[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code

[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index d7d1536a4f37..31a7f9aac6e3 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -1211,11 +1211,9 @@ static int fsl_asrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto err_pm_disable;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_get_sync;
-	}
 
 	ret = fsl_asrc_init(asrc);
 	if (ret) {
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index d7d1536a4f37..31a7f9aac6e3 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -1211,11 +1211,9 @@ static int fsl_asrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto err_pm_disable;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_get_sync;
-	}
 
 	ret = fsl_asrc_init(asrc);
 	if (ret) {
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 03:04:02 +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
> pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
> actual functional changes.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code
      commit: d05040741afef6eb5d4366de7d5b62f700958787

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 03:04:02 +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
> pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
> actual functional changes.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_asrc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get to simplify the code
      commit: d05040741afef6eb5d4366de7d5b62f700958787

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark