From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
vivek.gautam@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: TLB invalidation for SVA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:56:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161133027280.1510517.883040182514210311.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122151054.2833521-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:10:53 +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Since v1 [1]
> * Renamed arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range()
> * Removed unnecessary tlb_inv_command variable
> * Rebased onto for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates (oddly I didn't get any
> conflict, I hope it will apply this time)
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210122115257.2502526-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/
>
> [...]
Applied to will (for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates), thanks!
[1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range()
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/eba8d2f8f803
[2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make BTM optional for SVA
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/51d113c3be09
[3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for VHE
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/9111aebf770d
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
vivek.gautam@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: TLB invalidation for SVA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:56:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161133027280.1510517.883040182514210311.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122151054.2833521-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:10:53 +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Since v1 [1]
> * Renamed arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range()
> * Removed unnecessary tlb_inv_command variable
> * Rebased onto for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates (oddly I didn't get any
> conflict, I hope it will apply this time)
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210122115257.2502526-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/
>
> [...]
Applied to will (for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates), thanks!
[1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range()
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/eba8d2f8f803
[2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make BTM optional for SVA
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/51d113c3be09
[3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for VHE
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/9111aebf770d
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: TLB invalidation for SVA Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range() Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make BTM optional for SVA Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for VHE Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-22 18:56 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-01-22 18:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: TLB invalidation for SVA Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161133027280.1510517.883040182514210311.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.