All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes
@ 2022-11-09 12:05 Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2022-11-09 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo,
	Andy Shevchenko, Bjorn Helgaas

Hi All,

This is a v2 of the series previously posted as

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/2276401.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher/

The first three patches in the series have not changed since then (I have
considered moving the last patch, which is a fix, to the front, but that turns
out to be a bit cumbersome and not really worth the effort).

This series of patches does some assorted ACPI-related cleanups to the CMOS RTC
driver:
- redundant static variable is dropped,
- code duplication is reduced,
- code is relocated so as to drop a few unnecessary forward declarations of
  functions,
- functions are renamed to avoid confusion,
and fixes up an issue in the driver removal path.

Thanks!




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2022-11-09 12:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() " Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2022-11-09 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo,
	Andy Shevchenko, Bjorn Helgaas

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Notice that cmos_wake_setup() is the only user of acpi_rtc_info and it
can operate on the cmos_rtc variable directly, so it need not set the
platform_data pointer before cmos_do_probe() is called.  Instead, it
can be called by cmos_do_probe() in the case when the platform_data
pointer is not set to implement the default behavior (which is to use
the FADT information as long as ACPI support is enabled).

Modify the code accordingly.

While at it, drop a comment that doesn't really match the code it is
supposed to be describing.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

No changes since v1.

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -744,6 +744,8 @@ static irqreturn_t cmos_interrupt(int ir
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
+static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev);
+
 #ifdef	CONFIG_PNP
 #define	INITSECTION
 
@@ -827,19 +829,27 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct
 		if (info->address_space)
 			address_space = info->address_space;
 
-		if (info->rtc_day_alarm && info->rtc_day_alarm < 128)
-			cmos_rtc.day_alrm = info->rtc_day_alarm;
-		if (info->rtc_mon_alarm && info->rtc_mon_alarm < 128)
-			cmos_rtc.mon_alrm = info->rtc_mon_alarm;
-		if (info->rtc_century && info->rtc_century < 128)
-			cmos_rtc.century = info->rtc_century;
+		cmos_rtc.day_alrm = info->rtc_day_alarm;
+		cmos_rtc.mon_alrm = info->rtc_mon_alarm;
+		cmos_rtc.century = info->rtc_century;
 
 		if (info->wake_on && info->wake_off) {
 			cmos_rtc.wake_on = info->wake_on;
 			cmos_rtc.wake_off = info->wake_off;
 		}
+	} else {
+		cmos_wake_setup(dev);
 	}
 
+	if (cmos_rtc.day_alrm >= 128)
+		cmos_rtc.day_alrm = 0;
+
+	if (cmos_rtc.mon_alrm >= 128)
+		cmos_rtc.mon_alrm = 0;
+
+	if (cmos_rtc.century >= 128)
+		cmos_rtc.century = 0;
+
 	cmos_rtc.dev = dev;
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, &cmos_rtc);
 
@@ -1275,13 +1285,6 @@ static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
 static inline void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void) { }
 #endif
 
-/* Every ACPI platform has a mc146818 compatible "cmos rtc".  Here we find
- * its device node and pass extra config data.  This helps its driver use
- * capabilities that the now-obsolete mc146818 didn't have, and informs it
- * that this board's RTC is wakeup-capable (per ACPI spec).
- */
-static struct cmos_rtc_board_info acpi_rtc_info;
-
 static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
 {
 	if (acpi_disabled)
@@ -1289,26 +1292,23 @@ static void cmos_wake_setup(struct devic
 
 	use_acpi_alarm_quirks();
 
-	acpi_rtc_info.wake_on = rtc_wake_on;
-	acpi_rtc_info.wake_off = rtc_wake_off;
+	cmos_rtc.wake_on = rtc_wake_on;
+	cmos_rtc.wake_off = rtc_wake_off;
 
-	/* workaround bug in some ACPI tables */
+	/* ACPI tables bug workaround. */
 	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm && !acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "bogus FADT month_alarm (%d)\n",
 			acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm);
 		acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm = 0;
 	}
 
-	acpi_rtc_info.rtc_day_alarm = acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm;
-	acpi_rtc_info.rtc_mon_alarm = acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm;
-	acpi_rtc_info.rtc_century = acpi_gbl_FADT.century;
+	cmos_rtc.day_alrm = acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm;
+	cmos_rtc.mon_alrm = acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm;
+	cmos_rtc.century = acpi_gbl_FADT.century;
 
-	/* NOTE:  S4_RTC_WAKE is NOT currently useful to Linux */
 	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_S4_RTC_WAKE)
 		dev_info(dev, "RTC can wake from S4\n");
 
-	dev->platform_data = &acpi_rtc_info;
-
 	/* RTC always wakes from S1/S2/S3, and often S4/STD */
 	device_init_wakeup(dev, 1);
 }
@@ -1359,8 +1359,6 @@ static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev
 {
 	int irq, ret;
 
-	cmos_wake_setup(&pnp->dev);
-
 	if (pnp_port_start(pnp, 0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp, 0)) {
 		irq = 0;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
@@ -1468,7 +1466,6 @@ static int __init cmos_platform_probe(st
 	int irq, ret;
 
 	cmos_of_init(pdev);
-	cmos_wake_setup(&pdev->dev);
 
 	if (RTC_IOMAPPED)
 		resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, 0);




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2022-11-09 12:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2022-11-09 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo,
	Andy Shevchenko, Bjorn Helgaas

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To reduce code duplication, move the invocation of rtc_wake_setup()
into cmos_do_probe() and simplify the callers of the latter.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

No changes since v1.

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |   28 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cmos_interrupt(int ir
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
+static inline void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev);
 static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev);
 
 #ifdef	CONFIG_PNP
@@ -938,6 +939,13 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct
 	nvmem_cfg.size = address_space - NVRAM_OFFSET;
 	devm_rtc_nvmem_register(cmos_rtc.rtc, &nvmem_cfg);
 
+	/*
+	 * Everything has gone well so far, so by default register a handler for
+	 * the ACPI RTC fixed event.
+	 */
+	if (!info)
+		rtc_wake_setup(dev);
+
 	dev_info(dev, "%s%s, %d bytes nvram%s\n",
 		 !is_valid_irq(rtc_irq) ? "no alarms" :
 		 cmos_rtc.mon_alrm ? "alarms up to one year" :
@@ -1357,7 +1365,7 @@ static void rtc_wake_setup(struct device
 
 static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *pnp, const struct pnp_device_id *id)
 {
-	int irq, ret;
+	int irq;
 
 	if (pnp_port_start(pnp, 0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp, 0)) {
 		irq = 0;
@@ -1373,13 +1381,7 @@ static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev
 		irq = pnp_irq(pnp, 0);
 	}
 
-	ret = cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	rtc_wake_setup(&pnp->dev);
-
-	return 0;
+	return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq);
 }
 
 static void cmos_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *pnp)
@@ -1463,7 +1465,7 @@ static inline void cmos_of_init(struct p
 static int __init cmos_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct resource *resource;
-	int irq, ret;
+	int irq;
 
 	cmos_of_init(pdev);
 
@@ -1475,13 +1477,7 @@ static int __init cmos_platform_probe(st
 	if (irq < 0)
 		irq = -1;
 
-	ret = cmos_do_probe(&pdev->dev, resource, irq);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	rtc_wake_setup(&pdev->dev);
-
-	return 0;
+	return cmos_do_probe(&pdev->dev, resource, irq);
 }
 
 static int cmos_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2022-11-09 12:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2022-11-09 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo,
	Andy Shevchenko, Bjorn Helgaas

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-cmos: 

Reorder the ACPI-related code before cmos_do_probe() so as to eliminate
excessive forward declarations of some functions.

While at it, for consistency, add the inline modifier to the
definitions of empty stub static funtions and remove it from the
corresponding definitions of functions with non-empty bodies.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

No changes since v1.

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |  304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 149 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -744,8 +744,155 @@ static irqreturn_t cmos_interrupt(int ir
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
-static inline void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev);
-static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev);
+#ifdef	CONFIG_ACPI
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+
+static u32 rtc_handler(void *context)
+{
+	struct device *dev = context;
+	struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	unsigned char rtc_control = 0;
+	unsigned char rtc_intr;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+
+	/*
+	 * Always update rtc irq when ACPI is used as RTC Alarm.
+	 * Or else, ACPI SCI is enabled during suspend/resume only,
+	 * update rtc irq in that case.
+	 */
+	if (cmos_use_acpi_alarm())
+		cmos_interrupt(0, (void *)cmos->rtc);
+	else {
+		/* Fix me: can we use cmos_interrupt() here as well? */
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
+		if (cmos_rtc.suspend_ctrl)
+			rtc_control = CMOS_READ(RTC_CONTROL);
+		if (rtc_control & RTC_AIE) {
+			cmos_rtc.suspend_ctrl &= ~RTC_AIE;
+			CMOS_WRITE(rtc_control, RTC_CONTROL);
+			rtc_intr = CMOS_READ(RTC_INTR_FLAGS);
+			rtc_update_irq(cmos->rtc, 1, rtc_intr);
+		}
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
+	}
+
+	pm_wakeup_hard_event(dev);
+	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
+	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
+	return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (acpi_disabled)
+		return;
+
+	acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, rtc_handler, dev);
+	/*
+	 * After the RTC handler is installed, the Fixed_RTC event should
+	 * be disabled. Only when the RTC alarm is set will it be enabled.
+	 */
+	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
+	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
+}
+
+static void rtc_wake_on(struct device *dev)
+{
+	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
+	acpi_enable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
+}
+
+static void rtc_wake_off(struct device *dev)
+{
+	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+/* Enable use_acpi_alarm mode for Intel platforms no earlier than 2015 */
+static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
+{
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
+		return;
+
+	if (!is_hpet_enabled())
+		return;
+
+	if (dmi_get_bios_year() < 2015)
+		return;
+
+	use_acpi_alarm = true;
+}
+#else
+static inline void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void) { }
+#endif
+
+static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (acpi_disabled)
+		return;
+
+	use_acpi_alarm_quirks();
+
+	cmos_rtc.wake_on = rtc_wake_on;
+	cmos_rtc.wake_off = rtc_wake_off;
+
+	/* ACPI tables bug workaround. */
+	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm && !acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "bogus FADT month_alarm (%d)\n",
+			acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm);
+		acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm = 0;
+	}
+
+	cmos_rtc.day_alrm = acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm;
+	cmos_rtc.mon_alrm = acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm;
+	cmos_rtc.century = acpi_gbl_FADT.century;
+
+	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_S4_RTC_WAKE)
+		dev_info(dev, "RTC can wake from S4\n");
+
+	/* RTC always wakes from S1/S2/S3, and often S4/STD */
+	device_init_wakeup(dev, 1);
+}
+
+static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(struct device *dev,
+					      unsigned char *rtc_control)
+{
+	struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	acpi_event_status rtc_status;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_FIXED_RTC)
+		return;
+
+	status = acpi_get_event_status(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, &rtc_status);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Could not get RTC status\n");
+	} else if (rtc_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_SET) {
+		unsigned char mask;
+		*rtc_control &= ~RTC_AIE;
+		CMOS_WRITE(*rtc_control, RTC_CONTROL);
+		mask = CMOS_READ(RTC_INTR_FLAGS);
+		rtc_update_irq(cmos->rtc, 1, mask);
+	}
+}
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
+
+static inline void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(struct device *dev,
+					      unsigned char *rtc_control)
+{
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
 
 #ifdef	CONFIG_PNP
 #define	INITSECTION
@@ -1140,9 +1287,6 @@ static void cmos_check_wkalrm(struct dev
 	}
 }
 
-static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(struct device *dev,
-				       unsigned char *rtc_control);
-
 static int __maybe_unused cmos_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct cmos_rtc	*cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1209,156 +1353,6 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cmos_pm_ops, cm
  * predate even PNPBIOS should set up platform_bus devices.
  */
 
-#ifdef	CONFIG_ACPI
-
-#include <linux/acpi.h>
-
-static u32 rtc_handler(void *context)
-{
-	struct device *dev = context;
-	struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	unsigned char rtc_control = 0;
-	unsigned char rtc_intr;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-
-	/*
-	 * Always update rtc irq when ACPI is used as RTC Alarm.
-	 * Or else, ACPI SCI is enabled during suspend/resume only,
-	 * update rtc irq in that case.
-	 */
-	if (cmos_use_acpi_alarm())
-		cmos_interrupt(0, (void *)cmos->rtc);
-	else {
-		/* Fix me: can we use cmos_interrupt() here as well? */
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
-		if (cmos_rtc.suspend_ctrl)
-			rtc_control = CMOS_READ(RTC_CONTROL);
-		if (rtc_control & RTC_AIE) {
-			cmos_rtc.suspend_ctrl &= ~RTC_AIE;
-			CMOS_WRITE(rtc_control, RTC_CONTROL);
-			rtc_intr = CMOS_READ(RTC_INTR_FLAGS);
-			rtc_update_irq(cmos->rtc, 1, rtc_intr);
-		}
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
-	}
-
-	pm_wakeup_hard_event(dev);
-	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
-	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
-	return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
-}
-
-static inline void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
-{
-	if (acpi_disabled)
-		return;
-
-	acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, rtc_handler, dev);
-	/*
-	 * After the RTC handler is installed, the Fixed_RTC event should
-	 * be disabled. Only when the RTC alarm is set will it be enabled.
-	 */
-	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
-	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
-}
-
-static void rtc_wake_on(struct device *dev)
-{
-	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
-	acpi_enable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
-}
-
-static void rtc_wake_off(struct device *dev)
-{
-	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-/* Enable use_acpi_alarm mode for Intel platforms no earlier than 2015 */
-static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
-{
-	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
-		return;
-
-	if (!is_hpet_enabled())
-		return;
-
-	if (dmi_get_bios_year() < 2015)
-		return;
-
-	use_acpi_alarm = true;
-}
-#else
-static inline void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void) { }
-#endif
-
-static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
-{
-	if (acpi_disabled)
-		return;
-
-	use_acpi_alarm_quirks();
-
-	cmos_rtc.wake_on = rtc_wake_on;
-	cmos_rtc.wake_off = rtc_wake_off;
-
-	/* ACPI tables bug workaround. */
-	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm && !acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "bogus FADT month_alarm (%d)\n",
-			acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm);
-		acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm = 0;
-	}
-
-	cmos_rtc.day_alrm = acpi_gbl_FADT.day_alarm;
-	cmos_rtc.mon_alrm = acpi_gbl_FADT.month_alarm;
-	cmos_rtc.century = acpi_gbl_FADT.century;
-
-	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_S4_RTC_WAKE)
-		dev_info(dev, "RTC can wake from S4\n");
-
-	/* RTC always wakes from S1/S2/S3, and often S4/STD */
-	device_init_wakeup(dev, 1);
-}
-
-static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(struct device *dev,
-				       unsigned char *rtc_control)
-{
-	struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	acpi_event_status rtc_status;
-	acpi_status status;
-
-	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_FIXED_RTC)
-		return;
-
-	status = acpi_get_event_status(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, &rtc_status);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Could not get RTC status\n");
-	} else if (rtc_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_SET) {
-		unsigned char mask;
-		*rtc_control &= ~RTC_AIE;
-		CMOS_WRITE(*rtc_control, RTC_CONTROL);
-		mask = CMOS_READ(RTC_INTR_FLAGS);
-		rtc_update_irq(cmos->rtc, 1, mask);
-	}
-}
-
-#else
-
-static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
-{
-}
-
-static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(struct device *dev,
-				       unsigned char *rtc_control)
-{
-}
-
-static void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
-{
-}
-#endif
-
 #ifdef	CONFIG_PNP
 
 #include <linux/pnp.h>




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2022-11-09 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 12:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2022-11-09 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo,
	Andy Shevchenko, Bjorn Helgaas

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The names of rtc_wake_setup() and cmos_wake_setup() don't indicate
that these functions are ACPI-related, which is the case, and the
former doesn't really reflect the role of the function.

Rename them to acpi_rtc_event_setup() and acpi_cmos_wake_setup(),
respectively, to address this shortcoming.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

v1 -> v2:
   * Use acpi_cmos_wake_setup() as the new name instead of
     cmos_acpi_wake_setup() (Andy)

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static u32 rtc_handler(void *context)
 	return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
 }
 
-static void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+static void acpi_rtc_event_setup(struct device *dev)
 {
 	if (acpi_disabled)
 		return;
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
 static inline void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void) { }
 #endif
 
-static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+static void acpi_cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
 {
 	if (acpi_disabled)
 		return;
@@ -880,11 +880,11 @@ static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(s
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
 
-static inline void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+static inline void acpi_rtc_event_setup(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
 
-static inline void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
+static inline void acpi_cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
 
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct
 			cmos_rtc.wake_off = info->wake_off;
 		}
 	} else {
-		cmos_wake_setup(dev);
+		acpi_cmos_wake_setup(dev);
 	}
 
 	if (cmos_rtc.day_alrm >= 128)
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct
 	 * the ACPI RTC fixed event.
 	 */
 	if (!info)
-		rtc_wake_setup(dev);
+		acpi_rtc_event_setup(dev);
 
 	dev_info(dev, "%s%s, %d bytes nvram%s\n",
 		 !is_valid_irq(rtc_irq) ? "no alarms" :




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-09 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2022-11-09 12:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2022-11-09 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Andy Shevchenko
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2022-11-09 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo,
	Andy Shevchenko, Bjorn Helgaas

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Make cmos_do_remove() drop the ACPI RTC fixed event handler so as to
prevent it from operating on stale data in case the event triggers
after driver removal.

Fixes: 311ee9c151ad ("rtc: cmos: allow using ACPI for RTC alarm instead of HPET")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

v1 -> v2:
   * Do not clear the driver data pointer (the driver core does that) (Andy)
   * Adjust the code pattern in acpi_rtc_event_cleanup() (Andy)
   * Drop inline from the full definition of acpi_rtc_event_cleanup()

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -798,6 +798,14 @@ static void acpi_rtc_event_setup(struct
 	acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
 }
 
+static void acpi_rtc_event_cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (acpi_disabled)
+		return;
+
+	acpi_remove_fixed_event_handler(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, rtc_handler);
+}
+
 static void rtc_wake_on(struct device *dev)
 {
 	acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
@@ -884,6 +892,10 @@ static inline void acpi_rtc_event_setup(
 {
 }
 
+static inline void acpi_rtc_event_cleanup(void)
+{
+}
+
 static inline void acpi_cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
@@ -1138,6 +1150,9 @@ static void cmos_do_remove(struct device
 			hpet_unregister_irq_handler(cmos_interrupt);
 	}
 
+	if (!dev_get_platdata(dev))
+		acpi_rtc_event_cleanup();
+
 	cmos->rtc = NULL;
 
 	ports = cmos->iomem;




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-09 12:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2022-11-09 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2022-11-10 12:00 ` Zhang Rui
  2022-11-15 20:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2022-11-09 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc, Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM,
	Zhang Rui, Alessandro Zummo, Bjorn Helgaas

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:05:13PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This is a v2 of the series previously posted as
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/2276401.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher/
> 
> The first three patches in the series have not changed since then (I have
> considered moving the last patch, which is a fix, to the front, but that turns
> out to be a bit cumbersome and not really worth the effort).
> 
> This series of patches does some assorted ACPI-related cleanups to the CMOS RTC
> driver:
> - redundant static variable is dropped,
> - code duplication is reduced,
> - code is relocated so as to drop a few unnecessary forward declarations of
>   functions,
> - functions are renamed to avoid confusion,
> and fixes up an issue in the driver removal path.

LGTM, FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-09 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Andy Shevchenko
@ 2022-11-10 12:00 ` Zhang Rui
  2022-11-15 20:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2022-11-10 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexandre Belloni, linux-rtc
  Cc: Linux ACPI, LKML, Linux PM, Alessandro Zummo, Andy Shevchenko,
	Bjorn Helgaas

On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 13:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This is a v2 of the series previously posted as
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/2276401.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher/
> 
> The first three patches in the series have not changed since then (I
> have
> considered moving the last patch, which is a fix, to the front, but
> that turns
> out to be a bit cumbersome and not really worth the effort).
> 
> This series of patches does some assorted ACPI-related cleanups to
> the CMOS RTC
> driver:
> - redundant static variable is dropped,
> - code duplication is reduced,
> - code is relocated so as to drop a few unnecessary forward
> declarations of
>   functions,
> - functions are renamed to avoid confusion,
> and fixes up an issue in the driver removal path.
> 
> 
> 

Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>

And I have tested the patch series on a platform with both
use_acpi_alarm parameter set and cleared, the ACPI RTC fixed event
works as expected, for both runtime and suspend wakeups.

So
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>

thanks,
rui



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes
  2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-10 12:00 ` Zhang Rui
@ 2022-11-15 20:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2022-11-15 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-rtc, Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux PM, Andy Shevchenko, Alessandro Zummo, Linux ACPI, LKML,
	Zhang Rui, Bjorn Helgaas

On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:05:13 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This is a v2 of the series previously posted as
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/2276401.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher/
> 
> The first three patches in the series have not changed since then (I have
> considered moving the last patch, which is a fix, to the front, but that turns
> out to be a bit cumbersome and not really worth the effort).
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
      commit: 508ccdfb86b21da37ad091003a4d4567709d5dfb
[2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
      commit: 375bbba09692fe4c5218eddee8e312dd733fa846
[3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions
      commit: dca4d3b71c8a09a16951add656711fbd6f5bfbb0
[4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
      commit: d13e9ad9f5146f066a5c5a1cc993d09e4fb21ead
[5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal
      commit: 83ebb7b3036d151ee39a4a752018665648fc3bd4

Best regards,

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-15 20:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-09 12:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 12:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Assorted ACPI-related cleanups and fixes Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-10 12:00 ` Zhang Rui
2022-11-15 20:08 ` Alexandre Belloni

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.