * Layout for non-RT signal frames
  */

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Eric Richter <erichte@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:13:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1585896170.ohti800w9v.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324193833.GH25468@kitsune.suse.cz>

Michal Suchánek's on March 25, 2020 5:38 am:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:48:20PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Michal Suchanek's on March 19, 2020 10:19 pm:
>> > There are two almost identical copies for 32bit and 64bit.
>> > 
>> > The function is used only in 32bit code which will be split out in next
>> > patch so consolidate to one function.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
>> > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>> > ---
>> > v6:  new patch
>> > v8:  move the consolidated function out of the ifdef block.
>> > v11: rebase on top of def0bfdbd603
>> > ---
>> >  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > index cbc251981209..c9a78c6e4361 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> > @@ -161,18 +161,6 @@ static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
>> >  	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
>> > -{
>> > -	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
>> > -	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
>> > -		return -EFAULT;
>> > -
>> > -	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
>> > -		return 0;
>> > -
>> > -	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
>> > -}
>> > -
>> >  static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
>> >  {
>> >  	if (!sp || (sp & 7) || sp > (is_64 ? TASK_SIZE : 0x100000000UL) - 32)
>> > @@ -277,19 +265,9 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  #else  /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> > -/*
>> > - * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
>> > - * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
>> > - * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
>> > - * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
>> > - */
>> > -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
>> > +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
>> >  {
>> > -	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
>> > -	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
>> > -		return -EFAULT;
>> > -
>> > -	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
>> > +	return 0;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> >  static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> > @@ -312,6 +290,28 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
>> >  
>> >  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> >  
>> > +/*
>> > + * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
>> > + * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
>> > + * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
>> > + * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
>> > + */
>> 
>> The comment is actually probably better to stay in the 32-bit
>> read_user_stack_slow implementation. Is that function defined
>> on 32-bit purely so that you can use IS_ENABLED()? In that case
> It documents the IS_ENABLED() and that's where it is. The 32bit
> definition is only a technical detail.

Sorry for the late reply, busy trying to fix bugs in the C rewrite
series. I don't think it is the right place, it should be in the
ppc32 implementation detail. ppc64 has an equivalent comment at the
top of its read_user_stack functions.

>> I would prefer to put a BUG() there which makes it self documenting.
> Which will cause checkpatch complaints about introducing new BUG() which
> is frowned on.

It's fine in this case, that warning is about not introducing
runtime bugs, but this wouldn't be.

But... I actually don't like adding read_user_stack_slow on 32-bit
and especially not just to make IS_ENABLED work.

IMO this would be better if you really want to consolidate it

---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
index cbc251981209..ca3a599b3f54 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
  * interrupt context, so if the access faults, we read the page tables
  * to find which page (if any) is mapped and access it directly.
  */
-static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
+static int read_user_stack_slow(const void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
 {
 	int ret = -EFAULT;
 	pgd_t *pgdir;
@@ -149,28 +149,21 @@ static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
+static int __read_user_stack(const void __user *ptr, void *ret, size_t size)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned long) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 7))
+	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - size ||
+	    ((unsigned long)ptr & (size - 1)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
+	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, size))
 		return 0;
 
-	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
+	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, size);
 }
 
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
-		return 0;
-
-	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
+	return __read_user_stack(ptr, ret, sizeof(*ret));
 }
 
 static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
@@ -283,13 +276,13 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
  * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
  * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
  */
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int __read_user_stack(const void __user *ptr, void *ret, size_t size)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
+	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - size ||
+	    ((unsigned long)ptr & (size - 1)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
+	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, size);
 }
 
 static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
@@ -312,6 +305,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
+static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+{
+	return __read_user_stack(ptr, ret, sizeof(*ret));
+}
+
 /*
  * Layout for non-RT signal frames
  */

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-03  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 163+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-25 17:35 [PATCH v3 00/32] powerpc/64: interrupts and syscalls series Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 01/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Introduce INT_DEFINE parameter block for code generation Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-01 12:53   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 02/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Add GEN_COMMON macro that uses INT_DEFINE parameters Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Add GEN_KVM " Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Expand EXC_COMMON and EXC_COMMON_ASYNC macros Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Move all interrupt handlers to new style code gen macros Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 06/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Remove old INT_ENTRY macro Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Remove old INT_COMMON macro Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 08/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Remove old INT_KVM_HANDLER Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 09/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Add ISIDE option Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 10/32] powerpc/64s/exception: move real->virt switch into the common handler Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 11/32] powerpc/64s/exception: move soft-mask test to common code Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 12/32] powerpc/64s/exception: move KVM " Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 13/32] powerpc/64s/exception: remove confusing IEARLY option Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 14/32] powerpc/64s/exception: remove the SPR saving patch code macros Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 15/32] powerpc/64s/exception: trim unused arguments from KVMTEST macro Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 16/32] powerpc/64s/exception: hdecrementer avoid touching the stack Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 17/32] powerpc/64s/exception: re-inline some handlers Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 18/32] powerpc/64s/exception: Clean up SRR specifiers Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 19/32] powerpc/64s/exception: add more comments for interrupt handlers Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 20/32] powerpc/64s/exception: only test KVM in SRR interrupts when PR KVM is supported Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 21/32] powerpc/64s/exception: sreset interrupts reconcile fix Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 22/32] powerpc/64s/exception: soft nmi interrupt should not use ret_from_except Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 23/32] powerpc/64: system call remove non-volatile GPR save optimisation Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 24/32] powerpc/64: sstep ifdef the deprecated fast endian switch syscall Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 25/32] powerpc/64: system call implement entry/exit logic in C Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-19  9:18   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-03-20  3:39     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 26/32] powerpc/64: system call zero volatile registers when returning Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 21:20   ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-26  3:39     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-07  0:54     ` [PATCH] Fix " Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 27/32] powerpc/64: implement soft interrupt replay in C Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 28/32] powerpc/64s: interrupt implement exit logic " Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-27  8:54   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-01-28  0:09     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-03 16:25   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-04  3:27     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-04  8:03       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-04  8:53         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-05  0:22           ` Michael Ellerman
2021-02-05  2:16             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-05  6:04               ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-06  2:28                 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-27 10:07   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-01  0:47     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-03-15 13:41   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-16  7:36     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-03-19 11:44       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 29/32] powerpc/64s/exception: remove lite interrupt return Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 30/32] powerpc/64: system call reconcile interrupts Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 31/32] powerpc/64s/exception: treat NIA below __end_interrupts as soft-masked Nicholas Piggin
2020-02-25 17:35 ` [PATCH v3 32/32] powerpc/64s: system call support for scv/rfscv instructions Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-01 12:20   ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-01 12:20     ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-19 12:19 ` [PATCH v11 0/8] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v11 Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 1/8] powerpc: Add back __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK macro Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 2/8] powerpc: move common register copy functions from signal_32.c to signal.c Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-24  8:48     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-24  8:48       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-24 19:38       ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-24 19:38         ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-03  7:13         ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-04-03  7:13           ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03 10:52           ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-03 10:52             ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-03 11:26             ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03 11:26               ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03 11:51               ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-03 11:51                 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-06 20:52           ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-06 20:52             ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-06 21:00           ` [PATCH] powerpcs: perf: consolidate perf_callchain_user_64 and perf_callchain_user_32 Michal Suchanek
2020-04-06 21:00             ` Michal Suchanek
2020-04-07  5:21             ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-07  5:21               ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-09 11:22               ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-09 11:22                 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 4/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate valid_user_sp Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 5/8] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-24  8:54     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-24  8:54       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-24 19:30       ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-24 19:30         ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-03  7:16         ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03  7:16           ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 6/8] powerpc/64: Make COMPAT user-selectable disabled on littleendian by default Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 7/8] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19   ` [PATCH v11 8/8] MAINTAINERS: perf: Add pattern that matches ppc perf to the perf entry Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 12:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 13:37     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-19 13:37       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-19 14:00       ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-19 14:00         ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-19 14:26         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-19 14:26           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-19 17:03     ` Joe Perches
2020-03-19 17:03       ` Joe Perches
2020-03-19 12:36   ` [PATCH v11 0/8] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v11 Christophe Leroy
2020-03-19 12:36     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-03-19 14:01     ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-19 14:01       ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-03  7:25   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03  7:25     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03  7:26     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-03  7:26       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-03  9:43       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-03  9:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-04-05  0:40         ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-05  0:40           ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-20 10:20 ` [PATCH v12 0/8] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v12 Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 1/8] powerpc: Add back __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK macro Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-04-06 13:05     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 2/8] powerpc: move common register copy functions from signal_32.c to signal.c Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 4/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate valid_user_sp -> invalid_user_sp Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 5/8] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-04-07  5:50     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-07  5:50       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-07  9:57       ` Michal Suchánek
2020-04-07  9:57         ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 6/8] powerpc/64: Make COMPAT user-selectable disabled on littleendian by default Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 7/8] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20   ` [PATCH v12 8/8] MAINTAINERS: perf: Add pattern that matches ppc perf to the perf entry Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:20     ` Michal Suchanek
2020-03-20 10:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 10:33       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 11:23       ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 11:23         ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 12:42         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 12:42           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:42           ` Joe Perches
2020-03-20 14:42             ` Joe Perches
2020-03-20 16:28             ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 16:28               ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 16:31             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 16:31               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 16:42               ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 16:42                 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-20 16:47                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 16:47                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 21:36               ` Joe Perches
2020-03-20 21:36                 ` Joe Perches
2020-03-19 11:52 [PATCH v11 0/8] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v11 Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 11:52 ` [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 Michal Suchanek
2020-03-19 11:52   ` Michal Suchanek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1585896170.ohti800w9v.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=erichte@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavold@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.