All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Add tda998x (HDMI) support to atmel-hlcdc
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 11:20:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1980444.sF26are89T@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180420112204.GK4235@w540>

Hi Jacopo,

On Friday, 20 April 2018 14:22:04 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:18:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 20 April 2018 11:52:35 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > > 
> > > I've been a bit a pain in the arse for you recently, but please
> > > bear with me a bit more, and sorry for jumping late on the band wagon.
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:27:44PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > I naively thought that since there was support for both nxp,tda19988
> > > > (in the tda998x driver) and the atmel-hlcdc, things would be a smooth
> > > > ride. But it wasn't, so I started looking around and realized I had to
> > > > fix things.
> > > > 
> > > > In v1 and v2 I fixed things by making the atmel-hlcdc driver a master
> > > > component, but now in v3 I fix things by making the tda998x driver
> > > > a bridge instead. This was after a suggestion from Boris Brezillion
> > > > (the atmel-hlcdc maintainer), so there was some risk of bias ... but
> > > > after comparing what was needed, I too find the bridge approach
> > > > better.
> > > > 
> > > > In addition to the above, our PCB interface between the SAMA5D3 and
> > > > the HDMI encoder is only using 16 bits, and this has to be described
> > > > somewhere, or the atmel-hlcdc driver have no chance of selecting the
> > > > correct output mode. Since I have similar problems with a ds90c185
> > > > lvds encoder I added patches to override the atmel-hlcdc output format
> > > > via DT properties compatible with the media video-interface binding
> > > > and things start to play together.
> > > > 
> > > > Since this series superseeds the bridge series [1], I have included
> > > > the leftover bindings patch for the ti,ds90c185 here.
> > > 
> > > I feel like this series would look better if it would make use of the
> > > proposed bridge media bus format support I have recently sent out [1]
> > > (and which was not there when you first sent v1).
> > > 
> > > I understand your fundamental problem here is that the bus format
> > > that should be reported by your bridge is different from the ones
> > > actually supported by the TDA19988 chip, as the wirings ground some
> > > of the input pins.
> > > 
> > > Although this is defintely something that could be described in the
> > > bridge's own OF node with the 'bus_width' property, and what I would do,
> > > now that you have made a bridge out from the tda19988 driver, is:
> > > 
> > > 1) Set the bridge accepted input bus_format parsing its pin
> > > configuration, or default it if that's not implemented yet.
> > > This will likely be rgb888. You can do that using the trivial
> > > support for bridge input image formats implemented by my series.
> > > 2) Specify in the bridge endpoint a 'bus_width' of <16>
> > > 3) In your atmel-hlcd get both the image format of the bridge (rgb888)
> > > and parse the remote endpoint property 'bus_width' and get the <16>
> > > value back.
> > 
> > Parsing properties of remote nodes should be avoided as much as possible,
> > as they need to be interpreted in the context of the DT bindings related
> > to the compatible string applicable to that node. I'd rather have the
> > bus_width property in the local endpoint node.
> 
> Right, I see...
> Well, in Peter's case, the bus width, being a consequence of
> wirings, can be described safely in both endpoints, right?

If we look at it from the endpoints' point of view, the display controller has 
to output a 16-bit format, and the HDMI encoder receives a 24-bit format. The 
conversion is due to PCB wiring so there's no DT node to describe that. I thus 
believe the right description to be bus-width = <16> on the display controller 
side, and bus-width = <24> on the HDMI encoder side.

This being said, even if the bus-width property was set to 16 on both sides, 
what I frown upon is parsing a property of the HDMI encoder DT node in the 
display controller driver.

> > > 4) Set the correct format in the atmel hlcd driver to accommodate a
> > > bridge that wants rgb888 on a 16 bit wide bus (that would be rgb565,
> > > or are there other possible combinations I am missing?)
> > > 
> > > I would consider this better mostly because in this series you are
> > > creating a semantic for the whole DRM subsystem on the 'bus_width'
> > > property, where numerical values as '12', '16' etc are arbitrary tied
> > > to the selection of a media bus format. At least you should use a
> > > common set of defines [1] between the device tree and the driver,
> > > but this looks anyway fragile imho.
> > 
> > This I agree with though. Combining the remote bus format with the local
> > bus width should fix the problem without having to parse remote
> > properties.
> > 
> > > Have I maybe missed some parts of the problem you are trying to solve
> > > here?
> > > 
> > > [1] drm: bridge: Add support for static image formats
> > > 
> > >     https://lwn.net/Articles/752296/
> > > 
> > > [2] include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h
> > > 
> > > > Anyway, this series solves some real issues for my HW.
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v2   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/17/385
> > > > - patch 2/7 fixed spelling and added an example
> > > > - patch 4/7 parse the DT up front and store the result indexed by
> > > > encoder
> > > > - old patch 5/6 and 6/6 dropped
> > > > - patch 5-7/7 are new and makes the tda998x driver a drm_bridge
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v1   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/9/294
> > > > - added reviewed-by from Rob to patch 1/6
> > > > - patch 2/6 changed so that the bus format override is in the endpoint
> > > > 
> > > >   DT node, and follows the binding of media video-interfaces.
> > > > 
> > > > - patch 3/6 is new, it adds drm_of_media_bus_fmt which parses above
> > > > 
> > > >   media video-interface binding (partially).
> > > > 
> > > > - patch 4/6 now makes use of the above helper (and also fixes problems
> > > > 
> > > >   with the 3/5 patch from v1 when no override was specified).
> > > > 
> > > > - do not mention unrelated connector display_info details in the cover
> > > > 
> > > >   letter and commit messages.
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > "Bridge" series v2   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/26/610
> > > > "Bridge" series v1   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/17/221
> > > > 
> > > > Peter Rosin (7):
> > > >   dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti,ds90c185
> > > >   dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints
> > > >   drm: of: introduce drm_of_media_bus_fmt
> > > >   drm/atmel-hlcdc: support bus-width (12/16/18/24) in endpoint nodes
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: find the drm_device via the drm_connector
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: split encoder and component functions from the
> > > >   work
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: register as a drm bridge
> > > >  
> > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt |  26 +++
> > > >  .../bindings/display/bridge/lvds-transmitter.txt   |   8 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c     |  71 ++++++--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h       |   2 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c   |  40 +++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c                           |  38 ++++
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c                  | 201 ++++++++++--
> > > >  include/drm/drm_of.h                               |   7 +
> > > >  8 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Add tda998x (HDMI) support to atmel-hlcdc
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 11:20:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1980444.sF26are89T@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180420112204.GK4235@w540>

Hi Jacopo,

On Friday, 20 April 2018 14:22:04 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:18:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 20 April 2018 11:52:35 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > > 
> > > I've been a bit a pain in the arse for you recently, but please
> > > bear with me a bit more, and sorry for jumping late on the band wagon.
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:27:44PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > I naively thought that since there was support for both nxp,tda19988
> > > > (in the tda998x driver) and the atmel-hlcdc, things would be a smooth
> > > > ride. But it wasn't, so I started looking around and realized I had to
> > > > fix things.
> > > > 
> > > > In v1 and v2 I fixed things by making the atmel-hlcdc driver a master
> > > > component, but now in v3 I fix things by making the tda998x driver
> > > > a bridge instead. This was after a suggestion from Boris Brezillion
> > > > (the atmel-hlcdc maintainer), so there was some risk of bias ... but
> > > > after comparing what was needed, I too find the bridge approach
> > > > better.
> > > > 
> > > > In addition to the above, our PCB interface between the SAMA5D3 and
> > > > the HDMI encoder is only using 16 bits, and this has to be described
> > > > somewhere, or the atmel-hlcdc driver have no chance of selecting the
> > > > correct output mode. Since I have similar problems with a ds90c185
> > > > lvds encoder I added patches to override the atmel-hlcdc output format
> > > > via DT properties compatible with the media video-interface binding
> > > > and things start to play together.
> > > > 
> > > > Since this series superseeds the bridge series [1], I have included
> > > > the leftover bindings patch for the ti,ds90c185 here.
> > > 
> > > I feel like this series would look better if it would make use of the
> > > proposed bridge media bus format support I have recently sent out [1]
> > > (and which was not there when you first sent v1).
> > > 
> > > I understand your fundamental problem here is that the bus format
> > > that should be reported by your bridge is different from the ones
> > > actually supported by the TDA19988 chip, as the wirings ground some
> > > of the input pins.
> > > 
> > > Although this is defintely something that could be described in the
> > > bridge's own OF node with the 'bus_width' property, and what I would do,
> > > now that you have made a bridge out from the tda19988 driver, is:
> > > 
> > > 1) Set the bridge accepted input bus_format parsing its pin
> > > configuration, or default it if that's not implemented yet.
> > > This will likely be rgb888. You can do that using the trivial
> > > support for bridge input image formats implemented by my series.
> > > 2) Specify in the bridge endpoint a 'bus_width' of <16>
> > > 3) In your atmel-hlcd get both the image format of the bridge (rgb888)
> > > and parse the remote endpoint property 'bus_width' and get the <16>
> > > value back.
> > 
> > Parsing properties of remote nodes should be avoided as much as possible,
> > as they need to be interpreted in the context of the DT bindings related
> > to the compatible string applicable to that node. I'd rather have the
> > bus_width property in the local endpoint node.
> 
> Right, I see...
> Well, in Peter's case, the bus width, being a consequence of
> wirings, can be described safely in both endpoints, right?

If we look at it from the endpoints' point of view, the display controller has 
to output a 16-bit format, and the HDMI encoder receives a 24-bit format. The 
conversion is due to PCB wiring so there's no DT node to describe that. I thus 
believe the right description to be bus-width = <16> on the display controller 
side, and bus-width = <24> on the HDMI encoder side.

This being said, even if the bus-width property was set to 16 on both sides, 
what I frown upon is parsing a property of the HDMI encoder DT node in the 
display controller driver.

> > > 4) Set the correct format in the atmel hlcd driver to accommodate a
> > > bridge that wants rgb888 on a 16 bit wide bus (that would be rgb565,
> > > or are there other possible combinations I am missing?)
> > > 
> > > I would consider this better mostly because in this series you are
> > > creating a semantic for the whole DRM subsystem on the 'bus_width'
> > > property, where numerical values as '12', '16' etc are arbitrary tied
> > > to the selection of a media bus format. At least you should use a
> > > common set of defines [1] between the device tree and the driver,
> > > but this looks anyway fragile imho.
> > 
> > This I agree with though. Combining the remote bus format with the local
> > bus width should fix the problem without having to parse remote
> > properties.
> > 
> > > Have I maybe missed some parts of the problem you are trying to solve
> > > here?
> > > 
> > > [1] drm: bridge: Add support for static image formats
> > > 
> > >     https://lwn.net/Articles/752296/
> > > 
> > > [2] include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h
> > > 
> > > > Anyway, this series solves some real issues for my HW.
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v2   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/17/385
> > > > - patch 2/7 fixed spelling and added an example
> > > > - patch 4/7 parse the DT up front and store the result indexed by
> > > > encoder
> > > > - old patch 5/6 and 6/6 dropped
> > > > - patch 5-7/7 are new and makes the tda998x driver a drm_bridge
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v1   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/9/294
> > > > - added reviewed-by from Rob to patch 1/6
> > > > - patch 2/6 changed so that the bus format override is in the endpoint
> > > > 
> > > >   DT node, and follows the binding of media video-interfaces.
> > > > 
> > > > - patch 3/6 is new, it adds drm_of_media_bus_fmt which parses above
> > > > 
> > > >   media video-interface binding (partially).
> > > > 
> > > > - patch 4/6 now makes use of the above helper (and also fixes problems
> > > > 
> > > >   with the 3/5 patch from v1 when no override was specified).
> > > > 
> > > > - do not mention unrelated connector display_info details in the cover
> > > > 
> > > >   letter and commit messages.
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > "Bridge" series v2   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/26/610
> > > > "Bridge" series v1   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/17/221
> > > > 
> > > > Peter Rosin (7):
> > > >   dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti,ds90c185
> > > >   dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints
> > > >   drm: of: introduce drm_of_media_bus_fmt
> > > >   drm/atmel-hlcdc: support bus-width (12/16/18/24) in endpoint nodes
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: find the drm_device via the drm_connector
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: split encoder and component functions from the
> > > >   work
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: register as a drm bridge
> > > >  
> > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt |  26 +++
> > > >  .../bindings/display/bridge/lvds-transmitter.txt   |   8 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c     |  71 ++++++--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h       |   2 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c   |  40 +++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c                           |  38 ++++
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c                  | 201 ++++++++++--
> > > >  include/drm/drm_of.h                               |   7 +
> > > >  8 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] Add tda998x (HDMI) support to atmel-hlcdc
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 11:20:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1980444.sF26are89T@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180420112204.GK4235@w540>

Hi Jacopo,

On Friday, 20 April 2018 14:22:04 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:18:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 20 April 2018 11:52:35 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > > 
> > > I've been a bit a pain in the arse for you recently, but please
> > > bear with me a bit more, and sorry for jumping late on the band wagon.
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:27:44PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > I naively thought that since there was support for both nxp,tda19988
> > > > (in the tda998x driver) and the atmel-hlcdc, things would be a smooth
> > > > ride. But it wasn't, so I started looking around and realized I had to
> > > > fix things.
> > > > 
> > > > In v1 and v2 I fixed things by making the atmel-hlcdc driver a master
> > > > component, but now in v3 I fix things by making the tda998x driver
> > > > a bridge instead. This was after a suggestion from Boris Brezillion
> > > > (the atmel-hlcdc maintainer), so there was some risk of bias ... but
> > > > after comparing what was needed, I too find the bridge approach
> > > > better.
> > > > 
> > > > In addition to the above, our PCB interface between the SAMA5D3 and
> > > > the HDMI encoder is only using 16 bits, and this has to be described
> > > > somewhere, or the atmel-hlcdc driver have no chance of selecting the
> > > > correct output mode. Since I have similar problems with a ds90c185
> > > > lvds encoder I added patches to override the atmel-hlcdc output format
> > > > via DT properties compatible with the media video-interface binding
> > > > and things start to play together.
> > > > 
> > > > Since this series superseeds the bridge series [1], I have included
> > > > the leftover bindings patch for the ti,ds90c185 here.
> > > 
> > > I feel like this series would look better if it would make use of the
> > > proposed bridge media bus format support I have recently sent out [1]
> > > (and which was not there when you first sent v1).
> > > 
> > > I understand your fundamental problem here is that the bus format
> > > that should be reported by your bridge is different from the ones
> > > actually supported by the TDA19988 chip, as the wirings ground some
> > > of the input pins.
> > > 
> > > Although this is defintely something that could be described in the
> > > bridge's own OF node with the 'bus_width' property, and what I would do,
> > > now that you have made a bridge out from the tda19988 driver, is:
> > > 
> > > 1) Set the bridge accepted input bus_format parsing its pin
> > > configuration, or default it if that's not implemented yet.
> > > This will likely be rgb888. You can do that using the trivial
> > > support for bridge input image formats implemented by my series.
> > > 2) Specify in the bridge endpoint a 'bus_width' of <16>
> > > 3) In your atmel-hlcd get both the image format of the bridge (rgb888)
> > > and parse the remote endpoint property 'bus_width' and get the <16>
> > > value back.
> > 
> > Parsing properties of remote nodes should be avoided as much as possible,
> > as they need to be interpreted in the context of the DT bindings related
> > to the compatible string applicable to that node. I'd rather have the
> > bus_width property in the local endpoint node.
> 
> Right, I see...
> Well, in Peter's case, the bus width, being a consequence of
> wirings, can be described safely in both endpoints, right?

If we look at it from the endpoints' point of view, the display controller has 
to output a 16-bit format, and the HDMI encoder receives a 24-bit format. The 
conversion is due to PCB wiring so there's no DT node to describe that. I thus 
believe the right description to be bus-width = <16> on the display controller 
side, and bus-width = <24> on the HDMI encoder side.

This being said, even if the bus-width property was set to 16 on both sides, 
what I frown upon is parsing a property of the HDMI encoder DT node in the 
display controller driver.

> > > 4) Set the correct format in the atmel hlcd driver to accommodate a
> > > bridge that wants rgb888 on a 16 bit wide bus (that would be rgb565,
> > > or are there other possible combinations I am missing?)
> > > 
> > > I would consider this better mostly because in this series you are
> > > creating a semantic for the whole DRM subsystem on the 'bus_width'
> > > property, where numerical values as '12', '16' etc are arbitrary tied
> > > to the selection of a media bus format. At least you should use a
> > > common set of defines [1] between the device tree and the driver,
> > > but this looks anyway fragile imho.
> > 
> > This I agree with though. Combining the remote bus format with the local
> > bus width should fix the problem without having to parse remote
> > properties.
> > 
> > > Have I maybe missed some parts of the problem you are trying to solve
> > > here?
> > > 
> > > [1] drm: bridge: Add support for static image formats
> > > 
> > >     https://lwn.net/Articles/752296/
> > > 
> > > [2] include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h
> > > 
> > > > Anyway, this series solves some real issues for my HW.
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v2   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/17/385
> > > > - patch 2/7 fixed spelling and added an example
> > > > - patch 4/7 parse the DT up front and store the result indexed by
> > > > encoder
> > > > - old patch 5/6 and 6/6 dropped
> > > > - patch 5-7/7 are new and makes the tda998x driver a drm_bridge
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v1   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/9/294
> > > > - added reviewed-by from Rob to patch 1/6
> > > > - patch 2/6 changed so that the bus format override is in the endpoint
> > > > 
> > > >   DT node, and follows the binding of media video-interfaces.
> > > > 
> > > > - patch 3/6 is new, it adds drm_of_media_bus_fmt which parses above
> > > > 
> > > >   media video-interface binding (partially).
> > > > 
> > > > - patch 4/6 now makes use of the above helper (and also fixes problems
> > > > 
> > > >   with the 3/5 patch from v1 when no override was specified).
> > > > 
> > > > - do not mention unrelated connector display_info details in the cover
> > > > 
> > > >   letter and commit messages.
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > "Bridge" series v2   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/26/610
> > > > "Bridge" series v1   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/17/221
> > > > 
> > > > Peter Rosin (7):
> > > >   dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti,ds90c185
> > > >   dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints
> > > >   drm: of: introduce drm_of_media_bus_fmt
> > > >   drm/atmel-hlcdc: support bus-width (12/16/18/24) in endpoint nodes
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: find the drm_device via the drm_connector
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: split encoder and component functions from the
> > > >   work
> > > >   drm/i2c: tda998x: register as a drm bridge
> > > >  
> > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt |  26 +++
> > > >  .../bindings/display/bridge/lvds-transmitter.txt   |   8 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c     |  71 ++++++--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h       |   2 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_output.c   |  40 +++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c                           |  38 ++++
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c                  | 201 ++++++++++--
> > > >  include/drm/drm_of.h                               |   7 +
> > > >  8 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-21  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-19 16:27 [PATCH v3 0/7] Add tda998x (HDMI) support to atmel-hlcdc Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27 ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti,ds90c185 Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti, ds90c185 Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm: of: introduce drm_of_media_bus_fmt Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/atmel-hlcdc: support bus-width (12/16/18/24) in endpoint nodes Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-21 16:19   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-21 16:19     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-21 16:19     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-21 22:13     ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-21 22:13       ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i2c: tda998x: find the drm_device via the drm_connector Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20  9:41   ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20  9:41     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i2c: tda998x: split encoder and component functions from the work Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20  9:51   ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20  9:51     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-19 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i2c: tda998x: register as a drm bridge Peter Rosin
2018-04-19 16:27   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 10:06   ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 10:06     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 10:06     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 10:24     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-20 10:24       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-20 13:28       ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 13:28         ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 10:41   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-20 10:41     ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-20 10:41     ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-20 10:49     ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 10:49       ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 10:53       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-20 10:53         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-20 13:09         ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 13:09           ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 12:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-20 12:00     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-20  8:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Add tda998x (HDMI) support to atmel-hlcdc jacopo mondi
2018-04-20  8:52   ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20  8:52   ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 10:18   ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 10:18     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 10:18     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 11:05     ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 11:05       ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 11:38       ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 11:38         ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 11:38         ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 12:55         ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 12:55           ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-21  8:38           ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-21  8:38             ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-21  8:38             ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-21 15:05             ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-21 15:05               ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-20 11:22     ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 11:22       ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 11:22       ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-21  8:20       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2018-04-21  8:20         ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-21  8:20         ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1980444.sF26are89T@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
    --cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.