* [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
@ 2015-01-28 16:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-01-28 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
built on another symbol.
It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
we get a build error:
../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
^
../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
^
This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
--- a/security/smack/Makefile
+++ b/security/smack/Makefile
@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
-smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
+smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
2015-01-28 16:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2015-01-28 16:27 ` Casey Schaufler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2015-01-28 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-security-module, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On 1/28/2015 8:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> built on another symbol.
A patch for this problem, 82b0b2c2b1e64ad6c5309a9eeba806af9812666b
is already available in:
git://git.gitorious.org/smack-next/kernel.git smack-for-3.20-rebased
A pull request has sent to James Morris for inclusion in the security tree.
>
> It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
> be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
> we get a build error:
>
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
>
> This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
>
> smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
@ 2015-01-28 16:27 ` Casey Schaufler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2015-01-28 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 1/28/2015 8:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> built on another symbol.
A patch for this problem, 82b0b2c2b1e64ad6c5309a9eeba806af9812666b
is already available in:
git://git.gitorious.org/smack-next/kernel.git smack-for-3.20-rebased
A pull request has sent to James Morris for inclusion in the security tree.
>
> It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
> be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
> we get a build error:
>
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
>
> This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
>
> smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
2015-01-28 16:27 ` Casey Schaufler
@ 2015-01-28 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-01-28 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Schaufler; +Cc: linux-security-module, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 08:27:20 Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 1/28/2015 8:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> > Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> > built on another symbol.
>
> A patch for this problem, 82b0b2c2b1e64ad6c5309a9eeba806af9812666b
> is already available in:
>
> git://git.gitorious.org/smack-next/kernel.git smack-for-3.20-rebased
>
> A pull request has sent to James Morris for inclusion in the security tree.
Ok, thanks!
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
@ 2015-01-28 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-01-28 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 08:27:20 Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 1/28/2015 8:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> > Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> > built on another symbol.
>
> A patch for this problem, 82b0b2c2b1e64ad6c5309a9eeba806af9812666b
> is already available in:
>
> git://git.gitorious.org/smack-next/kernel.git smack-for-3.20-rebased
>
> A pull request has sent to James Morris for inclusion in the security tree.
Ok, thanks!
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
2015-01-28 16:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2015-01-28 18:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2015-01-28 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann, Casey Schaufler
Cc: linux-security-module, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Hello.
On 01/28/2015 07:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> built on another symbol.
> It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
> be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
> we get a build error:
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
>
> This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
> diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
>
> smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
CONFIG_ missing?
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
@ 2015-01-28 18:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2015-01-28 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello.
On 01/28/2015 07:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> built on another symbol.
> It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
> be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
> we get a build error:
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
>
> This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
> diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
>
> smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
CONFIG_ missing?
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
2015-01-28 18:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2015-01-28 19:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-01-28 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov, Casey Schaufler, linux-security-module, linux-kernel
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 21:18:11 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> > index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> > --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> > +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> > @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
> >
> > smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> > -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> > +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
>
> CONFIG_ missing?
Yes, you are right. Anyway, as another fix is already queued,
it doesn't matter any more.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
@ 2015-01-28 19:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-01-28 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 21:18:11 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> > index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> > --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> > +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> > @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
> >
> > smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> > -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> > +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
>
> CONFIG_ missing?
Yes, you are right. Anyway, as another fix is already queued,
it doesn't matter any more.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
2015-01-28 16:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2015-01-29 0:36 ` Paul Bolle
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2015-01-29 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Casey Schaufler, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 17:12 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> built on another symbol.
>
> It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
> be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
> we get a build error:
>
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
>
> This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
>
> smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
You probably wanted to use:
CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] Smack: fix netfilter Makefile entry
@ 2015-01-29 0:36 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2015-01-29 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 17:12 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added Smack support for netfilter secmark has its own
> Kconfig symbol, but the actual implementation is conditionally
> built on another symbol.
>
> It is possible for CONFIG_NETFILTER and SECURITY_SMACK to both
> be enabled, but NETWORK_SECMARK to be disabled, in which case
> we get a build error:
>
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv6_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:36:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c: In function 'smack_ipv4_output':
> ../security/smack/smack_netfilter.c:55:6: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'secmark'
> skb->secmark = skp->smk_secid;
> ^
>
> This changes the Makefile to use the correct Kconfig symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 69f287ae6fc83 ("Smack: secmark support for netfilter")
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/Makefile b/security/smack/Makefile
> index 616cf93b368e..d4a376c84050 100644
> --- a/security/smack/Makefile
> +++ b/security/smack/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
>
> smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
> -smack-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
> +smack-$(SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER) += smack_netfilter.o
You probably wanted to use:
CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread