All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mst@redhat.com, michael.christie@oracle.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mjguzik@gmail.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 16:01:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1abcad65-5367-44e0-8000-11feec1015e8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231028102247.404488-1-singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>

On 10/28/23 15:52, Abhinav Singh wrote:
> This patch fixes the warning about directly dereferencing a pointer
> tagged with __rcu annotation.
> 
> Dereferencing the pointers tagged with __rcu directly should
> always be avoided according to the docs. There is a rcu helper
> function rcu_dereference(...) to use when dereferencing a __rcu
> pointer. This function returns the non __rcu tagged pointer which
> can be dereferenced just like a normal pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2694
> v2 -> v3 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2695
> 
>   kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 10917c3e1f03..e78649974669 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>   
>   	retval = -EAGAIN;
>   	if (is_rlimit_overlimit(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC))) {
> -		if (p->real_cred->user != INIT_USER &&
> +		if (rcu_dereference(p->real_cred)->user != INIT_USER &&
>   		    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>   			goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
>   	}
> @@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>   			 * tasklist_lock with adding child to the process tree
>   			 * for propagate_has_child_subreaper optimization.
>   			 */
> -			p->signal->has_child_subreaper = p->real_parent->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> -							 p->real_parent->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> -			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
> +			p->signal->has_child_subreaper = rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> +							rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> +			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->children);
>   			list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
>   			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>   			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);

I tested the above with these two config enabled, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING 
and CONFIG_PROVE_RCU. In qemu it booted fine without any issues. I then 
checked dmesg log (inside booted qemu envirnoment) for any issues with 
rcu, but didnt get any error or warning.

I didnt receive any warning message "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() 
usage" atleast from sparse tool or in the dmesg log as suggested by Oleg 
Nesterov.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mst@redhat.com, michael.christie@oracle.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mjguzik@gmail.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 16:01:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1abcad65-5367-44e0-8000-11feec1015e8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231028102247.404488-1-singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>

On 10/28/23 15:52, Abhinav Singh wrote:
> This patch fixes the warning about directly dereferencing a pointer
> tagged with __rcu annotation.
> 
> Dereferencing the pointers tagged with __rcu directly should
> always be avoided according to the docs. There is a rcu helper
> function rcu_dereference(...) to use when dereferencing a __rcu
> pointer. This function returns the non __rcu tagged pointer which
> can be dereferenced just like a normal pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2694
> v2 -> v3 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2695
> 
>   kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 10917c3e1f03..e78649974669 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>   
>   	retval = -EAGAIN;
>   	if (is_rlimit_overlimit(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC))) {
> -		if (p->real_cred->user != INIT_USER &&
> +		if (rcu_dereference(p->real_cred)->user != INIT_USER &&
>   		    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>   			goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
>   	}
> @@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>   			 * tasklist_lock with adding child to the process tree
>   			 * for propagate_has_child_subreaper optimization.
>   			 */
> -			p->signal->has_child_subreaper = p->real_parent->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> -							 p->real_parent->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> -			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
> +			p->signal->has_child_subreaper = rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> +							rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> +			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->children);
>   			list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
>   			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>   			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);

I tested the above with these two config enabled, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING 
and CONFIG_PROVE_RCU. In qemu it booted fine without any issues. I then 
checked dmesg log (inside booted qemu envirnoment) for any issues with 
rcu, but didnt get any error or warning.

I didnt receive any warning message "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() 
usage" atleast from sparse tool or in the dmesg log as suggested by Oleg 
Nesterov.
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-28 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 22:28 [PATCH] Fixing warning of directly dereferencing __rcu tagged Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 22:28 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-25 22:38   ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-25 23:27   ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 23:27     ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 23:50     ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-25 23:50       ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-26 12:16       ` [PATCH v2] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 12:16         ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 13:14         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 13:14           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 14:06           ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 14:06             ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 14:51             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-26 14:51               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-26 15:07               ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 15:07                 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 15:17             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 15:17               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 15:37               ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:37                 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:47                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 15:47                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27  6:37                   ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27  6:37                     ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27  6:41                     ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27  6:41                       ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27  7:00                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27  7:00                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27  6:50                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27  6:50                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 12:18       ` [PATCH] Fixing warning of directly dereferencing __rcu tagged Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 12:18         ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 12:27       ` [PATCH] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 12:27         ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-26 15:03           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-27 12:22           ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-10-27 12:22             ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-10-28 10:22             ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 10:22               ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 10:31               ` Abhinav Singh [this message]
2023-10-28 10:31                 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 12:20               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-28 12:20                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-28 20:43                 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 20:43                   ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 20:46                   ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 20:46                     ` Abhinav Singh
2023-11-03  6:30                     ` kernel test robot
2023-11-03  6:30                       ` kernel test robot
2023-11-12 19:30                       ` [PATCH v4] " Abhinav Singh
2023-11-12 19:56                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-11-12 19:58                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-12 20:18                           ` Abhinav Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1abcad65-5367-44e0-8000-11feec1015e8@gmail.com \
    --to=singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.