* [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication
@ 2021-09-01 3:05 Benjamin Li
2021-09-01 6:41 ` Loic Poulain
[not found] ` <CAMZdPi_frOfwf+9nfiUw2NJhfuSVgcPj3=Hx2g0d8UsaZza5MA@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Li @ 2021-09-01 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue, Loic Poulain, Benjamin Li, stable,
David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, wcn36xx, linux-wireless, netdev,
linux-kernel
Firmware sends delete_sta_context_ind when it detects the AP has gone
away in STA mode. Right now the handler for that indication only handles
AP mode; fix it to also handle STA mode.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8def9ec46a5f ("wcn36xx: Enable firmware link monitoring")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
index 57fa857b290b..f6bea896abe8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
@@ -2623,30 +2623,52 @@ static int wcn36xx_smd_delete_sta_context_ind(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
size_t len)
{
struct wcn36xx_hal_delete_sta_context_ind_msg *rsp = buf;
- struct wcn36xx_vif *tmp;
+ struct wcn36xx_vif *vif_priv;
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif;
+ struct ieee80211_bss_conf *bss_conf;
struct ieee80211_sta *sta;
+ bool found = false;
if (len != sizeof(*rsp)) {
wcn36xx_warn("Corrupted delete sta indication\n");
return -EIO;
}
- wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL, "delete station indication %pM index %d\n",
- rsp->addr2, rsp->sta_id);
+ wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL,
+ "delete station indication %pM index %d reason %d\n",
+ rsp->addr2, rsp->sta_id, rsp->reason_code);
- list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wcn->vif_list, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(vif_priv, &wcn->vif_list, list) {
rcu_read_lock();
- sta = ieee80211_find_sta(wcn36xx_priv_to_vif(tmp), rsp->addr2);
- if (sta)
- ieee80211_report_low_ack(sta, 0);
+ vif = wcn36xx_priv_to_vif(vif_priv);
+
+ if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
+ /* We could call ieee80211_find_sta too, but checking
+ * bss_conf is clearer.
+ */
+ bss_conf = &vif->bss_conf;
+ if (vif_priv->sta_assoc &&
+ !memcmp(bss_conf->bssid, rsp->addr2, ETH_ALEN)) {
+ found = true;
+ wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL,
+ "connection loss bss_index %d\n",
+ vif_priv->bss_index);
+ ieee80211_connection_loss(vif);
+ }
+ } else {
+ sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, rsp->addr2);
+ if (sta) {
+ found = true;
+ ieee80211_report_low_ack(sta, 0);
+ }
+ }
+
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (sta)
+ if (found)
return 0;
}
- wcn36xx_warn("STA with addr %pM and index %d not found\n",
- rsp->addr2,
- rsp->sta_id);
+ wcn36xx_warn("BSS or STA with addr %pM not found\n", rsp->addr2);
return -ENOENT;
}
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication
2021-09-01 3:05 [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication Benjamin Li
@ 2021-09-01 6:41 ` Loic Poulain
[not found] ` <CAMZdPi_frOfwf+9nfiUw2NJhfuSVgcPj3=Hx2g0d8UsaZza5MA@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Loic Poulain @ 2021-09-01 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Li
Cc: Kalle Valo, Bryan O'Donoghue, stable, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, wcn36xx, linux-wireless, Network Development,
open list
Hi Benjamin,
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 05:05, Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> wrote:
>
> Firmware sends delete_sta_context_ind when it detects the AP has gone
> away in STA mode. Right now the handler for that indication only handles
> AP mode; fix it to also handle STA mode.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 8def9ec46a5f ("wcn36xx: Enable firmware link monitoring")
I think it's good to have but does it really fix the link monitoring issue?
Is the connection loss detected in this scenario:
- Connect to AP
- Force active mode (iw wlan0 set power_save off)
- Wait for no data activity
- HW shutdown the AP (AP leave)
Do you get any indication?
In this scenario, DB410C (wcn3620) does not report anything.
Regards,
Loic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication
[not found] ` <CAMZdPi_frOfwf+9nfiUw2NJhfuSVgcPj3=Hx2g0d8UsaZza5MA@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2021-09-01 11:56 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2021-09-01 18:02 ` Benjamin Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2021-09-01 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Poulain, Benjamin Li
Cc: Kalle Valo, stable, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, wcn36xx,
linux-wireless, Network Development, open list
On 01/09/2021 07:40, Loic Poulain wrote:
> iw wlan0 set power_save off
I do this on wcn3680b and get no loss of signal
If I do this though
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
index 03966072f34c..ba613fbb728d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
@@ -2345,6 +2345,8 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_feature_caps_exchange(struct
wcn36xx *wcn)
set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, DOT11AC);
set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps,
ANTENNA_DIVERSITY_SELECTION);
}
+ set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, IBSS_HEARTBEAT_OFFLOAD);
+ set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, WLANACTIVE_OFFLOAD);
PREPARE_HAL_BUF(wcn->hal_buf, msg_body);
@@ -2589,7 +2591,7 @@ static int wcn36xx_smd_missed_beacon_ind(struct
wcn36xx *wcn,
struct wcn36xx_hal_missed_beacon_ind_msg *rsp = buf;
struct ieee80211_vif *vif = NULL;
struct wcn36xx_vif *tmp;
-
+wcn36xx_info("%s/%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
/* Old FW does not have bss index */
if (wcn36xx_is_fw_version(wcn, 1, 2, 2, 24)) {
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wcn->vif_list, list) {
@@ -2608,7 +2610,7 @@ static int wcn36xx_smd_missed_beacon_ind(struct
wcn36xx *wcn,
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wcn->vif_list, list) {
if (tmp->bss_index == rsp->bss_index) {
- wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL, "beacon missed
bss_index %d\n",
+ wcn36xx_info("beacon missed bss_index %d\n",
rsp->bss_index);
vif = wcn36xx_priv_to_vif(tmp);
ieee80211_connection_loss(vif);
bingo
root@linaro-developer:~# iw wlan0 set power_save off
# pulls plug on AP
root@linaro-developer:~# [ 83.290987] wcn36xx:
wcn36xx_smd_missed_beacon_ind/2594
[ 83.291070] wcn36xx: beacon missed bss_index 0
[ 83.295403] wlan0: Connection to AP e2:63:da:9c:a4:bd lost
I'm not sure if both flags are required but, this is the behavior we want
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication
2021-09-01 11:56 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2021-09-01 18:02 ` Benjamin Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Li @ 2021-09-01 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan O'Donoghue, Loic Poulain
Cc: Kalle Valo, stable, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, wcn36xx,
linux-wireless, Network Development, open list
Thanks for the investigation!
As discussed offline, I will send v2 with Fixes: removed, and Bryan will test and submit a separate patch to add the additional feat_caps for the power_save off case.
Depending on DB410c testing, these feat_caps may need to be gated for WCN3680 only, in which case Loic's patch to re-enable CONNECTION_MONITOR (but gated for WCN3660/3620) would still be needed.
Ben
On 9/1/21 4:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 01/09/2021 07:40, Loic Poulain wrote:
>> iw wlan0 set power_save off
>
> I do this on wcn3680b and get no loss of signal
>
> If I do this though
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
> index 03966072f34c..ba613fbb728d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
> @@ -2345,6 +2345,8 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_feature_caps_exchange(struct wcn36xx *wcn)
> set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, DOT11AC);
> set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, ANTENNA_DIVERSITY_SELECTION);
> }
> + set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, IBSS_HEARTBEAT_OFFLOAD);
> + set_feat_caps(msg_body.feat_caps, WLANACTIVE_OFFLOAD);
>
> PREPARE_HAL_BUF(wcn->hal_buf, msg_body);
>
> @@ -2589,7 +2591,7 @@ static int wcn36xx_smd_missed_beacon_ind(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
> struct wcn36xx_hal_missed_beacon_ind_msg *rsp = buf;
> struct ieee80211_vif *vif = NULL;
> struct wcn36xx_vif *tmp;
> -
> +wcn36xx_info("%s/%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
> /* Old FW does not have bss index */
> if (wcn36xx_is_fw_version(wcn, 1, 2, 2, 24)) {
> list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wcn->vif_list, list) {
> @@ -2608,7 +2610,7 @@ static int wcn36xx_smd_missed_beacon_ind(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
>
> list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wcn->vif_list, list) {
> if (tmp->bss_index == rsp->bss_index) {
> - wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL, "beacon missed bss_index %d\n",
> + wcn36xx_info("beacon missed bss_index %d\n",
> rsp->bss_index);
> vif = wcn36xx_priv_to_vif(tmp);
> ieee80211_connection_loss(vif);
>
>
> bingo
>
> root@linaro-developer:~# iw wlan0 set power_save off
>
>
> # pulls plug on AP
>
> root@linaro-developer:~# [ 83.290987] wcn36xx: wcn36xx_smd_missed_beacon_ind/2594
> [ 83.291070] wcn36xx: beacon missed bss_index 0
> [ 83.295403] wlan0: Connection to AP e2:63:da:9c:a4:bd lost
>
> I'm not sure if both flags are required but, this is the behavior we want
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-01 18:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-01 3:05 [PATCH] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication Benjamin Li
2021-09-01 6:41 ` Loic Poulain
[not found] ` <CAMZdPi_frOfwf+9nfiUw2NJhfuSVgcPj3=Hx2g0d8UsaZza5MA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-09-01 11:56 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2021-09-01 18:02 ` Benjamin Li
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.