All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors
@ 2009-06-12 12:02 Paul Mackerras
  2009-06-12 14:04 ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2009-06-12 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: benh, linuxppc-dev

32-bit powerpc processors have no 64-bit atomic instructions, but we wi=
ll
need atomic64_t in order to support the perf_counter subsystem on 32-bi=
t
processors.

This adds an implementation of 64-bit atomic operations using hashed
spinlocks to provide atomicity.  For each atomic operation, the address=

of the atomic64_t variable is hashed to an index into an array of 16
spinlocks.  That spinlock is taken (with interrupts disabled) around th=
e
operation, which can then be coded non-atomically within the lock.

On UP, all the spinlock manipulation goes away and we simply disable
interrupts around each operation.  In fact gcc eliminates the whole
atomic64_lock variable as well.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
---
Compile-tested only at this stage, which is why it's [RFC].

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h |   29 ++++++
 arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile         |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c    |  173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
++++++++
 3 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/a=
sm/atomic.h
index b401950..45356d6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -470,6 +470,35 @@ static __inline__ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64=
_t *v, long a, long u)
=20
 #define atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) atomic64_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
=20
+#else /* not __powerpc64__ */
+
+typedef struct {
+=09long long counter;
+} atomic64_t;
+
+#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i)=09{ (i) }
+
+extern long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v);
+extern void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i);
+extern void atomic64_add(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_add_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern void atomic64_sub(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_sub_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long long o, long lon=
g n);
+extern long long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long new);
+extern int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u=
);
+
+#define atomic64_add_negative(a, v)=09(atomic64_add_return((a), (v)) <=
 0)
+#define atomic64_inc(v)=09=09=09(atomic64_add(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_inc_return(v)=09=09(atomic64_add_return(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_inc_and_test(v) =09(atomic64_inc_return(v) =3D=3D 0)
+#define atomic64_sub_and_test(a, v)=09(atomic64_sub_return((a), (v)) =3D=
=3D 0)
+#define atomic64_dec(v)=09=09=09(atomic64_sub(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_dec_return(v)=09=09(atomic64_sub_return(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_dec_and_test(v)=09(atomic64_dec_return((v)) =3D=3D 0)=

+#define atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) =09atomic64_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
+
 #endif /* __powerpc64__ */
=20
 #include <asm-generic/atomic.h>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
index 29b742b..1537f13 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_feature-fixups.o =3D -pg
=20
 obj-y=09=09=09:=3D string.o alloc.o \
 =09=09=09   checksum_$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE).o
-obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)=09+=3D div64.o copy_32.o crtsavres.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)=09+=3D div64.o copy_32.o crtsavres.o atomic64_32.o=

 obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM)=09+=3D devres.o
=20
 obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64)=09+=3D copypage_64.o copyuser_64.o \
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64=
_32.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c24b8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/*
+ * Implementation of 64-bit atomics on 32-bit PowerPC processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright =A9 2009 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp. <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+
+/*
+ * We use a hashed array of spinlocks to provide exclusive access
+ * to each atomic64_t variable.  Since this is expected to used on
+ * systems with at most 4 processors, we use a relatively small
+ * array of 16 spinlocks.
+ */
+#define NR_LOCKS=0916
+
+/*
+ * Ensure each lock is in a separate cacheline on SMP.
+ */
+static union {
+=09spinlock_t lock;
+=09char pad[L1_CACHE_BYTES];
+} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+
+static inline spinlock_t *lock_addr(const atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long addr =3D (unsigned long) v;
+
+=09addr >>=3D L1_CACHE_SHIFT;
+=09addr ^=3D (addr >> 8) ^ (addr >> 16);
+=09return &atomic64_lock[addr & (NR_LOCKS - 1)].lock;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09v->counter =3D i;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
+
+void atomic64_add(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09v->counter +=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
+
+long long atomic64_add_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter +=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+void atomic64_sub(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09v->counter -=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
+
+long long atomic64_sub_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter -=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter - 1;
+=09if (val >=3D 0)
+=09=09v->counter =3D val;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long long o, long long n)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter;
+=09if (val =3D=3D o)
+=09=09v->counter =3D n;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long new)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter;
+=09v->counter =3D new;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09int ret =3D 1;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09if (v->counter !=3D u) {
+=09=09v->counter +=3D a;
+=09=09ret =3D 0;
+=09}
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return ret;
+}
+
+static int init_atomic64_lock(void)
+{
+=09int i;
+
+=09for (i =3D 0; i < NR_LOCKS; ++i)
+=09=09spin_lock_init(&atomic64_lock[i].lock);
+=09return 0;
+}
+
+pure_initcall(init_atomic64_lock);
--=20
1.6.0.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors
  2009-06-12 12:02 [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors Paul Mackerras
@ 2009-06-12 14:04 ` Kumar Gala
  2009-06-12 17:40   ` Kyle McMartin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2009-06-12 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: linuxppc-dev


On Jun 12, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:

> 32-bit powerpc processors have no 64-bit atomic instructions, but we  
> will
> need atomic64_t in order to support the perf_counter subsystem on 32- 
> bit
> processors.
>
> This adds an implementation of 64-bit atomic operations using hashed
> spinlocks to provide atomicity.  For each atomic operation, the  
> address
> of the atomic64_t variable is hashed to an index into an array of 16
> spinlocks.  That spinlock is taken (with interrupts disabled) around  
> the
> operation, which can then be coded non-atomically within the lock.
>
> On UP, all the spinlock manipulation goes away and we simply disable
> interrupts around each operation.  In fact gcc eliminates the whole
> atomic64_lock variable as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> ---
> Compile-tested only at this stage, which is why it's [RFC].

any reason not to make this lib/asm generic?  Seems like it isn't ppc  
specific.

- k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors
  2009-06-12 14:04 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2009-06-12 17:40   ` Kyle McMartin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kyle McMartin @ 2009-06-12 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:04:52AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On UP, all the spinlock manipulation goes away and we simply disable
>> interrupts around each operation.  In fact gcc eliminates the whole
>> atomic64_lock variable as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>> ---
>> Compile-tested only at this stage, which is why it's [RFC].
>
> any reason not to make this lib/asm generic?  Seems like it isn't ppc  
> specific.
>

Indeed... PA-RISC uses these for all atomics, since we have no useful
atomic insns to implement them... I'd be happy to submit a cleanup after
you merge this, if you don't have time to ahead of time.

regards, Kyle

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-12 17:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-12 12:02 [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors Paul Mackerras
2009-06-12 14:04 ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-12 17:40   ` Kyle McMartin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.