FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Add support for RDPID without RDTSCP" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Add support for RDPID without RDTSCP" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 36fa06f9ff39f23e03cd8206dc6bbb7711c23be6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:17:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Add support for RDPID without RDTSCP

Allow userspace to enable RDPID for a guest without also enabling RDTSCP.
Aside from checking for RDPID support in the obvious flows, VMX also needs
to set ENABLE_RDTSCP=1 when RDPID is exposed.

For the record, there is no known scenario where enabling RDPID without
RDTSCP is desirable.  But, both AMD and Intel architectures allow for the
condition, i.e. this is purely to make KVM more architecturally accurate.

Fixes: 41cd02c6f7f6 ("kvm: x86: Expose RDPID in KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210504171734.1434054-8-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 13e4dd128177..0ba0a00f8dc6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -2669,7 +2669,8 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 		if (tsc_aux_uret_slot < 0)
 			return 1;
 		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
-		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) &&
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID))
 			return 1;
 		msr_info->data = svm->tsc_aux;
 		break;
@@ -2891,7 +2892,8 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 			return 1;
 
 		if (!msr->host_initiated &&
-		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) &&
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID))
 			return 1;
 
 		/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 11ff9c3d95d5..b304e372aab3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1788,7 +1788,8 @@ static void setup_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	if (update_transition_efer(vmx))
 		vmx_setup_uret_msr(vmx, MSR_EFER);
 
-	if (guest_cpuid_has(&vmx->vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
+	if (guest_cpuid_has(&vmx->vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)  ||
+	    guest_cpuid_has(&vmx->vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID))
 		vmx_setup_uret_msr(vmx, MSR_TSC_AUX);
 
 	vmx_setup_uret_msr(vmx, MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL);
@@ -1994,7 +1995,8 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 		break;
 	case MSR_TSC_AUX:
 		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
-		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) &&
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID))
 			return 1;
 		goto find_uret_msr;
 	case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
@@ -2314,7 +2316,8 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 		break;
 	case MSR_TSC_AUX:
 		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
-		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) &&
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID))
 			return 1;
 		/* Check reserved bit, higher 32 bits should be zero */
 		if ((data >> 32) != 0)
@@ -4368,7 +4371,23 @@ static void vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 						  xsaves_enabled, false);
 	}
 
-	vmx_adjust_sec_exec_feature(vmx, &exec_control, rdtscp, RDTSCP);
+	/*
+	 * RDPID is also gated by ENABLE_RDTSCP, turn on the control if either
+	 * feature is exposed to the guest.  This creates a virtualization hole
+	 * if both are supported in hardware but only one is exposed to the
+	 * guest, but letting the guest execute RDTSCP or RDPID when either one
+	 * is advertised is preferable to emulating the advertised instruction
+	 * in KVM on #UD, and obviously better than incorrectly injecting #UD.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_has_vmx_rdtscp()) {
+		bool rdpid_or_rdtscp_enabled =
+			guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) ||
+			guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID);
+
+		vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(vmx, &exec_control,
+						  SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_RDTSCP,
+						  rdpid_or_rdtscp_enabled, false);
+	}
 	vmx_adjust_sec_exec_feature(vmx, &exec_control, invpcid, INVPCID);
 
 	vmx_adjust_sec_exec_exiting(vmx, &exec_control, rdrand, RDRAND);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index bd90c73c37b4..0856636efc44 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5941,7 +5941,8 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_TSC_AUX:
-			if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
+			if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) &&
+			    !kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_RDPID))
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL: