Patches for replacing obsolete GCC initializers

Patches for replacing obsolete GCC initializers

[Art Haas]

Hi.

I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
set is around 70K and affects 34 files. Would it be acceptable to post
the patch in compressed form to the list, or would posting the patches
in say two or three sets be better?

Art Haas
-- 
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities
the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind.

-Thomas Jefferson to James Smith, 1822


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

Re: Patches for replacing obsolete GCC initializers

[Takashi Iwai]

At Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:13 -0500,
Art Haas wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
> initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
> set is around 70K and affects 34 files. Would it be acceptable to post
> the patch in compressed form to the list, or would posting the patches
> in say two or three sets be better?

i vote for the latter one.
the binary attachment might be rejected by the spam filter.

btw, i'm surprised that there are still so many files.  i thought most
of them have been already replaced.  is it really to the latest ALSA
0.9.5?


ciao,

Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

Re: Patches for replacing obsolete GCC initializers

[Art Haas]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:13 -0500,
> Art Haas wrote:
> > 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
> > initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
> > set is around 70K and affects 34 files. Would it be acceptable to post
> > the patch in compressed form to the list, or would posting the patches
> > in say two or three sets be better?
> 
> i vote for the latter one.
> the binary attachment might be rejected by the spam filter.
> 

I'll split up the patches into a number of files and mail them today.

> btw, i'm surprised that there are still so many files.  i thought most
> of them have been already replaced.  is it really to the latest ALSA
> 0.9.5?

Yes - CVS from a day or two ago. There are lots of files in
alsa-lib/src/pcm that use the old GCC syntax.

I'd sent a set of patches before, but I think the moderator Dave Null
(ha-ha-ha!) must have rejected them. I was not subscribed to the list at
the time.

Art Haas
-- 
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities
the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind.

-Thomas Jefferson to James Smith, 1822


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

Re: Patches for replacing obsolete GCC initializers

[Takashi Iwai]

At Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:37:31 -0500,
Art Haas wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:13 -0500,
> > Art Haas wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi.
> > > 
> > > I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
> > > initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
> > > set is around 70K and affects 34 files. Would it be acceptable to post
> > > the patch in compressed form to the list, or would posting the patches
> > > in say two or three sets be better?
> > 
> > i vote for the latter one.
> > the binary attachment might be rejected by the spam filter.
> > 
> 
> I'll split up the patches into a number of files and mail them today.

thanks.

> > btw, i'm surprised that there are still so many files.  i thought most
> > of them have been already replaced.  is it really to the latest ALSA
> > 0.9.5?
> 
> Yes - CVS from a day or two ago. There are lots of files in
> alsa-lib/src/pcm that use the old GCC syntax.
 
oh yeah, in alsa-lib and utils & co.  i forgot them :)

> I'd sent a set of patches before, but I think the moderator Dave Null
> (ha-ha-ha!) must have rejected them. I was not subscribed to the list at
> the time.

i think this "moderated" message confuses the people in most cases.
(it's funny though :)


Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0