All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when free space is tight
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:44:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162758428318.332903.10268108408219495793.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162758423315.332903.16799817941903734904.stgit@magnolia>

From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Now that we have made the inactivation of unlinked inodes a background
task to increase the throughput of file deletions, we need to be a
little more careful about how long of a delay we can tolerate.

On a mostly empty filesystem, the risk of the allocator making poor
decisions due to fragmentation of the free space on account a lengthy
delay in background updates is minimal because there's plenty of space.
However, if free space is tight, we want to deallocate unlinked inodes
as quickly as possible to avoid fallocate ENOSPC and to give the
allocator the best shot at optimal allocations for new writes.

Therefore, use the same free space thresholds that we use to limit
preallocation to scale down the delay between an AG being tagged for
needing inodgc work and the inodegc worker being executed.  This follows
the same principle that XFS becomes less aggressive about allocations
(and more precise about accounting) when nearing full.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c |   96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h  |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 69f7fb048116..6418e50518f8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -212,6 +212,39 @@ xfs_reclaim_work_queue(
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+/*
+ * Scale down the background work delay if we're low on free space.  Similar to
+ * the way that we throttle preallocations, we halve the delay time for every
+ * low free space threshold that isn't met.  Return value is in ms.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int
+xfs_gc_delay_freesp(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	unsigned int		tag,
+	unsigned int		delay_ms)
+{
+	int64_t			freesp;
+	unsigned int		shift = 0;
+
+	freesp = percpu_counter_read_positive(&mp->m_fdblocks);
+	if (freesp < mp->m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_5_PCNT]) {
+		shift = 2;
+		if (freesp < mp->m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_4_PCNT])
+			shift++;
+		if (freesp < mp->m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_3_PCNT])
+			shift++;
+		if (freesp < mp->m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_2_PCNT])
+			shift++;
+		if (freesp < mp->m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_1_PCNT])
+			shift++;
+	}
+
+	if (shift)
+		trace_xfs_gc_delay_fdblocks(mp, tag, shift);
+
+	return delay_ms >> shift;
+}
+
 /*
  * Compute the lag between scheduling and executing some kind of background
  * garbage collection work.  Return value is in ms.
@@ -239,7 +272,7 @@ xfs_gc_delay_ms(
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	return default_ms;
+	return xfs_gc_delay_freesp(mp, tag, default_ms);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -265,7 +298,8 @@ xfs_blockgc_queue(
  */
 static void
 xfs_inodegc_queue(
-	struct xfs_mount        *mp)
+	struct xfs_mount        *mp,
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
 {
 	if (!test_bit(XFS_OPFLAG_INODEGC_RUNNING_BIT, &mp->m_opflags))
 		return;
@@ -282,14 +316,55 @@ xfs_inodegc_queue(
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+/*
+ * Reschedule the background inactivation worker immediately if space is
+ * getting tight and the worker hasn't started running yet.
+ */
+static void
+xfs_gc_requeue_now(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	unsigned int		tag)
+{
+	struct delayed_work	*dwork;
+	unsigned int		opflag_bit;
+	unsigned int		default_ms;
+
+	switch (tag) {
+	case XFS_ICI_INODEGC_TAG:
+		dwork = &mp->m_inodegc_work;
+		default_ms = xfs_inodegc_ms;
+		opflag_bit = XFS_OPFLAG_INODEGC_RUNNING_BIT;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (!delayed_work_pending(dwork) ||
+	    !test_bit(opflag_bit, &mp->m_opflags))
+		return;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, tag))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	if (xfs_gc_delay_ms(mp, tag) == default_ms)
+		goto unlock;
+
+	trace_xfs_gc_requeue_now(mp, tag);
+	queue_delayed_work(mp->m_gc_workqueue, dwork, 0);
+unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 /* Set a tag on both the AG incore inode tree and the AG radix tree. */
 static void
 xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(
 	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
-	xfs_agino_t		agino,
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	unsigned int		tag)
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = pag->pag_mount;
+	xfs_agino_t		agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino);
 	bool			was_tagged;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
@@ -302,8 +377,10 @@ xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(
 	else if (tag == XFS_ICI_INODEGC_TAG)
 		pag->pag_ici_needs_inactive++;
 
-	if (was_tagged)
+	if (was_tagged) {
+		xfs_gc_requeue_now(mp, tag);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	/* propagate the tag up into the perag radix tree */
 	spin_lock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
@@ -319,7 +396,7 @@ xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(
 		xfs_blockgc_queue(pag);
 		break;
 	case XFS_ICI_INODEGC_TAG:
-		xfs_inodegc_queue(mp);
+		xfs_inodegc_queue(mp, ip);
 		break;
 	}
 
@@ -479,7 +556,7 @@ xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable(
 		tag = XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG;
 	}
 
-	xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(pag, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino), tag);
+	xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(pag, ip, tag);
 
 	spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
@@ -1367,8 +1444,7 @@ xfs_blockgc_set_iflag(
 	pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
 	spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 
-	xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(pag, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino),
-			XFS_ICI_BLOCKGC_TAG);
+	xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(pag, ip, XFS_ICI_BLOCKGC_TAG);
 
 	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 	xfs_perag_put(pag);
@@ -1849,7 +1925,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_inactivate(
 	ip->i_flags |= XFS_IRECLAIMABLE;
 
 	xfs_perag_clear_inode_tag(pag, agino, XFS_ICI_INODEGC_TAG);
-	xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(pag, agino, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
+	xfs_perag_set_inode_tag(pag, ip, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
 
 	spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
@@ -1915,7 +1991,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_start(
 		return;
 
 	trace_xfs_inodegc_start(mp, __return_address);
-	xfs_inodegc_queue(mp);
+	xfs_inodegc_queue(mp, NULL);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
index d3f3f6a32872..2092a8542862 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
@@ -213,6 +213,28 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xfs_inodegc_requeue_mempressure,
 		  __entry->caller_ip)
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(xfs_gc_delay_fdblocks,
+	TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, unsigned int tag, unsigned int shift),
+	TP_ARGS(mp, tag, shift),
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(dev_t, dev)
+		__field(unsigned long long, fdblocks)
+		__field(unsigned int, tag)
+		__field(unsigned int, shift)
+	),
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->dev = mp->m_super->s_dev;
+		__entry->fdblocks = percpu_counter_read(&mp->m_fdblocks);
+		__entry->tag = tag;
+		__entry->shift = shift;
+	),
+	TP_printk("dev %d:%d tag %u shift %u fdblocks %llu",
+		  MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
+		  __entry->tag,
+		  __entry->shift,
+		  __entry->fdblocks)
+);
+
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_gc_queue_class,
 	TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, unsigned int delay_ms),
 	TP_ARGS(mp, delay_ms),
@@ -234,6 +256,22 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(xfs_gc_queue_class, name,	\
 	TP_ARGS(mp, delay_ms))
 DEFINE_GC_QUEUE_EVENT(xfs_inodegc_queue);
 
+TRACE_EVENT(xfs_gc_requeue_now,
+	TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, unsigned int tag),
+	TP_ARGS(mp, tag),
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(dev_t, dev)
+		__field(unsigned int, tag)
+	),
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->dev = mp->m_super->s_dev;
+		__entry->tag = tag;
+	),
+	TP_printk("dev %d:%d tag %u",
+		  MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
+		  __entry->tag)
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(xfs_inodegc_throttle_mempressure,
 	TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp),
 	TP_ARGS(mp),


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 18:43 [PATCHSET v8 00/20] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:43 ` [PATCH 01/20] xfs: move xfs_inactive call to xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 02/20] xfs: detach dquots from inode if we don't need to inactivate it Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 03/20] xfs: defer inode inactivation to a workqueue Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-30  4:24   ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-31  4:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-01 21:49       ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-01 23:47         ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-03  8:34   ` [PATCH, alternative] xfs: per-cpu deferred inode inactivation queues Dave Chinner
2021-08-03 20:20     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04  3:20     ` [PATCH, alternative v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 10:03       ` [PATCH] xfs: inodegc needs to stop before freeze Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 12:37         ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 10:46       ` [PATCH] xfs: don't run inodegc flushes when inodegc is not active Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:20         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 11:09       ` [PATCH, alternative v2] xfs: per-cpu deferred inode inactivation queues Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 15:59         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:35           ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:49       ` [PATCH, pre-03/20 #1] xfs: introduce CPU hotplug infrastructure Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:50       ` [PATCH, pre-03/20 #2] xfs: introduce all-mounts list for cpu hotplug notifications Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:06         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:17           ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 11:52       ` [PATCH, post-03/20 1/1] xfs: hook up inodegc to CPU dead notification Dave Chinner
2021-08-04 16:19         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-04 21:48           ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 04/20] xfs: throttle inode inactivation queuing on memory reclaim Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 05/20] xfs: don't throttle memory reclaim trying to queue inactive inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 06/20] xfs: throttle inodegc queuing on backlog Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02  0:45   ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-02  1:30     ` Dave Chinner
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 07/20] xfs: queue inodegc worker immediately when memory is tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 08/20] xfs: expose sysfs knob to control inode inactivation delay Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 10/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when quota are tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 11/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when realtime extents " Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:44 ` [PATCH 12/20] xfs: inactivate inodes any time we try to free speculative preallocations Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 13/20] xfs: flush inode inactivation work when compiling usage statistics Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 14/20] xfs: parallelize inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02  0:55   ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-02 21:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 15/20] xfs: reduce inactivation delay when AG free space are tight Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 16/20] xfs: queue inodegc worker immediately on backlog Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 17/20] xfs: don't run speculative preallocation gc when fs is frozen Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 18/20] xfs: scale speculative preallocation gc delay based on free space Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 19/20] xfs: use background worker pool when transactions can't get " Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-29 18:45 ` [PATCH 20/20] xfs: avoid buffer deadlocks when walking fs inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-02 10:35 ` [PATCHSET v8 00/20] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162758428318.332903.10268108408219495793.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.