From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jian Cai <jiancai@google.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161850887861.19953.221061108559265600.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414000803.662534-1-nathan@kernel.org>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:08:04 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is
> set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S:
>
> <instantiation>:5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (664b-663b) + (662b-661b)
> ^
> <instantiation>:6:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (662b-661b) + (664b-663b)
> ^
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/22315a2296f4
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jian Cai <jiancai@google.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161850887861.19953.221061108559265600.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414000803.662534-1-nathan@kernel.org>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:08:04 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is
> set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S:
>
> <instantiation>:5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (664b-663b) + (662b-661b)
> ^
> <instantiation>:6:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (662b-661b) + (664b-663b)
> ^
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/22315a2296f4
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 0:08 [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-14 17:46 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-14 17:46 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-14 19:22 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-14 19:22 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-15 9:17 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 9:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 13:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-15 13:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-15 14:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 14:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 15:50 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-15 15:50 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-15 16:57 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 16:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-04-15 17:48 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161850887861.19953.221061108559265600.b4-ty@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jiancai@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.