* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
@ 2021-02-16 10:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2021-02-16 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
counter values.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <float.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
#include "igt_perf.h"
#include "igt_sysfs.h"
#include "igt_pm.h"
+#include "igt_stats.h"
#include "sw_sync.h"
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
@@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
static void
single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
{
+ unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
+ double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
unsigned long slept;
igt_spin_t *spin;
+ igt_stats_t s;
uint64_t val;
int fd;
@@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
else
spin = NULL;
- val = pmu_read_single(fd);
- slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
- end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
- val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
+ igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
+
+ while (--loops) {
+ uint64_t ts[2];
+
+ val = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+ slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
+ if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
+ end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
+ val = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]) - val;
+
+ if (flags & FLAG_LONG) {
+ unsigned long t = ts[1] - ts[0];
+ double err = (double)((long)val - (long)t) / t * 1e6;
+
+ igt_debug("time=%lu busy=%"PRIu64" error=%.2fppm\n",
+ t, val, err);
+
+ igt_assert_f(fabs(err) <= 5000, "Error=%.2fppm\n", err);
+
+ if (err > err_max)
+ err_max = err;
+ if (err < err_min)
+ err_min = err;
+
+ igt_stats_push_float(&s, err);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (flags & FLAG_LONG)
+ igt_info("error min=%.2fppm avg=%.2fppm max=%.2fppm\n",
+ err_min, igt_stats_get_mean(&s), err_max);
+
+ igt_stats_fini(&s);
if (flags & FLAG_HANG)
igt_force_gpu_reset(gem_fd);
@@ -2126,6 +2160,8 @@ igt_main
*/
test_each_engine("busy", fd, e)
single(fd, e, TEST_BUSY);
+ test_each_engine("busy-accuracy", fd, e)
+ single(fd, e, TEST_BUSY | FLAG_LONG);
test_each_engine("busy-idle", fd, e)
single(fd, e, TEST_BUSY | TEST_TRAILING_IDLE);
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
@ 2021-02-16 10:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2021-02-16 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx, Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
counter values.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <float.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
#include "igt_perf.h"
#include "igt_sysfs.h"
#include "igt_pm.h"
+#include "igt_stats.h"
#include "sw_sync.h"
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
@@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
static void
single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
{
+ unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
+ double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
unsigned long slept;
igt_spin_t *spin;
+ igt_stats_t s;
uint64_t val;
int fd;
@@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
else
spin = NULL;
- val = pmu_read_single(fd);
- slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
- end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
- val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
+ igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
+
+ while (--loops) {
+ uint64_t ts[2];
+
+ val = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+ slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
+ if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
+ end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
+ val = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]) - val;
+
+ if (flags & FLAG_LONG) {
+ unsigned long t = ts[1] - ts[0];
+ double err = (double)((long)val - (long)t) / t * 1e6;
+
+ igt_debug("time=%lu busy=%"PRIu64" error=%.2fppm\n",
+ t, val, err);
+
+ igt_assert_f(fabs(err) <= 5000, "Error=%.2fppm\n", err);
+
+ if (err > err_max)
+ err_max = err;
+ if (err < err_min)
+ err_min = err;
+
+ igt_stats_push_float(&s, err);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (flags & FLAG_LONG)
+ igt_info("error min=%.2fppm avg=%.2fppm max=%.2fppm\n",
+ err_min, igt_stats_get_mean(&s), err_max);
+
+ igt_stats_fini(&s);
if (flags & FLAG_HANG)
igt_force_gpu_reset(gem_fd);
@@ -2126,6 +2160,8 @@ igt_main
*/
test_each_engine("busy", fd, e)
single(fd, e, TEST_BUSY);
+ test_each_engine("busy-accuracy", fd, e)
+ single(fd, e, TEST_BUSY | FLAG_LONG);
test_each_engine("busy-idle", fd, e)
single(fd, e, TEST_BUSY | TEST_TRAILING_IDLE);
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 10:50 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
(?)
@ 2021-02-16 11:39 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-02-16 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin; +Cc: igt-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4300 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/87118/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_6004 -> IGTPW_5512
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_5512 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@query-info:
- fi-tgl-y: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109315] / [i915#2575])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-tgl-y/igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@query-info.html
* igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@semaphore:
- fi-bsw-nick: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-bsw-nick/igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@semaphore.html
* igt@fbdev@read:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#402]) +2 similar issues
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/fi-tgl-y/igt@fbdev@read.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-tgl-y/igt@fbdev@read.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][5] ([i915#2411] / [i915#402]) -> [PASS][6]
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [DMESG-WARN][7] ([i915#2605]) -> [PASS][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-bsw-nick: [INCOMPLETE][9] ([i915#2940]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
* igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][12] +1 similar issue
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
[i915#1436]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1436
[i915#2295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2295
[i915#2411]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2411
[i915#2505]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2505
[i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2575
[i915#2605]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2605
[i915#2782]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2782
[i915#2940]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2940
[i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
Participating hosts (44 -> 38)
------------------------------
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-dg1-1 fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* IGT: IGT_6004 -> IGTPW_5512
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9777: 5fd19bfd239ec997f3bcac75d6af8c9340066b12 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_5512: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/index.html
IGT_6004: fe9ac2aeffc1828c6d61763a611a44fbd450aa96 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
== Testlist changes ==
+igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4940 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 10:50 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
@ 2021-02-16 11:44 ` Chris Wilson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> counter values.
We've previously only included the accuracy tests on platforms that
claim to be accurate. Can we rephrase the goal of the test such that it
sounds more like a universal truth that should also be valid for the
sampling backends? "The busyness should never exceed 100% (within a
margin of error)..." And since accuracy is currently protected by
has_busy_stats, let's try to find a different name.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
@ 2021-02-16 11:44 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> counter values.
We've previously only included the accuracy tests on platforms that
claim to be accurate. Can we rephrase the goal of the test such that it
sounds more like a universal truth that should also be valid for the
sampling backends? "The busyness should never exceed 100% (within a
margin of error)..." And since accuracy is currently protected by
has_busy_stats, let's try to find a different name.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 10:50 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2021-02-16 12:40 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-02-16 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin; +Cc: igt-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30286 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/87118/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_6004_full -> IGTPW_5512_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_5512_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_5512_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_5512_full:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* {igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@vcs0} (NEW):
- shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] +2 similar issues
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@vcs0.html
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-hang@bcs0:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] +9 similar issues
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-tglb1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-hang@bcs0.html
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-hang@bcs0.html
* igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5] +7 similar issues
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-iclb2/igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0.html
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb5/igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0.html
- shard-hsw: [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] +7 similar issues
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-hsw2/igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw7/igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0.html
- shard-glk: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] +7 similar issues
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-glk1/igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0.html
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk6/igt@perf_pmu@idle@bcs0.html
* igt@perf_pmu@idle@rcs0:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][10] +2 similar issues
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-snb6/igt@perf_pmu@idle@rcs0.html
* igt@perf_pmu@idle@vecs0:
- shard-apl: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] +3 similar issues
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-apl2/igt@perf_pmu@idle@vecs0.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl1/igt@perf_pmu@idle@vecs0.html
- shard-kbl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] +4 similar issues
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-kbl6/igt@perf_pmu@idle@vecs0.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl1/igt@perf_pmu@idle@vecs0.html
New tests
---------
New tests have been introduced between IGT_6004_full and IGTPW_5512_full:
### New IGT tests (53) ###
* igt@gem_ctx_engines@libapi:
- Statuses : 7 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.00, 0.01] s
* igt@gem_ctx_engines@none:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@close-replace-race:
- Statuses : 5 pass(s) 1 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 5.46] s
* igt@gem_ctx_sseu@mmap-args:
- Statuses : 6 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@gem_ctx_sseu@mmap-args@gtt:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.00] s
* igt@gem_ctx_sseu@mmap-args@uc:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@gem_ctx_sseu@mmap-args@wb:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.00] s
* igt@gem_ctx_sseu@mmap-args@wc:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await:
- Statuses : 1 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@bcs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.07, 0.12] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@rcs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.07, 0.11] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vcs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.07, 0.11] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vcs1:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.08] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await@vecs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.07, 0.12] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0:
- Statuses : 3 pass(s) 3 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@rcs0:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@vcs0:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@vcs1:
- Statuses : 2 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@vecs0:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait@bcs0:
- Statuses : 3 pass(s) 2 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 0.03] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait@rcs0:
- Statuses : 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait@vcs0:
- Statuses : 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait@vcs1:
- Statuses : 2 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait@vecs0:
- Statuses : 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.01, 0.02] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await:
- Statuses : 1 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@bcs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.05, 0.10] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@rcs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.05, 0.11] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@vcs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.05, 0.08] s
* igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await@vecs0:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.05, 0.07] s
* igt@kms_busy@basic:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@kms_busy@basic@flip:
- Statuses : 7 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.28, 0.95] s
* igt@kms_busy@basic@modeset:
- Statuses : 7 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.46, 3.67] s
* igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms:
- Statuses : 5 skip(s) 2 timeout(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 121.09] s
* igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch:
- Statuses : 5 pass(s) 1 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 2.62] s
* igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s) 1 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 3.84] s
* igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend:
- Statuses : 4 pass(s) 1 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 4.45] s
* igt@kms_hdr@static-swap:
- Statuses : 6 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@kms_hdr@static-toggle:
- Statuses : 5 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 0.00] s
* igt@kms_hdr@static-toggle-dpms:
- Statuses : 4 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 0.00] s
* igt@kms_hdr@static-toggle-suspend:
- Statuses : 7 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 0.00] s
* igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer:
- Statuses : 3 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
* igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s) 5 skip(s)
- Exec time: [0.0, 0.38] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@bcs0:
- Statuses : 1 fail(s) 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [2.06, 9.53] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@rcs0:
- Statuses : 1 fail(s) 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [5.66, 9.53] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@vcs0:
- Statuses : 1 fail(s) 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [9.05, 9.53] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@vcs1:
- Statuses : 2 pass(s)
- Exec time: [9.52] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy@vecs0:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s)
- Exec time: [9.52, 9.54] s
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-blt:
- Statuses : 5 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.02, 0.08] s
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-blt:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.09, 0.15] s
* igt@prime_vgem@coherency-blt:
- Statuses : 6 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.58, 5.51] s
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_5512_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_create@create-massive:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#3002])
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_create@create-massive.html
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-hostile:
- shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +1 similar issue
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw7/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-hostile.html
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@smoketest:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +8 similar issues
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-snb6/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@smoketest.html
* igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][18] -> [TIMEOUT][19] ([i915#3070])
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us.html
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us.html
* igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][20] -> [INCOMPLETE][21] ([i915#1895] / [i915#2295] / [i915#3031])
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][22] -> [FAIL][23] ([i915#2842])
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
- shard-apl: [PASS][24] -> [SKIP][25] ([fdo#109271])
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-apl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
- shard-apl: [PASS][26] -> [FAIL][27] ([i915#2842])
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0:
- shard-glk: [PASS][28] -> [FAIL][29] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][30] -> [FAIL][31] ([i915#2842])
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][32] -> [FAIL][33] ([i915#2849])
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-parallel:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][34] ([i915#1729])
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl8/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-parallel.html
* igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@rcs0:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][35] ([i915#2389]) +4 similar issues
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][36] -> [SKIP][37] ([i915#2190])
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_pread@exhaustion:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [WARN][38] ([i915#2658])
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_pread@exhaustion.html
* igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [WARN][39] ([i915#2658])
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion.html
* igt@gem_render_copy@yf-tiled-mc-ccs-to-vebox-y-tiled:
- shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][40] ([fdo#109271]) +31 similar issues
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk7/igt@gem_render_copy@yf-tiled-mc-ccs-to-vebox-y-tiled.html
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][41] ([i915#768]) +1 similar issue
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_render_copy@yf-tiled-mc-ccs-to-vebox-y-tiled.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][42] ([i915#3002])
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][43] ([i915#2724])
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-snb5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][44] ([i915#2502] / [i915#2667])
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html
* igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume:
- shard-apl: [PASS][45] -> [DMESG-WARN][46] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-apl6/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl1/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html
* igt@gen7_exec_parse@cmd-crossing-page:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109289])
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb2/igt@gen7_exec_parse@cmd-crossing-page.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@basic-rejected-ctx-param:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#112306])
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@basic-rejected-ctx-param.html
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][49] ([fdo#112306])
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@basic-rejected-ctx-param.html
* igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][50] -> [WARN][51] ([i915#1519])
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-hsw8/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle.html
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw1/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle.html
* igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][52] ([i915#42])
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-snb6/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-16bpp-rotate-90:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][53] ([fdo#111614]) +2 similar issues
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-16bpp-rotate-90.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-90:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#110725] / [fdo#111614]) +1 similar issue
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-90.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-64bpp-rotate-270:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#111615]) +1 similar issue
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-64bpp-rotate-270.html
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][56] ([fdo#110723])
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-64bpp-rotate-270.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][57] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +17 similar issues
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl7/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][58] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +5 similar issues
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd.html
- shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +2 similar issues
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk7/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd.html
- shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +2 similar issues
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw2/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd.html
* igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-max:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][61] ([fdo#109278] / [i915#1149])
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-max.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +17 similar issues
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-red-to-blue:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][63] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +1 similar issue
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-red-to-blue.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-0-5:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][64] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +23 similar issues
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-snb7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-0-5.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@atomic:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][65] ([i915#1319])
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms (NEW):
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][66] ([i915#1319]) +1 similar issue
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl1/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@uevent:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][67] ([i915#2105])
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl7/igt@kms_content_protection@uevent.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x85-onscreen:
- shard-glk: [PASS][68] -> [DMESG-WARN][69] ([i915#118] / [i915#95])
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-glk2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x85-onscreen.html
[69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x85-onscreen.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][70] ([i915#180])
[70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-512x512-rapid-movement:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][71] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#109279]) +1 similar issue
[71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-512x512-rapid-movement.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-onscreen:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][72] ([fdo#109279]) +2 similar issues
[72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-onscreen.html
* igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-64x64-top-edge:
- shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +10 similar issues
[73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-64x64-top-edge.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-legacy:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][74] ([fdo#109274] / [fdo#109278]) +1 similar issue
[74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-legacy.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][75] -> [FAIL][76] ([i915#2370])
[75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-hsw6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle.html
[76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-move:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][77] ([fdo#109278]) +10 similar issues
[77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-move.html
* igt@kms_flip@2x-nonexisting-fb:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][78] ([fdo#109274]) +1 similar issue
[78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_flip@2x-nonexisting-fb.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@c-hdmi-a1:
- shard-glk: [PASS][79] -> [FAIL][80] ([i915#2122])
[79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-glk3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@c-hdmi-a1.html
[80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@c-hdmi-a1.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytileccs-to-64bpp-ytile:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][81] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2642])
[81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl1/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytileccs-to-64bpp-ytile.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-16bpp-ytile:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][82] ([i915#2641])
[82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-16bpp-ytile.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][83] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672])
[83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl2/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-indfb-plflip-blt:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][84] ([fdo#111825]) +16 similar issues
[84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-indfb-plflip-blt.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-pgflip-blt:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][85] ([fdo#109280]) +7 similar issues
[85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-pgflip-blt.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-onoff:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][86] ([fdo#109271]) +369 similar issues
[86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-snb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-onoff.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-wc:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][87] ([fdo#109271]) +213 similar issues
[87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-wc.html
* igt@kms_hdr@static-swap (NEW):
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][88] ([i915#1187])
[88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_hdr@static-swap.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc-pipe-d:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][89] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
[89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc-pipe-d.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][90] -> [DMESG-WARN][91] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue
[90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
[91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
* igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][92] ([i915#180] / [i915#533])
[92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][93] ([i915#265])
[93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb:
- shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][94] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +1 similar issue
[94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb.html
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][95] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +1 similar issue
[95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-opaque-fb:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][96] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues
[96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-opaque-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf:
- shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][97] ([fdo#109271]) +35 similar issues
[97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf.html
* igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][98] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2733])
[98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl6/igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][99] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +3 similar issues
[99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl7/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html
* igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip (NEW):
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][100] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +2 similar issues
[100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
* igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
- shard-hsw: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][101] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1072]) +1 similar issue
[101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_cpu:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][102] -> [SKIP][103] ([fdo#109441]) +2 similar issues
[102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_cpu.html
[103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_cpu.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][104] ([fdo#109441])
[104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html
* igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][105] ([IGT#2])
[105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing.html
* igt@kms_vblank@pipe-d-ts-continuation-idle:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][106] ([fdo#109271]) +168 similar issues
[106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl8/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-d-ts-continuation-idle.html
* igt@kms_writeback@writeback-check-output:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][107] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437])
[107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-apl6/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-check-output.html
* igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][108] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437])
[108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters.html
* igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-a-source-outp-inactive:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][109] ([i915#2530])
[109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb4/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-a-source-outp-inactive.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][110] ([i915#2530]) +1 similar issue
[110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-tglb8/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-a-source-outp-inactive.html
* igt@sysfs_clients@sema-10@vcs0:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][111] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3026]) +3 similar issues
[111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-kbl4/igt@sysfs_clients@sema-10@vcs0.html
* igt@sysfs_clients@split-10@bcs0:
- shard-glk: [PASS][112] -> [SKIP][113] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3026])
[112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6004/shard-glk9/igt@sysfs_clients@split-10@bcs0.html
[113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-glk3/igt@sysfs_clients@split-10@bcs0.html
* igt@tools_test@sysfs_l3_parity:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][114] ([fdo#109307])
[114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/shard-iclb3/igt@tools_test@sysfs_l3_parity.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][115] ([fdo#109307])
[115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/d
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_5512/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 34967 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 10:50 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
@ 2021-02-16 12:47 ` Chris Wilson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> counter values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <float.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> #include "igt_perf.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include "igt_pm.h"
> +#include "igt_stats.h"
> #include "sw_sync.h"
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
> static void
> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
> unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> + igt_stats_t s;
> uint64_t val;
> int fd;
Something to record is that TEST_TRAILING_IDLE and TEST_LONG are mutually
exclusive.
So assert(igt_hweight(flags & (TEST_TRAILING_IDLE | TEST_LONG)) <= 1); ?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
@ 2021-02-16 12:47 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> counter values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <float.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> #include "igt_perf.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include "igt_pm.h"
> +#include "igt_stats.h"
> #include "sw_sync.h"
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
> static void
> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
> unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> + igt_stats_t s;
> uint64_t val;
> int fd;
Something to record is that TEST_TRAILING_IDLE and TEST_LONG are mutually
exclusive.
So assert(igt_hweight(flags & (TEST_TRAILING_IDLE | TEST_LONG)) <= 1); ?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 10:50 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
@ 2021-02-16 12:49 ` Chris Wilson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> counter values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <float.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> #include "igt_perf.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include "igt_pm.h"
> +#include "igt_stats.h"
> #include "sw_sync.h"
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
> static void
> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
> unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> + igt_stats_t s;
> uint64_t val;
> int fd;
>
> @@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> else
> spin = NULL;
>
> - val = pmu_read_single(fd);
> - slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> - if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
> - end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
> - val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
> + igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
> +
> + while (--loops) {
while (loops--)
/o\
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
@ 2021-02-16 12:49 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> counter values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <float.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> #include "igt_perf.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include "igt_pm.h"
> +#include "igt_stats.h"
> #include "sw_sync.h"
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
> static void
> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
> unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> + igt_stats_t s;
> uint64_t val;
> int fd;
>
> @@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> else
> spin = NULL;
>
> - val = pmu_read_single(fd);
> - slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> - if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
> - end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
> - val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
> + igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
> +
> + while (--loops) {
while (loops--)
/o\
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 12:49 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
@ 2021-02-16 15:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2021-02-16 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
On 16/02/2021 12:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
>> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
>> counter values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> +#include <float.h>
>> #include <inttypes.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> #include <signal.h>
>> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
>> #include "igt_perf.h"
>> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
>> #include "igt_pm.h"
>> +#include "igt_stats.h"
>> #include "sw_sync.h"
>>
>> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
>> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
>> static void
>> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
>> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
>> unsigned long slept;
>> igt_spin_t *spin;
>> + igt_stats_t s;
>> uint64_t val;
>> int fd;
>>
>> @@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
>> else
>> spin = NULL;
>>
>> - val = pmu_read_single(fd);
>> - slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>> - if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
>> - end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
>> - val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
>> + igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
>> +
>> + while (--loops) {
>
> while (loops--)
>
> /o\
Yeah.. At least I know the oddity is related to sampling. Since even on
Haswell:
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500207720 busy=500037022 error=-341.25ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500252520 busy=500033517 error=-437.78ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500187490 busy=499999817 error=-375.21ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500244871 busy=499999837 error=-489.83ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500268670 busy=499999477 error=-538.10ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500245246 busy=500000432 error=-489.39ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500245735 busy=499999306 error=-492.62ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500270045 busy=500001747 error=-536.31ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500254286 busy=499998162 error=-511.99ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500247790 busy=500000347 error=-494.64ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250261 busy=500000257 error=-499.76ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250005 busy=500008177 error=-483.41ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500249065 busy=499991867 error=-514.14ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500249725 busy=500000371 error=-498.46ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250335 busy=499999772 error=-500.88ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500258691 busy=499999937 error=-517.24ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500239980 busy=500001037 error=-477.66ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500240791 busy=504999361 error=9512.56ppm
And this last one is way more than one sampling period. I'll be thinking
about this in the background.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
@ 2021-02-16 15:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2021-02-16 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
On 16/02/2021 12:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
>> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
>> counter values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> +#include <float.h>
>> #include <inttypes.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> #include <signal.h>
>> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
>> #include "igt_perf.h"
>> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
>> #include "igt_pm.h"
>> +#include "igt_stats.h"
>> #include "sw_sync.h"
>>
>> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
>> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
>> static void
>> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
>> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
>> unsigned long slept;
>> igt_spin_t *spin;
>> + igt_stats_t s;
>> uint64_t val;
>> int fd;
>>
>> @@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
>> else
>> spin = NULL;
>>
>> - val = pmu_read_single(fd);
>> - slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>> - if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
>> - end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
>> - val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
>> + igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
>> +
>> + while (--loops) {
>
> while (loops--)
>
> /o\
Yeah.. At least I know the oddity is related to sampling. Since even on
Haswell:
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500207720 busy=500037022 error=-341.25ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500252520 busy=500033517 error=-437.78ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500187490 busy=499999817 error=-375.21ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500244871 busy=499999837 error=-489.83ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500268670 busy=499999477 error=-538.10ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500245246 busy=500000432 error=-489.39ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500245735 busy=499999306 error=-492.62ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500270045 busy=500001747 error=-536.31ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500254286 busy=499998162 error=-511.99ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500247790 busy=500000347 error=-494.64ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250261 busy=500000257 error=-499.76ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250005 busy=500008177 error=-483.41ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500249065 busy=499991867 error=-514.14ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500249725 busy=500000371 error=-498.46ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250335 busy=499999772 error=-500.88ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500258691 busy=499999937 error=-517.24ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500239980 busy=500001037 error=-477.66ppm
(perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500240791 busy=504999361 error=9512.56ppm
And this last one is way more than one sampling period. I'll be thinking
about this in the background.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy
2021-02-16 15:59 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
(?)
@ 2021-02-16 17:53 ` Chris Wilson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-16 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, igt-dev; +Cc: Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 15:59:33)
>
> On 16/02/2021 12:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-16 10:50:50)
> >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Test that periodic reads of engine busyness against a constant 100% load
> >> are within the 5000ppm tolerance when comparing perf timestamp versus
> >> counter values.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> >> index 50b5c82bc472..728312be5293 100644
> >> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> >> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
> >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >> #include <stdio.h>
> >> #include <string.h>
> >> #include <fcntl.h>
> >> +#include <float.h>
> >> #include <inttypes.h>
> >> #include <errno.h>
> >> #include <signal.h>
> >> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> >> #include "igt_perf.h"
> >> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> >> #include "igt_pm.h"
> >> +#include "igt_stats.h"
> >> #include "sw_sync.h"
> >>
> >> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the i915 pmu perf interface");
> >> @@ -278,8 +280,11 @@ static void end_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
> >> static void
> >> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> >> {
> >> + unsigned int loops = flags & FLAG_LONG ? 20 : 1;
> >> + double err_min = DBL_MAX, err_max = -DBL_MAX;
> >> unsigned long slept;
> >> igt_spin_t *spin;
> >> + igt_stats_t s;
> >> uint64_t val;
> >> int fd;
> >>
> >> @@ -290,11 +295,40 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> >> else
> >> spin = NULL;
> >>
> >> - val = pmu_read_single(fd);
> >> - slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> >> - if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
> >> - end_spin(gem_fd, spin, flags);
> >> - val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
> >> + igt_stats_init_with_size(&s, loops);
> >> +
> >> + while (--loops) {
> >
> > while (loops--)
> >
> > /o\
>
> Yeah.. At least I know the oddity is related to sampling. Since even on
> Haswell:
>
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500207720 busy=500037022 error=-341.25ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500252520 busy=500033517 error=-437.78ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500187490 busy=499999817 error=-375.21ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500244871 busy=499999837 error=-489.83ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500268670 busy=499999477 error=-538.10ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500245246 busy=500000432 error=-489.39ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500245735 busy=499999306 error=-492.62ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500270045 busy=500001747 error=-536.31ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500254286 busy=499998162 error=-511.99ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500247790 busy=500000347 error=-494.64ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250261 busy=500000257 error=-499.76ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250005 busy=500008177 error=-483.41ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500249065 busy=499991867 error=-514.14ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500249725 busy=500000371 error=-498.46ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500250335 busy=499999772 error=-500.88ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500258691 busy=499999937 error=-517.24ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500239980 busy=500001037 error=-477.66ppm
> (perf_pmu:1591) DEBUG: time=500240791 busy=504999361 error=9512.56ppm
>
> And this last one is way more than one sampling period. I'll be thinking
> about this in the background.
One thing to add would be the cumulative error. It does feel like a
corrective factor is applied to the sampling period.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-16 17:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-16 10:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/perf_pmu: Subtest to measure sampling error for 100% busy Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-16 10:50 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-16 11:39 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-02-16 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] " Chris Wilson
2021-02-16 11:44 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2021-02-16 12:40 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2021-02-16 12:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] " Chris Wilson
2021-02-16 12:47 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2021-02-16 12:49 ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-16 12:49 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2021-02-16 15:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-16 15:59 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-16 17:53 ` Chris Wilson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.