* [PATCH -next] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 3:41 Mao Wenan
2020-08-02 4:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mao Wenan @ 2020-08-02 3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, jasowang, davem, kuba; +Cc: netdev, Mao Wenan
The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
call trace as below:
virtnet_poll
virtnet_receive
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
virtqueue_napi_complete
virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ba38765..a058da1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(vq);
if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed)) {
- if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
+ if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)) &&
+ unlikely(!virtqueue_is_broken(vq)))
virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
} else {
virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
2020-08-02 3:41 [PATCH -next] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll Mao Wenan
@ 2020-08-02 4:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 5:56 ` Mao Wenan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: jasowang, davem, kuba, netdev
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 11:41:23AM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
I think it's more a bug in virtqueue_poll : virtqueue_get_buf reports
NULL on broken, so virtqueue_poll should report false for consistency.
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index ba38765..a058da1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
>
> opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(vq);
> if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed)) {
> - if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
> + if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)) &&
> + unlikely(!virtqueue_is_broken(vq)))
> virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
> } else {
> virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
2020-08-02 4:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2020-08-02 5:56 ` Mao Wenan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mao Wenan @ 2020-08-02 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, jasowang; +Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Mao Wenan
The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
call trace as below:
virtnet_poll
virtnet_receive
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
virtqueue_napi_complete
virtqueue_poll //return true
virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
---
v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
+ if (unlikely(vq->broken))
+ return false;
+
virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 5:56 ` Mao Wenan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mao Wenan @ 2020-08-02 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, jasowang; +Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Mao Wenan
The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
call trace as below:
virtnet_poll
virtnet_receive
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
virtqueue_napi_complete
virtqueue_poll //return true
virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
---
v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
+ if (unlikely(vq->broken))
+ return false;
+
virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
2020-08-02 5:56 ` Mao Wenan
(?)
@ 2020-08-02 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: jasowang, virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:56:33PM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
Looks good:
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: jasowang, virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:56:33PM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
Looks good:
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, virtualization
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:56:33PM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
Looks good:
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
2020-08-02 5:56 ` Mao Wenan
(?)
@ 2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: jasowang, virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Just noticed the subject is wrong: this is no longer
a virtio_net patch.
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:56:33PM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: jasowang, virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Just noticed the subject is wrong: this is no longer
a virtio_net patch.
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:56:33PM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-02 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan; +Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, virtualization
Just noticed the subject is wrong: this is no longer
a virtio_net patch.
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:56:33PM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> To fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2020-08-02 7:31 ` maowenan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: maowenan @ 2020-08-02 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: jasowang, virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On 8/2/20 2:26 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> Just noticed the subject is wrong: this is no longer
> a virtio_net patch.
thanks, I will change the subject and send v3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v2] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll
@ 2020-08-02 7:31 ` maowenan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: maowenan @ 2020-08-02 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: jasowang, virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On 8/2/20 2:26 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> Just noticed the subject is wrong: this is no longer
> a virtio_net patch.
thanks, I will change the subject and send v3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH -next v3] virtio_ring: Avoid loop when vq is broken in virtqueue_poll
2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2020-08-02 7:44 ` Mao Wenan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mao Wenan @ 2020-08-02 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, jasowang; +Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Mao Wenan
The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
call trace as below:
virtnet_poll
virtnet_receive
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
virtqueue_napi_complete
virtqueue_poll //return true
virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
to fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
v2->v3: change subject, original is : "virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll"
v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
+ if (unlikely(vq->broken))
+ return false;
+
virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH -next v3] virtio_ring: Avoid loop when vq is broken in virtqueue_poll
@ 2020-08-02 7:44 ` Mao Wenan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mao Wenan @ 2020-08-02 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, jasowang; +Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Mao Wenan
The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
call trace as below:
virtnet_poll
virtnet_receive
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
virtqueue_napi_complete
virtqueue_poll //return true
virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
to fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
v2->v3: change subject, original is : "virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll"
v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
+ if (unlikely(vq->broken))
+ return false;
+
virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v3] virtio_ring: Avoid loop when vq is broken in virtqueue_poll
2020-08-02 7:44 ` Mao Wenan
(?)
@ 2020-08-04 2:42 ` Jason Wang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2020-08-04 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan, mst; +Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On 2020/8/2 下午3:44, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> to fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2->v3: change subject, original is : "virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll"
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v3] virtio_ring: Avoid loop when vq is broken in virtqueue_poll
@ 2020-08-04 2:42 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2020-08-04 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan, mst; +Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On 2020/8/2 下午3:44, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> to fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2->v3: change subject, original is : "virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll"
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v3] virtio_ring: Avoid loop when vq is broken in virtqueue_poll
@ 2020-08-04 2:42 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2020-08-04 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mao Wenan, mst; +Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, virtualization
On 2020/8/2 下午3:44, Mao Wenan wrote:
> The loop may exist if vq->broken is true,
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed or virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> will return NULL, so virtnet_poll will reschedule napi to
> receive packet, it will lead cpu usage(si) to 100%.
>
> call trace as below:
> virtnet_poll
> virtnet_receive
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed
> virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split
> virtqueue_napi_complete
> virtqueue_poll //return true
> virtqueue_napi_schedule //it will reschedule napi
>
> to fix this, return false if vq is broken in virtqueue_poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2->v3: change subject, original is : "virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll"
> v1->v2: fix it in virtqueue_poll suggested by Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96ba..4f7c73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1960,6 +1960,9 @@ bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> + if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> + return false;
> +
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_poll_packed(_vq, last_used_idx) :
> virtqueue_poll_split(_vq, last_used_idx);
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-04 2:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-02 3:41 [PATCH -next] virtio_net: Avoid loop in virtnet_poll Mao Wenan
2020-08-02 4:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 5:56 ` [PATCH -next v2] " Mao Wenan
2020-08-02 5:56 ` Mao Wenan
2020-08-02 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-08-02 7:31 ` maowenan
2020-08-02 7:31 ` maowenan
2020-08-02 7:44 ` [PATCH -next v3] virtio_ring: Avoid loop when vq is broken in virtqueue_poll Mao Wenan
2020-08-02 7:44 ` Mao Wenan
2020-08-04 2:42 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-04 2:42 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-04 2:42 ` Jason Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.