All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] xfs: move xfs_inactive call to xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:43:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162758423915.332903.12021883694187724326.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162758423315.332903.16799817941903734904.stgit@magnolia>

From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Move the xfs_inactive call and all the other debugging checks and stats
updates into xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable because most of that are
implementation details about the inode cache.  This is preparation for
deferred inactivation that is coming up.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c  |   50 --------------------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 086a88b8dfdb..7bc2690da87d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -292,6 +292,32 @@ xfs_perag_clear_inode_tag(
 	trace_xfs_perag_clear_inode_tag(mp, pag->pag_agno, tag, _RET_IP_);
 }
 
+#ifdef DEBUG
+static void
+xfs_check_delalloc(
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
+	int			whichfork)
+{
+	struct xfs_ifork	*ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
+	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	got;
+	struct xfs_iext_cursor	icur;
+
+	if (!ifp || !xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ifp, 0, &icur, &got))
+		return;
+	do {
+		if (isnullstartblock(got.br_startblock)) {
+			xfs_warn(ip->i_mount,
+	"ino %llx %s fork has delalloc extent at [0x%llx:0x%llx]",
+				ip->i_ino,
+				whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK ? "data" : "cow",
+				got.br_startoff, got.br_blockcount);
+		}
+	} while (xfs_iext_next_extent(ifp, &icur, &got));
+}
+#else
+#define xfs_check_delalloc(ip, whichfork)	do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
 /*
  * We set the inode flag atomically with the radix tree tag.
  * Once we get tag lookups on the radix tree, this inode flag
@@ -304,6 +330,29 @@ xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
 	struct xfs_perag	*pag;
 
+	xfs_inactive(ip);
+
+	if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp) && ip->i_delayed_blks) {
+		xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
+		xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_COW_FORK);
+		ASSERT(0);
+	}
+
+	XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_reclaim);
+
+	/*
+	 * We should never get here with one of the reclaim flags already set.
+	 */
+	ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
+	ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
+
+	/*
+	 * We always use background reclaim here because even if the inode is
+	 * clean, it still may be under IO and hence we have wait for IO
+	 * completion to occur before we can reclaim the inode. The background
+	 * reclaim path handles this more efficiently than we can here, so
+	 * simply let background reclaim tear down all inodes.
+	 */
 	pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
 	spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 36fc81e52dc2..ef89a9a3ba9e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -591,32 +591,6 @@ xfs_fs_alloc_inode(
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-#ifdef DEBUG
-static void
-xfs_check_delalloc(
-	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
-	int			whichfork)
-{
-	struct xfs_ifork	*ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
-	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	got;
-	struct xfs_iext_cursor	icur;
-
-	if (!ifp || !xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ifp, 0, &icur, &got))
-		return;
-	do {
-		if (isnullstartblock(got.br_startblock)) {
-			xfs_warn(ip->i_mount,
-	"ino %llx %s fork has delalloc extent at [0x%llx:0x%llx]",
-				ip->i_ino,
-				whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK ? "data" : "cow",
-				got.br_startoff, got.br_blockcount);
-		}
-	} while (xfs_iext_next_extent(ifp, &icur, &got));
-}
-#else
-#define xfs_check_delalloc(ip, whichfork)	do { } while (0)
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Now that the generic code is guaranteed not to be accessing
  * the linux inode, we can inactivate and reclaim the inode.
@@ -632,30 +606,6 @@ xfs_fs_destroy_inode(
 	ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&inode->i_rwsem));
 	XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_rele);
 	XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_remove);
-
-	xfs_inactive(ip);
-
-	if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount) && ip->i_delayed_blks) {
-		xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
-		xfs_check_delalloc(ip, XFS_COW_FORK);
-		ASSERT(0);
-	}
-
-	XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_reclaim);
-
-	/*
-	 * We should never get here with one of the reclaim flags already set.
-	 */
-	ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
-	ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
-
-	/*
-	 * We always use background reclaim here because even if the inode is
-	 * clean, it still may be under IO and hence we have wait for IO
-	 * completion to occur before we can reclaim the inode. The background
-	 * reclaim path handles this more efficiently than we can here, so
-	 * simply let background reclaim tear down all inodes.
-	 */
 	xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable(ip);
 }
 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 18:43 [PATCHSET v8 00/20] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:43 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 02/20] xfs: detach dquots from inode if we don't need to inactivate it Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 03/20] xfs: defer inode inactivation to a workqueue Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-30  4:24   ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-31  4:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-01 21:49       ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-01 23:47         ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-03  8:34   ` [PATCH, alternative] xfs: per-cpu deferred inode inactivation queues Dave Chinner
2021-08-03 20:20     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04  3:20     ` [PATCH, alternative v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 10:03       ` [PATCH] xfs: inodegc needs to stop before freeze Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 12:37         ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 10:46       ` [PATCH] xfs: don't run inodegc flushes when inodegc is not active Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:20         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 11:09       ` [PATCH, alternative v2] xfs: per-cpu deferred inode inactivation queues Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 15:59         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:35           ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:49       ` [PATCH, pre-03/20 #1] xfs: introduce CPU hotplug infrastructure Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:50       ` [PATCH, pre-03/20 #2] xfs: introduce all-mounts list for cpu hotplug notifications Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:06         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:17           ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:52       ` [PATCH, post-03/20 1/1] xfs: hook up inodegc to CPU dead notification Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:19         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:48           ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 04/20] xfs: throttle inode inactivation queuing on memory reclaim Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 05/20] xfs: don't throttle memory reclaim trying to queue inactive inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 06/20] xfs: throttle inodegc queuing on backlog Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02  0:45   ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-02  1:30     ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 07/20] xfs: queue inodegc worker immediately when memory is tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 08/20] xfs: expose sysfs knob to control inode inactivation delay Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 09/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when free space is tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 10/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when quota are tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 11/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when realtime extents " Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 12/20] xfs: inactivate inodes any time we try to free speculative preallocations Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 13/20] xfs: flush inode inactivation work when compiling usage statistics Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 14/20] xfs: parallelize inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02  0:55   ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-02 21:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 15/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when AG free space are tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 16/20] xfs: queue inodegc worker immediately on backlog Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 17/20] xfs: don't run speculative preallocation gc when fs is frozen Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 18/20] xfs: scale speculative preallocation gc delay based on free space Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 19/20] xfs: use background worker pool when transactions can't get " Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 20/20] xfs: avoid buffer deadlocks when walking fs inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02 10:35 ` [PATCHSET v8 00/20] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162758423915.332903.12021883694187724326.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.