All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	joabreu@synopsys.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	boon.leong.ong@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: Fix overall budget calculation for rxtx_napi
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:10:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163084380500.2594.10060610886272582296.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210903020026.1381962-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Fri,  3 Sep 2021 10:00:26 +0800 you wrote:
> tx_done is not used for napi_complete_done(). Thus, NAPI busy polling
> mechanism by gro_flush_timeout and napi_defer_hard_irqs will not able
> be triggered after a packet is transmitted when there is no receive
> packet.
> 
> Fix this by taking the maximum value between tx_done and rx_done as
> overall budget completed by the rxtx NAPI poll to ensure XDP Tx ZC
> operation is continuously polling for next Tx frame. This gives
> benefit of lower packet submission processing latency and jitter
> under XDP Tx ZC mode.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,1/1] net: stmmac: Fix overall budget calculation for rxtx_napi
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/81d0885d68ec

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	joabreu@synopsys.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	boon.leong.ong@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: Fix overall budget calculation for rxtx_napi
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:10:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163084380500.2594.10060610886272582296.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210903020026.1381962-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Fri,  3 Sep 2021 10:00:26 +0800 you wrote:
> tx_done is not used for napi_complete_done(). Thus, NAPI busy polling
> mechanism by gro_flush_timeout and napi_defer_hard_irqs will not able
> be triggered after a packet is transmitted when there is no receive
> packet.
> 
> Fix this by taking the maximum value between tx_done and rx_done as
> overall budget completed by the rxtx NAPI poll to ensure XDP Tx ZC
> operation is continuously polling for next Tx frame. This gives
> benefit of lower packet submission processing latency and jitter
> under XDP Tx ZC mode.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,1/1] net: stmmac: Fix overall budget calculation for rxtx_napi
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/81d0885d68ec

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-05 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-03  2:00 [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: Fix overall budget calculation for rxtx_napi Song Yoong Siang
2021-09-03  2:00 ` Song Yoong Siang
2021-09-05 12:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2021-09-05 12:10   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=163084380500.2594.10060610886272582296.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.