All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr
@ 2020-05-14 18:13 ` Colin King
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-05-14 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kalle Valo, David S . Miller, Ping-Ke Shih,
	linux-wireless, netdev
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently ldo_pwr has the LDO25 voltage bits set to zero and then
it is overwritten with the new voltage setting. The assignment
looks incorrect, it should be bit-wise or'ing in the new voltage
setting rather than a direct assignment.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Fixes: 1afb5eb7a00d ("rtw88: 8723d: Add cfg_ldo25 to control LDO25")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
index b517af417e0e..2c6e417c5bca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void rtw8723d_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable)
 	ldo_pwr = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3);
 	if (enable) {
 		ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_MASK_LDO25_VOLTAGE;
-		ldo_pwr = (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN;
+		ldo_pwr |= (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN;
 	} else {
 		ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_LDO25_EN;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr
@ 2020-05-14 18:13 ` Colin King
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-05-14 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kalle Valo, David S . Miller, Ping-Ke Shih,
	linux-wireless, netdev
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently ldo_pwr has the LDO25 voltage bits set to zero and then
it is overwritten with the new voltage setting. The assignment
looks incorrect, it should be bit-wise or'ing in the new voltage
setting rather than a direct assignment.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Fixes: 1afb5eb7a00d ("rtw88: 8723d: Add cfg_ldo25 to control LDO25")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
index b517af417e0e..2c6e417c5bca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void rtw8723d_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable)
 	ldo_pwr = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3);
 	if (enable) {
 		ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_MASK_LDO25_VOLTAGE;
-		ldo_pwr = (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN;
+		ldo_pwr |= (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN;
 	} else {
 		ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_LDO25_EN;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr
  2020-05-14 18:13 ` Colin King
@ 2020-05-15  0:26   ` Pkshih
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pkshih @ 2020-05-15  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tony Chuang, colin.king, kvalo, linux-wireless, davem, netdev
  Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 18:13 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently ldo_pwr has the LDO25 voltage bits set to zero and then
> it is overwritten with the new voltage setting. The assignment
> looks incorrect, it should be bit-wise or'ing in the new voltage
> setting rather than a direct assignment.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Fixes: 1afb5eb7a00d ("rtw88: 8723d: Add cfg_ldo25 to control LDO25")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Thank you for your fix.

Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
> index b517af417e0e..2c6e417c5bca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void rtw8723d_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> bool enable)
>  	ldo_pwr = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3);
>  	if (enable) {
>  		ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_MASK_LDO25_VOLTAGE;
> -		ldo_pwr = (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN;
> +		ldo_pwr |= (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN;
>  	} else {
>  		ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_LDO25_EN;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr
@ 2020-05-15  0:26   ` Pkshih
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pkshih @ 2020-05-15  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tony Chuang, colin.king, kvalo, linux-wireless, davem, netdev
  Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr
  2020-05-14 18:13 ` Colin King
@ 2020-05-18 12:17   ` Kalle Valo
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-05-18 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King
  Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang, David S . Miller, Ping-Ke Shih, linux-wireless,
	netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently ldo_pwr has the LDO25 voltage bits set to zero and then
> it is overwritten with the new voltage setting. The assignment
> looks incorrect, it should be bit-wise or'ing in the new voltage
> setting rather than a direct assignment.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Fixes: 1afb5eb7a00d ("rtw88: 8723d: Add cfg_ldo25 to control LDO25")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

c5457559b626 rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11549469/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr
@ 2020-05-18 12:17   ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-05-18 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King
  Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang, David S . Miller, Ping-Ke Shih, linux-wireless,
	netdev, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently ldo_pwr has the LDO25 voltage bits set to zero and then
> it is overwritten with the new voltage setting. The assignment
> looks incorrect, it should be bit-wise or'ing in the new voltage
> setting rather than a direct assignment.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Fixes: 1afb5eb7a00d ("rtw88: 8723d: Add cfg_ldo25 to control LDO25")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

c5457559b626 rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11549469/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-18 12:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-14 18:13 [PATCH][next] rtw88: 8723d: fix incorrect setting of ldo_pwr Colin King
2020-05-14 18:13 ` Colin King
2020-05-15  0:26 ` Pkshih
2020-05-15  0:26   ` Pkshih
2020-05-18 12:17 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-18 12:17   ` Kalle Valo

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.