* [PATCH v2 01/10] tty/sysrq: Add a blank line after declarations
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] tty/sysrq: Fix issues of code indent should use tabs Xiaofei Tan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Add a blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index 959f9e1..0372ed7 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_loglevel_op = {
static void sysrq_handle_SAK(int key)
{
struct work_struct *SAK_work = &vc_cons[fg_console].SAK_work;
+
schedule_work(SAK_work);
}
static const struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_SAK_op = {
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 02/10] tty/sysrq: Fix issues of code indent should use tabs
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] tty/sysrq: Add a blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Add a blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Fix issues of code indent should use tabs, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index 0372ed7..6628792 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -548,22 +548,22 @@ static int sysrq_key_table_key2index(int key)
*/
static const struct sysrq_key_op *__sysrq_get_key_op(int key)
{
- const struct sysrq_key_op *op_p = NULL;
- int i;
+ const struct sysrq_key_op *op_p = NULL;
+ int i;
i = sysrq_key_table_key2index(key);
if (i != -1)
- op_p = sysrq_key_table[i];
+ op_p = sysrq_key_table[i];
- return op_p;
+ return op_p;
}
static void __sysrq_put_key_op(int key, const struct sysrq_key_op *op_p)
{
- int i = sysrq_key_table_key2index(key);
+ int i = sysrq_key_table_key2index(key);
- if (i != -1)
- sysrq_key_table[i] = op_p;
+ if (i != -1)
+ sysrq_key_table[i] = op_p;
}
void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask)
@@ -587,8 +587,8 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask)
orig_log_level = console_loglevel;
console_loglevel = CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT;
- op_p = __sysrq_get_key_op(key);
- if (op_p) {
+ op_p = __sysrq_get_key_op(key);
+ if (op_p) {
/*
* Should we check for enabled operations (/proc/sysrq-trigger
* should not) and is the invoked operation enabled?
@@ -637,13 +637,13 @@ static int sysrq_reset_downtime_ms;
/* Simple translation table for the SysRq keys */
static const unsigned char sysrq_xlate[KEY_CNT] =
- "\000\0331234567890-=\177\t" /* 0x00 - 0x0f */
- "qwertyuiop[]\r\000as" /* 0x10 - 0x1f */
- "dfghjkl;'`\000\\zxcv" /* 0x20 - 0x2f */
- "bnm,./\000*\000 \000\201\202\203\204\205" /* 0x30 - 0x3f */
- "\206\207\210\211\212\000\000789-456+1" /* 0x40 - 0x4f */
- "230\177\000\000\213\214\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000" /* 0x50 - 0x5f */
- "\r\000/"; /* 0x60 - 0x6f */
+ "\000\0331234567890-=\177\t" /* 0x00 - 0x0f */
+ "qwertyuiop[]\r\000as" /* 0x10 - 0x1f */
+ "dfghjkl;'`\000\\zxcv" /* 0x20 - 0x2f */
+ "bnm,./\000*\000 \000\201\202\203\204\205" /* 0x30 - 0x3f */
+ "\206\207\210\211\212\000\000789-456+1" /* 0x40 - 0x4f */
+ "230\177\000\000\213\214\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000" /* 0x50 - 0x5f */
+ "\r\000/"; /* 0x60 - 0x6f */
struct sysrq_state {
struct input_handle handle;
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ int sysrq_toggle_support(int enable_mask)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysrq_toggle_support);
static int __sysrq_swap_key_ops(int key, const struct sysrq_key_op *insert_op_p,
- const struct sysrq_key_op *remove_op_p)
+ const struct sysrq_key_op *remove_op_p)
{
int retval;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 03/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Add a blank line after declarations
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] tty/sysrq: Add a blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] tty/sysrq: Fix issues of code indent should use tabs Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Fix coding style issues of block comments Xiaofei Tan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Add a blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
index 4b751b9..86070f7 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ void proc_clear_tty(struct task_struct *p)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_struct *tty;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
tty = p->signal->tty;
p->signal->tty = NULL;
@@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_current_tty);
void session_clear_tty(struct pid *session)
{
struct task_struct *p;
+
do_each_pid_task(session, PIDTYPE_SID, p) {
proc_clear_tty(p);
} while_each_pid_task(session, PIDTYPE_SID, p);
@@ -269,6 +271,7 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit)
tty_vhangup_session(tty);
} else {
struct pid *tty_pgrp = tty_get_pgrp(tty);
+
if (tty_pgrp) {
kill_pgrp(tty_pgrp, SIGHUP, on_exit);
if (!on_exit)
@@ -280,6 +283,7 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit)
} else if (on_exit) {
struct pid *old_pgrp;
+
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
old_pgrp = current->signal->tty_old_pgrp;
current->signal->tty_old_pgrp = NULL;
@@ -328,6 +332,7 @@ void no_tty(void)
between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possible we need
to protect against this anyway */
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+
disassociate_ctty(0);
proc_clear_tty(tsk);
}
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 04/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Fix coding style issues of block comments
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Add a blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-07 5:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Remove spaces before tabs Xiaofei Tan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Besides, do some expression optimization for the sentenses.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
index 86070f7..7003b6b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
@@ -204,8 +204,10 @@ int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct *tty, int exit_session)
spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
if (p->signal->tty == tty) {
p->signal->tty = NULL;
- /* We defer the dereferences outside fo
- the tasklist lock */
+ /*
+ * We defer the dereferences outside of
+ * the tasklist lock period
+ */
refs++;
}
if (!p->signal->leader) {
@@ -328,9 +330,11 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit)
*/
void no_tty(void)
{
- /* FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
- between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possible we need
- to protect against this anyway */
+ /*
+ * FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
+ * between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possibly we need
+ * to protect against this period anyway
+ */
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
disassociate_ctty(0);
@@ -536,7 +540,7 @@ static int tiocgsid(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *real_tty, pid_t _
/*
* (tty == real_tty) is a cheap way of
* testing if the tty is NOT a master pty.
- */
+ */
if (tty == real_tty && current->signal->tty != real_tty)
return -ENOTTY;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Fix coding style issues of block comments
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Fix coding style issues of block comments Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-07 5:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-04-07 6:57 ` Xiaofei Tan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2021-04-07 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiaofei Tan, gregkh; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm
On 06. 04. 21, 13:24, Xiaofei Tan wrote:
> Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.
> Besides, do some expression optimization for the sentenses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
> index 86070f7..7003b6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
> @@ -204,8 +204,10 @@ int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct *tty, int exit_session)
> spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
> if (p->signal->tty == tty) {
> p->signal->tty = NULL;
> - /* We defer the dereferences outside fo
> - the tasklist lock */
> + /*
> + * We defer the dereferences outside of
> + * the tasklist lock period
:). No, I meant "period" as this punctuation mark: .
> + */
> refs++;
> }
> if (!p->signal->leader) {
> @@ -328,9 +330,11 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit)
> */
> void no_tty(void)
> {
> - /* FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
> - between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possible we need
> - to protect against this anyway */
> + /*
> + * FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
> + * between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possibly we need
> + * to protect against this period anyway
The same here.
> + */
> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
>
> disassociate_ctty(0);
> @@ -536,7 +540,7 @@ static int tiocgsid(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *real_tty, pid_t _
> /*
> * (tty == real_tty) is a cheap way of
> * testing if the tty is NOT a master pty.
> - */
> + */
> if (tty == real_tty && current->signal->tty != real_tty)
> return -ENOTTY;
>
>
--
js
suse labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Fix coding style issues of block comments
2021-04-07 5:26 ` Jiri Slaby
@ 2021-04-07 6:57 ` Xiaofei Tan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-07 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Slaby, gregkh; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm
Hi Jiri,
On 2021/4/7 13:26, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 06. 04. 21, 13:24, Xiaofei Tan wrote:
>> Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.
>> Besides, do some expression optimization for the sentenses.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
>> index 86070f7..7003b6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
>> @@ -204,8 +204,10 @@ int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct
>> *tty, int exit_session)
>> spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
>> if (p->signal->tty == tty) {
>> p->signal->tty = NULL;
>> - /* We defer the dereferences outside fo
>> - the tasklist lock */
>> + /*
>> + * We defer the dereferences outside of
>> + * the tasklist lock period
>
> :). No, I meant "period" as this punctuation mark: .
>
Oh, my misunderstanding. I will send v3 later. thanks. :)
>> + */
>> refs++;
>> }
>> if (!p->signal->leader) {
>> @@ -328,9 +330,11 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit)
>> */
>> void no_tty(void)
>> {
>> - /* FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
>> - between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possible we need
>> - to protect against this anyway */
>> + /*
>> + * FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
>> + * between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possibly we need
>> + * to protect against this period anyway
>
> The same here.
>
Sure
>> + */
>> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
>> disassociate_ctty(0);
>> @@ -536,7 +540,7 @@ static int tiocgsid(struct tty_struct *tty, struct
>> tty_struct *real_tty, pid_t _
>> /*
>> * (tty == real_tty) is a cheap way of
>> * testing if the tty is NOT a master pty.
>> - */
>> + */
>> if (tty == real_tty && current->signal->tty != real_tty)
>> return -ENOTTY;
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 05/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Remove spaces before tabs
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Fix coding style issues of block comments Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix an issue of code indent should use tabs Xiaofei Tan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Remove spaces before tabs following the advice of checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
index 7003b6b..9cbb08a 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
@@ -244,10 +244,10 @@ int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct *tty, int exit_session)
* it wants to disassociate itself from its controlling tty.
*
* It performs the following functions:
- * (1) Sends a SIGHUP and SIGCONT to the foreground process group
- * (2) Clears the tty from being controlling the session
- * (3) Clears the controlling tty for all processes in the
- * session group.
+ * (1) Sends a SIGHUP and SIGCONT to the foreground process group
+ * (2) Clears the tty from being controlling the session
+ * (3) Clears the controlling tty for all processes in the
+ * session group.
*
* The argument on_exit is set to 1 if called when a process is
* exiting; it is 0 if called by the ioctl TIOCNOTTY.
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 06/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix an issue of code indent should use tabs
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] tty: tty_jobctrl: Remove spaces before tabs Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Add a blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Fix an issue of code indent should use tabs, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 1ba74d6..2992319 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int tty_ldisc_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_ldisc *ld)
WARN_ON(test_and_set_bit(TTY_LDISC_OPEN, &tty->flags));
if (ld->ops->open) {
int ret;
- /* BTM here locks versus a hangup event */
+ /* BTM here locks versus a hangup event */
ret = ld->ops->open(tty);
if (ret)
clear_bit(TTY_LDISC_OPEN, &tty->flags);
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 07/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Add a blank line after declarations
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix an issue of code indent should use tabs Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix coding style issues of block comments Xiaofei Tan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Add a blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 2992319..df0b589 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ void tty_ldisc_hangup(struct tty_struct *tty, bool reinit)
int tty_ldisc_setup(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *o_tty)
{
int retval = tty_ldisc_open(tty, tty->ldisc);
+
if (retval)
return retval;
@@ -829,6 +830,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_ldisc_release);
int tty_ldisc_init(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct tty_ldisc *ld = tty_ldisc_get(tty, N_TTY);
+
if (IS_ERR(ld))
return PTR_ERR(ld);
tty->ldisc = ld;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 08/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix coding style issues of block comments
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Add a blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Do not use assignment in if condition Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Remove the repeated word 'the' Xiaofei Tan
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index df0b589..874d238 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -529,9 +529,11 @@ static void tty_ldisc_restore(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_ldisc *old)
const char *name = tty_name(tty);
pr_warn("Falling back ldisc for %s.\n", name);
- /* The traditional behaviour is to fall back to N_TTY, we
- want to avoid falling back to N_NULL unless we have no
- choice to avoid the risk of breaking anything */
+ /*
+ * The traditional behaviour is to fall back to N_TTY, we
+ * want to avoid falling back to N_NULL unless we have no
+ * choice to avoid the risk of breaking anything
+ */
if (tty_ldisc_failto(tty, N_TTY) < 0 &&
tty_ldisc_failto(tty, N_NULL) < 0)
panic("Couldn't open N_NULL ldisc for %s.", name);
@@ -600,17 +602,21 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int disc)
up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
}
- /* At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
- reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
- the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
- above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
- the old ldisc is correct. */
+ /*
+ * At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
+ * reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
+ * the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
+ * above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
+ * the old ldisc is correct.
+ */
new_ldisc = old_ldisc;
out:
tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
- /* Restart the work queue in case no characters kick it off. Safe if
- already running */
+ /*
+ * Restart the work queue in case no characters kick it off. Safe if
+ * already running
+ */
tty_buffer_restart_work(tty->port);
err:
tty_ldisc_put(new_ldisc); /* drop the extra reference */
@@ -812,8 +818,10 @@ void tty_ldisc_release(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty_ldisc_kill(o_tty);
tty_ldisc_unlock_pair(tty, o_tty);
- /* And the memory resources remaining (buffers, termios) will be
- disposed of when the kref hits zero */
+ /*
+ * And the memory resources remaining (buffers, termios) will be
+ * disposed of when the kref hits zero
+ */
tty_ldisc_debug(tty, "released\n");
}
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 09/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Do not use assignment in if condition
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Fix coding style issues of block comments Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Remove the repeated word 'the' Xiaofei Tan
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Do not use assignment in if condition following the advice of
checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 874d238..56e67f7 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -508,7 +508,8 @@ static int tty_ldisc_failto(struct tty_struct *tty, int ld)
return PTR_ERR(disc);
tty->ldisc = disc;
tty_set_termios_ldisc(tty, ld);
- if ((r = tty_ldisc_open(tty, disc)) < 0)
+ r = tty_ldisc_open(tty, disc);
+ if (r < 0)
tty_ldisc_put(disc);
return r;
}
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 10/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Remove the repeated word 'the'
2021-04-06 11:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] tty: Fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] tty: tty_ldisc: Do not use assignment in if condition Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-04-06 11:24 ` Xiaofei Tan
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-04-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, jirislaby; +Cc: linux-kernel, linuxarm, Xiaofei Tan
Remove the repeated word 'the' following advice of checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 56e67f7..fdc4fa3 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int tty_ldisc_autoload = IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_LDISC_AUTOLOAD);
* Returns: -EINVAL if the discipline index is not [N_TTY..NR_LDISCS] or
* if the discipline is not registered
* -EAGAIN if request_module() failed to load or register the
- * the discipline
+ * discipline
* -ENOMEM if allocation failure
*
* Otherwise, returns a pointer to the discipline and bumps the
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread