* [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3
@ 2021-03-09 15:34 Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-09 15:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-09 20:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2021-03-09 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
Bartosz Golaszewski
Linus,
Here's a bunch of fixes for the GPIO subsystem. We have two regressions in the
core code spotted right after the merge window, a series of fixes for ACPI GPIO
and a subsequent fix for a related regression in gpio-pca953x + a minor tweak
in .gitignore and a rework of handling of the gpio-line-names to remedy a
regression in stm32mp151.
Please pull!
Best Regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
The following changes since commit a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15:
Linux 5.12-rc2 (2021-03-05 17:33:41 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git tags/gpio-fixes-for-v5.12-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to b41ba2ec54a70908067034f139aa23d0dd2985ce:
gpiolib: Read "gpio-line-names" from a firmware node (2021-03-08 11:59:17 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
gpio fixes for v5.12-rc3
- fix two regressions in core GPIO subsystem code: one NULL-pointer dereference
and one list corruption
- read GPIO line names from fwnode instead of using the generic device
properties to fix a regression on stm32mp151
- fixes to ACPI GPIO and gpio-pca953x to handle a regression in IRQ handling
on Intel Galileo
- update .gitignore in GPIO selftests
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Shevchenko (4):
gpiolib: acpi: Add ACPI_GPIO_QUIRK_ABSOLUTE_NUMBER quirk
gpiolib: acpi: Allow to find GpioInt() resource by name and index
gpio: pca953x: Set IRQ type when handle Intel Galileo Gen 2
gpiolib: Read "gpio-line-names" from a firmware node
Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
selftests: gpio: update .gitignore
Johan Hovold (2):
gpio: fix NULL-deref-on-deregistration regression
gpio: fix gpio-device list corruption
Yang Li (1):
gpiolib: acpi: Add missing IRQF_ONESHOT
drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 78 ++++++++++-----------------------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 21 ++++++---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 19 ++++----
include/linux/acpi.h | 10 ++++-
include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/gpio/.gitignore | 2 +-
6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3
2021-03-09 15:34 [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3 Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2021-03-09 15:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-09 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-09 20:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2021-03-09 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:34 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> Linus,
>
> Here's a bunch of fixes for the GPIO subsystem. We have two regressions in the
> core code spotted right after the merge window, a series of fixes for ACPI GPIO
> and a subsequent fix for a related regression in gpio-pca953x + a minor tweak
> in .gitignore and a rework of handling of the gpio-line-names to remedy a
> regression in stm32mp151.
>
> Please pull!
>
> Best Regards,
> Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> The following changes since commit a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15:
>
> Linux 5.12-rc2 (2021-03-05 17:33:41 -0800)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git tags/gpio-fixes-for-v5.12-rc3
>
> for you to fetch changes up to b41ba2ec54a70908067034f139aa23d0dd2985ce:
>
> gpiolib: Read "gpio-line-names" from a firmware node (2021-03-08 11:59:17 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> gpio fixes for v5.12-rc3
>
> - fix two regressions in core GPIO subsystem code: one NULL-pointer dereference
> and one list corruption
> - read GPIO line names from fwnode instead of using the generic device
> properties to fix a regression on stm32mp151
> - fixes to ACPI GPIO and gpio-pca953x to handle a regression in IRQ handling
> on Intel Galileo
> - update .gitignore in GPIO selftests
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Shevchenko (4):
> gpiolib: acpi: Add ACPI_GPIO_QUIRK_ABSOLUTE_NUMBER quirk
> gpiolib: acpi: Allow to find GpioInt() resource by name and index
> gpio: pca953x: Set IRQ type when handle Intel Galileo Gen 2
> gpiolib: Read "gpio-line-names" from a firmware node
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
> selftests: gpio: update .gitignore
>
> Johan Hovold (2):
> gpio: fix NULL-deref-on-deregistration regression
> gpio: fix gpio-device list corruption
>
> Yang Li (1):
> gpiolib: acpi: Add missing IRQF_ONESHOT
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 78 ++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 21 ++++++---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 19 ++++----
> include/linux/acpi.h | 10 ++++-
> include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 2 +
> tools/testing/selftests/gpio/.gitignore | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Hi Linus,
I realized only after I sent out this PR that I had rebased the branch
on top of v5.12-rc2 (because of the v5.12-rc1 situation) without
--rebase-merges and this caused git to drop the merge commit for
Andy's pull-request. Please let me know if you can pull this as is or
if I should rebuild my branch and resend.
Best Regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3
2021-03-09 15:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2021-03-09 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-10 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2021-03-09 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:43 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> I realized only after I sent out this PR that I had rebased the branch
> on top of v5.12-rc2 (because of the v5.12-rc1 situation) without
> --rebase-merges and this caused git to drop the merge commit for
> Andy's pull-request. Please let me know if you can pull this as is or
> if I should rebuild my branch and resend.
This is fine - it's small, it's a one-time pain, and there's that reason for it.
So as long as Andy is aware of how his patches got rebased and don't
match his branch any more, I think it's not a big deal, and I've
pulled it as-is.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3
2021-03-09 15:34 [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3 Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-09 15:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2021-03-09 20:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pr-tracker-bot @ 2021-03-09 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
The pull request you sent on Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:34:43 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git tags/gpio-fixes-for-v5.12-rc3
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/4b3d9f9cf108ebf2c48fbbbf30a8d1346d9cc7d6
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/prtracker.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3
2021-03-09 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2021-03-10 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-10 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Walleij, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:04:58PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:43 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > I realized only after I sent out this PR that I had rebased the branch
> > on top of v5.12-rc2 (because of the v5.12-rc1 situation) without
> > --rebase-merges and this caused git to drop the merge commit for
> > Andy's pull-request. Please let me know if you can pull this as is or
> > if I should rebuild my branch and resend.
>
> This is fine - it's small, it's a one-time pain, and there's that reason for it.
>
> So as long as Andy is aware of how his patches got rebased and don't
> match his branch any more, I think it's not a big deal, and I've
> pulled it as-is.
Thanks! It's not big deal, but a good learning anyway how to communicate and
proceed with the git in such (rare I suppose) situations.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-10 11:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-09 15:34 [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.12-rc3 Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-09 15:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-09 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-10 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-09 20:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.