All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/10] bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

This series adds support attaching freplace BPF programs to multiple targets.
This is needed to support incremental attachment of multiple XDP programs using
the libxdp dispatcher model.

The first patch fixes an issue that came up in review: The verifier will
currently allow MODIFY_RETURN tracing functions to attach to other BPF programs,
even though it is pretty clear from the commit messages introducing the
functionality that this was not the intention. This patch is included in the
serise because the subsequent refactoring patches touch the same code.

The next three patches are refactoring patches: Patch 2 is a trivial change to
the logging in the verifier, split out to make the subsequent refactor easier to
read. Patch 3 refactors check_attach_btf_id() so that the checks on program and
target compatibility can be reused when attaching to a secondary location.

Patch 4 moves prog_aux->linked_prog and the trampoline to be embedded in
bpf_tracing_link on attach, and freed by the link release logic, and introduces
a mutex to protect the writing of the pointers in prog->aux.

Based on these refactorings, it becomes pretty straight-forward to support
multiple-attach for freplace programs (patch 5). This is simply a matter of
creating a second bpf_tracing_link if a target is supplied. However, for API
consistency with other types of link attach, this option is added to the
BPF_LINK_CREATE API instead of extending bpf_raw_tracepoint_open().

Patch 6 is a port of Jiri Olsa's patch to support fentry/fexit on freplace
programs. His approach of getting the target type from the target program
reference no longer works after we've gotten rid of linked_prog (because the
bpf_tracing_link reference disappears on attach). Instead, we used the saved
reference to the target prog type that is also used to verify compatibility on
secondary freplace attachment.

Patches 7 is the accompanying libbpf update, and patches 8-10 are selftests:
patch 8 tests for the multi-freplace functionality itself, patch 9 is Jiri's
previous selftest for the fentry-to-freplace fix, and patch 10 is a test for
the change introduced in patch 1, blocking MODIFY_RETURN functions from
attaching to other BPF programs.

With this series, libxdp and xdp-tools can successfully attach multiple programs
one at a time. To play with this, use the 'freplace-multi-attach' branch of
xdp-tools:

$ git clone --recurse-submodules --branch freplace-multi-attach https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tools
$ cd xdp-tools
$ make
$ sudo ./xdp-loader/xdp-loader load veth0 lib/testing/xdp_drop.o
$ sudo ./xdp-loader/xdp-loader load veth0 lib/testing/xdp_pass.o
$ sudo ./xdp-loader/xdp-loader status

The series is also available here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/toke/linux.git/log/?h=bpf-freplace-multi-attach-alt-06

Changelog:

v6:
  - Rebase to latest bpf-next
  - Simplify logic in bpf_tracing_prog_attach()
  - Don't create a new attach_type for link_create(), disambiguate on prog->type
    instead
  - Use raw_tracepoint_open() in libbpf bpf_program__attach_ftrace() if called
    with NULL target
  - Switch bpf_program__attach_ftrace() to take function name as parameter
    instead of btf_id
  - Add a patch disallowing MODIFY_RETURN programs from attaching to other BPF
    programs, and an accompanying selftest (patches 1 and 10)

v5:
  - Fix typo in inline function definition of bpf_trampoline_get()
  - Don't put bpf_tracing_link in prog->aux, use a mutex to protect tgt_prog and
    trampoline instead, and move them to the link on attach.
  - Restore Jiri as author of the last selftest patch

v4:
  - Cleanup the refactored check_attach_btf_id() to make the logic easier to follow
  - Fix cleanup paths for bpf_tracing_link
  - Use xchg() for removing the bpf_tracing_link from prog->aux and restore on (some) failures
  - Use BPF_LINK_CREATE operation to create link with target instead of extending raw_tracepoint_open
  - Fold update of tools/ UAPI header into main patch
  - Update arg dereference patch to use skeletons and set_attach_target()

v3:
  - Get rid of prog_aux->linked_prog entirely in favour of a bpf_tracing_link
  - Incorporate Jiri's fix for attaching fentry to freplace programs

v2:
  - Drop the log arguments from bpf_raw_tracepoint_open
  - Fix kbot errors
  - Rebase to latest bpf-next

---

Jiri Olsa (1):
      selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (9):
      bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs
      bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointer
      bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()
      bpf: move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach
      bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points
      bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs
      libbpf: add support for freplace attachment in bpf_link_create
      selftests: add test for multiple attachments of freplace program
      selftests: Add selftest for disallowing modify_return attachment to freplace


 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  26 +-
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h                  |  14 +-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   9 +-
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  21 +-
 kernel/bpf/core.c                             |   9 +-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 136 ++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       |  32 ++-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         | 247 ++++++++++--------
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   9 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           |   1 +
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |   3 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        |  36 ++-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |   3 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c  | 225 +++++++++++++---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c      | 111 ++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c   |  14 +
 .../bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c         |  15 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c      |  18 ++
 .../bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c        |  25 ++
 20 files changed, 765 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/10] bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/10] bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

From the checks and commit messages for modify_return, it seems it was
never the intention that it should be possible to attach a tracing program
with expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN to another BPF program.
However, check_attach_modify_return() will only look at the function name,
so if the target function starts with "security_", the attach will be
allowed even for bpf2bpf attachment.

Fix this oversight by also blocking the modification if a target program is
supplied.

Fixes: 18644cec714a ("bpf: Fix use-after-free in fmod_ret check")
Fixes: 6ba43b761c41 ("bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 814bc6c1ad16..da9c828a43dc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11295,7 +11295,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 					prog->aux->attach_func_name);
 		} else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) {
 			ret = check_attach_modify_return(prog, addr);
-			if (ret)
+			if (ret || tgt_prog)
 				verbose(env, "%s() is not modifiable\n",
 					prog->aux->attach_func_name);
 		}


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/10] bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointer
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/10] bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/10] bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

In preparation for moving code around, change a bunch of references to
env->log (and the verbose() logging helper) to use bpf_log() and a direct
pointer to struct bpf_verifier_log. While we're touching the function
signature, mark the 'prog' argument to bpf_check_type_match() as const.

Also enhance the bpf_verifier_log_needed() check to handle NULL pointers
for the log struct so we can re-use the code with logging disabled.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |    2 +-
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |    5 +++-
 kernel/bpf/btf.c             |    6 +++--
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 5dcce0364634..52db2b2a9826 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
 			     struct bpf_reg_state *regs);
 int btf_prepare_func_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
 			  struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
-int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			 struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t);
 
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_by_id(u32 id);
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 53c7bd568c5d..20009e766805 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -347,8 +347,9 @@ static inline bool bpf_verifier_log_full(const struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 
 static inline bool bpf_verifier_log_needed(const struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 {
-	return (log->level && log->ubuf && !bpf_verifier_log_full(log)) ||
-		log->level == BPF_LOG_KERNEL;
+	return log &&
+		((log->level && log->ubuf && !bpf_verifier_log_full(log)) ||
+		 log->level == BPF_LOG_KERNEL);
 }
 
 #define BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS 256
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index f9ac6935ab3c..2ace56c99c36 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -4401,7 +4401,7 @@ static int btf_check_func_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 }
 
 /* Compare BTFs of given program with BTF of target program */
-int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			 struct btf *btf2, const struct btf_type *t2)
 {
 	struct btf *btf1 = prog->aux->btf;
@@ -4409,7 +4409,7 @@ int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	u32 btf_id = 0;
 
 	if (!prog->aux->func_info) {
-		bpf_log(&env->log, "Program extension requires BTF\n");
+		bpf_log(log, "Program extension requires BTF\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -4421,7 +4421,7 @@ int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	if (!t1 || !btf_type_is_func(t1))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	return btf_check_func_type_match(&env->log, btf1, t1, btf2, t2);
+	return btf_check_func_type_match(log, btf1, t1, btf2, t2);
 }
 
 /* Compare BTF of a function with given bpf_reg_state.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index da9c828a43dc..077d666695d1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11043,6 +11043,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
 	bool prog_extension = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
 	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
+	struct bpf_verifier_log *log = &env->log;
 	u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	const char prefix[] = "btf_trace_";
 	struct btf_func_model fmodel;
@@ -11070,23 +11071,23 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!btf_id) {
-		verbose(env, "Tracing programs must provide btf_id\n");
+		bpf_log(log, "Tracing programs must provide btf_id\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
 	if (!btf) {
-		verbose(env,
+		bpf_log(log,
 			"FENTRY/FEXIT program can only be attached to another program annotated with BTF\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	t = btf_type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
 	if (!t) {
-		verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is invalid\n", btf_id);
+		bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is invalid\n", btf_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
 	if (!tname) {
-		verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u doesn't have a name\n", btf_id);
+		bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u doesn't have a name\n", btf_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	if (tgt_prog) {
@@ -11098,18 +11099,18 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				break;
 			}
 		if (subprog == -1) {
-			verbose(env, "Subprog %s doesn't exist\n", tname);
+			bpf_log(log, "Subprog %s doesn't exist\n", tname);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		conservative = aux->func_info_aux[subprog].unreliable;
 		if (prog_extension) {
 			if (conservative) {
-				verbose(env,
+				bpf_log(log,
 					"Cannot replace static functions\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
 			if (!prog->jit_requested) {
-				verbose(env,
+				bpf_log(log,
 					"Extension programs should be JITed\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
@@ -11117,7 +11118,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			prog->expected_attach_type = tgt_prog->expected_attach_type;
 		}
 		if (!tgt_prog->jited) {
-			verbose(env, "Can attach to only JITed progs\n");
+			bpf_log(log, "Can attach to only JITed progs\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		if (tgt_prog->type == prog->type) {
@@ -11125,7 +11126,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			 * Cannot attach program extension to another extension.
 			 * It's ok to attach fentry/fexit to extension program.
 			 */
-			verbose(env, "Cannot recursively attach\n");
+			bpf_log(log, "Cannot recursively attach\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		if (tgt_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
@@ -11147,13 +11148,13 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			 * reasonable stack size. Hence extending fentry is not
 			 * allowed.
 			 */
-			verbose(env, "Cannot extend fentry/fexit\n");
+			bpf_log(log, "Cannot extend fentry/fexit\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		key = ((u64)aux->id) << 32 | btf_id;
 	} else {
 		if (prog_extension) {
-			verbose(env, "Cannot replace kernel functions\n");
+			bpf_log(log, "Cannot replace kernel functions\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		key = btf_id;
@@ -11162,17 +11163,17 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	switch (prog->expected_attach_type) {
 	case BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP:
 		if (tgt_prog) {
-			verbose(env,
+			bpf_log(log,
 				"Only FENTRY/FEXIT progs are attachable to another BPF prog\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		if (!btf_type_is_typedef(t)) {
-			verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a typedef\n",
+			bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a typedef\n",
 				btf_id);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		if (strncmp(prefix, tname, sizeof(prefix) - 1)) {
-			verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u points to wrong type name %s\n",
+			bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u points to wrong type name %s\n",
 				btf_id, tname);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -11195,7 +11196,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		return 0;
 	case BPF_TRACE_ITER:
 		if (!btf_type_is_func(t)) {
-			verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
+			bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
 				btf_id);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -11206,8 +11207,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		prog->aux->attach_func_proto = t;
 		if (!bpf_iter_prog_supported(prog))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(&env->log, btf, t,
-					     tname, &fmodel);
+		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf, t, tname, &fmodel);
 		return ret;
 	default:
 		if (!prog_extension)
@@ -11219,18 +11219,18 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT:
 		prog->aux->attach_func_name = tname;
 		if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
-			ret = bpf_lsm_verify_prog(&env->log, prog);
+			ret = bpf_lsm_verify_prog(log, prog);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 		}
 
 		if (!btf_type_is_func(t)) {
-			verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
+			bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
 				btf_id);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		if (prog_extension &&
-		    btf_check_type_match(env, prog, btf, t))
+		    btf_check_type_match(log, prog, btf, t))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
 		if (!btf_type_is_func_proto(t))
@@ -11249,7 +11249,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			prog->aux->attach_func_proto = NULL;
 			t = NULL;
 		}
-		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(&env->log, btf, t,
+		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf, t,
 					     tname, &tr->func.model);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto out;
@@ -11261,7 +11261,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		} else {
 			addr = kallsyms_lookup_name(tname);
 			if (!addr) {
-				verbose(env,
+				bpf_log(log,
 					"The address of function %s cannot be found\n",
 					tname);
 				ret = -ENOENT;
@@ -11291,12 +11291,12 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				break;
 			}
 			if (ret)
-				verbose(env, "%s is not sleepable\n",
+				bpf_log(log, "%s is not sleepable\n",
 					prog->aux->attach_func_name);
 		} else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) {
 			ret = check_attach_modify_return(prog, addr);
 			if (ret || tgt_prog)
-				verbose(env, "%s() is not modifiable\n",
+				bpf_log(log, "%s() is not modifiable\n",
 					prog->aux->attach_func_name);
 		}
 		if (ret)


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/10] bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/10] bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/10] bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/10] bpf: move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

The check_attach_btf_id() function really does three things:

1. It performs a bunch of checks on the program to ensure that the
   attachment is valid.

2. It stores a bunch of state about the attachment being requested in
   the verifier environment and struct bpf_prog objects.

3. It allocates a trampoline for the attachment.

This patch splits out (1.) and (3.) into separate functions in preparation
for reusing them when the actual attachment is happening (in the
raw_tracepoint_open syscall operation), which will allow tracing programs
to have multiple (compatible) attachments.

No functional change is intended with this patch.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |    7 +
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |    9 ++
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c      |   20 ++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        |  197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 4 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 52db2b2a9826..46383741ff16 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -616,6 +616,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int bpf_dispatcher_nop_func(
 struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_lookup(u64 key);
 int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog);
+struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key, void *addr,
+					  struct btf_func_model *fmodel);
 void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
 #define BPF_DISPATCHER_INIT(_name) {				\
 	.mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(_name.mutex),		\
@@ -672,6 +674,11 @@ static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
+static inline struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key, void *addr,
+							struct btf_func_model *fmodel)
+{
+	return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+}
 static inline void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr) {}
 #define DEFINE_BPF_DISPATCHER(name)
 #define DECLARE_BPF_DISPATCHER(name)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 20009e766805..db3db0b69aad 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -447,4 +447,13 @@ bpf_prog_offload_remove_insns(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 cnt);
 int check_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		  const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno);
 
+int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+			    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+			    const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
+			    u32 btf_id,
+			    struct btf_func_model *fmodel,
+			    long *tgt_addr,
+			    const char **tgt_name,
+			    const struct btf_type **tgt_type);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_VERIFIER_H */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 7dd523a7e32d..e86d32f7f7dc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -336,6 +336,26 @@ int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	return err;
 }
 
+struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key, void *addr,
+					  struct btf_func_model *fmodel)
+{
+	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
+
+	tr = bpf_trampoline_lookup(key);
+	if (!tr)
+		return NULL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&tr->mutex);
+	if (tr->func.addr)
+		goto out;
+
+	memcpy(&tr->func.model, fmodel, sizeof(*fmodel));
+	tr->func.addr = addr;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex);
+	return tr;
+}
+
 void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 {
 	if (!tr)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 077d666695d1..541dd5e09e60 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10997,11 +10997,11 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 }
 #define SECURITY_PREFIX "security_"
 
-static int check_attach_modify_return(struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long addr)
+static int check_attach_modify_return(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long addr,
+				      const char *func_name)
 {
 	if (within_error_injection_list(addr) ||
-	    !strncmp(SECURITY_PREFIX, prog->aux->attach_func_name,
-		     sizeof(SECURITY_PREFIX) - 1))
+	    !strncmp(SECURITY_PREFIX, func_name, sizeof(SECURITY_PREFIX) - 1))
 		return 0;
 
 	return -EINVAL;
@@ -11038,43 +11038,29 @@ static int check_non_sleepable_error_inject(u32 btf_id)
 	return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_non_sleepable_error_inject, btf_id);
 }
 
-static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+			    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+			    const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
+			    u32 btf_id,
+			    struct btf_func_model *fmodel,
+			    long *tgt_addr,
+			    const char **tgt_name,
+			    const struct btf_type **tgt_type)
 {
-	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
 	bool prog_extension = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
-	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
-	struct bpf_verifier_log *log = &env->log;
-	u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	const char prefix[] = "btf_trace_";
-	struct btf_func_model fmodel;
 	int ret = 0, subprog = -1, i;
-	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
 	const struct btf_type *t;
 	bool conservative = true;
 	const char *tname;
 	struct btf *btf;
-	long addr;
-	u64 key;
-
-	if (prog->aux->sleepable && prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
-	    prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
-		verbose(env, "Only fentry/fexit/fmod_ret and lsm programs can be sleepable\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
-		return check_struct_ops_btf_id(env);
-
-	if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
-	    prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM &&
-	    !prog_extension)
-		return 0;
+	long addr = 0;
 
 	if (!btf_id) {
 		bpf_log(log, "Tracing programs must provide btf_id\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
+	btf = tgt_prog ? tgt_prog->aux->btf : btf_vmlinux;
 	if (!btf) {
 		bpf_log(log,
 			"FENTRY/FEXIT program can only be attached to another program annotated with BTF\n");
@@ -11114,8 +11100,6 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 					"Extension programs should be JITed\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
-			env->ops = bpf_verifier_ops[tgt_prog->type];
-			prog->expected_attach_type = tgt_prog->expected_attach_type;
 		}
 		if (!tgt_prog->jited) {
 			bpf_log(log, "Can attach to only JITed progs\n");
@@ -11151,13 +11135,11 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			bpf_log(log, "Cannot extend fentry/fexit\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		key = ((u64)aux->id) << 32 | btf_id;
 	} else {
 		if (prog_extension) {
 			bpf_log(log, "Cannot replace kernel functions\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		key = btf_id;
 	}
 
 	switch (prog->expected_attach_type) {
@@ -11187,13 +11169,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			/* should never happen in valid vmlinux build */
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		/* remember two read only pointers that are valid for
-		 * the life time of the kernel
-		 */
-		prog->aux->attach_func_name = tname;
-		prog->aux->attach_func_proto = t;
-		prog->aux->attach_btf_trace = true;
-		return 0;
+		break;
 	case BPF_TRACE_ITER:
 		if (!btf_type_is_func(t)) {
 			bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
@@ -11203,12 +11179,10 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
 		if (!btf_type_is_func_proto(t))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		prog->aux->attach_func_name = tname;
-		prog->aux->attach_func_proto = t;
-		if (!bpf_iter_prog_supported(prog))
-			return -EINVAL;
-		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf, t, tname, &fmodel);
-		return ret;
+		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf, t, tname, fmodel);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		break;
 	default:
 		if (!prog_extension)
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -11217,13 +11191,6 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	case BPF_LSM_MAC:
 	case BPF_TRACE_FENTRY:
 	case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT:
-		prog->aux->attach_func_name = tname;
-		if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
-			ret = bpf_lsm_verify_prog(log, prog);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
-		}
-
 		if (!btf_type_is_func(t)) {
 			bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
 				btf_id);
@@ -11235,24 +11202,14 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
 		if (!btf_type_is_func_proto(t))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		tr = bpf_trampoline_lookup(key);
-		if (!tr)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		/* t is either vmlinux type or another program's type */
-		prog->aux->attach_func_proto = t;
-		mutex_lock(&tr->mutex);
-		if (tr->func.addr) {
-			prog->aux->trampoline = tr;
-			goto out;
-		}
-		if (tgt_prog && conservative) {
-			prog->aux->attach_func_proto = NULL;
+
+		if (tgt_prog && conservative)
 			t = NULL;
-		}
-		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf, t,
-					     tname, &tr->func.model);
+
+		ret = btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf, t, tname, fmodel);
 		if (ret < 0)
-			goto out;
+			return ret;
+
 		if (tgt_prog) {
 			if (subprog == 0)
 				addr = (long) tgt_prog->bpf_func;
@@ -11264,8 +11221,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				bpf_log(log,
 					"The address of function %s cannot be found\n",
 					tname);
-				ret = -ENOENT;
-				goto out;
+				return -ENOENT;
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -11290,25 +11246,98 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			default:
 				break;
 			}
-			if (ret)
-				bpf_log(log, "%s is not sleepable\n",
-					prog->aux->attach_func_name);
+			if (ret) {
+				bpf_log(log, "%s is not sleepable\n", tname);
+				return ret;
+			}
 		} else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) {
-			ret = check_attach_modify_return(prog, addr);
-			if (ret || tgt_prog)
-				bpf_log(log, "%s() is not modifiable\n",
-					prog->aux->attach_func_name);
+			ret = check_attach_modify_return(prog, addr, tname);
+			if (ret || tgt_prog) {
+				bpf_log(log, "%s() is not modifiable\n", tname);
+				return ret;
+			}
 		}
-		if (ret)
-			goto out;
-		tr->func.addr = (void *)addr;
-		prog->aux->trampoline = tr;
-out:
-		mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex);
-		if (ret)
-			bpf_trampoline_put(tr);
+
+		break;
+	}
+	*tgt_addr = addr;
+	if (tgt_name)
+		*tgt_name = tname;
+	if (tgt_type)
+		*tgt_type = t;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
+	u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
+	struct btf_func_model fmodel;
+	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
+	const struct btf_type *t;
+	const char *tname;
+	long addr;
+	int ret;
+	u64 key;
+
+	if (prog->aux->sleepable && prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
+	    prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
+		verbose(env, "Only fentry/fexit/fmod_ret and lsm programs can be sleepable\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
+		return check_struct_ops_btf_id(env);
+
+	if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
+	    prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM &&
+	    prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = bpf_check_attach_target(&env->log, prog, tgt_prog, btf_id,
+				      &fmodel, &addr, &tname, &t);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
+
+	if (tgt_prog) {
+		if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
+			env->ops = bpf_verifier_ops[tgt_prog->type];
+			prog->expected_attach_type =
+				tgt_prog->expected_attach_type;
+		}
+		key = ((u64)tgt_prog->aux->id) << 32 | btf_id;
+	} else {
+		key = btf_id;
 	}
+
+	/* remember two read only pointers that are valid for
+	 * the life time of the kernel
+	 */
+	prog->aux->attach_func_proto = t;
+	prog->aux->attach_func_name = tname;
+
+	if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) {
+		prog->aux->attach_btf_trace = true;
+		return 0;
+	} else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_ITER) {
+		if (!bpf_iter_prog_supported(prog))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
+		ret = bpf_lsm_verify_prog(&env->log, prog);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	tr = bpf_trampoline_get(key, (void *)addr, &fmodel);
+	if (!tr)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	prog->aux->trampoline = tr;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/10] bpf: move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/10] bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

In preparation for allowing multiple attachments of freplace programs, move
the references to the target program and trampoline into the
bpf_tracing_link structure when that is created. To do this atomically,
introduce a new mutex in prog->aux to protect writing to the two pointers
to target prog and trampoline, and rename the members to make it clear that
they are related.

With this change, it is no longer possible to attach the same tracing
program multiple times (detaching in-between), since the reference from the
tracing program to the target disappears on the first attach. However,
since the next patch will let the caller supply an attach target, that will
also make it possible to attach to the same place multiple times.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h     |   15 +++++++++-----
 kernel/bpf/btf.c        |    6 +++---
 kernel/bpf/core.c       |    9 ++++++---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c    |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c |   12 ++++--------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c   |    9 +++++----
 6 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 46383741ff16..9dbac21c8091 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -614,8 +614,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int bpf_dispatcher_nop_func(
 }
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
 struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_lookup(u64 key);
-int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog);
-int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog);
+int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
+int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
 struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key, void *addr,
 					  struct btf_func_model *fmodel);
 void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
@@ -666,11 +666,13 @@ static inline struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_lookup(u64 key)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
-static inline int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static inline int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+					   struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 {
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
-static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+					     struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 {
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
@@ -738,14 +740,15 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	u32 max_rdonly_access;
 	u32 max_rdwr_access;
 	const struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *ctx_arg_info;
-	struct bpf_prog *linked_prog;
+	struct mutex tgt_mutex; /* protects writing of tgt_* pointers below */
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog;
+	struct bpf_trampoline *tgt_trampoline;
 	bool verifier_zext; /* Zero extensions has been inserted by verifier. */
 	bool offload_requested;
 	bool attach_btf_trace; /* true if attaching to BTF-enabled raw tp */
 	bool func_proto_unreliable;
 	bool sleepable;
 	enum bpf_tramp_prog_type trampoline_prog_type;
-	struct bpf_trampoline *trampoline;
 	struct hlist_node tramp_hlist;
 	/* BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO for valid attach_btf_id */
 	const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 2ace56c99c36..9228af9917a8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3706,7 +3706,7 @@ struct btf *btf_parse_vmlinux(void)
 
 struct btf *bpf_prog_get_target_btf(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
-	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->tgt_prog;
 
 	if (tgt_prog) {
 		return tgt_prog->aux->btf;
@@ -3733,7 +3733,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 		    struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
 {
 	const struct btf_type *t = prog->aux->attach_func_proto;
-	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->tgt_prog;
 	struct btf *btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
 	const char *tname = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
 	struct bpf_verifier_log *log = info->log;
@@ -4572,7 +4572,7 @@ int btf_prepare_func_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 	if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT)
-		prog_type = prog->aux->linked_prog->type;
+		prog_type = prog->aux->tgt_prog->type;
 
 	t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
 	if (!t || !btf_type_is_func_proto(t)) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 2a20c2833996..a872504c836b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flag
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&fp->aux->ksym.lnode);
 	mutex_init(&fp->aux->used_maps_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&fp->aux->tgt_mutex);
 
 	return fp;
 }
@@ -255,6 +256,7 @@ void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 {
 	if (fp->aux) {
 		mutex_destroy(&fp->aux->used_maps_mutex);
+		mutex_destroy(&fp->aux->tgt_mutex);
 		free_percpu(fp->aux->stats);
 		kfree(fp->aux->poke_tab);
 		kfree(fp->aux);
@@ -2137,7 +2139,8 @@ static void bpf_prog_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (aux->prog->has_callchain_buf)
 		put_callchain_buffers();
 #endif
-	bpf_trampoline_put(aux->trampoline);
+	if (aux->tgt_trampoline)
+		bpf_trampoline_put(aux->tgt_trampoline);
 	for (i = 0; i < aux->func_cnt; i++)
 		bpf_jit_free(aux->func[i]);
 	if (aux->func_cnt) {
@@ -2153,8 +2156,8 @@ void bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = fp->aux;
 
-	if (aux->linked_prog)
-		bpf_prog_put(aux->linked_prog);
+	if (aux->tgt_prog)
+		bpf_prog_put(aux->tgt_prog);
 	INIT_WORK(&aux->work, bpf_prog_free_deferred);
 	schedule_work(&aux->work);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 2ce32cad5c8e..4af35a59d0d9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2161,7 +2161,9 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 			err = PTR_ERR(tgt_prog);
 			goto free_prog_nouncharge;
 		}
-		prog->aux->linked_prog = tgt_prog;
+		mutex_lock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
+		prog->aux->tgt_prog = tgt_prog;
+		mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
 	}
 
 	prog->aux->offload_requested = !!attr->prog_ifindex;
@@ -2498,11 +2500,22 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_link_get_from_fd(u32 ufd)
 struct bpf_tracing_link {
 	struct bpf_link link;
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
+	struct bpf_trampoline *trampoline;
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog;
 };
 
 static void bpf_tracing_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(link->prog));
+	struct bpf_tracing_link *tr_link =
+		container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_link, link);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(link->prog,
+						tr_link->trampoline));
+
+	bpf_trampoline_put(tr_link->trampoline);
+
+	if (tr_link->tgt_prog)
+		bpf_prog_put(tr_link->tgt_prog);
 }
 
 static void bpf_tracing_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
@@ -2545,7 +2558,9 @@ static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_tracing_link_lops = {
 static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = NULL;
 	struct bpf_tracing_link *link;
+	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
 	int err;
 
 	switch (prog->type) {
@@ -2583,19 +2598,37 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		      &bpf_tracing_link_lops, prog);
 	link->attach_type = prog->expected_attach_type;
 
-	err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
-	if (err) {
-		kfree(link);
-		goto out_put_prog;
+	mutex_lock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
+
+	if (!prog->aux->tgt_trampoline) {
+		err = -ENOENT;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
+	tr = prog->aux->tgt_trampoline;
+	tgt_prog = prog->aux->tgt_prog;
+
+	err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_unlock;
 
-	err = bpf_trampoline_link_prog(prog);
+	err = bpf_trampoline_link_prog(prog, tr);
 	if (err) {
 		bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
-		goto out_put_prog;
+		link = NULL;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	link->tgt_prog = tgt_prog;
+	link->trampoline = tr;
+
+	prog->aux->tgt_prog = NULL;
+	prog->aux->tgt_trampoline = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
+
 	return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer);
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
+	kfree(link);
 out_put_prog:
 	bpf_prog_put(prog);
 	return err;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index e86d32f7f7dc..3145615647a5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -261,14 +261,12 @@ static enum bpf_tramp_prog_type bpf_attach_type_to_tramp(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 }
 
-int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 {
 	enum bpf_tramp_prog_type kind;
-	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
 	int err = 0;
 	int cnt;
 
-	tr = prog->aux->trampoline;
 	kind = bpf_attach_type_to_tramp(prog);
 	mutex_lock(&tr->mutex);
 	if (tr->extension_prog) {
@@ -301,7 +299,7 @@ int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 	hlist_add_head(&prog->aux->tramp_hlist, &tr->progs_hlist[kind]);
 	tr->progs_cnt[kind]++;
-	err = bpf_trampoline_update(prog->aux->trampoline);
+	err = bpf_trampoline_update(tr);
 	if (err) {
 		hlist_del(&prog->aux->tramp_hlist);
 		tr->progs_cnt[kind]--;
@@ -312,13 +310,11 @@ int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 }
 
 /* bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog() should never fail. */
-int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 {
 	enum bpf_tramp_prog_type kind;
-	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
 	int err;
 
-	tr = prog->aux->trampoline;
 	kind = bpf_attach_type_to_tramp(prog);
 	mutex_lock(&tr->mutex);
 	if (kind == BPF_TRAMP_REPLACE) {
@@ -330,7 +326,7 @@ int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 	hlist_del(&prog->aux->tramp_hlist);
 	tr->progs_cnt[kind]--;
-	err = bpf_trampoline_update(prog->aux->trampoline);
+	err = bpf_trampoline_update(tr);
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex);
 	return err;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 541dd5e09e60..116f3f275b98 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2628,8 +2628,7 @@ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
 
 static enum bpf_prog_type resolve_prog_type(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
-	return prog->aux->linked_prog ? prog->aux->linked_prog->type
-				      : prog->type;
+	return prog->aux->tgt_prog ? prog->aux->tgt_prog->type : prog->type;
 }
 
 static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -11271,8 +11270,8 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
-	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->linked_prog;
 	u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
+	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = prog->aux->tgt_prog;
 	struct btf_func_model fmodel;
 	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
 	const struct btf_type *t;
@@ -11336,7 +11335,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	if (!tr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	prog->aux->trampoline = tr;
+	mutex_lock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
+	prog->aux->tgt_trampoline = tr;
+	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/10] bpf: move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-18 18:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/10] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach
points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target
btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the
target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was
supplied at program load time.

The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of
check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the
old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be
created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to
co-exist simultaneously.

The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of
tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of
those, there is no API support for doing so.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h            |    2 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |    9 +++-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |  101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c          |    9 ++++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |    9 +++-
 5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 9dbac21c8091..094156d3dd9d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -743,6 +743,8 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	struct mutex tgt_mutex; /* protects writing of tgt_* pointers below */
 	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog;
 	struct bpf_trampoline *tgt_trampoline;
+	enum bpf_prog_type tgt_prog_type;
+	enum bpf_attach_type tgt_attach_type;
 	bool verifier_zext; /* Zero extensions has been inserted by verifier. */
 	bool offload_requested;
 	bool attach_btf_trace; /* true if attaching to BTF-enabled raw tp */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index a22812561064..feff1ed49f86 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -632,8 +632,13 @@ union bpf_attr {
 		};
 		__u32		attach_type;	/* attach type */
 		__u32		flags;		/* extra flags */
-		__aligned_u64	iter_info;	/* extra bpf_iter_link_info */
-		__u32		iter_info_len;	/* iter_info length */
+		union {
+			__u32		target_btf_id;	/* btf_id of target to attach to */
+			struct {
+				__aligned_u64	iter_info;	/* extra bpf_iter_link_info */
+				__u32		iter_info_len;	/* iter_info length */
+			};
+		};
 	} link_create;
 
 	struct { /* struct used by BPF_LINK_UPDATE command */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 4af35a59d0d9..9d542f1934f2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
 #include <linux/bpf_lirc.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
 #include <linux/btf.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -2555,12 +2556,17 @@ static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_tracing_link_lops = {
 	.fill_link_info = bpf_tracing_link_fill_link_info,
 };
 
-static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+				   int tgt_prog_fd,
+				   u32 btf_id)
 {
 	struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
 	struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = NULL;
+	struct bpf_trampoline *tr = NULL;
 	struct bpf_tracing_link *link;
-	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
+	struct btf_func_model fmodel;
+	u64 key = 0;
+	long addr;
 	int err;
 
 	switch (prog->type) {
@@ -2589,6 +2595,28 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		goto out_put_prog;
 	}
 
+	if (!!tgt_prog_fd != !!btf_id) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_put_prog;
+	}
+
+	if (tgt_prog_fd) {
+		/* For now we only allow new targets for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT */
+		if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_put_prog;
+		}
+
+		tgt_prog = bpf_prog_get(tgt_prog_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(tgt_prog)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(tgt_prog);
+			tgt_prog = NULL;
+			goto out_put_prog;
+		}
+
+		key = ((u64)tgt_prog->aux->id) << 32 | btf_id;
+	}
+
 	link = kzalloc(sizeof(*link), GFP_USER);
 	if (!link) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2600,12 +2628,28 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 
 	mutex_lock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
 
-	if (!prog->aux->tgt_trampoline) {
+	if (!prog->aux->tgt_trampoline && !tgt_prog) {
 		err = -ENOENT;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
-	tr = prog->aux->tgt_trampoline;
-	tgt_prog = prog->aux->tgt_prog;
+
+	if (!prog->aux->tgt_trampoline ||
+	    (key && key != prog->aux->tgt_trampoline->key)) {
+
+		err = bpf_check_attach_target(NULL, prog, tgt_prog, btf_id,
+					      &fmodel, &addr, NULL, NULL);
+		if (err)
+			goto out_unlock;
+
+		tr = bpf_trampoline_get(key, (void *)addr, &fmodel);
+		if (!tr) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
+	} else {
+		tr = prog->aux->tgt_trampoline;
+		tgt_prog = prog->aux->tgt_prog;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
 	if (err)
@@ -2620,16 +2664,24 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 
 	link->tgt_prog = tgt_prog;
 	link->trampoline = tr;
-
-	prog->aux->tgt_prog = NULL;
-	prog->aux->tgt_trampoline = NULL;
+	if (tr == prog->aux->tgt_trampoline) {
+		/* if we got a new ref from syscall, drop existing one from prog */
+		if (tgt_prog_fd)
+			bpf_prog_put(prog->aux->tgt_prog);
+		prog->aux->tgt_trampoline = NULL;
+		prog->aux->tgt_prog = NULL;
+	}
 	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
 
 	return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer);
 out_unlock:
+	if (tr && tr != prog->aux->tgt_trampoline)
+		bpf_trampoline_put(tr);
 	mutex_unlock(&prog->aux->tgt_mutex);
 	kfree(link);
 out_put_prog:
+	if (tgt_prog_fd && tgt_prog)
+		bpf_prog_put(tgt_prog);
 	bpf_prog_put(prog);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -2743,7 +2795,7 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
 			tp_name = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
 			break;
 		}
-		return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog);
+		return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog, 0, 0);
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT:
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE:
 		if (strncpy_from_user(buf,
@@ -3934,6 +3986,16 @@ static int tracing_bpf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static int freplace_bpf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	if (attr->link_create.attach_type == prog->expected_attach_type)
+		return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog,
+					       attr->link_create.target_fd,
+					       attr->link_create.target_btf_id);
+	return -EINVAL;
+
+}
+
 #define BPF_LINK_CREATE_LAST_FIELD link_create.iter_info_len
 static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
@@ -3944,18 +4006,25 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_LINK_CREATE))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->link_create.attach_type);
-	if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->link_create.prog_fd, ptype);
+	prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->link_create.prog_fd);
 	if (IS_ERR(prog))
 		return PTR_ERR(prog);
 
 	ret = bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(prog,
 						attr->link_create.attach_type);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_out;
+		goto out;
+
+	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
+		ret = freplace_bpf_link_attach(attr, prog);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->link_create.attach_type);
+	if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	switch (ptype) {
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB:
@@ -3983,7 +4052,7 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-err_out:
+out:
 	if (ret < 0)
 		bpf_prog_put(prog);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 116f3f275b98..eeb5a4f58516 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11202,6 +11202,12 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 		if (!btf_type_is_func_proto(t))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
+		if ((prog->aux->tgt_prog_type &&
+		     prog->aux->tgt_prog_type != tgt_prog->type) ||
+		    (prog->aux->tgt_attach_type &&
+		     prog->aux->tgt_attach_type != tgt_prog->expected_attach_type))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 		if (tgt_prog && conservative)
 			t = NULL;
 
@@ -11300,6 +11306,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (tgt_prog) {
+		prog->aux->tgt_prog_type = tgt_prog->type;
+		prog->aux->tgt_attach_type = tgt_prog->expected_attach_type;
+
 		if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
 			env->ops = bpf_verifier_ops[tgt_prog->type];
 			prog->expected_attach_type =
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index a22812561064..feff1ed49f86 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -632,8 +632,13 @@ union bpf_attr {
 		};
 		__u32		attach_type;	/* attach type */
 		__u32		flags;		/* extra flags */
-		__aligned_u64	iter_info;	/* extra bpf_iter_link_info */
-		__u32		iter_info_len;	/* iter_info length */
+		union {
+			__u32		target_btf_id;	/* btf_id of target to attach to */
+			struct {
+				__aligned_u64	iter_info;	/* extra bpf_iter_link_info */
+				__u32		iter_info_len;	/* iter_info length */
+			};
+		};
 	} link_create;
 
 	struct { /* struct used by BPF_LINK_UPDATE command */


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/10] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/10] libbpf: add support for freplace attachment in bpf_link_create Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

Eelco reported we can't properly access arguments if the tracing
program is attached to extension program.

Having following program:

  SEC("classifier/test_pkt_md_access")
  int test_pkt_md_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)

with its extension:

  SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
  int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)

and tracing that extension with:

  SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
  int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)

It's not possible to access skb argument in the fentry program,
with following error from verifier:

  ; int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
  0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
  invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=8

The problem is that btf_ctx_access gets the context type for the
traced program, which is in this case the extension.

But when we trace extension program, we want to get the context
type of the program that the extension is attached to, so we can
access the argument properly in the trace program.

This version of the patch is tweaked slightly from Jiri's original one,
since the refactoring in the previous patches means we have to get the
target prog type from the new variable in prog->aux instead of directly
from the target prog.

Reported-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 9228af9917a8..55f7b2ba1cbd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3860,7 +3860,14 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 
 	info->reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
 	if (tgt_prog) {
-		ret = btf_translate_to_vmlinux(log, btf, t, tgt_prog->type, arg);
+		enum bpf_prog_type tgt_type;
+
+		if (tgt_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT)
+			tgt_type = tgt_prog->aux->tgt_prog_type;
+		else
+			tgt_type = tgt_prog->type;
+
+		ret = btf_translate_to_vmlinux(log, btf, t, tgt_type, arg);
 		if (ret > 0) {
 			info->btf_id = ret;
 			return true;


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/10] libbpf: add support for freplace attachment in bpf_link_create
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/10] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/10] selftests: add test for multiple attachments of freplace program Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

This adds support for supplying a target btf ID for the bpf_link_create()
operation, and adds a new bpf_program__attach_freplace() high-level API for
attaching freplace functions with a target.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c      |    1 +
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h      |    3 ++-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c   |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h   |    3 +++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map |    1 +
 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 2baa1308737c..114f57aad607 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ int bpf_link_create(int prog_fd, int target_fd,
 	attr.link_create.iter_info =
 		ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, iter_info, (void *)0));
 	attr.link_create.iter_info_len = OPTS_GET(opts, iter_info_len, 0);
+	attr.link_create.target_btf_id = OPTS_GET(opts, target_btf_id, 0);
 
 	return sys_bpf(BPF_LINK_CREATE, &attr, sizeof(attr));
 }
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index 8c1ac4b42f90..6b8dbe24adc9 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -174,8 +174,9 @@ struct bpf_link_create_opts {
 	__u32 flags;
 	union bpf_iter_link_info *iter_info;
 	__u32 iter_info_len;
+	__u32 target_btf_id;
 };
-#define bpf_link_create_opts__last_field iter_info_len
+#define bpf_link_create_opts__last_field target_btf_id
 
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_link_create(int prog_fd, int target_fd,
 			       enum bpf_attach_type attach_type,
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 570235dbc922..3b008917e67d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -9390,9 +9390,11 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_iter(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
 }
 
 static struct bpf_link *
-bpf_program__attach_fd(struct bpf_program *prog, int target_fd,
+bpf_program__attach_fd(struct bpf_program *prog, int target_fd, int btf_id,
 		       const char *target_name)
 {
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, opts,
+			    .target_btf_id = btf_id);
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
 	char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
 	struct bpf_link *link;
@@ -9410,7 +9412,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_fd(struct bpf_program *prog, int target_fd,
 	link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
 
 	attach_type = bpf_program__get_expected_attach_type(prog);
-	link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, target_fd, attach_type, NULL);
+	link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, target_fd, attach_type, &opts);
 	if (link_fd < 0) {
 		link_fd = -errno;
 		free(link);
@@ -9426,19 +9428,43 @@ bpf_program__attach_fd(struct bpf_program *prog, int target_fd,
 struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_cgroup(struct bpf_program *prog, int cgroup_fd)
 {
-	return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, cgroup_fd, "cgroup");
+	return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup");
 }
 
 struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_netns(struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd)
 {
-	return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, netns_fd, "netns");
+	return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, netns_fd, 0, "netns");
 }
 
 struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_xdp(struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex)
 {
 	/* target_fd/target_ifindex use the same field in LINK_CREATE */
-	return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, ifindex, "xdp");
+	return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, ifindex, 0, "xdp");
+}
+
+struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_freplace(struct bpf_program *prog,
+					      int target_fd,
+					      const char *attach_func_name)
+{
+	int btf_id;
+
+	if (!!target_fd != !!attach_func_name || prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	if (target_fd) {
+
+		btf_id = libbpf_find_prog_btf_id(attach_func_name, target_fd);
+		if (btf_id < 0)
+			return ERR_PTR(btf_id);
+
+		return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, target_fd, btf_id, "freplace");
+	} else {
+		/* no target, so use raw_tracepoint_open for compatibility
+		 * with old kernels
+		 */
+		return bpf_program__attach_trace(prog);
+	}
 }
 
 struct bpf_link *
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index a750f67a23f6..6909ee81113a 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_netns(struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd);
 LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_xdp(struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex);
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
+bpf_program__attach_freplace(struct bpf_program *prog,
+			     int target_fd, const char *attach_func_name);
 
 struct bpf_map;
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index 5f054dadf082..b1c537873b23 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ LIBBPF_0.1.0 {
 LIBBPF_0.2.0 {
 	global:
 		bpf_prog_bind_map;
+		bpf_program__attach_freplace;
 		bpf_program__section_name;
 		perf_buffer__buffer_cnt;
 		perf_buffer__buffer_fd;


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/10] selftests: add test for multiple attachments of freplace program
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/10] libbpf: add support for freplace attachment in bpf_link_create Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/10] selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/10] selftests: Add selftest for disallowing modify_return attachment to freplace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

This adds a selftest for attaching an freplace program to multiple targets
simultaneously.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c       |  157 ++++++++++++++++----
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c    |   15 ++
 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
index eda682727787..27677e015730 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -2,36 +2,79 @@
 /* Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook */
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+
+typedef int (*test_cb)(struct bpf_object *obj);
+
+static int check_data_map(struct bpf_object *obj, int prog_cnt, bool reset)
+{
+	struct bpf_map *data_map = NULL, *map;
+	__u64 *result = NULL;
+	const int zero = 0;
+	__u32 duration = 0;
+	int ret = -1, i;
+
+	result = malloc((prog_cnt + 32 /* spare */) * sizeof(__u64));
+	if (CHECK(!result, "alloc_memory", "failed to alloc memory"))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	bpf_object__for_each_map(map, obj)
+		if (bpf_map__is_internal(map)) {
+			data_map = map;
+			break;
+		}
+	if (CHECK(!data_map, "find_data_map", "data map not found\n"))
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(data_map), &zero, result);
+	if (CHECK(ret, "get_result",
+		  "failed to get output data: %d\n", ret))
+		goto out;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < prog_cnt; i++) {
+		if (CHECK(result[i] != 1, "result",
+			  "fexit_bpf2bpf result[%d] failed err %llu\n",
+			  i, result[i]))
+			goto out;
+		result[i] = 0;
+	}
+	if (reset) {
+		ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(data_map), &zero, result, 0);
+		if (CHECK(ret, "reset_result", "failed to reset result\n"))
+			goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	free(result);
+	return ret;
+}
 
 static void test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common(const char *obj_file,
 				      const char *target_obj_file,
 				      int prog_cnt,
 				      const char **prog_name,
-				      bool run_prog)
+				      bool run_prog,
+				      test_cb cb)
 {
-	struct bpf_object *obj = NULL, *pkt_obj;
-	int err, pkt_fd, i;
-	struct bpf_link **link = NULL;
+	struct bpf_object *obj = NULL, *tgt_obj;
 	struct bpf_program **prog = NULL;
+	struct bpf_link **link = NULL;
 	__u32 duration = 0, retval;
-	struct bpf_map *data_map;
-	const int zero = 0;
-	__u64 *result = NULL;
+	int err, tgt_fd, i;
 
 	err = bpf_prog_load(target_obj_file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
-			    &pkt_obj, &pkt_fd);
+			    &tgt_obj, &tgt_fd);
 	if (CHECK(err, "tgt_prog_load", "file %s err %d errno %d\n",
 		  target_obj_file, err, errno))
 		return;
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts,
-			    .attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd,
+			    .attach_prog_fd = tgt_fd,
 			   );
 
 	link = calloc(sizeof(struct bpf_link *), prog_cnt);
 	prog = calloc(sizeof(struct bpf_program *), prog_cnt);
-	result = malloc((prog_cnt + 32 /* spare */) * sizeof(__u64));
-	if (CHECK(!link || !prog || !result, "alloc_memory",
-		  "failed to alloc memory"))
+	if (CHECK(!link || !prog, "alloc_memory", "failed to alloc memory"))
 		goto close_prog;
 
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(obj_file, &opts);
@@ -53,39 +96,33 @@ static void test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common(const char *obj_file,
 			goto close_prog;
 	}
 
-	if (!run_prog)
-		goto close_prog;
+	if (cb) {
+		err = cb(obj);
+		if (err)
+			goto close_prog;
+	}
 
-	data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "fexit_bp.bss");
-	if (CHECK(!data_map, "find_data_map", "data map not found\n"))
+	if (!run_prog)
 		goto close_prog;
 
-	err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(tgt_fd, 1, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
 				NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
 	CHECK(err || retval, "ipv6",
 	      "err %d errno %d retval %d duration %d\n",
 	      err, errno, retval, duration);
 
-	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(data_map), &zero, result);
-	if (CHECK(err, "get_result",
-		  "failed to get output data: %d\n", err))
+	if (check_data_map(obj, prog_cnt, false))
 		goto close_prog;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < prog_cnt; i++)
-		if (CHECK(result[i] != 1, "result", "fexit_bpf2bpf failed err %llu\n",
-			  result[i]))
-			goto close_prog;
-
 close_prog:
 	for (i = 0; i < prog_cnt; i++)
 		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(link[i]))
 			bpf_link__destroy(link[i]);
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj))
 		bpf_object__close(obj);
-	bpf_object__close(pkt_obj);
+	bpf_object__close(tgt_obj);
 	free(link);
 	free(prog);
-	free(result);
 }
 
 static void test_target_no_callees(void)
@@ -96,7 +133,7 @@ static void test_target_no_callees(void)
 	test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common("./fexit_bpf2bpf_simple.o",
 				  "./test_pkt_md_access.o",
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(prog_name),
-				  prog_name, true);
+				  prog_name, true, NULL);
 }
 
 static void test_target_yes_callees(void)
@@ -110,7 +147,7 @@ static void test_target_yes_callees(void)
 	test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common("./fexit_bpf2bpf.o",
 				  "./test_pkt_access.o",
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(prog_name),
-				  prog_name, true);
+				  prog_name, true, NULL);
 }
 
 static void test_func_replace(void)
@@ -128,7 +165,7 @@ static void test_func_replace(void)
 	test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common("./fexit_bpf2bpf.o",
 				  "./test_pkt_access.o",
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(prog_name),
-				  prog_name, true);
+				  prog_name, true, NULL);
 }
 
 static void test_func_replace_verify(void)
@@ -139,7 +176,61 @@ static void test_func_replace_verify(void)
 	test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common("./freplace_connect4.o",
 				  "./connect4_prog.o",
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(prog_name),
-				  prog_name, false);
+				  prog_name, false, NULL);
+}
+
+static int test_second_attach(struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+	const char *prog_name = "freplace/get_constant";
+	const char *tgt_name = prog_name + 9; /* cut off freplace/ */
+	const char *tgt_obj_file = "./test_pkt_access.o";
+	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL;
+	struct bpf_object *tgt_obj;
+	__u32 duration = 0, retval;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	int err = 0, tgt_fd;
+
+	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj, prog_name);
+	if (CHECK(!prog, "find_prog", "prog %s not found\n", prog_name))
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_load(tgt_obj_file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
+			    &tgt_obj, &tgt_fd);
+	if (CHECK(err, "second_prog_load", "file %s err %d errno %d\n",
+		  tgt_obj_file, err, errno))
+		return err;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_freplace(prog, tgt_fd, tgt_name);
+	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "second_link", "failed to attach second link prog_fd %d tgt_fd %d\n", bpf_program__fd(prog), tgt_fd))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(tgt_fd, 1, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
+				NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
+	if (CHECK(err || retval, "ipv6",
+		  "err %d errno %d retval %d duration %d\n",
+		  err, errno, retval, duration))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = check_data_map(obj, 1, true);
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
+out:
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(link))
+		bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	bpf_object__close(tgt_obj);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void test_func_replace_multi(void)
+{
+	const char *prog_name[] = {
+		"freplace/get_constant",
+	};
+	test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common("./freplace_get_constant.o",
+				  "./test_pkt_access.o",
+				  ARRAY_SIZE(prog_name),
+				  prog_name, true, test_second_attach);
 }
 
 static void test_func_sockmap_update(void)
@@ -150,7 +241,7 @@ static void test_func_sockmap_update(void)
 	test_fexit_bpf2bpf_common("./freplace_cls_redirect.o",
 				  "./test_cls_redirect.o",
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(prog_name),
-				  prog_name, false);
+				  prog_name, false, NULL);
 }
 
 static void test_obj_load_failure_common(const char *obj_file,
@@ -222,4 +313,6 @@ void test_fexit_bpf2bpf(void)
 		test_func_replace_return_code();
 	if (test__start_subtest("func_map_prog_compatibility"))
 		test_func_map_prog_compatibility();
+	if (test__start_subtest("func_replace_multi"))
+		test_func_replace_multi();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8f0ecf94e533
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+
+volatile __u64 test_get_constant = 0;
+SEC("freplace/get_constant")
+int new_get_constant(long val)
+{
+	if (val != 123)
+		return 0;
+	test_get_constant = 1;
+	return test_get_constant; /* original get_constant() returns val - 122 */
+}
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/10] selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/10] selftests: add test for multiple attachments of freplace program Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/10] selftests: Add selftest for disallowing modify_return attachment to freplace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding test that setup following program:

  SEC("classifier/test_pkt_md_access")
  int test_pkt_md_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)

with its extension:

  SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
  int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)

and tracing that extension with:

  SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
  int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)

The test verifies that the tracing program can
dereference skb argument properly.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c |  111 ++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c |   18 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c   |   25 +++++
 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..924441d4362d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+
+#include "test_pkt_md_access.skel.h"
+#include "test_trace_ext.skel.h"
+#include "test_trace_ext_tracing.skel.h"
+
+static __u32 duration;
+
+void test_trace_ext(void)
+{
+	struct test_pkt_md_access *skel_pkt = NULL;
+	struct test_trace_ext_tracing *skel_trace = NULL;
+	struct test_trace_ext_tracing__bss *bss_trace;
+	struct test_trace_ext *skel_ext = NULL;
+	struct test_trace_ext__bss *bss_ext;
+	int err, pkt_fd, ext_fd;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	char buf[100];
+	__u32 retval;
+	__u64 len;
+
+	/* open/load/attach test_pkt_md_access */
+	skel_pkt = test_pkt_md_access__open_and_load();
+	if (CHECK(!skel_pkt, "setup", "classifier/test_pkt_md_access open failed\n"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	err = test_pkt_md_access__attach(skel_pkt);
+	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "classifier/test_pkt_md_access attach failed: %d\n", err))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	prog = skel_pkt->progs.test_pkt_md_access;
+	pkt_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+
+	/* open extension */
+	skel_ext = test_trace_ext__open();
+	if (CHECK(!skel_ext, "setup", "freplace/test_pkt_md_access open failed\n"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* set extension's attach target - test_pkt_md_access  */
+	prog = skel_ext->progs.test_pkt_md_access_new;
+	bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, pkt_fd, "test_pkt_md_access");
+
+	/* load/attach extension */
+	err = test_trace_ext__load(skel_ext);
+	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "freplace/test_pkt_md_access load failed\n")) {
+		libbpf_strerror(err, buf, sizeof(buf));
+		fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", buf);
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	err = test_trace_ext__attach(skel_ext);
+	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "freplace/test_pkt_md_access attach failed: %d\n", err))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	prog = skel_ext->progs.test_pkt_md_access_new;
+	ext_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+
+	/* open tracing  */
+	skel_trace = test_trace_ext_tracing__open();
+	if (CHECK(!skel_trace, "setup", "tracing/test_pkt_md_access_new open failed\n"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* set tracing's attach target - fentry */
+	prog = skel_trace->progs.fentry;
+	bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, ext_fd, "test_pkt_md_access_new");
+
+	/* set tracing's attach target - fexit */
+	prog = skel_trace->progs.fexit;
+	bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, ext_fd, "test_pkt_md_access_new");
+
+	/* load/attach tracing */
+	err = test_trace_ext_tracing__load(skel_trace);
+	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "tracing/test_pkt_md_access_new load failed\n")) {
+		libbpf_strerror(err, buf, sizeof(buf));
+		fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", buf);
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	err = test_trace_ext_tracing__attach(skel_trace);
+	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "tracing/test_pkt_md_access_new attach failed: %d\n", err))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* trigger the test */
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
+				NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
+	CHECK(err || retval, "run", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", err, errno, retval);
+
+	bss_ext = skel_ext->bss;
+	bss_trace = skel_trace->bss;
+
+	len = bss_ext->ext_called;
+
+	CHECK(bss_ext->ext_called == 0,
+		"check", "failed to trigger freplace/test_pkt_md_access\n");
+	CHECK(bss_trace->fentry_called != len,
+		"check", "failed to trigger fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new\n");
+	CHECK(bss_trace->fexit_called != len,
+		"check", "failed to trigger fexit/test_pkt_md_access_new\n");
+
+cleanup:
+	test_trace_ext_tracing__destroy(skel_trace);
+	test_trace_ext__destroy(skel_ext);
+	test_pkt_md_access__destroy(skel_pkt);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d19a634d0e78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+__u64 ext_called = 0;
+
+SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
+int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	ext_called = skb->len;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..52f3baf98f20
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_trace_ext_tracing.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+__u64 fentry_called = 0;
+
+SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
+int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	fentry_called = skb->len;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 fexit_called = 0;
+
+SEC("fexit/test_pkt_md_access_new")
+int BPF_PROG(fexit, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	fexit_called = skb->len;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/10] selftests: Add selftest for disallowing modify_return attachment to freplace
  2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/10] selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-17 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-17 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
	Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Eelco Chaudron,
	KP Singh, netdev, bpf

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

This adds a selftest that ensures that modify_return tracing programs
cannot be attached to freplace programs. The security_ prefix is added to
the freplace program because that would otherwise let it pass the check for
modify_return.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c       |   68 ++++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c        |   14 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c    |    2 -
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
index 27677e015730..6339d125ef9a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -233,6 +233,72 @@ static void test_func_replace_multi(void)
 				  prog_name, true, test_second_attach);
 }
 
+static void test_fmod_ret_freplace(void)
+{
+	const char *tgt_name = "./test_pkt_access.o";
+	const char *freplace_name = "./freplace_get_constant.o";
+	const char *fmod_ret_name = "./fmod_ret_freplace.o";
+	struct bpf_link *freplace_link = NULL, *fmod_link = NULL;
+	struct bpf_object *freplace_obj = NULL, *pkt_obj, *fmod_obj = NULL;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	__u32 duration = 0;
+	int err, pkt_fd;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_load(tgt_name, BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
+			    &pkt_obj, &pkt_fd);
+	/* the target prog should load fine */
+	if (CHECK(err, "tgt_prog_load", "file %s err %d errno %d\n",
+		  tgt_name, err, errno))
+		return;
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts,
+			    .attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd,
+			   );
+
+	freplace_obj = bpf_object__open_file(freplace_name, &opts);
+	if (CHECK(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(freplace_obj), "freplace_obj_open",
+		  "failed to open %s: %ld\n", freplace_name,
+		  PTR_ERR(freplace_obj)))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_object__load(freplace_obj);
+	if (CHECK(err, "freplace_obj_load", "err %d\n", err))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, freplace_obj);
+	freplace_link = bpf_program__attach_trace(prog);
+	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(freplace_link), "freplace_attach_trace", "failed to link\n"))
+		goto out;
+
+	opts.attach_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+	fmod_obj = bpf_object__open_file(fmod_ret_name, &opts);
+	if (CHECK(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fmod_obj), "fmod_obj_open",
+		  "failed to open %s: %ld\n", fmod_ret_name,
+		  PTR_ERR(fmod_obj)))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_object__load(fmod_obj);
+	if (CHECK(err, "fmod_obj_load", "err %d\n", err))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, fmod_obj);
+	fmod_link = bpf_program__attach_trace(prog);
+	if (CHECK(!IS_ERR(fmod_link), "fmod_attach_trace",
+		  "linking fmod_ret to freplace should fail\n"))
+		goto out;
+
+out:
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(freplace_link))
+		bpf_link__destroy(freplace_link);
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fmod_link))
+		bpf_link__destroy(fmod_link);
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(freplace_obj))
+		bpf_object__close(freplace_obj);
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fmod_obj))
+		bpf_object__close(fmod_obj);
+	bpf_object__close(pkt_obj);
+}
+
+
 static void test_func_sockmap_update(void)
 {
 	const char *prog_name[] = {
@@ -315,4 +381,6 @@ void test_fexit_bpf2bpf(void)
 		test_func_map_prog_compatibility();
 	if (test__start_subtest("func_replace_multi"))
 		test_func_replace_multi();
+	if (test__start_subtest("fmod_ret_freplace"))
+		test_fmod_ret_freplace();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c8943ccee6c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fmod_ret_freplace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+volatile __u64 test_fmod_ret = 0;
+SEC("fmod_ret/security_new_get_constant")
+int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, long val, int ret)
+{
+	test_fmod_ret = 1;
+	return 120;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c
index 8f0ecf94e533..705e4b64dfc2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_get_constant.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 volatile __u64 test_get_constant = 0;
 SEC("freplace/get_constant")
-int new_get_constant(long val)
+int security_new_get_constant(long val)
 {
 	if (val != 123)
 		return 0;


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points
  2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-09-18 18:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2020-09-19 10:14     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-09-18 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa,
	Eelco Chaudron, KP Singh, Networking, bpf

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:21 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>
> This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach
> points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target
> btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the
> target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was
> supplied at program load time.
>
> The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of
> check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the
> old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be
> created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to
> co-exist simultaneously.
>
> The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of
> tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of
> those, there is no API support for doing so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> ---

You patch set breaks at least bpf_iter tests:

$ sudo ./test_progs -t bpf_iter
...
#4 bpf_iter:FAIL
Summary: 0/19 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED

Please check and fix.

>  include/linux/bpf.h            |    2 +
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |    9 +++-
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |  101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c          |    9 ++++
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |    9 +++-
>  5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>

[...]

> -static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +                                  int tgt_prog_fd,
> +                                  u32 btf_id)
>  {
>         struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
>         struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_trampoline *tr = NULL;
>         struct bpf_tracing_link *link;
> -       struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
> +       struct btf_func_model fmodel;
> +       u64 key = 0;
> +       long addr;
>         int err;
>
>         switch (prog->type) {
> @@ -2589,6 +2595,28 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)

bpf_tracing_prog_attach logic looks correct to me now, thanks.

>                 goto out_put_prog;
>         }
>

[...]

> @@ -3934,6 +3986,16 @@ static int tracing_bpf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *
>         return -EINVAL;
>  }
>
> +static int freplace_bpf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)

Any reason to have this separate from tracing_bpf_link_attach? I'd
merge them and do a simple switch inside, based on prog->type. It
would also be easier to follow the flow if this expected_attach_type
check was first and returned -EINVAL immediately at the top.


> +{
> +       if (attr->link_create.attach_type == prog->expected_attach_type)
> +               return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog,
> +                                              attr->link_create.target_fd,
> +                                              attr->link_create.target_btf_id);
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +

nit: unnecessary empty line?

> +}
> +
>  #define BPF_LINK_CREATE_LAST_FIELD link_create.iter_info_len
>  static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  {
> @@ -3944,18 +4006,25 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>         if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_LINK_CREATE))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->link_create.attach_type);
> -       if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> -
> -       prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->link_create.prog_fd, ptype);
> +       prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->link_create.prog_fd);
>         if (IS_ERR(prog))
>                 return PTR_ERR(prog);
>
>         ret = bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(prog,
>                                                 attr->link_create.attach_type);
>         if (ret)
> -               goto err_out;
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
> +               ret = freplace_bpf_link_attach(attr, prog);
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->link_create.attach_type);
> +       if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +               goto out;
> +       }

you seem to be missing a check that prog->type matches ptype,
previously implicitly performed by bpf_prog_get_type(), no?

>
>         switch (ptype) {
>         case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB:
> @@ -3983,7 +4052,7 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> -err_out:
> +out:
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 bpf_prog_put(prog);
>         return ret;

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points
  2020-09-18 18:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2020-09-19 10:14     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-09-19 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa,
	Eelco Chaudron, KP Singh, Networking, bpf

Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:21 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>>
>> This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach
>> points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target
>> btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the
>> target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was
>> supplied at program load time.
>>
>> The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of
>> check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the
>> old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be
>> created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to
>> co-exist simultaneously.
>>
>> The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of
>> tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of
>> those, there is no API support for doing so.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> You patch set breaks at least bpf_iter tests:
>
> $ sudo ./test_progs -t bpf_iter
> ...
> #4 bpf_iter:FAIL
> Summary: 0/19 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED
>
> Please check and fix.

Huh, did notice something was broken, but they didn't when I reverted
the patch either, so I put it down to just the tests being broken. I'll
take another look :)

>>  include/linux/bpf.h            |    2 +
>>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |    9 +++-
>>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |  101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c          |    9 ++++
>>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |    9 +++-
>>  5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> -static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>> +static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> +                                  int tgt_prog_fd,
>> +                                  u32 btf_id)
>>  {
>>         struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
>>         struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog = NULL;
>> +       struct bpf_trampoline *tr = NULL;
>>         struct bpf_tracing_link *link;
>> -       struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
>> +       struct btf_func_model fmodel;
>> +       u64 key = 0;
>> +       long addr;
>>         int err;
>>
>>         switch (prog->type) {
>> @@ -2589,6 +2595,28 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>
> bpf_tracing_prog_attach logic looks correct to me now, thanks.
>
>>                 goto out_put_prog;
>>         }
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -3934,6 +3986,16 @@ static int tracing_bpf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *
>>         return -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int freplace_bpf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>
> Any reason to have this separate from tracing_bpf_link_attach? I'd
> merge them and do a simple switch inside, based on prog->type. It
> would also be easier to follow the flow if this expected_attach_type
> check was first and returned -EINVAL immediately at the top.

I created a different one function it had to be called at a different
place; don't mind combining them, though.

>> +{
>> +       if (attr->link_create.attach_type == prog->expected_attach_type)
>> +               return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog,
>> +                                              attr->link_create.target_fd,
>> +                                              attr->link_create.target_btf_id);
>> +       return -EINVAL;
>> +
>
> nit: unnecessary empty line?
>
>> +}
>> +
>>  #define BPF_LINK_CREATE_LAST_FIELD link_create.iter_info_len
>>  static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>>  {
>> @@ -3944,18 +4006,25 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>>         if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_LINK_CREATE))
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>
>> -       ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->link_create.attach_type);
>> -       if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC)
>> -               return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -       prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->link_create.prog_fd, ptype);
>> +       prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->link_create.prog_fd);
>>         if (IS_ERR(prog))
>>                 return PTR_ERR(prog);
>>
>>         ret = bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(prog,
>>                                                 attr->link_create.attach_type);
>>         if (ret)
>> -               goto err_out;
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
>> +               ret = freplace_bpf_link_attach(attr, prog);
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->link_create.attach_type);
>> +       if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>
> you seem to be missing a check that prog->type matches ptype,
> previously implicitly performed by bpf_prog_get_type(), no?

Ah yes, good catch! I played around with different versions of this, and
guess I forgot to put that check back in for this one...

-Toke


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-19 10:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-17 20:20 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/10] bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/10] bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/10] bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/10] bpf: move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-18 18:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-19 10:14     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/10] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/10] libbpf: add support for freplace attachment in bpf_link_create Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/10] selftests: add test for multiple attachments of freplace program Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/10] selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-17 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/10] selftests: Add selftest for disallowing modify_return attachment to freplace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.