[PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: Remove the repeated declaration

[PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: Remove the repeated declaration

[Shaokun Zhang]

Function 'sigmadsp_reset' is declared twice, so remove the repeated
declaration.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.h b/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.h
index d63b8c366efb..2783eff633a1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.h
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.h
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ struct sigmadsp {
 
 struct sigmadsp *devm_sigmadsp_init(struct device *dev,
 	const struct sigmadsp_ops *ops, const char *firmware_name);
-void sigmadsp_reset(struct sigmadsp *sigmadsp);
 
 int sigmadsp_restrict_params(struct sigmadsp *sigmadsp,
 	struct snd_pcm_substream *substream);
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: Remove the repeated declaration

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, 29 May 2021 17:14:50 +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
> Function 'sigmadsp_reset' is declared twice, so remove the repeated
> declaration.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: sigmadsp: Remove the repeated declaration
      commit: f34cd5eb2c57c93bdd7659522da9f7f97e863a0d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark