All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91sam9261ek: remove unused chosen nodes
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 10:19:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1aa65857-7638-b78f-8cde-cc5c968555cc@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f831f1b-c87d-48bd-cf02-2ebb334b964c@linaro.org>


Hi Rob,

a gentle ping ... ;)

On 08/04/2019 18:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> the following patch has been pushed in 2016 by commit 51f0aeb2d21f1.
> 
> Being able to specify which timer should act as a clocksource or a
> clockevent is often requested. Doing this from the driver itself forces
> to do some assumption in the timer definition ordering in the DT.
> 
> That impacts badly the resulting code and its self-encapsulation.
> 
>  - There is one node and the driver hardcodes the value and initializes
> a clocksource and a clockevent
> 
>  - There are several nodes, one for the clocksource and one for the
> clockevent, and the driver assumes the order of the node in the DT
> 
>  - There are several nodes and multiple channels and those are used for
> PWM. It is impossible to know which one are used for PWM or for the
> clocksource or for the clockevent
> 
> For example with STM32, we should be able to specify which timer to use.
> There are 16 timers IIRC, they can be used for PWM, clocksource or
> clockevent. Half is 16 bits, other half is 32 bits, depending on the
> destination of the platform we can be interested to use one or another
> without recompiling a kernel but just the DT.
> 
> We need a way to specify which timer to be used from the DT. The patch
> below sounded like a good way to characterize the nodes as they belong
> to the 'chosen' node and we stay to a 'linux' thing.
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> 
> On 08/04/2019 17:11, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> The chosen clocksource and clockevent bindings have never been accepted and
>> parsed, remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts | 8 --------
>>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts
>> index a57f2d435dca..11ed55d8a87d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts
>> @@ -15,14 +15,6 @@
>>  	chosen {
>>  		bootargs = "rootfstype=ubifs ubi.mtd=5 root=ubi0:rootfs rw";
>>  		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>> -
>> -		clocksource {
>> -			timer = <&timer0>;
>> -		};
>> -
>> -		clockevent {
>> -			timer = <&timer1>;
>> -		};
>>  	};
>>  
>>  	memory {
>>
> 
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91sam9261ek: remove unused chosen nodes
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 10:19:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1aa65857-7638-b78f-8cde-cc5c968555cc@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f831f1b-c87d-48bd-cf02-2ebb334b964c@linaro.org>


Hi Rob,

a gentle ping ... ;)

On 08/04/2019 18:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> the following patch has been pushed in 2016 by commit 51f0aeb2d21f1.
> 
> Being able to specify which timer should act as a clocksource or a
> clockevent is often requested. Doing this from the driver itself forces
> to do some assumption in the timer definition ordering in the DT.
> 
> That impacts badly the resulting code and its self-encapsulation.
> 
>  - There is one node and the driver hardcodes the value and initializes
> a clocksource and a clockevent
> 
>  - There are several nodes, one for the clocksource and one for the
> clockevent, and the driver assumes the order of the node in the DT
> 
>  - There are several nodes and multiple channels and those are used for
> PWM. It is impossible to know which one are used for PWM or for the
> clocksource or for the clockevent
> 
> For example with STM32, we should be able to specify which timer to use.
> There are 16 timers IIRC, they can be used for PWM, clocksource or
> clockevent. Half is 16 bits, other half is 32 bits, depending on the
> destination of the platform we can be interested to use one or another
> without recompiling a kernel but just the DT.
> 
> We need a way to specify which timer to be used from the DT. The patch
> below sounded like a good way to characterize the nodes as they belong
> to the 'chosen' node and we stay to a 'linux' thing.
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> 
> On 08/04/2019 17:11, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> The chosen clocksource and clockevent bindings have never been accepted and
>> parsed, remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts | 8 --------
>>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts
>> index a57f2d435dca..11ed55d8a87d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts
>> @@ -15,14 +15,6 @@
>>  	chosen {
>>  		bootargs = "rootfstype=ubifs ubi.mtd=5 root=ubi0:rootfs rw";
>>  		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>> -
>> -		clocksource {
>> -			timer = <&timer0>;
>> -		};
>> -
>> -		clockevent {
>> -			timer = <&timer1>;
>> -		};
>>  	};
>>  
>>  	memory {
>>
> 
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-22  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 15:11 [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91sam9261ek: remove unused chosen nodes Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-08 15:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-08 16:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-04-08 16:30   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-04-28 12:47   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-04-28 12:47     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-22  8:19   ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-05-22  8:19     ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1aa65857-7638-b78f-8cde-cc5c968555cc@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.