All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org,
	davidb@codeaurora.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] reentrancy in the common clk framework
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:44:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1703638.PLNmMUvYmW@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364445958-2999-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org>

Hi Mike,

On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:45:56 Mike Turquette wrote:
> This fifth attempt at allowing calls to the clk api to reenter splits
> the last patch into two parts.  The first patch abstracts out the
> locking details into some helper functions and converts all of the
> direct calls to the mutex and spinlock api to use these helpers.
> 
> The second patch introduces the reentrancy logic into these helper
> functions.  Fundamentally the reentrancy logic hasn't changed since v4,
> but fixing casting bugs, removing unnecessary barriers and better design
> & beautification separate this approach from the last one.
> 
> Changes tested on top of the latest clk-next branch with an OMAP4430
> Panda board.
> 
> Mike Turquette (2):
>   clk: abstract locking out into helper functions
>   clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework
> 
>  drivers/clk/clk.c |  136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

For the whole patch set,

Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

on a DM3730.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] reentrancy in the common clk framework
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:44:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1703638.PLNmMUvYmW@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364445958-2999-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org>

Hi Mike,

On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:45:56 Mike Turquette wrote:
> This fifth attempt at allowing calls to the clk api to reenter splits
> the last patch into two parts.  The first patch abstracts out the
> locking details into some helper functions and converts all of the
> direct calls to the mutex and spinlock api to use these helpers.
> 
> The second patch introduces the reentrancy logic into these helper
> functions.  Fundamentally the reentrancy logic hasn't changed since v4,
> but fixing casting bugs, removing unnecessary barriers and better design
> & beautification separate this approach from the last one.
> 
> Changes tested on top of the latest clk-next branch with an OMAP4430
> Panda board.
> 
> Mike Turquette (2):
>   clk: abstract locking out into helper functions
>   clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework
> 
>  drivers/clk/clk.c |  136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

For the whole patch set,

Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

on a DM3730.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-28 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-27  7:09 [PATCH v4] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework Mike Turquette
2013-03-27  7:09 ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27  9:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-27  9:08   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-27 15:06   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27 17:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 17:12       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27  9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27  9:40   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27  9:55   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-27  9:55     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-27 10:03     ` Ulf Hansson
2013-03-27 10:03       ` Ulf Hansson
2013-03-27 11:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 11:09         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 14:25         ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27 14:25           ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27  9:59   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-27  9:59     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-27 11:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 11:24   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 16:47   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27 17:09     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 17:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 22:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-27 22:56   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-28  3:00   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] reentrancy in the common " Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45   ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: abstract locking out into helper functions Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45     ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  9:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-28  9:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-28  4:45   ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45     ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  9:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-28  9:33       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-28 15:23       ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 15:23         ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 10:44   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-03-28 10:44     ` [PATCH v5 0/2] reentrancy in the common " Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-28 20:59   ` [PATCH v6 " Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 20:59     ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 20:59     ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: abstract locking out into helper functions Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 20:59       ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-02  9:23       ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-02  9:23         ` Ulf Hansson
2013-03-28 20:59     ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 20:59       ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-02  9:35       ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-02  9:35         ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1703638.PLNmMUvYmW@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.