From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: remove residual _le structs naming
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:42:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160614966102.1284573.1127838863836084762.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123162008.35814-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:20:08 +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> For sake of consistency, remove any residual naming based on _le suffixes
> in SCMI Sensors Protocol, since little endianity is already assumed across
> all of SCMI implementation and, as such, all currently existent names do
> not explicitly state their endianness.
>
> No functional change.
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-linux-next), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove residual _le structs naming
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/e945927dc7
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: remove residual _le structs naming
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:42:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160614966102.1284573.1127838863836084762.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123162008.35814-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:20:08 +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> For sake of consistency, remove any residual naming based on _le suffixes
> in SCMI Sensors Protocol, since little endianity is already assumed across
> all of SCMI implementation and, as such, all currently existent names do
> not explicitly state their endianness.
>
> No functional change.
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-linux-next), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove residual _le structs naming
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/e945927dc7
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 16:20 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: remove residual _le structs naming Cristian Marussi
2020-11-23 16:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-11-23 16:42 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-11-23 16:42 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160614966102.1284573.1127838863836084762.b4-ty@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.