All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
@ 2022-02-17 19:14 gregkh
  2022-02-18  9:50 ` [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic Christian Löhle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-02-17 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: CLoehle, adrian.hunter, cloehle, ulf.hansson; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 54309fde1a352ad2674ebba004a79f7d20b9f037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20L=C3=B6hle?= <CLoehle@hyperstone.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:11:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic

On reads with MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK that fail,
the recovery handler will use MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK for
each of the blocks, up to MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES times each.
The logic for this is fixed to never report unsuccessful reads
as success to the block layer.

On command error with retries remaining, blk_update_request was
called with whatever value error was set last to.
In case it was last set to BLK_STS_OK (default), the read will be
reported as success, even though there was no data read from the device.
This could happen on a CRC mismatch for the response,
a card rejecting the command (e.g. again due to a CRC mismatch).
In case it was last set to BLK_STS_IOERR, the error is reported correctly,
but no retries will be attempted.

Fixes: 81196976ed946c ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@hyperstone.com>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bc706a6ab08c4fe2834ba0c05a804672@hyperstone.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index 4e61b28a002f..8d718aa56d33 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -1682,31 +1682,31 @@ static void mmc_blk_read_single(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 	struct mmc_card *card = mq->card;
 	struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
 	blk_status_t error = BLK_STS_OK;
-	int retries = 0;
 
 	do {
 		u32 status;
 		int err;
+		int retries = 0;
 
-		mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mqrq, card, 1, mq);
+		while (retries++ <= MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES) {
+			mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mqrq, card, 1, mq);
 
-		mmc_wait_for_req(host, mrq);
+			mmc_wait_for_req(host, mrq);
 
-		err = mmc_send_status(card, &status);
-		if (err)
-			goto error_exit;
-
-		if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) &&
-		    !mmc_ready_for_data(status)) {
-			err = mmc_blk_fix_state(card, req);
+			err = mmc_send_status(card, &status);
 			if (err)
 				goto error_exit;
-		}
 
-		if (mrq->cmd->error && retries++ < MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES)
-			continue;
+			if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) &&
+			    !mmc_ready_for_data(status)) {
+				err = mmc_blk_fix_state(card, req);
+				if (err)
+					goto error_exit;
+			}
 
-		retries = 0;
+			if (!mrq->cmd->error)
+				break;
+		}
 
 		if (mrq->cmd->error ||
 		    mrq->data->error ||


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
  2022-02-17 19:14 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree gregkh
@ 2022-02-18  9:50 ` Christian Löhle
  2022-02-18 10:33   ` gregkh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christian Löhle @ 2022-02-18  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, stable; +Cc: Ulf Hansson, Adrian Hunter

commit 54309fde1a352ad2674ebba004a79f7d20b9f037 upstream.

On reads with MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK that fail,
the recovery handler will use MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK for
each of the blocks, up to MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES times each.
The logic for this is fixed to never report unsuccessful reads
as success to the block layer.

On command error with retries remaining, blk_update_request was
called with whatever value error was set last to.
In case it was last set to BLK_STS_OK (default), the read will be
reported as success, even though there was no data read from the device.
This could happen on a CRC mismatch for the response,
a card rejecting the command (e.g. again due to a CRC mismatch).
In case it was last set to BLK_STS_IOERR, the error is reported correctly,
but no retries will be attempted.

Fixes: 81196976ed946c ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")

Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@hyperstone.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index d1cc0fdbc51c..630f3bcba56d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -1678,31 +1678,31 @@ static void mmc_blk_read_single(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 	struct mmc_card *card = mq->card;
 	struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
 	blk_status_t error = BLK_STS_OK;
-	int retries = 0;
 
 	do {
 		u32 status;
 		int err;
+		int retries = 0;
 
-		mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mqrq, card, 1, mq);
+		while (retries++ <= MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES) {
+			mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mqrq, card, 1, mq);
 
-		mmc_wait_for_req(host, mrq);
+			mmc_wait_for_req(host, mrq);
 
-		err = mmc_send_status(card, &status);
-		if (err)
-			goto error_exit;
-
-		if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) &&
-		    !mmc_blk_in_tran_state(status)) {
-			err = mmc_blk_fix_state(card, req);
+			err = mmc_send_status(card, &status);
 			if (err)
 				goto error_exit;
-		}
 
-		if (mrq->cmd->error && retries++ < MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES)
-			continue;
+			if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) &&
+			    !mmc_blk_in_tran_state(status)) {
+				err = mmc_blk_fix_state(card, req);
+				if (err)
+					goto error_exit;
+			}
 
-		retries = 0;
+			if (!mrq->cmd->error)
+				break;
+		}
 
 		if (mrq->cmd->error ||
 		    mrq->data->error ||
-- 
2.34.1

Hyperstone GmbH | Reichenaustr. 39a  | 78467 Konstanz
Managing Director: Dr. Jan Peter Berns.
Commercial register of local courts: Freiburg HRB381782


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
  2022-02-18  9:50 ` [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic Christian Löhle
@ 2022-02-18 10:33   ` gregkh
  2022-02-18 10:36     ` Christian Löhle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-02-18 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Löhle; +Cc: stable, Ulf Hansson, Adrian Hunter

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 09:50:54AM +0000, Christian Löhle wrote:
> commit 54309fde1a352ad2674ebba004a79f7d20b9f037 upstream.
> 
> On reads with MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK that fail,
> the recovery handler will use MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK for
> each of the blocks, up to MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES times each.
> The logic for this is fixed to never report unsuccessful reads
> as success to the block layer.
> 
> On command error with retries remaining, blk_update_request was
> called with whatever value error was set last to.
> In case it was last set to BLK_STS_OK (default), the read will be
> reported as success, even though there was no data read from the device.
> This could happen on a CRC mismatch for the response,
> a card rejecting the command (e.g. again due to a CRC mismatch).
> In case it was last set to BLK_STS_IOERR, the error is reported correctly,
> but no retries will be attempted.
> 
> Fixes: 81196976ed946c ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@hyperstone.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

What stable branch(s) is this backport for?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
  2022-02-18 10:33   ` gregkh
@ 2022-02-18 10:36     ` Christian Löhle
  2022-02-18 10:49       ` gregkh
       [not found]       ` <916c2090-5b39-e9e8-190e-d0f8a77adfa3@intel.com>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christian Löhle @ 2022-02-18 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, stable; +Cc: Ulf Hansson, Adrian Hunter

This is the backport for 4.19, it applied for more recent branches and is not applicable to 4.14.



From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 11:33 AM
To: Christian Löhle
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org; Ulf Hansson; Adrian Hunter
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
    
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 09:50:54AM +0000, Christian Löhle wrote:
> commit 54309fde1a352ad2674ebba004a79f7d20b9f037 upstream.
> 
> On reads with MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK that fail,
> the recovery handler will use MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK for
> each of the blocks, up to MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES times each.
> The logic for this is fixed to never report unsuccessful reads
> as success to the block layer.
> 
> On command error with retries remaining, blk_update_request was
> called with whatever value error was set last to.
> In case it was last set to BLK_STS_OK (default), the read will be
> reported as success, even though there was no data read from the device.
> This could happen on a CRC mismatch for the response,
> a card rejecting the command (e.g. again due to a CRC mismatch).
> In case it was last set to BLK_STS_IOERR, the error is reported correctly,
> but no retries will be attempted.
> 
> Fixes: 81196976ed946c ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@hyperstone.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

What stable branch(s) is this backport for?

thanks,

greg k-h
    =
Hyperstone GmbH | Reichenaustr. 39a  | 78467 Konstanz
Managing Director: Dr. Jan Peter Berns.
Commercial register of local courts: Freiburg HRB381782


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
  2022-02-18 10:36     ` Christian Löhle
@ 2022-02-18 10:49       ` gregkh
       [not found]       ` <916c2090-5b39-e9e8-190e-d0f8a77adfa3@intel.com>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-02-18 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Löhle; +Cc: stable, Ulf Hansson, Adrian Hunter

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:36:47AM +0000, Christian Löhle wrote:
> This is the backport for 4.19, it applied for more recent branches and
> is not applicable to 4.14.

Thanks, now queued up.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
       [not found]       ` <916c2090-5b39-e9e8-190e-d0f8a77adfa3@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-18 11:05         ` Christian Löhle
  2022-02-18 11:47           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christian Löhle @ 2022-02-18 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Hunter, Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable

You're right, I did not get an email about 5.4, maybe it was caught up somewhere.
Greg, can you apply this to 5.4, too?






From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 12:02 PM
To: Christian Löhle
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
    
On 18/02/2022 12:36, Christian Löhle wrote:
> This is the backport for 4.19, it applied for more recent branches and is not applicable to 4.14.

Was 5.4 done?  There was a "failed to apply email for that also"


> 
> 
> 
> From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 11:33 AM
> To: Christian Löhle
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org; Ulf Hansson; Adrian Hunter
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
>     
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 09:50:54AM +0000, Christian Löhle wrote:
>> commit 54309fde1a352ad2674ebba004a79f7d20b9f037 upstream.
>>
>> On reads with MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK that fail,
>> the recovery handler will use MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK for
>> each of the blocks, up to MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES times each.
>> The logic for this is fixed to never report unsuccessful reads
>> as success to the block layer.
>>
>> On command error with retries remaining, blk_update_request was
>> called with whatever value error was set last to.
>> In case it was last set to BLK_STS_OK (default), the read will be
>> reported as success, even though there was no data read from the device.
>> This could happen on a CRC mismatch for the response,
>> a card rejecting the command (e.g. again due to a CRC mismatch).
>> In case it was last set to BLK_STS_IOERR, the error is reported correctly,
>> but no retries will be attempted.
>>
>> Fixes: 81196976ed946c ("mmc: block: Add blk-mq support")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@hyperstone.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> What stable branch(s) is this backport for?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
>     =
> Hyperstone GmbH | Reichenaustr. 39a  | 78467 Konstanz
> Managing Director: Dr. Jan Peter Berns.
> Commercial register of local courts: Freiburg HRB381782
> 

    =
Hyperstone GmbH | Reichenaustr. 39a  | 78467 Konstanz
Managing Director: Dr. Jan Peter Berns.
Commercial register of local courts: Freiburg HRB381782


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic
  2022-02-18 11:05         ` Christian Löhle
@ 2022-02-18 11:47           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-02-18 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Löhle; +Cc: Adrian Hunter, stable

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:05:21AM +0000, Christian Löhle wrote:
> You're right, I did not get an email about 5.4, maybe it was caught up somewhere.
> Greg, can you apply this to 5.4, too?

Oops, forgot that one, now queued up.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-18 11:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-17 19:14 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree gregkh
2022-02-18  9:50 ` [PATCH] mmc: block: fix read single on recovery logic Christian Löhle
2022-02-18 10:33   ` gregkh
2022-02-18 10:36     ` Christian Löhle
2022-02-18 10:49       ` gregkh
     [not found]       ` <916c2090-5b39-e9e8-190e-d0f8a77adfa3@intel.com>
2022-02-18 11:05         ` Christian Löhle
2022-02-18 11:47           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.