* [PATCH v2] seqlock: <linux/seqlock.h>: fix multiple kernel-doc warnings
@ 2020-08-17 0:02 Randy Dunlap
2020-08-19 9:25 ` peterz
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Fix " tip-bot2 for Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2020-08-17 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Randy Dunlap, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, kernel test robot
Fix kernel-doc warnings in <linux/seqlock.h>.
../include/linux/seqlock.h:152: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
../include/linux/seqlock.h:164: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'seq_name' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'assoc_lock' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'name' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'lock' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:695: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
Demote kernel-doc notation for the macros "seqcount_LOCKNAME_init()" and
"SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE()"; scripts/kernel-doc does not handle them correctly.
Rename function parameters in SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO() documentation
to match the macro's argument names. Change the macro name in the
documentation to SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() to match the macro's name.
For raw_write_seqcount_latch(), rename the second NOTE: to NOTE2:
to prevent a kernel-doc warning. However, the generated output is not
quite as nice as it could be for this.
Fix a typo: s/LOCKTYPR/LOCKTYPE/
Fixes: 0efc94c5d15c ("seqcount: Compress SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO()")
Fixes: e4e9ab3f9f91 ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition")
Fixes: a8772dccb2ec ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_t definition")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
v2: do not move the definition of seqcount_LOCKNAME_init().
Fix build errors reported by kernel test robot.
Actually build a kernel with these changes.
include/linux/seqlock.h | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- lnx-59-rc1.orig/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ lnx-59-rc1/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_read
#endif
/**
- * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPR associated
+ * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPE associated
* @seqcount: The real sequence counter
* @lock: Pointer to the associated spinlock
*
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_read
* that the write side critical section is properly serialized.
*/
-/**
+/*
* seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
* @s: Pointer to the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance
* @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE
@@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ seqcount_##lockname##_init(seqcount_##lo
seqcount_init(&s->seqcount); \
__SEQ_LOCK(s->lock = lock); \
} \
- \
static __always_inline seqcount_t * \
__seqcount_##lockname##_ptr(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s) \
{ \
@@ -218,9 +217,9 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex,
SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base)
/**
- * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
- * @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance
- * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE
+ * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
+ * @seq_name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance
+ * @assoc_lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE
*/
#define SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO(seq_name, assoc_lock) { \
@@ -688,7 +687,7 @@ static inline int raw_read_seqcount_t_la
* to miss an entire modification sequence, once it resumes it might
* observe the new entry.
*
- * NOTE:
+ * NOTE2:
*
* When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU
* patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] seqlock: <linux/seqlock.h>: fix multiple kernel-doc warnings 2020-08-17 0:02 [PATCH v2] seqlock: <linux/seqlock.h>: fix multiple kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap @ 2020-08-19 9:25 ` peterz 2020-08-19 16:52 ` Randy Dunlap 2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Fix " tip-bot2 for Randy Dunlap 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: peterz @ 2020-08-19 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, kernel test robot On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 05:02:00PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > --- lnx-59-rc1.orig/include/linux/seqlock.h > +++ lnx-59-rc1/include/linux/seqlock.h > @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ seqcount_##lockname##_init(seqcount_##lo > seqcount_init(&s->seqcount); \ > __SEQ_LOCK(s->lock = lock); \ > } \ > - \ > static __always_inline seqcount_t * \ > __seqcount_##lockname##_ptr(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s) \ > { \ I think I'd rather like that empty line there.. > @@ -218,9 +217,9 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, > SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base) > > /** > - * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t > - * @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance > - * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE > + * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t > + * @seq_name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance > + * @assoc_lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE > */ > > #define SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO(seq_name, assoc_lock) { \ And this hunk seems wrong, SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() is not the intended API, SEQCNT_*_ZERO() are. I've edited the patch like below, is that OK with you? --- Subject: seqlock: Fix multiple kernel-doc warnings From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:02:00 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Fix kernel-doc warnings in <linux/seqlock.h>. ../include/linux/seqlock.h:152: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t ../include/linux/seqlock.h:164: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'seq_name' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'assoc_lock' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'name' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'lock' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:695: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE' Demote kernel-doc notation for the macros "seqcount_LOCKNAME_init()" and "SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE()"; scripts/kernel-doc does not handle them correctly. Rename function parameters in SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO() documentation to match the macro's argument names. Change the macro name in the documentation to SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() to match the macro's name. For raw_write_seqcount_latch(), rename the second NOTE: to NOTE2: to prevent a kernel-doc warning. However, the generated output is not quite as nice as it could be for this. Fix a typo: s/LOCKTYPR/LOCKTYPE/ Fixes: 0efc94c5d15c ("seqcount: Compress SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO()") Fixes: e4e9ab3f9f91 ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition") Fixes: a8772dccb2ec ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_t definition") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817000200.20993-1-rdunlap@infradead.org --- v2: do not move the definition of seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(). Fix build errors reported by kernel test robot. Actually build a kernel with these changes. include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_read #endif /** - * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPR associated + * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPE associated * @seqcount: The real sequence counter * @lock: Pointer to the associated spinlock * @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_read * that the write side critical section is properly serialized. */ -/** +/* * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t * @s: Pointer to the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(rwlock_t, rwlock, fa SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, true, s->lock) SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base) -/** +/* * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t * @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static inline int raw_read_seqcount_t_la * to miss an entire modification sequence, once it resumes it might * observe the new entry. * - * NOTE: + * NOTE2: * * When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU * patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] seqlock: <linux/seqlock.h>: fix multiple kernel-doc warnings 2020-08-19 9:25 ` peterz @ 2020-08-19 16:52 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2020-08-19 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, kernel test robot On 8/19/20 2:25 AM, peterz@infradead.org wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 05:02:00PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> --- lnx-59-rc1.orig/include/linux/seqlock.h >> +++ lnx-59-rc1/include/linux/seqlock.h > >> @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ seqcount_##lockname##_init(seqcount_##lo >> seqcount_init(&s->seqcount); \ >> __SEQ_LOCK(s->lock = lock); \ >> } \ >> - \ >> static __always_inline seqcount_t * \ >> __seqcount_##lockname##_ptr(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s) \ >> { \ > > I think I'd rather like that empty line there.. > >> @@ -218,9 +217,9 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, >> SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base) >> >> /** >> - * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t >> - * @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance >> - * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE >> + * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t >> + * @seq_name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance >> + * @assoc_lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE >> */ >> >> #define SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO(seq_name, assoc_lock) { \ > > And this hunk seems wrong, SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() is not the intended > API, SEQCNT_*_ZERO() are. > > > I've edited the patch like below, is that OK with you? Hi Peter, Yes, this looks good. Thanks for your help. > --- > Subject: seqlock: Fix multiple kernel-doc warnings > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:02:00 -0700 > > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > > Fix kernel-doc warnings in <linux/seqlock.h>. > > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:152: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:164: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'seq_name' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'assoc_lock' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'name' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'lock' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' > ../include/linux/seqlock.h:695: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE' > > Demote kernel-doc notation for the macros "seqcount_LOCKNAME_init()" and > "SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE()"; scripts/kernel-doc does not handle them correctly. > > Rename function parameters in SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO() documentation > to match the macro's argument names. Change the macro name in the > documentation to SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() to match the macro's name. > > For raw_write_seqcount_latch(), rename the second NOTE: to NOTE2: > to prevent a kernel-doc warning. However, the generated output is not > quite as nice as it could be for this. > > Fix a typo: s/LOCKTYPR/LOCKTYPE/ > > Fixes: 0efc94c5d15c ("seqcount: Compress SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO()") > Fixes: e4e9ab3f9f91 ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition") > Fixes: a8772dccb2ec ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_t definition") > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817000200.20993-1-rdunlap@infradead.org > --- > v2: do not move the definition of seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(). > Fix build errors reported by kernel test robot. > Actually build a kernel with these changes. > > include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h > +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_read > #endif > > /** > - * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPR associated > + * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPE associated > * @seqcount: The real sequence counter > * @lock: Pointer to the associated spinlock > * > @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_read > * that the write side critical section is properly serialized. > */ > > -/** > +/* > * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t > * @s: Pointer to the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance > * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(rwlock_t, rwlock, fa > SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, true, s->lock) > SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base) > > -/** > +/* > * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t > * @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance > * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE > @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static inline int raw_read_seqcount_t_la > * to miss an entire modification sequence, once it resumes it might > * observe the new entry. > * > - * NOTE: > + * NOTE2: > * > * When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU > * patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within. > -- ~Randy Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Fix multiple kernel-doc warnings 2020-08-17 0:02 [PATCH v2] seqlock: <linux/seqlock.h>: fix multiple kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap 2020-08-19 9:25 ` peterz @ 2020-08-27 7:54 ` tip-bot2 for Randy Dunlap 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: tip-bot2 for Randy Dunlap @ 2020-08-27 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: kernel test robot, Randy Dunlap, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), x86, LKML The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip: Commit-ID: a28e884b966e713da29caefbb347efea77367d22 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a28e884b966e713da29caefbb347efea77367d22 Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> AuthorDate: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:02:00 -07:00 Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> CommitterDate: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:42:02 +02:00 seqlock: Fix multiple kernel-doc warnings Fix kernel-doc warnings in <linux/seqlock.h>. ../include/linux/seqlock.h:152: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t ../include/linux/seqlock.h:164: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'seq_name' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'assoc_lock' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'name' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'lock' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO' ../include/linux/seqlock.h:695: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE' Demote kernel-doc notation for the macros "seqcount_LOCKNAME_init()" and "SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE()"; scripts/kernel-doc does not handle them correctly. Rename function parameters in SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO() documentation to match the macro's argument names. Change the macro name in the documentation to SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() to match the macro's name. For raw_write_seqcount_latch(), rename the second NOTE: to NOTE2: to prevent a kernel-doc warning. However, the generated output is not quite as nice as it could be for this. Fix a typo: s/LOCKTYPR/LOCKTYPE/ Fixes: 0efc94c5d15c ("seqcount: Compress SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO()") Fixes: e4e9ab3f9f91 ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition") Fixes: a8772dccb2ec ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_t definition") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817000200.20993-1-rdunlap@infradead.org --- include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h index 962d976..300cbf3 100644 --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) #endif /** - * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPR associated + * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPE associated * @seqcount: The real sequence counter * @lock: Pointer to the associated spinlock * @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) * that the write side critical section is properly serialized. */ -/** +/* * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t * @s: Pointer to the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(rwlock_t, rwlock, false, s->lock) SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, true, s->lock) SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base) -/** +/* * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t * @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance * @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static inline int raw_read_seqcount_t_latch(seqcount_t *s) * to miss an entire modification sequence, once it resumes it might * observe the new entry. * - * NOTE: + * NOTE2: * * When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU * patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-27 7:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-08-17 0:02 [PATCH v2] seqlock: <linux/seqlock.h>: fix multiple kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap 2020-08-19 9:25 ` peterz 2020-08-19 16:52 ` Randy Dunlap 2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Fix " tip-bot2 for Randy Dunlap
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.