[PATCH] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops

[PATCH] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops

[Rikard Falkeborn]

The struct cz_aif1_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the
snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops.
Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.

Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c b/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c
index d6ba94677ac2..6d5c547a32de 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int cz_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct snd_soc_ops cz_aif1_ops = {
+static const struct snd_soc_ops cz_aif1_ops = {
 	.hw_params = cz_aif1_hw_params,
 };
 
-- 
2.33.0

[PATCH] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops

[Rikard Falkeborn]

The struct cz_aif1_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the
snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops.
Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.

Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c b/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c
index d6ba94677ac2..6d5c547a32de 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/acp-rt5645.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int cz_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct snd_soc_ops cz_aif1_ops = {
+static const struct snd_soc_ops cz_aif1_ops = {
 	.hw_params = cz_aif1_hw_params,
 };
 
-- 
2.33.0

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:45:14 +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> The struct cz_aif1_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the
> snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops.
> Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops
      commit: d54aa2aeaa70237f4482336e86195235ea1de032

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:45:14 +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> The struct cz_aif1_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the
> snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops.
> Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: amd: acp-rt5645: Constify static snd_soc_ops
      commit: d54aa2aeaa70237f4482336e86195235ea1de032

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark