From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> Subject: [PATCH 8/8] clk: imx: Rework imx_clk_hw_pll14xx wrapper Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:24:50 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1631521490-17171-9-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1631521490-17171-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> It looks much cleaner to just have a macro compared to having a function that passes NULL as dev to the lower-level imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx. Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> --- drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h index 4f3b87d8aee3..d170cb988f2b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ extern struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_dram_pll; #define imx_clk_hw_divider_flags(name, parent, reg, shift, width, flags) \ __imx_clk_hw_divider(name, parent, reg, shift, width, flags) +#define imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(name, parent_name, base, pll_clk) \ + imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx(NULL, name, parent_name, base, pll_clk) + struct clk_hw *imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name, void __iomem *base, const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk); @@ -294,13 +297,6 @@ static inline struct clk *to_clk(struct clk_hw *hw) return hw->clk; } -static inline struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name, - void __iomem *base, - const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk) -{ - return imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx(NULL, name, parent_name, base, pll_clk); -} - static inline struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_fixed(const char *name, int rate) { return clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, name, NULL, 0, rate); -- 2.31.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> Subject: [PATCH 8/8] clk: imx: Rework imx_clk_hw_pll14xx wrapper Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:24:50 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1631521490-17171-9-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1631521490-17171-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> It looks much cleaner to just have a macro compared to having a function that passes NULL as dev to the lower-level imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx. Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> --- drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h index 4f3b87d8aee3..d170cb988f2b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ extern struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_dram_pll; #define imx_clk_hw_divider_flags(name, parent, reg, shift, width, flags) \ __imx_clk_hw_divider(name, parent, reg, shift, width, flags) +#define imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(name, parent_name, base, pll_clk) \ + imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx(NULL, name, parent_name, base, pll_clk) + struct clk_hw *imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name, void __iomem *base, const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk); @@ -294,13 +297,6 @@ static inline struct clk *to_clk(struct clk_hw *hw) return hw->clk; } -static inline struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name, - void __iomem *base, - const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk) -{ - return imx_dev_clk_hw_pll14xx(NULL, name, parent_name, base, pll_clk); -} - static inline struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_fixed(const char *name, int rate) { return clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, name, NULL, 0, rate); -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 8:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-13 8:24 [PATCH 0/8] imx: clk: Rework all the wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 1/8] clk: imx: Remove unused helpers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 2/8] clk: imx: Make mux/mux2 clk based helpers use clk_hw based ones Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 3/8] clk: imx: Rework all clk_hw_register_gate wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 4/8] clk: imx: Rework all clk_hw_register_gate2 wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 5/8] clk: imx: Rework all clk_hw_register_mux wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 6/8] clk: imx: Rework all clk_hw_register_divider wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 7/8] clk: imx: Rework all imx_clk_hw_composite wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-13 8:24 ` Abel Vesa [this message] 2021-09-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 8/8] clk: imx: Rework imx_clk_hw_pll14xx wrapper Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2021-09-15 9:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] imx: clk: Rework all the wrappers Abel Vesa 2021-09-15 9:57 ` Abel Vesa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1631521490-17171-9-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com \ --to=abel.vesa@nxp.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.