All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:56:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1997148.5Fa3W8ZmXx@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409417172-6846-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 06:46:05 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood.  Not
> all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
> 
> The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> maintainers do not need to do anything.
> 
> The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> pattern of all the other patches.
> 
> Andrew Lunn (7):
>   cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency

I have no problems with these changes, but what exactly am I supposed to do?

Rafael


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:56:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1997148.5Fa3W8ZmXx@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409417172-6846-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 06:46:05 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood.  Not
> all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
> 
> The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> maintainers do not need to do anything.
> 
> The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> pattern of all the other patches.
> 
> Andrew Lunn (7):
>   cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>   cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency

I have no problems with these changes, but what exactly am I supposed to do?

Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-01 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-30 16:46 Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 1/7] cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-03 13:45   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-03 13:45     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 2/7] ata: " Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-31 11:02   ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-31 11:02     ` Tejun Heo
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 3/7] thermal: " Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-02 11:53   ` edubezval
2014-09-02 11:53     ` edubezval at gmail.com
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 4/7] leds: " Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 5/7] rtc: " Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 6/7] watchdog: " Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 7/7] cpufreq: " Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01  4:05   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-09-01 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-09-01 13:56   ` [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-01 14:03   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 14:03     ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 23:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-01 23:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-09 15:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-09-09 15:10   ` Jason Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1997148.5Fa3W8ZmXx@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    --subject='Re: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.