From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:48:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163292283281.787570.15772098830500807545.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org>
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:54:57 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> This series overhauls the selftests we have for the SVE ptrace interface
> to make them much more comprehensive than they are currently, making the
> coverage of the data read and written more complete. The new coverage
> for setting data on all vector lengths showed the issue with using the
> wrong buffer size with ptrace reported and fixed by:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210909165356.10675-1-broonie@kernel.org/
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!
[1/8] selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to be run
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/78d2d816c45a
[2/8] selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace test
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/09121ad7186e
[3/8] selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/eab281e3afa6
[4/8] selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/736e6d5a5451
[5/8] selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/8c9eece0bfbf
[6/8] selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register sets
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/9f7d03a2c5a1
[7/8] selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a1d7111257cd
[8/8] selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/34785030dc06
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:48:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163292283281.787570.15772098830500807545.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org>
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:54:57 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> This series overhauls the selftests we have for the SVE ptrace interface
> to make them much more comprehensive than they are currently, making the
> coverage of the data read and written more complete. The new coverage
> for setting data on all vector lengths showed the issue with using the
> wrong buffer size with ptrace reported and fixed by:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210909165356.10675-1-broonie@kernel.org/
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!
[1/8] selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to be run
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/78d2d816c45a
[2/8] selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace test
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/09121ad7186e
[3/8] selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/eab281e3afa6
[4/8] selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/736e6d5a5451
[5/8] selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/8c9eece0bfbf
[6/8] selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register sets
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/9f7d03a2c5a1
[7/8] selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a1d7111257cd
[8/8] selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/34785030dc06
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 12:54 [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to be run Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace test Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register sets Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 17:48 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-09-29 17:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163292283281.787570.15772098830500807545.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.