All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
@ 2023-03-25 22:02 Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-25 22:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: " Arseniy Krasnov
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arseniy Krasnov @ 2023-03-25 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, David S. Miller,
	Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Bobby Eshleman
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel, oxffffaa, avkrasnov

This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
return to af_vsock.c.

Also this patchset includes second patch which adds check and return from
'virtio_transport_get_credit()' and 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' when
these functions are called with 0 argument. This is needed, because zero
argument makes both functions to behave as no-effect, but both of them
always tries to acquire spinlock. Moreover, first patch always calls
function 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' with zero argument in case of
successful packet transmission.

 Link to v1:
 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2c52aa26-8181-d37a-bccd-a86bd3cbc6e1@sberdevices.ru/
 Link to v2:
 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ea5725eb-6cb5-cf15-2938-34e335a442fa@sberdevices.ru/
 Link to v3:
 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/f33ef593-982e-2b3f-0986-6d537a3aaf08@sberdevices.ru/
 Link to v4:
 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0e0c1421-7cdc-2582-b120-cad6f42824bb@sberdevices.ru/
 Link to v5:
 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/f0b283a1-cc63-dc3d-cc0c-0da7f684d4d2@sberdevices.ru/

 Changelog:
 v1 -> v2:
 - If sent something, return number of bytes sent (even in
   case of error). Return error only if failed to sent first
   skbuff.

 v2 -> v3:
 - Handle case when transport callback returns unexpected value which
   is not equal to 'skb->len'. Break loop.
 - Don't check for zero value of 'rest_len' before calling
   'virtio_transport_put_credit()'. Decided to add this check directly
   to 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' in separate patch.

 v3 -> v4:
 - Use WARN_ONCE() to handle case when transport callback returns
   unexpected value.
 - Remove useless 'ret = -EFAULT;' assignment for case above.

 v4 -> v5:
 - Remove extra 'ret' initialization.
 - Remove empty extra line before 'if (ret < 0)'.
 - Add R-b tag for the first patch.
 - Add second patch, thus creating patchset of 2 patches.

Arseniy Krasnov (2):
  virtio/vsock: allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
  virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call

 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
  2023-03-25 22:02 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx Arseniy Krasnov
@ 2023-03-25 22:03 ` Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-25 22:04 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-28 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arseniy Krasnov @ 2023-03-25 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, David S. Miller,
	Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Bobby Eshleman
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel, oxffffaa, avkrasnov

This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
return to af_vsock.c.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 6564192e7f20..9e87c7d4d7cf 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 	const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
 	struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
 	u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	u32 rest_len;
+	int ret;
 
 	info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk));
 
@@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 
 	vvs = vsk->trans;
 
-	/* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
-	if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
-		pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
-
 	/* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
 	pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
 
@@ -227,17 +224,49 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 	if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
 		return pkt_len;
 
-	skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
-					 src_cid, src_port,
-					 dst_cid, dst_port);
-	if (!skb) {
-		virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	rest_len = pkt_len;
+
+	do {
+		struct sk_buff *skb;
+		size_t skb_len;
+
+		skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
+
+		skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
+						 src_cid, src_port,
+						 dst_cid, dst_port);
+		if (!skb) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			break;
+		}
 
-	virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+		virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
 
-	return t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+		ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			break;
+
+		/* Both virtio and vhost 'send_pkt()' returns 'skb_len',
+		 * but for reliability use 'ret' instead of 'skb_len'.
+		 * Also if partial send happens (e.g. 'ret' != 'skb_len')
+		 * somehow, we break this loop, but account such returned
+		 * value in 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'.
+		 */
+		rest_len -= ret;
+
+		if (WARN_ONCE(ret != skb_len,
+			      "'send_pkt()' returns %i, but %zu expected\n",
+			      ret, skb_len))
+			break;
+	} while (rest_len);
+
+	virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len);
+
+	/* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */
+	if (rest_len != pkt_len)
+		ret = pkt_len - rest_len;
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
-- 
2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call
  2023-03-25 22:02 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-25 22:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: " Arseniy Krasnov
@ 2023-03-25 22:04 ` Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-28 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arseniy Krasnov @ 2023-03-25 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, David S. Miller,
	Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Bobby Eshleman
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel, oxffffaa, avkrasnov

Both of these functions have no effect when input argument is 0, so to
avoid useless spinlock access, check argument before it.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 9e87c7d4d7cf..312658c176bd 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ u32 virtio_transport_get_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit)
 {
 	u32 ret;
 
+	if (!credit)
+		return 0;
+
 	spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
 	ret = vvs->peer_buf_alloc - (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt);
 	if (ret > credit)
@@ -315,6 +318,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_get_credit);
 
 void virtio_transport_put_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit)
 {
+	if (!credit)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
 	vvs->tx_cnt -= credit;
 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
-- 
2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
  2023-03-25 22:02 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-25 22:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: " Arseniy Krasnov
  2023-03-25 22:04 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call Arseniy Krasnov
@ 2023-03-28 10:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2023-03-28 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arseniy Krasnov
  Cc: stefanha, sgarzare, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
	bobby.eshleman, kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel,
	kernel, oxffffaa, avkrasnov

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 01:02:43 +0300 you wrote:
> This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
> skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
> credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
> return to af_vsock.c.
> 
> Also this patchset includes second patch which adds check and return from
> 'virtio_transport_get_credit()' and 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' when
> these functions are called with 0 argument. This is needed, because zero
> argument makes both functions to behave as no-effect, but both of them
> always tries to acquire spinlock. Moreover, first patch always calls
> function 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' with zero argument in case of
> successful packet transmission.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v5,1/2] virtio/vsock: allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b68ffb1b3bee
  - [net-next,v5,2/2] virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e3ec366eb0d1

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-28 10:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-25 22:02 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-25 22:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: " Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-25 22:04 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-28 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.