All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kuohong.wang@mediatek.com" <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"peter.wang@mediatek.com" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"andy.teng@mediatek.com" <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
	"chaotian.jing@mediatek.com" <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	"cc.chou@mediatek.com" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 09:26:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594517160.10600.33.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB4640BEAFE18BDC933FC7EC95FC640@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Avri,

On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 08:31 +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> > 
> > If somehow no interrupt notification is raised for a completed request
> > and its doorbell bit is cleared by host, UFS driver needs to cleanup
> > its outstanding bit in ufshcd_abort().
> Theoretically, this case is already accounted for - 
> See line 6407: a proper error is issued and eventually outstanding req is cleared.
> 
> Can you go over the scenario you are attending line by line,
> And explain why ufshcd_abort does not account for it?

Sure.

If a request using tag N is completed by UFS device without interrupt
notification till timeout happens, ufshcd_abort() will be invoked.

Since request completion flow is not executed, current status may be

- Tag N in hba->outstanding_reqs is set
- Tag N in doorbell register is not set

In this case, ufshcd_abort() flow would be

- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd was completed, but without a
notifying intr, tag = N"
- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: Device abort task at tag N"
- If hba->req_abort_skip is zero, QUERY_TASK command is sent
- Device responds "UPIU_TASK_MANAGEMENT_FUNC_COMPL"
- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd at tag N not pending in the
device."
- Doorbell tells that tag N is not set, so the driver goes to label
"out" with this log printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd at tag %d successfully
cleared from DB."
- In label "out" section, no cleanup will be made, and then ufshcd_abort
exits
- This request will be re-queued to request queue by SCSI timeout
handler

Now, Inconsistent state shows-up: A request is "re-queued" but its
corresponding resource in UFS layer is not cleared, below flow will
trigger bad things,

- A new request with tag M is finished
- Interrupt is raised and ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() found both tag N
and M can process the completion flow
- The post-processing flow for tag N will be executed while its request
is still alive

I am sorry that below messages are only for old kernel in non-blk-mq
case. However above scenario will also trigger bad thing in blk-mq case.

> 
> > 
> > Otherwise, system may crash by below abnormal flow:
> > 
> > After this request is requeued by SCSI layer with its
> > outstanding bit set, the next completed request will trigger
> > ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() to handle all "completed outstanding
> > bits". In this time, the "abnormal outstanding bit" will be detected
> > and the "requeued request" will be chosen to execute request
> > post-processing flow. This is wrong and blk_finish_request() will
> > BUG_ON because this request is still "alive".
> > 
> > It is worth mentioning that before ufshcd_abort() cleans the timed-out
> > request, driver need to check again if this request is really not
> > handled by __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() yet because it may be
> > possible that the interrupt comes very lately before the cleaning.
> What do you mean? Why checking the outstanding reqs isn't enough?
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index 8603b07045a6..f23fb14df9f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -6462,7 +6462,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> >                         /* command completed already */
> >                         dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: cmd at tag %d successfully cleared from
> > DB.\n",
> >                                 __func__, tag);
> > -                       goto out;
> > +                       goto cleanup;
> But you've arrived here only if (!(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) - 
> See line 6400. 
> 
> >                 } else {
> >                         dev_err(hba->dev,
> >                                 "%s: no response from device. tag = %d, err %d\n",
> > @@ -6496,9 +6496,14 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> >                 goto out;
> >         }
> > 
> > +cleanup:
> > +       spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> > +       if (!test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs)) {
> > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> > +               goto out;
> > +       }
> >         scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);
> > 
> > -       spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> >         ufshcd_outstanding_req_clear(hba, tag);
> >         hba->lrb[tag].cmd = NULL;
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> > --
> > 2.18.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"andy.teng@mediatek.com" <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"kuohong.wang@mediatek.com" <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cc.chou@mediatek.com" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"peter.wang@mediatek.com" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	"chaotian.jing@mediatek.com" <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 09:26:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594517160.10600.33.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB4640BEAFE18BDC933FC7EC95FC640@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Avri,

On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 08:31 +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> > 
> > If somehow no interrupt notification is raised for a completed request
> > and its doorbell bit is cleared by host, UFS driver needs to cleanup
> > its outstanding bit in ufshcd_abort().
> Theoretically, this case is already accounted for - 
> See line 6407: a proper error is issued and eventually outstanding req is cleared.
> 
> Can you go over the scenario you are attending line by line,
> And explain why ufshcd_abort does not account for it?

Sure.

If a request using tag N is completed by UFS device without interrupt
notification till timeout happens, ufshcd_abort() will be invoked.

Since request completion flow is not executed, current status may be

- Tag N in hba->outstanding_reqs is set
- Tag N in doorbell register is not set

In this case, ufshcd_abort() flow would be

- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd was completed, but without a
notifying intr, tag = N"
- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: Device abort task at tag N"
- If hba->req_abort_skip is zero, QUERY_TASK command is sent
- Device responds "UPIU_TASK_MANAGEMENT_FUNC_COMPL"
- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd at tag N not pending in the
device."
- Doorbell tells that tag N is not set, so the driver goes to label
"out" with this log printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd at tag %d successfully
cleared from DB."
- In label "out" section, no cleanup will be made, and then ufshcd_abort
exits
- This request will be re-queued to request queue by SCSI timeout
handler

Now, Inconsistent state shows-up: A request is "re-queued" but its
corresponding resource in UFS layer is not cleared, below flow will
trigger bad things,

- A new request with tag M is finished
- Interrupt is raised and ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() found both tag N
and M can process the completion flow
- The post-processing flow for tag N will be executed while its request
is still alive

I am sorry that below messages are only for old kernel in non-blk-mq
case. However above scenario will also trigger bad thing in blk-mq case.

> 
> > 
> > Otherwise, system may crash by below abnormal flow:
> > 
> > After this request is requeued by SCSI layer with its
> > outstanding bit set, the next completed request will trigger
> > ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() to handle all "completed outstanding
> > bits". In this time, the "abnormal outstanding bit" will be detected
> > and the "requeued request" will be chosen to execute request
> > post-processing flow. This is wrong and blk_finish_request() will
> > BUG_ON because this request is still "alive".
> > 
> > It is worth mentioning that before ufshcd_abort() cleans the timed-out
> > request, driver need to check again if this request is really not
> > handled by __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() yet because it may be
> > possible that the interrupt comes very lately before the cleaning.
> What do you mean? Why checking the outstanding reqs isn't enough?
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index 8603b07045a6..f23fb14df9f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -6462,7 +6462,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> >                         /* command completed already */
> >                         dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: cmd at tag %d successfully cleared from
> > DB.\n",
> >                                 __func__, tag);
> > -                       goto out;
> > +                       goto cleanup;
> But you've arrived here only if (!(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) - 
> See line 6400. 
> 
> >                 } else {
> >                         dev_err(hba->dev,
> >                                 "%s: no response from device. tag = %d, err %d\n",
> > @@ -6496,9 +6496,14 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> >                 goto out;
> >         }
> > 
> > +cleanup:
> > +       spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> > +       if (!test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs)) {
> > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> > +               goto out;
> > +       }
> >         scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);
> > 
> > -       spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> >         ufshcd_outstanding_req_clear(hba, tag);
> >         hba->lrb[tag].cmd = NULL;
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> > --
> > 2.18.0

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"andy.teng@mediatek.com" <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"kuohong.wang@mediatek.com" <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cc.chou@mediatek.com" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"peter.wang@mediatek.com" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	"chaotian.jing@mediatek.com" <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 09:26:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594517160.10600.33.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB4640BEAFE18BDC933FC7EC95FC640@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Avri,

On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 08:31 +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> > 
> > If somehow no interrupt notification is raised for a completed request
> > and its doorbell bit is cleared by host, UFS driver needs to cleanup
> > its outstanding bit in ufshcd_abort().
> Theoretically, this case is already accounted for - 
> See line 6407: a proper error is issued and eventually outstanding req is cleared.
> 
> Can you go over the scenario you are attending line by line,
> And explain why ufshcd_abort does not account for it?

Sure.

If a request using tag N is completed by UFS device without interrupt
notification till timeout happens, ufshcd_abort() will be invoked.

Since request completion flow is not executed, current status may be

- Tag N in hba->outstanding_reqs is set
- Tag N in doorbell register is not set

In this case, ufshcd_abort() flow would be

- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd was completed, but without a
notifying intr, tag = N"
- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: Device abort task at tag N"
- If hba->req_abort_skip is zero, QUERY_TASK command is sent
- Device responds "UPIU_TASK_MANAGEMENT_FUNC_COMPL"
- This log is printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd at tag N not pending in the
device."
- Doorbell tells that tag N is not set, so the driver goes to label
"out" with this log printed: "ufshcd_abort: cmd at tag %d successfully
cleared from DB."
- In label "out" section, no cleanup will be made, and then ufshcd_abort
exits
- This request will be re-queued to request queue by SCSI timeout
handler

Now, Inconsistent state shows-up: A request is "re-queued" but its
corresponding resource in UFS layer is not cleared, below flow will
trigger bad things,

- A new request with tag M is finished
- Interrupt is raised and ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() found both tag N
and M can process the completion flow
- The post-processing flow for tag N will be executed while its request
is still alive

I am sorry that below messages are only for old kernel in non-blk-mq
case. However above scenario will also trigger bad thing in blk-mq case.

> 
> > 
> > Otherwise, system may crash by below abnormal flow:
> > 
> > After this request is requeued by SCSI layer with its
> > outstanding bit set, the next completed request will trigger
> > ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() to handle all "completed outstanding
> > bits". In this time, the "abnormal outstanding bit" will be detected
> > and the "requeued request" will be chosen to execute request
> > post-processing flow. This is wrong and blk_finish_request() will
> > BUG_ON because this request is still "alive".
> > 
> > It is worth mentioning that before ufshcd_abort() cleans the timed-out
> > request, driver need to check again if this request is really not
> > handled by __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() yet because it may be
> > possible that the interrupt comes very lately before the cleaning.
> What do you mean? Why checking the outstanding reqs isn't enough?
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index 8603b07045a6..f23fb14df9f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -6462,7 +6462,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> >                         /* command completed already */
> >                         dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: cmd at tag %d successfully cleared from
> > DB.\n",
> >                                 __func__, tag);
> > -                       goto out;
> > +                       goto cleanup;
> But you've arrived here only if (!(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) - 
> See line 6400. 
> 
> >                 } else {
> >                         dev_err(hba->dev,
> >                                 "%s: no response from device. tag = %d, err %d\n",
> > @@ -6496,9 +6496,14 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> >                 goto out;
> >         }
> > 
> > +cleanup:
> > +       spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> > +       if (!test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs)) {
> > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> > +               goto out;
> > +       }
> >         scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);
> > 
> > -       spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> >         ufshcd_outstanding_req_clear(hba, tag);
> >         hba->lrb[tag].cmd = NULL;
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> > --
> > 2.18.0

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-12  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-06 13:21 [PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification Stanley Chu
2020-07-06 13:21 ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-06 13:21 ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-09  8:31 ` Avri Altman
2020-07-09  8:31   ` Avri Altman
2020-07-09  8:31   ` Avri Altman
2020-07-12  1:26   ` Stanley Chu [this message]
2020-07-12  1:26     ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-12  1:26     ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-12 10:04     ` Avri Altman
2020-07-12 10:04       ` Avri Altman
2020-07-12 10:04       ` Avri Altman
2020-07-14  8:48       ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-14  8:48         ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-14  8:48         ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-14  9:29         ` Avri Altman
2020-07-14  9:29           ` Avri Altman
2020-07-14  9:29           ` Avri Altman
2020-07-14 10:00           ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-14 10:00             ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-14 10:00             ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-13  1:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  1:39   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  1:39   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  2:27   ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-13  2:27     ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-13  2:27     ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-13  8:10     ` Avri Altman
2020-07-13  8:10       ` Avri Altman
2020-07-13  8:10       ` Avri Altman
2020-07-15  4:00       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-15  4:00         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-15  4:00         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-22 10:07         ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-22 10:07           ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-22 10:07           ` Stanley Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1594517160.10600.33.camel@mtkswgap22 \
    --to=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.