* [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
@ 2012-07-31 23:23 Hubert Kario
2012-08-01 12:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Kario @ 2012-07-31 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4977 bytes --]
Hello everyone!
It seems that I'm using lvm2cmd library in quite specific way, as I call
lvm2_init() and lvm2_exit() multiple times during lifetime of a program,
or more specifically, my application calls lvm2_exit() as soon as it won't
need it for the next 10-15 minutes...
One specific proglem I noticed, that after calling lvm2_exit() valgrind
complains about invalid *writes* while doing printf() of *static* strings.
At first I thought that this was just a false positive, but my application
isn't stable, and when it crashes glibc reports:
free(): invalid next size (fast)
gdb gives stacktrace pointing to freeing memory I'm completely sure is
allocated properly (it's strdup() of a const string, the same one that
previous 30000 allocations have and next 200000 allocations have).
So I've created a simple C program that also causes valgrind to complain as
soon as lvm2_exit() is called (attached below together with valgrind output).
In other words it looks to me like a bug in lvm2cmd library...
Please, keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed to this list
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Example application:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <lvm2cmd.h>
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *big_alloc = calloc(sizeof(char), 1024*1024*10);
void *handle = lvm2_init();
printf("Some text to output\n");
char *string = strdup("Other text");
printf("Variable before: \"%s\"\n", string);
lvm2_exit(handle);
printf("Variable after: \"%s\"\n", string);
free(string);
free(big_alloc);
return 0;
}
Interesting part of valgrind output:
Variable before: "Other text"
==3565== Invalid write of size 1
==3565== at 0x53BB944: _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x538B607: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x5395B98: printf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x4007F6: main (test.c:21)
==3565== Address 0x6b4c6a0 is 4,096 bytes inside a block of size 8,192 free'd
==3565== at 0x4C29A9E: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==3565== by 0x4E48B11: destroy_toolcontext (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4EB5B02: lvm_fin (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4007E0: main (test.c:19)
==3565==
==3565== Invalid write of size 1
==3565== at 0x53BB944: _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x538E2F8: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x5395B98: printf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x4007F6: main (test.c:21)
==3565== Address 0x6b4c6b1 is 4,113 bytes inside a block of size 8,192 free'd
==3565== at 0x4C29A9E: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==3565== by 0x4E48B11: destroy_toolcontext (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4EB5B02: lvm_fin (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4007E0: main (test.c:19)
==3565==
==3565== Invalid write of size 1
==3565== at 0x53BB944: _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x538C6C7: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x5395B98: printf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x4007F6: main (test.c:21)
==3565== Address 0x6b4c6bb is 4,123 bytes inside a block of size 8,192 free'd
==3565== at 0x4C29A9E: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==3565== by 0x4E48B11: destroy_toolcontext (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4EB5B02: lvm_fin (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4007E0: main (test.c:19)
==3565==
==3565== Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==3565== at 0x541F150: __write_nocancel (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x53BAFB2: _IO_file_write@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x53BAE91: new_do_write (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x53BBCB4: _IO_do_write@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x53BB9B1: _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x538C6C7: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x5395B98: printf (in /lib/libc-2.15.so)
==3565== by 0x4007F6: main (test.c:21)
==3565== Address 0x6b4c6a0 is 4,096 bytes inside a block of size 8,192 free'd
==3565== at 0x4C29A9E: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==3565== by 0x4E48B11: destroy_toolcontext (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4EB5B02: lvm_fin (in /usr/lib/liblvm2cmd.so.2.02)
==3565== by 0x4007E0: main (test.c:19)
==3565==
Variable after: "Other text"
==3934==
==3934== HEAP SUMMARY:
==3934== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3934== total heap usage: 2,575 allocs, 2,575 frees, 10,932,044 bytes allocated
==3934==
==3934== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==3934==
==3934== ERROR SUMMARY: 30 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 3 from 3)
--
Hubert Kario
hubert@kario.pl kario@wit.edu.pl https://hubert.kario.pl
PGP: 30D7 71F5 2F6F B157 872C D811 A1D0 6BC9 8956 DCFE
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
2012-07-31 23:23 [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()? Hubert Kario
@ 2012-08-01 12:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-01 16:17 ` Hubert Kario
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alasdair G Kergon @ 2012-08-01 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hubert Kario; +Cc: linux-lvm
Your test program works for me:
$ valgrind ./a.out
==14092== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==14092== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==14092== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==14092== Command: ./a.out
==14092==
Some text to output
Variable before: "Other text"
Variable after: "Other text"
==14092==
==14092== HEAP SUMMARY:
==14092== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==14092== total heap usage: 161 allocs, 161 frees, 10,620,400 bytes allocated
==14092==
==14092== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==14092==
==14092== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==14092== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 6 from 6)
What version of lvm2 are you using?
Retest with upstream source?
What lvm configure options are you using?
Alasdair
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
2012-08-01 12:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
@ 2012-08-01 16:17 ` Hubert Kario
2012-08-02 1:46 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-02 1:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Kario @ 2012-08-01 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alasdair G Kergon; +Cc: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2043 bytes --]
On Wednesday 01 of August 2012 13:24:13 Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> Your test program works for me:
>
> $ valgrind ./a.out
> ==14092== Memcheck, a memory error detector
> ==14092== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
> ==14092== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright
> info ==14092== Command: ./a.out
> ==14092==
> Some text to output
> Variable before: "Other text"
> Variable after: "Other text"
> ==14092==
> ==14092== HEAP SUMMARY:
> ==14092== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==14092== total heap usage: 161 allocs, 161 frees, 10,620,400 bytes allocated
> ==14092==
> ==14092== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
> ==14092==
> ==14092== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
> ==14092== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 6 from 6)
You've got 6 supressions, while I've got 3. Could be that errors I see are
hidden from You.
Try running with
valgrind -v ./a.out
I've re-worked the application to work with only one lvm2 handle and it's
been stable for the past 17h while with multiple lvm2_exit()'s called it would crash
after 2-3minutes...
> What version of lvm2 are you using?
lvm2 2.02.96-2
gcc-multilib 4.7.1-1
valgrind 3.7.0-2
> Retest with upstream source?
> What lvm configure options are you using?
It is vanilla upstream source, Archlinux package doesn't use any
distro-specific patches, it's compiled with
./configure --prefix=/ --sbindir=/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --datarootdir=/usr/share \
--includedir=/usr/include --with-usrlibdir=/usr/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --with-udev-prefix=/usr \
--with-systemdsystemunitdir=/usr/lib/systemd/system --enable-pkgconfig --enable-readline \
--enable-dmeventd --enable-cmdlib --enable-applib --enable-udev_sync --enable-udev_rules \
--with-default-locking-dir=/run/lock/lvm
make
Regards,
--
Hubert Kario
hubert@kario.pl kario@wit.edu.pl https://hubert.kario.pl
PGP: 30D7 71F5 2F6F B157 872C D811 A1D0 6BC9 8956 DCFE
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
2012-08-01 16:17 ` Hubert Kario
@ 2012-08-02 1:46 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-02 1:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alasdair G Kergon @ 2012-08-02 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hubert Kario; +Cc: linux-lvm
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:17:03PM +0200, Hubert Kario wrote:
> You've got 6 supressions, while I've got 3. Could be that errors I see are
> hidden from You.
I don't think those 6 matter.
--11875-- used_suppression: 6 dl-hack3-cond-1
I'm not seeing messages like yours, even when I enable a similar set of config
options.
Alasdair
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
2012-08-01 16:17 ` Hubert Kario
2012-08-02 1:46 ` Alasdair G Kergon
@ 2012-08-02 1:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-02 10:16 ` Hubert Kario
2012-08-03 9:56 ` Hubert Kario
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alasdair G Kergon @ 2012-08-02 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hubert Kario; +Cc: linux-lvm
Another factor might be different contents in your lvm.conf file compared with
mine, or different devices present causing you to hit a problem code path
and me not to.
Or some other difference in the distribution/compiler/libraries etc.
Alasdair
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
2012-08-02 1:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
@ 2012-08-02 10:16 ` Hubert Kario
2012-08-03 9:56 ` Hubert Kario
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Kario @ 2012-08-02 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alasdair G Kergon; +Cc: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2167 bytes --]
On Thursday 02 of August 2012 02:50:17 Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> Another factor might be different contents in your lvm.conf file compared
> with mine, or different devices present causing you to hit a problem code
> path and me not to.
As far as I know, I'm using standard lvm.conf (attached).
I'm having the same error (in valgrind) when I run the test app as a regular
user, so actual LVM config shouldn't have any effect (?):
/dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied
Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
>
> Or some other difference in the distribution/compiler/libraries etc.
I don't think so, I've got a test app that reliably crashes with normal
execution while works fine under valgrind:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <lvm2cmd.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <string.h>
int keep_running = 1;
void
signal_handler(int dummy)
{
keep_running = 0;
}
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
signal(SIGTERM, signal_handler);
signal(SIGINT, signal_handler);
const char dev[] = "string";
printf("Variable before: \"%s\"\n", dev);
void *handle = lvm2_init();
lvm2_exit(handle);
while (keep_running) {
int arr_len = (random()%320+1) * 1024;
char **table = malloc(sizeof(char *) * arr_len);
assert(table);
for (size_t i=0; i<arr_len; i++) {
table[i] = strdup(dev);
assert(table[i]);
}
char *big_alloc = malloc(arr_len * 1024);
big_alloc[0] = '\0';
big_alloc[4095] = '\0';
big_alloc[arr_len * 1024 - 4096] = '\0';
printf("Some text to output\n");
char *string = strdup("Other text");
printf("Variable after: \"%s\"\n", table[arr_len/2]);
free(string);
free(big_alloc);
for (size_t i=0; i<arr_len; i++) {
free(table[i]);
}
free(table);
//sleep(1);
}
return 0;
}
--
Hubert Kario
hubert@kario.pl kario@wit.edu.pl https://hubert.kario.pl
PGP: 30D7 71F5 2F6F B157 872C D811 A1D0 6BC9 8956 DCFE
[-- Attachment #1.2: lvm.conf --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2393 bytes --]
devices {
dir = "/dev"
scan = [ "/dev" ]
obtain_device_list_from_udev = 1
preferred_names = [ ]
filter = [ "a/.*/" ]
cache_dir = "/etc/lvm/cache"
cache_file_prefix = ""
write_cache_state = 1
sysfs_scan = 1
multipath_component_detection = 1
md_component_detection = 1
md_chunk_alignment = 1
data_alignment_detection = 1
data_alignment = 0
data_alignment_offset_detection = 1
ignore_suspended_devices = 0
disable_after_error_count = 0
require_restorefile_with_uuid = 1
pv_min_size = 2048
issue_discards = 0
}
allocation {
maximise_cling = 1
mirror_logs_require_separate_pvs = 0
thin_pool_metadata_require_separate_pvs = 0
}
log {
verbose = 0
syslog = 1
overwrite = 0
level = 0
indent = 1
command_names = 0
prefix = " "
}
backup {
backup = 1
backup_dir = "/etc/lvm/backup"
archive = 1
archive_dir = "/etc/lvm/archive"
retain_min = 10
retain_days = 30
}
shell {
history_size = 100
}
global {
umask = 077
test = 0
units = "h"
si_unit_consistency = 1
activation = 1
proc = "/proc"
locking_type = 1
wait_for_locks = 1
fallback_to_clustered_locking = 1
fallback_to_local_locking = 1
locking_dir = "/var/lock/lvm"
prioritise_write_locks = 1
abort_on_internal_errors = 0
detect_internal_vg_cache_corruption = 0
metadata_read_only = 0
mirror_segtype_default = "mirror"
use_lvmetad = 0
thin_check_executable = ""
thin_check_options = [ "-q" ]
}
activation {
checks = 0
udev_sync = 1
udev_rules = 1
verify_udev_operations = 0
retry_deactivation = 1
missing_stripe_filler = "error"
use_linear_target = 1
reserved_stack = 64
reserved_memory = 8192
process_priority = -18
mirror_region_size = 512
readahead = "auto"
raid_fault_policy = "warn"
mirror_log_fault_policy = "allocate"
mirror_image_fault_policy = "remove"
snapshot_autoextend_threshold = 100
snapshot_autoextend_percent = 20
thin_pool_autoextend_threshold = 100
thin_pool_autoextend_percent = 20
use_mlockall = 0
monitoring = 1
polling_interval = 15
}
dmeventd {
mirror_library = "libdevmapper-event-lvm2mirror.so"
snapshot_library = "libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so"
thin_library = "libdevmapper-event-lvm2thin.so"
}
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()?
2012-08-02 1:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-02 10:16 ` Hubert Kario
@ 2012-08-03 9:56 ` Hubert Kario
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Kario @ 2012-08-03 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alasdair G Kergon; +Cc: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]
On Thursday 02 of August 2012 02:50:17 Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> Another factor might be different contents in your lvm.conf file compared
> with mine, or different devices present causing you to hit a problem code
> path and me not to.
>
> Or some other difference in the distribution/compiler/libraries etc.
Interesting, I've tried to run the second test application on debian squeeze
(stable) and it worked so this could be a regression...
It works with
lvm2 2.02.66
gcc 4.4.5
glibc 2.13
While it doesn't with
lvm2 2.02.96-2
gcc 4.7.1-1
glibc 2.15
Regards,
--
Hubert Kario
hubert@kario.pl kario@wit.edu.pl https://hubert.kario.pl
PGP: 30D7 71F5 2F6F B157 872C D811 A1D0 6BC9 8956 DCFE
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-03 9:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-31 23:23 [linux-lvm] [lvm2cmd] Heap destruction by lvm2_exit()? Hubert Kario
2012-08-01 12:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-01 16:17 ` Hubert Kario
2012-08-02 1:46 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-02 1:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-02 10:16 ` Hubert Kario
2012-08-03 9:56 ` Hubert Kario
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.