All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix to reserve space for IO align feature" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
@ 2022-01-24 12:25 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-01-24 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: chao; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 300a842937fbcfb5a189cea9ba15374fdb0b5c6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:27:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to reserve space for IO align feature

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204137

With below script, we will hit panic during new segment allocation:

DISK=bingo.img
MOUNT_DIR=/mnt/f2fs

dd if=/dev/zero of=$DISK bs=1M count=105
mkfs.f2fe -a 1 -o 19 -t 1 -z 1 -f -q $DISK

mount -t f2fs $DISK $MOUNT_DIR -o "noinline_dentry,flush_merge,noextent_cache,mode=lfs,io_bits=7,fsync_mode=strict"

for (( i = 0; i < 4096; i++ )); do
	name=`head /dev/urandom | tr -dc A-Za-z0-9 | head -c 10`
	mkdir $MOUNT_DIR/$name
done

umount $MOUNT_DIR
rm $DISK

--- Core dump ---
Call Trace:
 allocate_segment_by_default+0x9d/0x100 [f2fs]
 f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x3c0/0x5c0 [f2fs]
 do_write_page+0x62/0x110 [f2fs]
 f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x43/0xc0 [f2fs]
 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x386/0x560 [f2fs]
 __write_data_page+0x706/0x850 [f2fs]
 f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x267/0x6a0 [f2fs]
 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x19c/0x2e0 [f2fs]
 do_writepages+0x1c/0x70
 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xaa/0xe0
 filemap_fdatawrite+0x1f/0x30
 f2fs_sync_dirty_inodes+0x74/0x1f0 [f2fs]
 block_operations+0xdc/0x350 [f2fs]
 f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x104/0x1150 [f2fs]
 f2fs_sync_fs+0xa2/0x120 [f2fs]
 f2fs_balance_fs_bg+0x33c/0x390 [f2fs]
 f2fs_write_node_pages+0x4c/0x1f0 [f2fs]
 do_writepages+0x1c/0x70
 __writeback_single_inode+0x45/0x320
 writeback_sb_inodes+0x273/0x5c0
 wb_writeback+0xff/0x2e0
 wb_workfn+0xa1/0x370
 process_one_work+0x138/0x350
 worker_thread+0x4d/0x3d0
 kthread+0x109/0x140
 ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

The root cause here is, with IO alignment feature enables, in worst
case, we need F2FS_IO_SIZE() free blocks space for single one 4k write
due to IO alignment feature will fill dummy pages to make IO being
aligned.

So we will easily run out of free segments during non-inline directory's
data writeback, even in process of foreground GC.

In order to fix this issue, I just propose to reserve additional free
space for IO alignment feature to handle worst case of free space usage
ratio during FGGC.

Fixes: 0a595ebaaa6b ("f2fs: support IO alignment for DATA and NODE writes")
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 8601d5e979d4..842020311f83 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1024,6 +1024,7 @@ struct f2fs_sm_info {
 	unsigned int segment_count;	/* total # of segments */
 	unsigned int main_segments;	/* # of segments in main area */
 	unsigned int reserved_segments;	/* # of reserved segments */
+	unsigned int additional_reserved_segments;/* reserved segs for IO align feature */
 	unsigned int ovp_segments;	/* # of overprovision segments */
 
 	/* a threshold to reclaim prefree segments */
@@ -2205,6 +2206,11 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 
 	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true))
 		avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
+
+	if (F2FS_IO_ALIGNED(sbi))
+		avail_user_block_count -= sbi->blocks_per_seg *
+				SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments;
+
 	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
 		if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
 			avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
@@ -2451,6 +2457,11 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 
 	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false))
 		valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
+
+	if (F2FS_IO_ALIGNED(sbi))
+		valid_block_count += sbi->blocks_per_seg *
+				SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments;
+
 	user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
 	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
 		user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
index 46fde9f3f28e..0291cd55cf09 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -538,7 +538,8 @@ static inline unsigned int free_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 
 static inline unsigned int reserved_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
-	return SM_I(sbi)->reserved_segments;
+	return SM_I(sbi)->reserved_segments +
+			SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int free_sections(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index ca5783fa56d5..053b508d1e4f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -329,6 +329,46 @@ static inline void limit_reserve_root(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 					   F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resgid));
 }
 
+static inline int adjust_reserved_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+{
+	unsigned int sec_blks = sbi->blocks_per_seg * sbi->segs_per_sec;
+	unsigned int avg_vblocks;
+	unsigned int wanted_reserved_segments;
+	block_t avail_user_block_count;
+
+	if (!F2FS_IO_ALIGNED(sbi))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* average valid block count in section in worst case */
+	avg_vblocks = sec_blks / F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi);
+
+	/*
+	 * we need enough free space when migrating one section in worst case
+	 */
+	wanted_reserved_segments = (F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi) / avg_vblocks) *
+						reserved_segments(sbi);
+	wanted_reserved_segments -= reserved_segments(sbi);
+
+	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
+				sbi->current_reserved_blocks -
+				F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
+
+	if (wanted_reserved_segments * sbi->blocks_per_seg >
+					avail_user_block_count) {
+		f2fs_err(sbi, "IO align feature can't grab additional reserved segment: %u, available segments: %u",
+			wanted_reserved_segments,
+			avail_user_block_count >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg);
+		return -ENOSPC;
+	}
+
+	SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments = wanted_reserved_segments;
+
+	f2fs_info(sbi, "IO align feature needs additional reserved segment: %u",
+			 wanted_reserved_segments);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void adjust_unusable_cap_perc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
 	if (!F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc)
@@ -4182,6 +4222,10 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 		goto free_nm;
 	}
 
+	err = adjust_reserved_segment(sbi);
+	if (err)
+		goto free_nm;
+
 	/* For write statistics */
 	sbi->sectors_written_start = f2fs_get_sectors_written(sbi);
 
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
index 55a7df17d5f3..c22bee84c8ec 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
@@ -424,7 +424,9 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
 	if (a->struct_type == RESERVED_BLOCKS) {
 		spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
 		if (t > (unsigned long)(sbi->user_block_count -
-				F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks)) {
+				F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks -
+				sbi->blocks_per_seg *
+				SM_I(sbi)->additional_reserved_segments)) {
 			spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-01-24 12:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-24 12:25 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix to reserve space for IO align feature" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree gregkh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.