All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>
To: ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ath11k: rx path optimizations
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 2020 14:13:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586421797-885-1-git-send-email-mpubbise@codeaurora.org> (raw)

During RX, accessing the reo dest ring descriptor directly is consuming
a lot of CPU cycles. Accessing the descriptor after copying it locally
has improved CPU usage by around ~10-15% while measuring throughput
in RX DBTC test cases(all radios are involved in the throughput
measurement).

HW tested: IPQ8074

Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
index a3f2c76..203fd44 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
@@ -2403,12 +2403,12 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id,
 
 try_again:
 	while ((rx_desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, srng))) {
-		struct hal_reo_dest_ring *desc = (struct hal_reo_dest_ring *)rx_desc;
+		struct hal_reo_dest_ring desc = *(struct hal_reo_dest_ring *)rx_desc;
 		enum hal_reo_dest_ring_push_reason push_reason;
 		u32 cookie;
 
 		cookie = FIELD_GET(BUFFER_ADDR_INFO1_SW_COOKIE,
-				   desc->buf_addr_info.info1);
+				   desc.buf_addr_info.info1);
 		buf_id = FIELD_GET(DP_RXDMA_BUF_COOKIE_BUF_ID,
 				   cookie);
 		mac_id = FIELD_GET(DP_RXDMA_BUF_COOKIE_PDEV_ID, cookie);
@@ -2436,7 +2436,7 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id,
 		total_msdu_reaped++;
 
 		push_reason = FIELD_GET(HAL_REO_DEST_RING_INFO0_PUSH_REASON,
-					desc->info0);
+					desc.info0);
 		if (push_reason !=
 		    HAL_REO_DEST_RING_PUSH_REASON_ROUTING_INSTRUCTION) {
 			dev_kfree_skb_any(msdu);
@@ -2444,15 +2444,15 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		rxcb->is_first_msdu = !!(desc->rx_msdu_info.info0 &
+		rxcb->is_first_msdu = !!(desc.rx_msdu_info.info0 &
 					 RX_MSDU_DESC_INFO0_FIRST_MSDU_IN_MPDU);
-		rxcb->is_last_msdu = !!(desc->rx_msdu_info.info0 &
+		rxcb->is_last_msdu = !!(desc.rx_msdu_info.info0 &
 					RX_MSDU_DESC_INFO0_LAST_MSDU_IN_MPDU);
-		rxcb->is_continuation = !!(desc->rx_msdu_info.info0 &
+		rxcb->is_continuation = !!(desc.rx_msdu_info.info0 &
 					   RX_MSDU_DESC_INFO0_MSDU_CONTINUATION);
 		rxcb->mac_id = mac_id;
 		rxcb->tid = FIELD_GET(HAL_REO_DEST_RING_INFO0_RX_QUEUE_NUM,
-				      desc->info0);
+				      desc.info0);
 
 		__skb_queue_tail(&msdu_list, msdu);
 
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>
To: ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ath11k: rx path optimizations
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 2020 14:13:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586421797-885-1-git-send-email-mpubbise@codeaurora.org> (raw)

During RX, accessing the reo dest ring descriptor directly is consuming
a lot of CPU cycles. Accessing the descriptor after copying it locally
has improved CPU usage by around ~10-15% while measuring throughput
in RX DBTC test cases(all radios are involved in the throughput
measurement).

HW tested: IPQ8074

Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <mpubbise@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
index a3f2c76..203fd44 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
@@ -2403,12 +2403,12 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id,
 
 try_again:
 	while ((rx_desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, srng))) {
-		struct hal_reo_dest_ring *desc = (struct hal_reo_dest_ring *)rx_desc;
+		struct hal_reo_dest_ring desc = *(struct hal_reo_dest_ring *)rx_desc;
 		enum hal_reo_dest_ring_push_reason push_reason;
 		u32 cookie;
 
 		cookie = FIELD_GET(BUFFER_ADDR_INFO1_SW_COOKIE,
-				   desc->buf_addr_info.info1);
+				   desc.buf_addr_info.info1);
 		buf_id = FIELD_GET(DP_RXDMA_BUF_COOKIE_BUF_ID,
 				   cookie);
 		mac_id = FIELD_GET(DP_RXDMA_BUF_COOKIE_PDEV_ID, cookie);
@@ -2436,7 +2436,7 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id,
 		total_msdu_reaped++;
 
 		push_reason = FIELD_GET(HAL_REO_DEST_RING_INFO0_PUSH_REASON,
-					desc->info0);
+					desc.info0);
 		if (push_reason !=
 		    HAL_REO_DEST_RING_PUSH_REASON_ROUTING_INSTRUCTION) {
 			dev_kfree_skb_any(msdu);
@@ -2444,15 +2444,15 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		rxcb->is_first_msdu = !!(desc->rx_msdu_info.info0 &
+		rxcb->is_first_msdu = !!(desc.rx_msdu_info.info0 &
 					 RX_MSDU_DESC_INFO0_FIRST_MSDU_IN_MPDU);
-		rxcb->is_last_msdu = !!(desc->rx_msdu_info.info0 &
+		rxcb->is_last_msdu = !!(desc.rx_msdu_info.info0 &
 					RX_MSDU_DESC_INFO0_LAST_MSDU_IN_MPDU);
-		rxcb->is_continuation = !!(desc->rx_msdu_info.info0 &
+		rxcb->is_continuation = !!(desc.rx_msdu_info.info0 &
 					   RX_MSDU_DESC_INFO0_MSDU_CONTINUATION);
 		rxcb->mac_id = mac_id;
 		rxcb->tid = FIELD_GET(HAL_REO_DEST_RING_INFO0_RX_QUEUE_NUM,
-				      desc->info0);
+				      desc.info0);
 
 		__skb_queue_tail(&msdu_list, msdu);
 
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k

             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-09  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09  8:43 Manikanta Pubbisetty [this message]
2020-04-09  8:43 ` [PATCH] ath11k: rx path optimizations Manikanta Pubbisetty
2020-04-14  8:34 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-14  8:34 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1586421797-885-1-git-send-email-mpubbise@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mpubbise@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.