* [Buildroot] Using buildroot to compiler the busybox, but it could not run !!
@ 2007-01-16 4:08 Liu Oyster
2007-01-16 14:00 ` Ashwin Bihari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Liu Oyster @ 2007-01-16 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
hi, Dear :
I use the buildroot and busybox recently. But, I encountered some
questions, please help me.
(1) buildroot : 0.9.27 , busybox : 1.0.0.rc2
(2) linux kernel header version 2.4.25
binutil : 2.25.91.0.02
gcc : 3.4.2
I run the "make menuconfig " at buildroot directory to set these fields.
Then run "make " and it produced the root_fs_i386.ext2. And I checked the
build_i386/busybox-1.0.0 directory, busybox file is generated, but I could
run the file "busybox".
If I did not use the buildroot toolchain to compiler this version
busybox, I could run the execution file busybox.
Please let me know how to fix this question .
--
Oyster Liu(?B?t??)
0911-679670
E-mail: oysterliu at gmail.com
oysterliu at yahoo.com.tw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20070116/6df5c177/attachment.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Using buildroot to compiler the busybox, but it could not run !!
2007-01-16 4:08 [Buildroot] Using buildroot to compiler the busybox, but it could not run !! Liu Oyster
@ 2007-01-16 14:00 ` Ashwin Bihari
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ashwin Bihari @ 2007-01-16 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
When you configured Buildroot, did you select the right architecture for
your target? Always start with the latest version of Buildroot.
~ Ashwin
On 1/15/07, Liu Oyster <oysterliu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi, Dear :
> I use the buildroot and busybox recently. But, I encountered some
> questions, please help me.
> (1) buildroot : 0.9.27 , busybox : 1.0.0.rc2
> (2) linux kernel header version 2.4.25
> binutil : 2.25.91.0.02
> gcc : 3.4.2
> I run the "make menuconfig " at buildroot directory to set these
> fields. Then run "make " and it produced the root_fs_i386.ext2. And I
> checked the build_i386/busybox-1.0.0 directory, busybox file is
> generated, but I could run the file "busybox".
>
> If I did not use the buildroot toolchain to compiler this version
> busybox, I could run the execution file busybox.
>
> Please let me know how to fix this question .
>
>
> --
> Oyster Liu(???)
> 0911-679670
> E-mail: oysterliu at gmail.com
> oysterliu at yahoo.com.tw
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
>
--
~ Ashwin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20070116/2392ee48/attachment.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-16 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-16 4:08 [Buildroot] Using buildroot to compiler the busybox, but it could not run !! Liu Oyster
2007-01-16 14:00 ` Ashwin Bihari
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.