All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zhiguo.niu" <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
To: <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <chao@kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <niuzhiguo84@gmail.com>, <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix atgc bug on issue in 32bits platform
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:40:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1667547621-26175-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> (raw)

From: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>

There is bug on issue after atgc feature is enabled in
32bits platform as the following log:

F2FS-fs (dm-x): inconsistent rbtree, cur(3470333575168) next(3320009719808)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/gc.c:602!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
PC is at get_victim_by_default+0x13c0/0x1498
LR is at f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence+0xc4/0xd4
....
[<c04d98b0>] (get_victim_by_default) from [<c04d4f44>] (f2fs_gc+0x220/0x6cc)
[<c04d4f44>] (f2fs_gc) from [<c04d4780>] (gc_thread_func+0x2ac/0x708)
[<c04d4780>] (gc_thread_func) from [<c015c774>] (kthread+0x1a8/0x1b4)
[<c015c774>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)

The reason is the 64bits key in struct rb_entry has __packed attibute
but has not in struct victim_entry, so the wrong key value got by
in f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence, the following are the memory layouts
of struct rb_entry and struct victim_entry in 32bits platform:

struct rb_entry {
   [0] struct rb_node rb_node;
       union {
           struct {...};
  [12]     unsigned long long key;
       };
}
struct victim_entry {
   [0] struct rb_node rb_node;
       union {
           struct {...};
  [16]     struct victim_info vi;
       };
  [32] struct list_head list;
}

This patch fix this inconsistence layout of 64bits key between
struct rb_entry and struct victim_entry.

Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/gc.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.h b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
index 19b956c2d697..9a03c6502b39 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct victim_entry {
 			unsigned int segno;		/* segment No. */
 		};
 		struct victim_info vi;	/* victim info */
-	};
+	} __packed;
 	struct list_head list;
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "zhiguo.niu" <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
To: <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <chao@kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com, niuzhiguo84@gmail.com
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix atgc bug on issue in 32bits platform
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:40:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1667547621-26175-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> (raw)

From: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>

There is bug on issue after atgc feature is enabled in
32bits platform as the following log:

F2FS-fs (dm-x): inconsistent rbtree, cur(3470333575168) next(3320009719808)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/gc.c:602!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
PC is at get_victim_by_default+0x13c0/0x1498
LR is at f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence+0xc4/0xd4
....
[<c04d98b0>] (get_victim_by_default) from [<c04d4f44>] (f2fs_gc+0x220/0x6cc)
[<c04d4f44>] (f2fs_gc) from [<c04d4780>] (gc_thread_func+0x2ac/0x708)
[<c04d4780>] (gc_thread_func) from [<c015c774>] (kthread+0x1a8/0x1b4)
[<c015c774>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)

The reason is the 64bits key in struct rb_entry has __packed attibute
but has not in struct victim_entry, so the wrong key value got by
in f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence, the following are the memory layouts
of struct rb_entry and struct victim_entry in 32bits platform:

struct rb_entry {
   [0] struct rb_node rb_node;
       union {
           struct {...};
  [12]     unsigned long long key;
       };
}
struct victim_entry {
   [0] struct rb_node rb_node;
       union {
           struct {...};
  [16]     struct victim_info vi;
       };
  [32] struct list_head list;
}

This patch fix this inconsistence layout of 64bits key between
struct rb_entry and struct victim_entry.

Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/gc.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.h b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
index 19b956c2d697..9a03c6502b39 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct victim_entry {
 			unsigned int segno;		/* segment No. */
 		};
 		struct victim_info vi;	/* victim info */
-	};
+	} __packed;
 	struct list_head list;
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-04  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-04  7:40 zhiguo.niu [this message]
2022-11-04  7:40 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix atgc bug on issue in 32bits platform zhiguo.niu
2022-11-07  1:25 ` Chao Yu
2022-11-07  1:25   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
     [not found]   ` <CAHJ8P3KGTJgvde2V-75XNcZHzbQrkFzDN5sY9r75rp8JBGC_PA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-07 14:51     ` Chao Yu
2022-11-07 14:51       ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1667547621-26175-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com \
    --to=zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niuzhiguo84@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.