All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: livepatch use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:06:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e07dae8-6699-6b72-1508-2b6b89d3d92d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f97800f-e78f-7d16-32b2-96ee5260321c@redhat.com>

On 4/12/19 12:51 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 4/12/19 1:05 PM, shuah wrote:
>> On 4/12/19 7:37 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, shuah wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/12/19 1:03 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> TEST_PROGS variable is for test shell scripts and common clean target
>>>>>> in lib.mk doesn't touch them. TEST_GEN_PROGS are removed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix it to use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts and 
>>>>>> TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED
>>>>>> for common functions.sh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 3 ++-
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> index af4aee79bebb..fd405402c3ff 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>>>>>     # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS := \
>>>>>> +TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := functions.sh
>>>>>> +TEST_PROGS := \
>>>>>>      test-livepatch.sh \
>>>>>>      test-callbacks.sh \
>>>>>>      test-shadow-vars.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the patch. We have already something similar queued in 
>>>>> our git
>>>>> tree. See
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/livepatching/livepatching.git/commit/?h=for-5.1/upstream-fixes&id=abfe3c4560684864f66641438fee3075de098e89 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is missing TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED though. Should we add it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please do. What that does is when selftests are installed, functions.h
>>>> gets installed as well so the the test can run from installed location.
>>>>
>>>> Did I miss reviewing the original? I maintain the framework and try to
>>>> catch these if patch gets sent to me.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately you did and it was our fault. You were not CCed, no one
>>> noticed and we were a bit trigger happy. Sorry about that. It should not
>>> have happened.
>>>
>>> Would this work for you?
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
> 
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Thanks for spotting this and apologies for missing your CC on my earlier 
> patch post.  For future reference, do you prefer a direct CC, 
> linux-kselftest, or both?

No worries. Happy to report the problem. Couldn't have missed it with
all the deleted lines showing up whenever I ran diff on my changes. :)

Direct to or cc to me and cc linux-kselftest list is preferred Same as
any other patch really, everybody getmaintainer.pl recommends.

thanks,
-- Shuah


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shuah at kernel.org (shuah)
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: livepatch use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:06:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e07dae8-6699-6b72-1508-2b6b89d3d92d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f97800f-e78f-7d16-32b2-96ee5260321c@redhat.com>

On 4/12/19 12:51 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 4/12/19 1:05 PM, shuah wrote:
>> On 4/12/19 7:37 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, shuah wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/12/19 1:03 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> TEST_PROGS variable is for test shell scripts and common clean target
>>>>>> in lib.mk doesn't touch them. TEST_GEN_PROGS are removed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix it to use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts and 
>>>>>> TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED
>>>>>> for common functions.sh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah at kernel.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 3 ++-
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> index af4aee79bebb..fd405402c3ff 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>>>>>     # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS := \
>>>>>> +TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := functions.sh
>>>>>> +TEST_PROGS := \
>>>>>>      test-livepatch.sh \
>>>>>>      test-callbacks.sh \
>>>>>>      test-shadow-vars.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the patch. We have already something similar queued in 
>>>>> our git
>>>>> tree. See
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/livepatching/livepatching.git/commit/?h=for-5.1/upstream-fixes&id=abfe3c4560684864f66641438fee3075de098e89 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is missing TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED though. Should we add it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please do. What that does is when selftests are installed, functions.h
>>>> gets installed as well so the the test can run from installed location.
>>>>
>>>> Did I miss reviewing the original? I maintain the framework and try to
>>>> catch these if patch gets sent to me.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately you did and it was our fault. You were not CCed, no one
>>> noticed and we were a bit trigger happy. Sorry about that. It should not
>>> have happened.
>>>
>>> Would this work for you?
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
> 
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Thanks for spotting this and apologies for missing your CC on my earlier 
> patch post.  For future reference, do you prefer a direct CC, 
> linux-kselftest, or both?

No worries. Happy to report the problem. Couldn't have missed it with
all the deleted lines showing up whenever I ran diff on my changes. :)

Direct to or cc to me and cc linux-kselftest list is preferred Same as
any other patch really, everybody getmaintainer.pl recommends.

thanks,
-- Shuah

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shuah@kernel.org (shuah)
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: livepatch use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:06:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e07dae8-6699-6b72-1508-2b6b89d3d92d@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190412190621.iOJJZzs44FF_-A3K3IeervEATLX2JpYez4htj1FjO4A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f97800f-e78f-7d16-32b2-96ee5260321c@redhat.com>

On 4/12/19 12:51 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 4/12/19 1:05 PM, shuah wrote:
>> On 4/12/19 7:37 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, shuah wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/12/19 1:03 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> TEST_PROGS variable is for test shell scripts and common clean target
>>>>>> in lib.mk doesn't touch them. TEST_GEN_PROGS are removed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix it to use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts and 
>>>>>> TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED
>>>>>> for common functions.sh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah at kernel.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 3 ++-
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> index af4aee79bebb..fd405402c3ff 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>>>>>     # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS := \
>>>>>> +TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := functions.sh
>>>>>> +TEST_PROGS := \
>>>>>>      test-livepatch.sh \
>>>>>>      test-callbacks.sh \
>>>>>>      test-shadow-vars.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the patch. We have already something similar queued in 
>>>>> our git
>>>>> tree. See
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/livepatching/livepatching.git/commit/?h=for-5.1/upstream-fixes&id=abfe3c4560684864f66641438fee3075de098e89 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is missing TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED though. Should we add it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please do. What that does is when selftests are installed, functions.h
>>>> gets installed as well so the the test can run from installed location.
>>>>
>>>> Did I miss reviewing the original? I maintain the framework and try to
>>>> catch these if patch gets sent to me.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately you did and it was our fault. You were not CCed, no one
>>> noticed and we were a bit trigger happy. Sorry about that. It should not
>>> have happened.
>>>
>>> Would this work for you?
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
> 
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Thanks for spotting this and apologies for missing your CC on my earlier 
> patch post.  For future reference, do you prefer a direct CC, 
> linux-kselftest, or both?

No worries. Happy to report the problem. Couldn't have missed it with
all the deleted lines showing up whenever I ran diff on my changes. :)

Direct to or cc to me and cc linux-kselftest list is preferred Same as
any other patch really, everybody getmaintainer.pl recommends.

thanks,
-- Shuah

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-12 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-12  1:18 [PATCH] selftests: livepatch use TEST_PROGS for test shell scripts Shuah Khan
2019-04-12  1:18 ` Shuah Khan
2019-04-12  1:18 ` shuah
2019-04-12  7:03 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-04-12  7:03   ` Miroslav Benes
2019-04-12  7:03   ` mbenes
2019-04-12 13:26   ` shuah
2019-04-12 13:26     ` shuah
2019-04-12 13:26     ` shuah
2019-04-12 13:37     ` Miroslav Benes
2019-04-12 13:37       ` Miroslav Benes
2019-04-12 13:37       ` mbenes
2019-04-12 17:05       ` shuah
2019-04-12 17:05         ` shuah
2019-04-12 17:05         ` shuah
2019-04-12 18:51         ` Joe Lawrence
2019-04-12 18:51           ` Joe Lawrence
2019-04-12 18:51           ` joe.lawrence
2019-04-12 19:06           ` shuah [this message]
2019-04-12 19:06             ` shuah
2019-04-12 19:06             ` shuah
2019-04-15 12:42       ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-15 12:42         ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-15 12:42         ` pmladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e07dae8-6699-6b72-1508-2b6b89d3d92d@kernel.org \
    --to=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.