All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
@ 2003-06-09 11:11 Sam Ravnborg
  2003-06-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
  2003-06-09 19:45 ` Robert Schwebel
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2003-06-09 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Being used to the Linux kernel 2.5 build system, the build system for
Das U-Boot looks like an area for improvements.

What features are most seeked among the u-boot developers?

I will not promise, but I may take a stamp on it.

Being inspired from the Linux kernel I have the following things in mind:
(no particular order)
- Less verbose output
- Dependency generation including dependency on CONFIG symbols
- Kernel config tool

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 11:11 [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements? Sam Ravnborg
@ 2003-06-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
  2003-06-09 20:03   ` Sam Ravnborg
  2003-06-09 19:45 ` Robert Schwebel
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2003-06-09 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In message <20030609111148.GA10440@mars.ravnborg.org> you wrote:
> Being used to the Linux kernel 2.5 build system, the build system for
> Das U-Boot looks like an area for improvements.
> 
> What features are most seeked among the u-boot developers?
> 
> I will not promise, but I may take a stamp on it.

This has been discussed  at  length  before.  See  the  mailing  list
archive, for example the thread "Linux Kernel Config 1.2 for u-boot?"
started by Holger Schurig on Tue, 5 Nov 2002.

> Being inspired from the Linux kernel I have the following things in mind:
> (no particular order)
> - Less verbose output

Less verbose output? Please don't.

If you want a semi-silent build just use "MAKEALL  target".  For  all
other  cases  I  insist  on being able to see what's going on. I hate
"silent" build procedures where you have to waste your time to figure
out what's going wrong and where and why.

> - Dependency generation including dependency on CONFIG symbols
> - Kernel config tool

See previous discussion.

First thing you should do is to define _why_ you want to do this.  Do
you  want  to  make  it easier to port U-Boot to a new board? Is yout
target group the programmer who just starts his first  port,  or  the
expert who is doing this for the umpteenth time?


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
Pray to God, but keep rowing to shore. - Russian Proverb

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 11:11 [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements? Sam Ravnborg
  2003-06-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2003-06-09 19:45 ` Robert Schwebel
  2003-06-09 20:04   ` Sam Ravnborg
  2003-06-09 20:43   ` Wolfgang Denk
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schwebel @ 2003-06-09 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:11:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Being used to the Linux kernel 2.5 build system, the build system for
> Das U-Boot looks like an area for improvements.

I've already done a kconfig port to u-boot some time ago, please have a
look at our web page if you are interested. Unfortunately Wolfgang
doesn't want to have it in u-boot, so I have not followed this path
further. 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2003-06-09 20:03   ` Sam Ravnborg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2003-06-09 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:51:50PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20030609111148.GA10440@mars.ravnborg.org> you wrote:
> > Being used to the Linux kernel 2.5 build system, the build system for
> > Das U-Boot looks like an area for improvements.
> > 
> > What features are most seeked among the u-boot developers?
> > 
> > I will not promise, but I may take a stamp on it.
> 
> This has been discussed  at  length  before.  See  the  mailing  list
> archive, for example the thread "Linux Kernel Config 1.2 for u-boot?"
> started by Holger Schurig on Tue, 5 Nov 2002.

I only went back to January this year. I will take a look.

> > Being inspired from the Linux kernel I have the following things in mind:
> > (no particular order)
> > - Less verbose output
> 
> Less verbose output? Please don't.
Why bother people with a lot of noise when less can do it in 99% of the cases.
The verbose variant is needed for sure - agree 100%.
But I do not see why it shall be the default choice.
Then a build where nothing is actually build should give minimum output.
Why should I be bothered with useless information about what directory
make visited for example. Much better to compile everything from
the same root.
Error messages is still OK, and you do not have to find out
which of the files with the same name was the culprint. After a screen
full of warnings where you lost the make info.

> 
> First thing you should do is to define _why_ you want to do this.  Do
> you  want  to  make  it easier to port U-Boot to a new board? Is yout
> target group the programmer who just starts his first  port,  or  the
> expert who is doing this for the umpteenth time?

My main focus is to make life easier for the newcomers, and give a bit
value to the experts. No-one should suffer, especially not the daily
users.

I will take a look at the above mentioned mail thread - and then mail my
initial conclusins. Earlist next week - being busy...

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 19:45 ` Robert Schwebel
@ 2003-06-09 20:04   ` Sam Ravnborg
  2003-06-09 20:43   ` Wolfgang Denk
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2003-06-09 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:45:25PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:11:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Being used to the Linux kernel 2.5 build system, the build system for
> > Das U-Boot looks like an area for improvements.
> 
> I've already done a kconfig port to u-boot some time ago, please have a
> look at our web page if you are interested. Unfortunately Wolfgang
> doesn't want to have it in u-boot, so I have not followed this path
> further. 
I will take a look, thanks.
But if the conclusion is that it is waste of time then no more than that :-)

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 19:45 ` Robert Schwebel
  2003-06-09 20:04   ` Sam Ravnborg
@ 2003-06-09 20:43   ` Wolfgang Denk
  2003-06-09 21:01     ` Robert Schwebel
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2003-06-09 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In message <20030609194525.GB9379@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> I've already done a kconfig port to u-boot some time ago, please have a
> look at our web page if you are interested. Unfortunately Wolfgang
> doesn't want to have it in u-boot, so I have not followed this path
> further. 

URL please? I can see the description for "LKC  support  for  U-Boot"
but no link. Is this "u-boot-config-1.diff" ? All I get for this is:

Not Found
The requested URL /software/csb226/u-boot-config-1.diff was not found on this server.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
Ernest asks Frank how long he has been working for the company.
        "Ever since they threatened to fire me."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 20:43   ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2003-06-09 21:01     ` Robert Schwebel
  2003-06-09 21:45       ` Robert Schwebel
  2003-06-09 22:03       ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schwebel @ 2003-06-09 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:43:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> URL please? I can see the description for "LKC  support  for  U-Boot"
> but no link. Is this "u-boot-config-1.diff" ? All I get for this is:
> 
> Not Found
> The requested URL /software/csb226/u-boot-config-1.diff was not found on this server.

Hmm, seems to need some maintainance. But I have the tree available
locally and could port it to the current state if needed. The question
is: would it be a desirable feature to have a configuration frontend?
Until now I thought your position was not, so I didn't spend more time. 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 21:01     ` Robert Schwebel
@ 2003-06-09 21:45       ` Robert Schwebel
  2003-06-09 22:13         ` Wolfgang Denk
  2003-06-09 22:03       ` Wolfgang Denk
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schwebel @ 2003-06-09 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Hmm, seems to need some maintainance.

I've fixed the link now. Note that it is from the era when kconfig was
not yet merged with the kernel, so some things might have improved in
the meantime. But porting it up should not be a big deal, I've done it
several times for PTXdist recently.  

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 21:01     ` Robert Schwebel
  2003-06-09 21:45       ` Robert Schwebel
@ 2003-06-09 22:03       ` Wolfgang Denk
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2003-06-09 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In message <20030609210100.GD9379@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> Hmm, seems to need some maintainance. But I have the tree available
> locally and could port it to the current state if needed. The question
> is: would it be a desirable feature to have a configuration frontend?
> Until now I thought your position was not, so I didn't spend more time. 

Please re-read the thread. I had (and have)  some  concerns,  but  to
have an opinion I have to see something first. 

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
"The number  of  Unix  installations  has  grown  to  10,  with  more
expected."    - The Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June, 1972

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 21:45       ` Robert Schwebel
@ 2003-06-09 22:13         ` Wolfgang Denk
  2003-06-09 22:25           ` Robert Schwebel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2003-06-09 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In message <20030609214545.GF9379@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> I've fixed the link now. Note that it is from the era when kconfig was
> not yet merged with the kernel, so some things might have improved in
> the meantime. But porting it up should not be a big deal, I've done it
> several times for PTXdist recently.  

Doesn't work for me:

-> make xconfig
make -C tools/lkc-1.2 libkconfig.so
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/u-boot/tools/lkc-1.2'
gcc -O2 -Wall -g -fPIC -c zconf.tab.c -o zconf.tab.o
gcc -shared zconf.tab.o -o libkconfig.so
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/u-boot/tools/lkc-1.2'
make -C tools/lkc-1.2 qconf
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/u-boot/tools/lkc-1.2'
g++ -O2 -Wall -g -fPIC -I/usr/lib/qt3-gcc3.2/include -c qconf.cc -o qconf.o
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc:29: no `void ConfigList::initMetaObject()' member function declared 
   in class `ConfigList'
qconf.moc: In member function `void ConfigList::initMetaObject()':
qconf.moc:33: `badSuperclassWarning' undeclared (first use this function)
qconf.moc:33: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each 
   function it appears in.)
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: At global scope:
qconf.moc:40: prototype for `QString ConfigList::tr(const char*)' does not 
   match any in class `ConfigList'
qconf.h:20: candidate is: static QString ConfigList::tr(const char*, const 
   char* = 0)
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: In static member function `static QMetaObject* 
   ConfigList::staticMetaObject()':
qconf.moc:78: no method `QMetaObject::new_metadata'
qconf.moc:79: no method `QMetaObject::new_metaaccess'
qconf.moc:81: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:81: `QMember' undeclared (first use this function)
qconf.moc:81: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:84: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:84: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:87: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:87: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:90: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:90: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:93: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:93: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:111: no method `QMetaObject::new_metadata'
qconf.moc:113: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:113: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:115: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:115: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:117: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:117: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:119: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:119: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:128: no matching function for call to `QMetaObject::new_metaobject(
   const char[11], const char[10], QMetaData*&, int, QMetaData*&, int, int, 
   int, int, int, int, int)'
/usr/lib/qt3-gcc3.2/include/qmetaobject.h:199: candidates are: static 
   QMetaObject* QMetaObject::new_metaobject(const char*, QMetaObject*, const 
   QMetaData*, int, const QMetaData*, int, const QMetaProperty*, int, const 
   QMetaEnum*, int, const QClassInfo*, int)
qconf.moc:129: no matching function for call to `QMetaObject::set_slot_access(
   QMetaData::Access*&)'
qconf.moc:69: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_0)(menu*)'
qconf.moc:71: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_1)(ConfigItem*)'
qconf.moc:73: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_2)(ConfigItem*, 
   tristate)'
qconf.moc:75: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_3)(ConfigItem*)'
qconf.moc:77: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_4)()'
qconf.moc:104: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov2_0)(menu*)'
qconf.moc:106: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov2_1)()'
qconf.moc:108: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov2_2)(ConfigItem*)'
qconf.moc:110: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov2_3)()'
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: In member function `void ConfigList::menuSelected(menu*)':
qconf.moc:161: invalid type argument of `unary *'
qconf.moc:169: invalid type argument of `unary *'
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: In member function `void ConfigList::parentSelected()':
qconf.moc:180: invalid conversion from `const char*' to `int'
qconf.moc:180:   initializing argument 1 of `void QObject::activate_signal(int)
   '
qconf.moc: In member function `void ConfigList::symbolChanged(ConfigItem*)':
qconf.moc:206: invalid type argument of `unary *'
qconf.moc:214: invalid type argument of `unary *'
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: In member function `void ConfigList::gotFocus()':
qconf.moc:225: invalid conversion from `const char*' to `int'
qconf.moc:225:   initializing argument 1 of `void QObject::activate_signal(int)
   '
qconf.moc: At global scope:
qconf.moc:237: no `void ConfigLineEdit::initMetaObject()' member function 
   declared in class `ConfigLineEdit'
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc:248: prototype for `QString ConfigLineEdit::tr(const char*)' does not 
   match any in class `ConfigLineEdit'
qconf.h:155: candidate is: static QString ConfigLineEdit::tr(const char*, const 
   char* = 0)
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: In static member function `static QMetaObject* 
   ConfigLineEdit::staticMetaObject()':
qconf.moc:271: no method `QMetaObject::new_metadata'
qconf.moc:273: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:273: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:282: no matching function for call to `QMetaObject::new_metaobject(
   const char[15], const char[10], int, int, QMetaData*&, int, int, int, int, 
   int, int, int)'
/usr/lib/qt3-gcc3.2/include/qmetaobject.h:199: candidates are: static 
   QMetaObject* QMetaObject::new_metaobject(const char*, QMetaObject*, const 
   QMetaData*, int, const QMetaData*, int, const QMetaProperty*, int, const 
   QMetaEnum*, int, const QClassInfo*, int)
qconf.moc:283: no matching function for call to `QMetaObject::set_slot_access(
   QMetaData::Access*&)'
qconf.moc:270: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov2_0)(ConfigItem*)'
qconf.moc: In member function `void ConfigLineEdit::lineChanged(ConfigItem*)':
qconf.moc:312: invalid type argument of `unary *'
qconf.moc:320: invalid type argument of `unary *'
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: At global scope:
qconf.moc:337: no `void ConfigView::initMetaObject()' member function declared 
   in class `ConfigView'
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc:348: prototype for `QString ConfigView::tr(const char*)' does not 
   match any in class `ConfigView'
qconf.h:171: candidate is: static QString ConfigView::tr(const char*, const 
   char* = 0)
In file included from qconf.cc:25:
qconf.moc: In static member function `static QMetaObject* 
   ConfigView::staticMetaObject()':
qconf.moc:426: no method `QMetaObject::new_metadata'
qconf.moc:427: no method `QMetaObject::new_metaaccess'
qconf.moc:429: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:429: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:432: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:432: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:435: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:435: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:438: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:438: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:441: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:441: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:444: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:444: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:447: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:447: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:450: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:450: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:453: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:453: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:456: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:456: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:459: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:459: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:462: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:462: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:465: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:465: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:468: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:468: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:471: `struct QMetaData' has no member named `ptr'
qconf.moc:471: parse error before `;' token
qconf.moc:481: no matching function for call to `QMetaObject::new_metaobject(
   const char[11], const char[12], QMetaData*&, int, int, int, int, int, int,    int, int, int)'
/usr/lib/qt3-gcc3.2/include/qmetaobject.h:199: candidates are: static 
   QMetaObject* QMetaObject::new_metaobject(const char*, QMetaObject*, const 
   QMetaData*, int, const QMetaData*, int, const QMetaProperty*, int, const 
   QMetaEnum*, int, const QClassInfo*, int)
qconf.moc:482: no matching function for call to `QMetaObject::set_slot_access(
   QMetaData::Access*&)'
qconf.moc:397: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_0)(QListViewItem*)
   '
qconf.moc:399: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_1)(menu*)'
qconf.moc:401: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_2)()'
qconf.moc:403: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_3)()'
qconf.moc:405: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_4)()'
qconf.moc:407: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_5)()'
qconf.moc:409: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_6)()'
qconf.moc:411: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_7)()'
qconf.moc:413: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_8)()'
qconf.moc:415: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_9)()'
qconf.moc:417: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_10)(bool)'
qconf.moc:419: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_11)(bool)'
qconf.moc:421: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_12)(bool)'
qconf.moc:423: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_13)(bool)'
qconf.moc:425: warning: unused variable `void (QObject::*ov1_14)(bool)'
make[1]: *** [qconf.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/u-boot/tools/lkc-1.2'
make: *** [tools/lkc-1.2/qconf] Error 2



"make menuconfig" works to some extend, but it's impossible to select
any board default configuration?

How can I - for example - use this to build U-Boot  for  the  TQM860L
board?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
I perceive a possibility of an immediate  chronological  sequence  of
events which includes a violence.
                        - Terry Pratchett, _The Dark Side of the Sun_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements?
  2003-06-09 22:13         ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2003-06-09 22:25           ` Robert Schwebel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schwebel @ 2003-06-09 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:13:18AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Doesn't work for me:

Hmm, that's what I supposed. It should be ported up to a recent version.
Unfortunately I don't have that much time at the moment to try it out. 
You are right that a test case would surely be a better base for 
further discussion.  

Robert 
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-09 22:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-09 11:11 [U-Boot-Users] Build system improvements? Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-06-09 20:03   ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-09 19:45 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-06-09 20:04   ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-09 20:43   ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-06-09 21:01     ` Robert Schwebel
2003-06-09 21:45       ` Robert Schwebel
2003-06-09 22:13         ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-06-09 22:25           ` Robert Schwebel
2003-06-09 22:03       ` Wolfgang Denk

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.