* [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0
@ 2021-11-24 10:13 Jiapeng Chong
2021-11-25 3:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-25 4:00 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiapeng Chong @ 2021-11-24 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rth; +Cc: ink, mattst88, linux-alpha, linux-kernel, Jiapeng Chong
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:193:52-53: WARNING comparing pointer to 0.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/alpha/mm/fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c b/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
index 6c0a277..22c1f24 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
no_context:
/* Are we prepared to handle this fault as an exception? */
- if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) != 0) {
+ if (!(fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) {
unsigned long newpc;
newpc = fixup_exception(dpf_reg, fixup, regs->pc);
regs->pc = newpc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0
2021-11-24 10:13 [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0 Jiapeng Chong
@ 2021-11-25 3:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-25 4:00 ` Joe Perches
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-11-25 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiapeng Chong, rth
Cc: kbuild-all, ink, mattst88, linux-alpha, linux-kernel, Jiapeng Chong
Hi Jiapeng,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on hnaz-mm/master]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jiapeng-Chong/mm-Fix-warning-comparing-pointer-to-0/20211124-181519
base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master
config: alpha-randconfig-r021-20211124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211125/202111251151.p23HabxR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/60f2c3a3b475b791c9d450b7bf64016757bf6959
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jiapeng-Chong/mm-Fix-warning-comparing-pointer-to-0/20211124-181519
git checkout 60f2c3a3b475b791c9d450b7bf64016757bf6959
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=alpha SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:85:1: error: no previous prototype for 'do_page_fault' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
85 | do_page_fault(unsigned long address, unsigned long mmcsr,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/alpha/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_page_fault':
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:195:57: error: expected ')' before '{' token
195 | if (!(fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) {
| ~ ^~
| )
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:250:1: error: expected expression before '}' token
250 | }
| ^
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:191:17: error: label 'do_sigsegv' used but not defined
191 | goto do_sigsegv;
| ^~~~
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:164:25: error: label 'do_sigbus' used but not defined
164 | goto do_sigbus;
| ^~~~
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:160:25: error: label 'out_of_memory' used but not defined
160 | goto out_of_memory;
| ^~~~
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:91:13: error: variable 'si_code' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
91 | int si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +195 arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
56
57
58 /*
59 * This routine handles page faults. It determines the address,
60 * and the problem, and then passes it off to handle_mm_fault().
61 *
62 * mmcsr:
63 * 0 = translation not valid
64 * 1 = access violation
65 * 2 = fault-on-read
66 * 3 = fault-on-execute
67 * 4 = fault-on-write
68 *
69 * cause:
70 * -1 = instruction fetch
71 * 0 = load
72 * 1 = store
73 *
74 * Registers $9 through $15 are saved in a block just prior to `regs' and
75 * are saved and restored around the call to allow exception code to
76 * modify them.
77 */
78
79 /* Macro for exception fixup code to access integer registers. */
80 #define dpf_reg(r) \
81 (((unsigned long *)regs)[(r) <= 8 ? (r) : (r) <= 15 ? (r)-16 : \
82 (r) <= 18 ? (r)+10 : (r)-10])
83
84 asmlinkage void
85 do_page_fault(unsigned long address, unsigned long mmcsr,
86 long cause, struct pt_regs *regs)
87 {
88 struct vm_area_struct * vma;
89 struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
90 const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
> 91 int si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
92 vm_fault_t fault;
93 unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT;
94
95 /* As of EV6, a load into $31/$f31 is a prefetch, and never faults
96 (or is suppressed by the PALcode). Support that for older CPUs
97 by ignoring such an instruction. */
98 if (cause == 0) {
99 unsigned int insn;
100 __get_user(insn, (unsigned int __user *)regs->pc);
101 if ((insn >> 21 & 0x1f) == 0x1f &&
102 /* ldq ldl ldt lds ldg ldf ldwu ldbu */
103 (1ul << (insn >> 26) & 0x30f00001400ul)) {
104 regs->pc += 4;
105 return;
106 }
107 }
108
109 /* If we're in an interrupt context, or have no user context,
110 we must not take the fault. */
111 if (!mm || faulthandler_disabled())
112 goto no_context;
113
114 #ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA_LARGE_VMALLOC
115 if (address >= TASK_SIZE)
116 goto vmalloc_fault;
117 #endif
118 if (user_mode(regs))
119 flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
120 perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
121 retry:
122 mmap_read_lock(mm);
123 vma = find_vma(mm, address);
124 if (!vma)
125 goto bad_area;
126 if (vma->vm_start <= address)
127 goto good_area;
128 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
129 goto bad_area;
130 if (expand_stack(vma, address))
131 goto bad_area;
132
133 /* Ok, we have a good vm_area for this memory access, so
134 we can handle it. */
135 good_area:
136 si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
137 if (cause < 0) {
138 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
139 goto bad_area;
140 } else if (!cause) {
141 /* Allow reads even for write-only mappings */
142 if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE)))
143 goto bad_area;
144 } else {
145 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
146 goto bad_area;
147 flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
148 }
149
150 /* If for any reason at all we couldn't handle the fault,
151 make sure we exit gracefully rather than endlessly redo
152 the fault. */
153 fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, regs);
154
155 if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs))
156 return;
157
158 if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
159 if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM)
> 160 goto out_of_memory;
161 else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV)
162 goto bad_area;
163 else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS)
> 164 goto do_sigbus;
165 BUG();
166 }
167
168 if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY) {
169 if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
170 flags |= FAULT_FLAG_TRIED;
171
172 /* No need to mmap_read_unlock(mm) as we would
173 * have already released it in __lock_page_or_retry
174 * in mm/filemap.c.
175 */
176
177 goto retry;
178 }
179 }
180
181 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
182
183 return;
184
185 /* Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map.
186 Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first. */
187 bad_area:
188 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
189
190 if (user_mode(regs))
> 191 goto do_sigsegv;
192
193 no_context:
194 /* Are we prepared to handle this fault as an exception? */
> 195 if (!(fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) {
196 unsigned long newpc;
197 newpc = fixup_exception(dpf_reg, fixup, regs->pc);
198 regs->pc = newpc;
199 return;
200 }
201
202 /* Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to
203 terminate things with extreme prejudice. */
204 printk(KERN_ALERT "Unable to handle kernel paging request at "
205 "virtual address %016lx\n", address);
206 die_if_kernel("Oops", regs, cause, (unsigned long*)regs - 16);
207 do_exit(SIGKILL);
208
209 /* We ran out of memory, or some other thing happened to us that
210 made us unable to handle the page fault gracefully. */
211 out_of_memory:
212 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
213 if (!user_mode(regs))
214 goto no_context;
215 pagefault_out_of_memory();
216 return;
217
218 do_sigbus:
219 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
220 /* Send a sigbus, regardless of whether we were in kernel
221 or user mode. */
222 force_sig_fault(SIGBUS, BUS_ADRERR, (void __user *) address);
223 if (!user_mode(regs))
224 goto no_context;
225 return;
226
227 do_sigsegv:
228 force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, (void __user *) address);
229 return;
230
231 #ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA_LARGE_VMALLOC
232 vmalloc_fault:
233 if (user_mode(regs))
234 goto do_sigsegv;
235 else {
236 /* Synchronize this task's top level page-table
237 with the "reference" page table from init. */
238 long index = pgd_index(address);
239 pgd_t *pgd, *pgd_k;
240
241 pgd = current->active_mm->pgd + index;
242 pgd_k = swapper_pg_dir + index;
243 if (!pgd_present(*pgd) && pgd_present(*pgd_k)) {
244 pgd_val(*pgd) = pgd_val(*pgd_k);
245 return;
246 }
247 goto no_context;
248 }
249 #endif
> 250 }
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0
@ 2021-11-25 3:39 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-11-25 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9426 bytes --]
Hi Jiapeng,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on hnaz-mm/master]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jiapeng-Chong/mm-Fix-warning-comparing-pointer-to-0/20211124-181519
base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master
config: alpha-randconfig-r021-20211124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211125/202111251151.p23HabxR-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/60f2c3a3b475b791c9d450b7bf64016757bf6959
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jiapeng-Chong/mm-Fix-warning-comparing-pointer-to-0/20211124-181519
git checkout 60f2c3a3b475b791c9d450b7bf64016757bf6959
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=alpha SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:85:1: error: no previous prototype for 'do_page_fault' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
85 | do_page_fault(unsigned long address, unsigned long mmcsr,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/alpha/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_page_fault':
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:195:57: error: expected ')' before '{' token
195 | if (!(fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) {
| ~ ^~
| )
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:250:1: error: expected expression before '}' token
250 | }
| ^
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:191:17: error: label 'do_sigsegv' used but not defined
191 | goto do_sigsegv;
| ^~~~
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:164:25: error: label 'do_sigbus' used but not defined
164 | goto do_sigbus;
| ^~~~
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:160:25: error: label 'out_of_memory' used but not defined
160 | goto out_of_memory;
| ^~~~
>> arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:91:13: error: variable 'si_code' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
91 | int si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +195 arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
56
57
58 /*
59 * This routine handles page faults. It determines the address,
60 * and the problem, and then passes it off to handle_mm_fault().
61 *
62 * mmcsr:
63 * 0 = translation not valid
64 * 1 = access violation
65 * 2 = fault-on-read
66 * 3 = fault-on-execute
67 * 4 = fault-on-write
68 *
69 * cause:
70 * -1 = instruction fetch
71 * 0 = load
72 * 1 = store
73 *
74 * Registers $9 through $15 are saved in a block just prior to `regs' and
75 * are saved and restored around the call to allow exception code to
76 * modify them.
77 */
78
79 /* Macro for exception fixup code to access integer registers. */
80 #define dpf_reg(r) \
81 (((unsigned long *)regs)[(r) <= 8 ? (r) : (r) <= 15 ? (r)-16 : \
82 (r) <= 18 ? (r)+10 : (r)-10])
83
84 asmlinkage void
85 do_page_fault(unsigned long address, unsigned long mmcsr,
86 long cause, struct pt_regs *regs)
87 {
88 struct vm_area_struct * vma;
89 struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
90 const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
> 91 int si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
92 vm_fault_t fault;
93 unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT;
94
95 /* As of EV6, a load into $31/$f31 is a prefetch, and never faults
96 (or is suppressed by the PALcode). Support that for older CPUs
97 by ignoring such an instruction. */
98 if (cause == 0) {
99 unsigned int insn;
100 __get_user(insn, (unsigned int __user *)regs->pc);
101 if ((insn >> 21 & 0x1f) == 0x1f &&
102 /* ldq ldl ldt lds ldg ldf ldwu ldbu */
103 (1ul << (insn >> 26) & 0x30f00001400ul)) {
104 regs->pc += 4;
105 return;
106 }
107 }
108
109 /* If we're in an interrupt context, or have no user context,
110 we must not take the fault. */
111 if (!mm || faulthandler_disabled())
112 goto no_context;
113
114 #ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA_LARGE_VMALLOC
115 if (address >= TASK_SIZE)
116 goto vmalloc_fault;
117 #endif
118 if (user_mode(regs))
119 flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
120 perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
121 retry:
122 mmap_read_lock(mm);
123 vma = find_vma(mm, address);
124 if (!vma)
125 goto bad_area;
126 if (vma->vm_start <= address)
127 goto good_area;
128 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
129 goto bad_area;
130 if (expand_stack(vma, address))
131 goto bad_area;
132
133 /* Ok, we have a good vm_area for this memory access, so
134 we can handle it. */
135 good_area:
136 si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
137 if (cause < 0) {
138 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
139 goto bad_area;
140 } else if (!cause) {
141 /* Allow reads even for write-only mappings */
142 if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE)))
143 goto bad_area;
144 } else {
145 if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
146 goto bad_area;
147 flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
148 }
149
150 /* If for any reason at all we couldn't handle the fault,
151 make sure we exit gracefully rather than endlessly redo
152 the fault. */
153 fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, regs);
154
155 if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs))
156 return;
157
158 if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
159 if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM)
> 160 goto out_of_memory;
161 else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV)
162 goto bad_area;
163 else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS)
> 164 goto do_sigbus;
165 BUG();
166 }
167
168 if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY) {
169 if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
170 flags |= FAULT_FLAG_TRIED;
171
172 /* No need to mmap_read_unlock(mm) as we would
173 * have already released it in __lock_page_or_retry
174 * in mm/filemap.c.
175 */
176
177 goto retry;
178 }
179 }
180
181 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
182
183 return;
184
185 /* Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map.
186 Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first. */
187 bad_area:
188 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
189
190 if (user_mode(regs))
> 191 goto do_sigsegv;
192
193 no_context:
194 /* Are we prepared to handle this fault as an exception? */
> 195 if (!(fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) {
196 unsigned long newpc;
197 newpc = fixup_exception(dpf_reg, fixup, regs->pc);
198 regs->pc = newpc;
199 return;
200 }
201
202 /* Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to
203 terminate things with extreme prejudice. */
204 printk(KERN_ALERT "Unable to handle kernel paging request at "
205 "virtual address %016lx\n", address);
206 die_if_kernel("Oops", regs, cause, (unsigned long*)regs - 16);
207 do_exit(SIGKILL);
208
209 /* We ran out of memory, or some other thing happened to us that
210 made us unable to handle the page fault gracefully. */
211 out_of_memory:
212 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
213 if (!user_mode(regs))
214 goto no_context;
215 pagefault_out_of_memory();
216 return;
217
218 do_sigbus:
219 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
220 /* Send a sigbus, regardless of whether we were in kernel
221 or user mode. */
222 force_sig_fault(SIGBUS, BUS_ADRERR, (void __user *) address);
223 if (!user_mode(regs))
224 goto no_context;
225 return;
226
227 do_sigsegv:
228 force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, (void __user *) address);
229 return;
230
231 #ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA_LARGE_VMALLOC
232 vmalloc_fault:
233 if (user_mode(regs))
234 goto do_sigsegv;
235 else {
236 /* Synchronize this task's top level page-table
237 with the "reference" page table from init. */
238 long index = pgd_index(address);
239 pgd_t *pgd, *pgd_k;
240
241 pgd = current->active_mm->pgd + index;
242 pgd_k = swapper_pg_dir + index;
243 if (!pgd_present(*pgd) && pgd_present(*pgd_k)) {
244 pgd_val(*pgd) = pgd_val(*pgd_k);
245 return;
246 }
247 goto no_context;
248 }
249 #endif
> 250 }
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0
2021-11-24 10:13 [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0 Jiapeng Chong
2021-11-25 3:39 ` kernel test robot
@ 2021-11-25 4:00 ` Joe Perches
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2021-11-25 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiapeng Chong, rth; +Cc: ink, mattst88, linux-alpha, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:13 +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
>
> ./arch/alpha/mm/fault.c:193:52-53: WARNING comparing pointer to 0.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
[]
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c b/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
[]
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
>
> no_context:
> /* Are we prepared to handle this fault as an exception? */
> - if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) != 0) {
> + if (!(fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) {
This is now a reversed test.
The more typical kernel style is:
fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc);
if (fixup) {
> unsigned long newpc;
> newpc = fixup_exception(dpf_reg, fixup, regs->pc);
> regs->pc = newpc;
and it looks as if newpc is unnecessary. Maybe:
---
arch/alpha/mm/fault.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c b/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
index eee5102c3d889..364b6322629cb 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/mm/fault.c
@@ -192,10 +192,9 @@ do_page_fault(unsigned long address, unsigned long mmcsr,
no_context:
/* Are we prepared to handle this fault as an exception? */
- if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) != 0) {
- unsigned long newpc;
- newpc = fixup_exception(dpf_reg, fixup, regs->pc);
- regs->pc = newpc;
+ fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->pc)
+ if (fixup) {
+ regs->pc = fixup_exception(dpf_reg, fixup, regs->pc);
return;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-25 4:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-24 10:13 [PATCH] mm: Fix warning comparing pointer to 0 Jiapeng Chong
2021-11-25 3:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-25 3:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-25 4:00 ` Joe Perches
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.