All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] media: si21xx: use time_after_eq() instead of jiffies judgment
@ 2022-02-10  8:31 Qing Wang
  2022-02-10  9:07 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Qing Wang @ 2022-02-10  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media, linux-kernel; +Cc: Wang Qing

From: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>

It is better to use time_xxx() directly instead of jiffies judgment
for understanding.

Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c
index 001b235..1c6cf76
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int si21xx_wait_diseqc_idle(struct si21xx_state *state, int timeout)
 	dprintk("%s\n", __func__);
 
 	while ((si21_readreg(state, LNB_CTRL_REG_1) & 0x8) == 8) {
-		if (jiffies - start > timeout) {
+		if (time_after(jiffies, start + timeout)) {
 			dprintk("%s: timeout!!\n", __func__);
 			return -ETIMEDOUT;
 		}
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] media: si21xx: use time_after_eq() instead of jiffies judgment
  2022-02-10  8:31 [PATCH] media: si21xx: use time_after_eq() instead of jiffies judgment Qing Wang
@ 2022-02-10  9:07 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2022-02-10  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qing Wang, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media, linux-kernel

On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 00:31 -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
> 
> It is better to use time_xxx() directly instead of jiffies judgment
> for understanding.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si21xx.c
[]
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int si21xx_wait_diseqc_idle(struct si21xx_state *state, int timeout)
>  	dprintk("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	while ((si21_readreg(state, LNB_CTRL_REG_1) & 0x8) == 8) {
> -		if (jiffies - start > timeout) {
> +		if (time_after(jiffies, start + timeout)) {
>  			dprintk("%s: timeout!!\n", __func__);
>  			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  		}

Appreciate all the conversions (IMO it should have been sent as
a block of patches with a cover letter instead of independent
unrelated patches) but wouldn't all of these be simpler and more
consistent using a style where the addition is done once and the
timeout test is something like:

	unsigned long end = jiffies + timeout;

	while (foo) {
		if (time_after(jiffies, end)) {
			error_msg(...)
			return -ETIMEDOUT;
		}
		bar...;
	}


		


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-10  9:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-10  8:31 [PATCH] media: si21xx: use time_after_eq() instead of jiffies judgment Qing Wang
2022-02-10  9:07 ` Joe Perches

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.