* [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: limit security support for hosts with very much memory
@ 2021-11-30 16:14 Jan Beulich
2021-11-30 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-12-01 16:13 ` Julien Grall
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2021-11-30 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Cc: Andrew Cooper, George Dunlap, Ian Jackson, Julien Grall,
Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu
Sufficient and in particular regular testing on very large hosts cannot
currently be guaranteed. Anyone wanting us to support larger hosts is
free to propose so, but will need to supply not only test results, but
also a test plan.
This is a follow-up to XSA-385.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- unstable.orig/SUPPORT.md 2021-06-25 11:19:03.000000000 +0200
+++ unstable/SUPPORT.md 2021-09-10 11:15:52.270364645 +0200
@@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ For the Cortex A57 r0p0 - r1p1, see Erra
Status, x86: Supported
+### Physical Memory
+
+ Status: Supported up to 8 TiB
+
+Hosts with more memory are supported, but not security supported.
+
### Physical Memory Hotplug
Status, x86: Supported
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: limit security support for hosts with very much memory
2021-11-30 16:14 [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: limit security support for hosts with very much memory Jan Beulich
@ 2021-11-30 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-12-01 16:13 ` Julien Grall
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2021-11-30 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel
Cc: Andrew Cooper, George Dunlap, Ian Jackson, Julien Grall,
Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu
On 30/11/2021 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Sufficient and in particular regular testing on very large hosts cannot
> currently be guaranteed. Anyone wanting us to support larger hosts is
> free to propose so, but will need to supply not only test results, but
> also a test plan.
>
> This is a follow-up to XSA-385.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: limit security support for hosts with very much memory
2021-11-30 16:14 [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: limit security support for hosts with very much memory Jan Beulich
2021-11-30 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2021-12-01 16:13 ` Julien Grall
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2021-12-01 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel
Cc: Andrew Cooper, George Dunlap, Ian Jackson, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu
Hi,
On 30/11/2021 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Sufficient and in particular regular testing on very large hosts cannot
> currently be guaranteed. Anyone wanting us to support larger hosts is
> free to propose so, but will need to supply not only test results, but
> also a test plan.
>
> This is a follow-up to XSA-385.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
Cheers,
>
> --- unstable.orig/SUPPORT.md 2021-06-25 11:19:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ unstable/SUPPORT.md 2021-09-10 11:15:52.270364645 +0200
> @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ For the Cortex A57 r0p0 - r1p1, see Erra
>
> Status, x86: Supported
>
> +### Physical Memory
> +
> + Status: Supported up to 8 TiB
> +
> +Hosts with more memory are supported, but not security supported.
> +
> ### Physical Memory Hotplug
>
> Status, x86: Supported
>
--
Julien Grall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-01 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-30 16:14 [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: limit security support for hosts with very much memory Jan Beulich
2021-11-30 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-12-01 16:13 ` Julien Grall
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.