[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename block_size()/block_offset()

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename block_size()/block_offset()
@ 2022-05-19 14:00 Ville Syrjala
  2022-05-19 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjala @ 2022-05-19 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Give block_size()/block_offset() a "raw_" prefix since they
both operate on the "raw" (as in not duplicated) BDB block
contents.

What actually spurred this was a conflict between intel_bios.c
block_size() vs. block_size() from blkdev.h. That only
happend to me on a custom tree where we somehow manage to
include blkdev.h into intel_bios.c. But I think the rename
makes sense anyway to clarify the purpose of these functions.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index 0c5638f5b72b..3ac1860a0b6e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ find_raw_section(const void *_bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
  * Offset from the start of BDB to the start of the
  * block data (just past the block header).
  */
-static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
+static u32 raw_block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
 {
 	const void *block;
 
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
 }
 
 /* size of the block excluding the header */
-static u32 block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
+static u32 raw_block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
 {
 	const void *block;
 
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
 	int data_block_size, lfp_data_size;
 	int i;
 
-	data_block_size = block_size(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
+	data_block_size = raw_block_size(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
 	if (data_block_size == 0)
 		return false;
 
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block)
 	u32 offset;
 	int i;
 
-	offset = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
+	offset = raw_block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
 		if (ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset < offset ||
-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread