From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Waxhead <waxhead@online.no>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is stability a joke?
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:36:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1819876.6i0n7pb72V@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57D54E7B.5040202@online.no>
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2016, 14:30:51 CEST schrieb Waxhead:
> > I think what would be a good next step would be to ask developers / users
> > about feature stability and then update the wiki. If thats important to
> > you, I suggest you invest some energy in doing that. And ask for help.
> > This mailinglist is a good idea.
> >
> > I already gave you my idea on what works for me.
> >
> > There is just one thing I won´t go further even a single step: The
> > complaining path. As it leads to no desirable outcome.
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> My intention was not to be hostile and if my response sound a bit harsh
> for you then by all means I do apologize for that.
Okay, maybe I read something into your mail that you didn´t intend to put
there. Sorry. Let us focus on the constructive way to move forward with this.
Thanks,
--
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-11 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-11 8:55 Is stability a joke? Waxhead
2016-09-11 9:56 ` Steven Haigh
2016-09-11 10:23 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 11:21 ` Zoiled
2016-09-11 11:43 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 12:05 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 12:39 ` Waxhead
2016-09-11 13:02 ` Hugo Mills
2016-09-11 14:59 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 20:14 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-12 12:20 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-12 12:59 ` Michel Bouissou
2016-09-12 13:14 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-12 14:04 ` Lionel Bouton
2016-09-15 1:05 ` Nicholas D Steeves
2016-09-15 8:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-16 7:13 ` Helmut Eller
2016-09-15 5:55 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-15 8:05 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 14:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 15:19 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-11 20:21 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-11 17:46 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-09-20 16:33 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-11 17:11 ` Duncan
2016-09-12 12:26 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-11 12:30 ` Waxhead
2016-09-11 14:36 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2016-09-12 12:48 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2016-09-12 13:53 ` Chris Mason
2016-09-12 17:36 ` Zoiled
2016-09-12 17:44 ` Waxhead
2016-09-15 1:12 ` Nicholas D Steeves
2016-09-12 14:27 ` David Sterba
2016-09-12 14:54 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-12 16:51 ` David Sterba
2016-09-12 17:31 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-15 1:07 ` Nicholas D Steeves
2016-09-15 1:13 ` Steven Haigh
2016-09-15 2:14 ` stability matrix (was: Is stability a joke?) Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-15 9:49 ` stability matrix Hans van Kranenburg
2016-09-15 11:54 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-15 14:15 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-15 14:56 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-19 14:38 ` David Sterba
2016-09-19 15:27 ` stability matrix (was: Is stability a joke?) David Sterba
2016-09-19 17:18 ` stability matrix Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 19:52 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-19 20:07 ` Chris Mason
2016-09-19 20:36 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-19 21:03 ` Chris Mason
2016-09-19 19:45 ` stability matrix (was: Is stability a joke?) Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-20 7:59 ` Duncan
2016-09-20 8:19 ` Hugo Mills
2016-09-20 8:34 ` David Sterba
2016-09-19 15:38 ` Is stability a joke? David Sterba
2016-09-19 21:25 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2016-09-12 16:27 ` Is stability a joke? (wiki updated) David Sterba
2016-09-12 16:56 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-12 17:29 ` Filipe Manana
2016-09-12 17:42 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-12 20:08 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-13 11:35 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-15 18:01 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-15 18:20 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-15 19:02 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-15 20:16 ` Hugo Mills
2016-09-15 20:26 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-16 12:00 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 2:57 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-09-19 12:37 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 4:08 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-09-19 15:27 ` Sean Greenslade
2016-09-19 17:38 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 18:27 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-19 18:34 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 20:15 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-09-20 12:09 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-15 21:23 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-16 12:13 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 3:47 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-09-19 12:32 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-19 15:33 ` Zygo Blaxell
2016-09-12 19:57 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-12 20:21 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2016-09-12 20:35 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-12 20:44 ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-13 11:28 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-09-13 11:39 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-14 5:53 ` Marc Haber
2016-09-12 20:48 ` Waxhead
2016-09-13 8:38 ` Timofey Titovets
2016-09-13 11:26 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1819876.6i0n7pb72V@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=waxhead@online.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.